Strategic Responses to Innovation Shocks: Evidence from the Video Game Industry

References

• Adner R, Kapoor R (2010) Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects form performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management J. 31(3):306–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal S, Kapoor R (2023) Value creation tradeoff in business ecosystems: Leveraging complementarities while managing interdependencies. Organ. Sci. 34(3):1216–1242.Link, Google Scholar
• Arend R, Bromiley P (2009) Assessing the dynamic capabilities view: Spare change, everyone? Strategic Organ. 7(1):75–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres N, Liebeskind J (1999) Contractual commitments, bargaining power, and governance inseparability: Incorporating history into transaction cost theory. Acad. Management Rev. 24(1):49–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres N, Bigelow L, Nickerson J (2015) Dominant designs, innovation shocks, and the follower’s dilemma. Strategic Management J. 36(2):216–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres N, Mahoney J, Nickerson J (2019) Strategic responses to shocks: Comparative adjustment costs, transaction costs, and opportunity costs. Strategic Management J. 40(3):357–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres N, Nickerson J, Ozalp H (2023) Platform competition and complementor responses: Insights from combining design rules with the comparative adjustment, transaction, and opportunity cost framework. Indust. Corporate Change 32(1):112–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakos Y, Halaburda H (2020) Platform competition with multihoming on both sides: Subsidize or no? Management Sci. 66(12):5599–5607.Link, Google Scholar
• Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1):99–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belleflamme P, Peitz M (2019) Platform competition: Who benefits from multihoming? Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 64:1–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bigelow L, Nickerson J, Park W (2019) When and how to shift gears: Dynamic trade‐offs among adjustment, opportunity, and transaction costs in response to an innovation shock. Strategic Management J. 40(3):377–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brace P (2003) Porting a PS2centric game to the Xbox: A case study of state of emergency. Game Developer (March 7), https://www.gamedeveloper.com/production/porting-a-ps2centric-game-to-the-xbox-a-case-study-of-state-of-emergency.Google Scholar
• Cennamo C, Ozalp H, Kretschmer T (2018) Platform architecture and quality trade-offs of multihoming complements. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):461–478.Link, Google Scholar
• Chatterjee S, Wernerfelt B (1991) The link between resources and type of diversification: Theory and evidence. Strategic Management J. 12(1):33–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen L, Tong T, Tang S, Han N (2022a) Governance and the design of digital platforms: A review and future directions on a meta-organization. J. Management 48(1):147–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen L, Yi J, Li S, Tong T (2022b) Platform governance design in business ecosystems: Implications for complementors’ multihoming decision. J. Management 48(3):630–656.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chung D, Yue M, Ethiraj S (2024) Platform governance in the presence of within-complementor interdependencies: Evidence from the rideshare industry. Management Sci. 70(2):799–814.Link, Google Scholar
• Cinelli C, Hazlett C (2020) Making sense of sensitivity: Extending omitted variable bias. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. 82(1):39–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corts K, Lederman M (2009) Software exclusivity and the scope of indirect network effects in the US home video game market. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 27(2):121–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dierickx I, Cool K (1989) Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Sci. 35(12):1504–1511.Link, Google Scholar
• Eggers JP (2012) All experience is not created equal: Learning, adapting, and focusing in product portfolio management. Strategic Management J. 33(3):315–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagiu A (2014) Strategic decisions for two-sided platforms. Sloan Management Rev. 55(2):71–80.Google Scