Resource Reconfiguration During Technological Change

References

• Allison PD (2014) Event History Analysis: Regression for Longitudinal Event Data (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Altman EI (1968) Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. J. Finance 23(4):589–609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alvarez‐Garrido E, Dushnitsky G (2016) Are entrepreneurial venture’s innovation rates sensitive to investor complementary assets? Comparing biotech ventures backed by corporate and independent VCs. Strategic Management J. 37(5):819–834.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anand J, Oriani R, Vassolo RS (2010) Alliance activity as a dynamic capability in the face of a discontinuous technological change. Organ. Sci. 21(6):1213–1232.Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson P, Tushman ML (1990) Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(4):604–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres NS, Silverman BS (2004) R&D, organization structure, and the development of corporate technological knowledge. Strategic Management J. 25(8-9):929–958.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres N, Rios LA, Silverman BS (2020) Organizational change and the dynamics of innovation: Formal R&D structure and intrafirm inventor networks. Strategic Management J. 41(11):2015–2049.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arogyaswamy K, Barker VL, Yasai‐Ardekani M (1995) Firm turnarounds: An integrative two‐stage model. J. Management Stud. 32(4):493–525.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Belenzon S, Rios LA (2014) Make, buy, organize: The interplay between research, external knowledge, and firm structure. Strategic Management J. 35(3):317–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Asgari N, Singh K, Mitchell W (2017) Alliance portfolio reconfiguration following a technological discontinuity. Strategic Management J. 38(5):1062–1081.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Askey P (2006) Sony Alpha DSLR-A100 review. Accessed October 2, 2017, https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sonydslra100.Google Scholar
• Audia PG, Locke EA, Smith KG (2000) The paradox of success: An archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence following radical environmental change. Acad. Management J. 43(5):837–853.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Austin JE, Leonard HBD (2008) Can the virtuous mouse and the wealthy elephant live happily ever after? Calif. Management Rev. 51(1):77–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barkema HG, Schijven M (2008) Toward unlocking the full potential of acquisitions: The role of organizational restructuring. Acad. Management J. 51(4):696–722.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belson K (2003) Minolta and Konica plan to merge by end of 2003. New York Times (January 8), https://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/08/business/minolta-and-konica-plan-to-merge-by-end-of-2003.html.Google Scholar
• Benner MJ (2009) Dynamic or static capabilities? Process management practices and response to technological change. J. Production Innovation Management 26(5):473–486.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ (2010) Securities analysts and incumbent response to radical technological change: Evidence from digital photography and Internet telephony. Organ. Sci. 21(1):42–62.Link, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Tripsas M (2012) The influence of prior industry affiliation on framing nascent industries: The evolution of digital cameras. Strategic Management J. 33(3):277–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bennett VM, Feldman ER (2017) Make room! Make room! A note on sequential spinoffs and acquisitions. Strategy Sci. 2(2):100–110.Link, Google Scholar
• Berry H (2013) When do firms divest foreign operations? Organ. Sci. 24(1):246–261.Link, Google Scholar
• Bingham CB, Heimeriks KH, Schijven M, Gates S (2015) Concurrent learning: How firms develop multiple dynamic capabilities in parallel. Strategic Management J. 36(12):1802–1825.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradley SW, Aldrich H, Shepherd DA, Wiklund J (2011) Resources, environmental change, and survival: Asymmetric paths of young independent and subsidiary organizations. Strategic Management J. 32(5):486–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brockner J, Grover S, O’Malley MN, Reed TF, Glynn MA (1993) Threat of future layoffs, self‐esteem, and survivors’ reactions: Evidence from the laboratory and the field. Strategic Management J. 14(51):153–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burgelman RA (1996) A process model of strategic business exit: Implications for an evolutionary perspective on strategy. Strategic Management J. 17:193–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Capron L, Mitchell W (2009) Selection capability: How capability gaps and internal social frictions affect internal and external strategic renewal. Organ. Sci. 20(2):294–312.Link, Google Scholar
• Capron L, Dussauge P, Mitchell W (1998) Resource redeployment following horizontal acquisitions in Europe and North America, 1988-1992. Strategic Management J. 19(7):631–661.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Capron L, Mitchell W, Swaminathan A (2001) Asset divestiture following horizontal acquisitions: A dynamic view. Strategic Management J. 22(9):817–844.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carnabuci G, Operti E (2013) Where do firms’ recombinant capabilities come from? Intraorganizational networks, knowledge, and firms’ ability to innovate through technological recombination. Strategic Management J. 34(13):1591–1613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cattani G (2005) Preadaptation, firm heterogeneity, and technological performance: A study on the evolution of fiber optics, 1970–1995. Organ. Sci. 16(6):563–580.Link, Google Scholar
• Chaturvedi T, Prescott JE (2020) Dynamic fit in an era of ferment: Product design realignment and the survival-enhancing role of alliances and acquisitions. Res. Policy 49(6):103989.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chesbrough H (2002) Graceful exits and missed opportunities: Xerox’s management of its technology spin-off organizations. Bus. History Rev. 76(4):803–837.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi S, McNamara G (2018) Repeating a familiar pattern in a new way: The effect of exploitation and exploration on knowledge leverage behaviors in technology acquisitions. Strategic Management J. 39(2):356–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen CM (1997) The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (Harvard Business Review Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Christensen CM, Bower JL (1996) Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management J. 17(3):197–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cleves AC, Gould WW, Marchenko Y (2016) An Introduction to Survival Analysis Using Stata (Stata Press, College Station, TX).Google Scholar
• Coff RW (1999) How buyers cope with uncertainty when acquiring firms in knowledge-intensive industries: Caveat emptor. Organ. Sci. 10(2):144–161.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen SL, Tripsas M (2018) Managing technological transitions by building bridges. Acad. Management J. 61(6):2319–2342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cording M, Christmann P, King DR (2008) Reducing causal ambiguity in acquisition integration: Intermediate goals as mediators of integration decisions and acquisition performance. Acad. Management J. 51(4):744–767.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coveney J (2015) FIRTHLOGIT: Stata module to calculate bias reduction in logistic regression. Econpapers. Accessed April 11, 2019, https://econpapers.repec.org/software/bocbocode/s456948.htm.Google Scholar
• Cozzolino A, Verona G, Rothaermel FT (2018) Unpacking the disruption process: New technology, business models, and incumbent adaptation. J. Management Stud. 55(7):1166–1202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danneels E (2010) Trying to become a different type of company: Dynamic capability at Smith Corona. Strategic Management J. 32(1):1–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danneels E, Verona G, Provera B (2018) Overcoming the inertia of organizational competence: Olivetti’s transition from mechanical to electronic technology. Indust. Corporate Change 27(3):595–618.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Datta DK, Grant JH (1990) Relationships between type of acquisition, the autonomy given to the acquired firm, and acquisition success: An empirical analysis. J. Management 16(1):29–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis PS, Robinson RB Jr, Pearce JA, Park SH (1992) Business unit relatedness and performance: A look at the pulp and paper industry. Strategic Management J. 13(5):349–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Figueiredo RJ Jr, Rawley E, Rider CI (2015) Why are firms rigid? A general framework and empirical tests. Organ. Sci. 26(5):1502–1519.Link, Google Scholar
• de Figueiredo RJ Jr, Feldman ER, Rawley E (2019) The costs of refocusing: Evidence from hedge fund closures during the financial crisis. Strategic Management J. 40:1268–1290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dickinson M (1997) Key role seen for Eastman Software. Rochester Business Journal (April 17), https://rbj.net/1997/04/17/key-role-seen-for-eastman-software/.Google Scholar
• Dickinson M (2000) Kodak to sell Eastman Software unit. Rochester Business Journal (August 23), https://rbj.net/2000/08/23/kodak-to-sell-eastman-software-unit/.Google Scholar
• Dorobantu S, Lindner T, Müllner J (2020) Political risk and alliance diversity: A two-stage model of partner selection in multipartner alliances. Acad. Management J. 63(6):1775–1806.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Du X, Li M, Wu B (2019) Incumbent repositioning with decision biases. Strategic Management J. 40(12):1984–2010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eggers JP, Kaplan S (2009) Cognition and renewal: Comparing CEO and organizational effects on incumbent adaptation to technical change. Organ. Sci. 20(2):461–477.Link, Google Scholar
• Eggers JP, Kaul A (2018) Motivation and ability? A behavioral perspective on the pursuit of radical invention in multi-technology incumbents. Acad. Management J. 61(1):67–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eggers JP, Park KF (2018) Incumbent adaptation to technological change: The past, present, and future of research on heterogeneous incumbent response. Acad. Management Ann. 12(1):357–389.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA (2000) Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management J. 21(10-11):1105–1121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman ER (2014) Legacy divestitures: Motives and implications. Organ. Sci. 25(3):815–832.Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman ER, Sakhartov AV (2021) Resource redeployment and divestiture as strategic alternatives. Organ. Sci., ePub ahead of print July 22, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1474.Link, Google Scholar
• Fisher SR, White MA (2000) Downsizing in a learning organization: Are there hidden costs? Acad. Management Rev. 25:244–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Folta TB, Helfat C, Karim S (2016) Resource Redeployment and Corporate Strategy (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galunic DC, Eisenhardt KM (1996) The evolution of intracorporate domains: Divisional charter losses in high-technology, multidivisional corporations. Organ. Sci. 7(3):255–282.Link, Google Scholar
• Gambardella A, Panico C, Valentini G (2015) Strategic incentives to human capital. Strategic Management J. 36(1):37–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert CG (2006) Change in the presence of residual fit: Can competing frames coexist? Organ. Sci. 17(1):150–167.Link, Google Scholar
• Girod SJG, Karim S (2017) Restructure or reconfigure? Designing the reorganization that works for you. Harvard Bus. Rev. 95:128–132.Google Scholar
• Graebner ME (2004) Momentum and serendipity: How acquired leaders create value in the integration of technology firms. Strategic Management J. 25(8-9):751–777.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graebner ME, Eisenhardt KM (2004) The seller’s side of the story: Acquisition as courtship and governance as syndicate in entrepreneurial firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(3):366–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graebner ME, Eisenhardt KM, Roundy PT (2010) Success and failure in technology acquisitions: Lessons for buyers and sellers. Acad. Management Perspect. 24(3):73–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffith A (2014) How Sony created the most innovative camera brand in under a decade. Accessed August 23 2017, https://petapixel.com/2014/05/31/alpha-dog-sony-created-innovative-camera-brand-decade/.Google Scholar
• Harrigan KR, Di Guardo MC, Cowgill B (2017) Multiplicative-innovation synergies: Tests in technological acquisitions. J. Tech. Transfer 42(5):1212–1233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison JS, Hitt MA, Hoskisson RE, Ireland RD (2001) Resource complementarity in business combinations: Extending the logic to organizational alliances. J. Management 27(6):679–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haspeslagh PC, Jemison DB (1991) Managing Acquisitions: Creating Value Through Corporate Renewal (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Hayward ML, Shimizu K (2006) De‐commitment to losing strategic action: Evidence from the divestiture of poorly performing acquisitions. Strategic Management J. 27(6):541–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu ST, Prescott JE (2017) The alliance experience transfer effect: The case of industry convergence in the telecommunications equipment industry. British J. Management 28(3):425–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu AG, Yongxu D (2019) Does government R&D stimulate or crowd out firm R&D spending? Evidence from Chinese manufacturing industries. Econom. Transition Institutional Change 27(2):497–518.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iansiti M (2000) How the incumbent can win: Managing technological transitions in the semiconductor industry. Management Sci. 46(2):169–185.Link, Google Scholar
• Inkpen AC, Tsang EW (2007) Learning and strategic alliances. Acad. Management Ann. 1(1):479–511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen MC (1989) Active investors, LBOs, and the privatization of bankruptcy. J. Appl. Corporate Finance 2(1):35–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Josefy MA, Harrison JS, Sirmon DG, Carnes C (2017) Living and dying: Synthesizing the literature on firm survival and failure across stages of development. Acad. Management Ann. 11(2):770–799.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kale P, Singh H, Raman AP (2009) Don’t integrate your acquisitions, partner with them. Harvard Bus. Rev. 87:109–115.Google Scholar
• Kapoor R, Klueter T (2015) Decoding the adaptability–rigidity puzzle: Evidence from pharmaceutical incumbents’ pursuit of gene therapy and monoclonal antibodies. Acad. Management J. 58(4):1180–1207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kapoor R, Lim K (2007) The impact of acquisitions on the productivity of inventors at semiconductor firms: A synthesis of knowledge-based and incentive-based perspectives. Acad. Management J. 30:1133–1155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karim S (2006) Modularity in organizational structure: The reconfiguration of internally developed and acquired business units. Strategic Management J. 27(9):799–823.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karim S, Capron L (2016) Reconfiguration: Adding, redeploying, recombining and divesting resources and business units. Strategic Management J. 37(13):E54–E62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karim S, Mitchell W (2000) Path-dependent and path-breaking change: Reconfiguring business resources following acquisitions in the US medical sector, 1978-1995. Strategic Management J. 21(10/11):1061–1081.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaul A (2012) Technology and corporate scope: Firm and rival innovation as antecedents of corporate transactions. Strategic Management J. 33(4):347–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keil T, Autio E, George G (2008) Corporate venture capital, disembodied experimentation and capability development. J. Management Stud. 45(8):1475–1505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keum DD (2020) Cog in the wheel: Resource release and the scope of interdependencies in corporate adjustment activities. Strategic Management J. 41(2):175–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim TY, Kuilman JG (2013) The demography of resources. J. Management Stud. 50(7):1155–1184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King G, Zeng L (2001) Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Anal. 9(2):137–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein A (1999) Kodak seeks to sell software unit it purchased from Wang in 1997. Wall Street Journal (March 8), https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB920851519832467500.Google Scholar
• Kline RB (2015) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Knapp G (1997) Kodak and Wang to form imaging powerhouse. Accessed August 26, 2017, https://idm.net.au/blog/006092-kodak-and-wang-form-imaging-powerhouse.Google Scholar
• Kok H, Faems D, de Faria P (2020) Ties that matter: The impact of alliance partner knowledge recombination novelty on knowledge utilization in R&D alliances. Res. Policy 49(7):104011.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kroon DP, Noorderhaven NG, Corley KG, Vaara E (2021) Hard and soft integration: Toward a dynamic model of post‐acquisition integration. J. Management Stud., ePub ahead of print September 2, https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12766.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landis RS, Beal DJ, Tesluk PE (2000) A comparison of approaches to forming composite measures in structural equation models. Organ. Res. Methods 3(2):186–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lane PJ, Salk JE, Lyles MA (2001) Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures. Strategic Management J. 22(12):1139–1161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lanza A, Simone G, Bruno R (2016) Resource orchestration in the context of knowledge resources acquisition and divestment. The empirical evidence from the Italian “Serie A” football. Eur. Management J. 34(2):145–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavie D (2006) Capability reconfiguration: An analysis of incumbent responses to technological change. Acad. Management Rev. 31(1):153–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavie D, Singh H (2012) The evolution of alliance portfolios: The case of Unisys. Indust. Corporate Change 21(3):763–809.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee TL, von Tunzelmann N (2005) A dynamic analytic approach to national innovation systems: The IC industry in Taiwan. Res. Policy 34(4):425–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(S2):95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis TR, Sappington DE (1991) Oversight of long-term investment by short-lived regulators. Internat. Econom. Rev. 32(3):579–600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Litov LP, Moreton P, Zenger TR (2012) Corporate strategy, analyst coverage, and the uniqueness paradox. Management Sci. 58(10):1797–1815.Link, Google Scholar
• Lucas HC Jr, Goh JM (2009) Disruptive technology: How Kodak missed the digital photography revolution. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 18:46–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Makri M, Hitt MA, Lane PJ (2010) Complementary technologies, knowledge relatedness, and invention outcomes in high technology mergers and acquisitions. Strategic Management J. 31(6):602–628.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maielli G (2017) Path-dependent product development and Fiat’s takeover of Lancia in 1969: Meta-routines for design selection between synergies and brand autonomy. Bus. History 59(1):101–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maula MV, Keil T, Zahra SA (2013) Top management’s attention to discontinuous technological change: Corporate venture capital as an alert mechanism. Organ. Sci. 24(3):926–947.Link, Google Scholar
• McGrath RG (2001) Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Acad. Management J. 44(1):118–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McNamara MJ (2006) Eclectic shock. Popular Photography 70(8):87–88.Google Scholar
• Menon AR, Yao DA (2017) Elevating repositioning costs: Strategy dynamics and competitive interactions. Strategic Management J. 38(10):1953–1963.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer CB (2008) Value leakages in mergers and acquisitions: Why they occur and how they can be addressed. Long Range Planning 41(2):197–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer CB, Altenborg E (2008) Incompatible strategies in international mergers: The failed merger between Telia and Telenor. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 39(3):508–525.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Natividad G, Rawley E (2016) Interdependence and performance: A natural experiment in firm scope. Strategy Sci. 1(1):12–31.Link, Google Scholar
• Nelson E, Auerbach J (1997) Kodak nears agreement to purchase Wang Unit. Wall Street Journal, January 28, https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB854410527538589000.Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Rosenberg N (1993) National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park HD, Tzabbar D (2016) Venture capital, CEOs’ sources of power, and innovation novelty at different life stages of a new venture. Organ. Sci. 27(2):336–353.Link, Google Scholar
• Paruchuri S, Nerkar A, Hambrick DC (2006) Acquisition integration and productivity losses in the technical core: Disruption of inventors in acquired companies. Organ. Sci. 17(5):545–562.Link, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Srikanth K (2007) What they know vs. what they do: How acquirers leverage technology acquisitions. Strategic Management J. 28(8):805–825.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Singh H, Zollo M (2003) A bird in the hand or two in the bush? Integration trade-offs in technology-grafting acquisitions. Eur. Management J. 21(2):179–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Singh H, Zollo M (2006) Organizing for innovation: Managing the coordination-autonomy dilemma in technology acquisitions. Acad. Management J. 49(2):263–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raffaelli R, Glynn MA, Tushman M (2019) Frame flexibility: The role of cognitive and emotional framing in innovation adoption by incumbent firms. Strategic Management J. 40(7):1013–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ranft AL, Lord MD (2002) Acquiring new technologies and capabilities: A grounded model of acquisition implementation. Organ. Sci. 13(4):420–441.Link, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel FT, Boeker W (2008) Old technology meets new technology: Complementarities, similarities, and alliance formation. Strategic Management J. 29(1):47–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roy R, Cohen SK (2017) Stock of downstream complementary assets as a catalyst for product innovation during technological change in the US machine tool industry. Strategic Management J. 38(6):1253–1267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roy R, Sarkar MB (2016) Knowledge, firm boundaries, and innovation: Mitigating the incumbent’s curse during radical technological change. Strategic Management J. 37(5):835–854.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schiavone F (2014) Innovation approaches for old products revitalization after technological change: The rise of technology reverse. Internat. J. Innovation Management 18(2):1450011.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilke O, Jiang H (2019) Embeddedness across governance modes: Is there a link between premerger alliances and divestitures? Acad. Management Discoveries 5(2):137–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schildt H, Keil T, Maula M (2012) The temporal effects of relative and firm‐level absorptive capacity on interorganizational learning. Strategic Management J. 33(10):1154–1173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schweizer L (2005) Organizational integration of acquired biotechnology companies into pharmaceutical companies: The need for a hybrid approach. Acad. Management J. 48(6):1051–1074.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sears JB (2017) When are acquired technological capabilities complements rather than substitutes? A study on value creation. J. Bus. Res. 78:33–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sears JB (2018) Post-acquisition integrative vs. independent innovation: A story of dueling success factors. Res. Policy 47(9):1688–1699.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sears J, Hoetker G (2014) Technological overlap, technological capabilities, and resource recombination in technological acquisitions. Strategic Management J. 35(1):48–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shah PP (2000) Network destruction: The structural implications of downsizing. Acad. Management J. 43(1):101–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shibata T, Baba Y, Suzuki J (2021) Managing exploration persistency in ambidextrous organizations: Case of Fujifilm and Kodak. R & D Management, ePub ahead of print March 26, https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12468.Google Scholar
• Shimizu K (2012) Risks of corporate entrepreneurship: Autonomy and agency issues. Organ. Sci. 23(1):194–206.Link, Google Scholar
• Shimizu K, Hitt MA (2005) What constrains or facilitates divestitures of formerly acquired firms? The effects of organizational inertia. J. Management 31(1):50–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N (2011) Firms as systems of interdependent choices. J. Management Stud. 48(5):1126–1140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N, Levinthal DA (2003) Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organ. Sci. 14(6):650–669.Link, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N, Rivkin JW (2006) When exploration backfires: Unintended consequences of multilevel organizational search. Acad. Management J. 49(4):779–795.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sony (2005) Konica Minolta and Sony agree to jointly develop digital SLR cameras. Accessed August 22, 2017, https://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/News/Press/200507/05-0719E/.Google Scholar
• Sosa ML (2009) Application-specific R&D capabilities and the advantage of incumbents: Evidence from the anticancer drug market. Management Sci. 55(8):1409–1422.Link, Google Scholar
• Srinivasan R, Haunschild P, Grewal R (2007) Vicarious learning in new product introductions in the early years of a converging market. Management Sci. 53(1):16–28.Link, Google Scholar
• Stahl GK, Voigt A (2008) Do cultural differences matter in mergers and acquisitions? A tentative model and examination. Organ. Sci. 19(1):160–176.Link, Google Scholar
• Sull DN, Tedlow RS, Rosenbloom RS (1997) Managerial commitments and technological change in the US tire industry. Indust. Corporate Change 6(2):461–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sullivan T (2006) Konica Minolta exits camera market. PC Magazine (January 19), https://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,1912898,00.asp.Google Scholar
• Taylor A (2010) The next generation: Technology adoption and integration through internal competition in new product development. Organ. Sci. 21(1):23–41.Link, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management J. 28(13):1319–1350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terza JV, Basu A, Rathouz PJ (2008) Two-stage residual inclusion estimation: Addressing endogeneity in health econometric modeling. J. Health Econom. 27(3):531–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Titus V Jr, House JM, Covin JG (2017) The influence of exploration on external corporate venturing activity. J. Management 43(5):1609–1630.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tomkins MR (2001) Kodak, Olympus announce alliance. Accessed May 2, 2017, https://www.imaging-resource.com/EVENTS/PMAS01/982087854.html.Google Scholar
• Tripsas M (2009) Technology, identity, and inertia through the lens of “The Digital Photography Company.” Organ. Sci. 20(2):441–460.Link, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M, Gavetti G (2000) Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. 21(10-11):1147–1161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wan WP, Yiu DW (2009) From crisis to opportunity: Environmental jolt, corporate acquisitions, and firm performance. Strategic Management J. 30(7):791–801.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wei T, Clegg J (2020) Untangling the integration–performance link: Levels of integration and functional integration strategies in post‐acquisition integration. J. Management Stud. 57(8):1643–1689.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wessel M, Levie A, Siegel R (2016) The problem with legacy ecosystems. Harvard Bus. Rev. 94:68–74.Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Wu B, Wan Z, Levinthal DA (2014) Complementary assets as pipes and prisms: Innovation incentives and trajectory choices. Strategic Management J. 35(9):1257–1278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang H, Lin Z, Peng MW (2011) Behind acquisitions of alliance partners: Exploratory learning and network embeddedness. Acad. Management J. 54(5):1069–1080.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoshida J (2005) Sensors alter Kodak’s focus. EE Times (July 11), https://www.eetimes.com/sensors-alter-kodaks-focus/#.Google Scholar
• Zaheer A, Castañer X, Souder D (2013) Synergy sources, target autonomy and integration in acquisitions. J. Management 39(3):604–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zollo M (2009) Superstitious learning with rare strategic decisions: Theory and evidence from corporate acquisitions. Organ. Sci. 20(5):894–908.Link, Google Scholar
• Zollo M, Reuer JJ (2010) Experience spillovers across corporate development activities. Organ. Sci. 21(6):1195–1212.Link, Google Scholar
• Zollo M, Singh H (2004) Deliberate learning in corporate acquisitions: Post‐acquisition strategies and integration capability in US bank mergers. Strategic Management J. 25(13):1233–1256.Crossref, Google Scholar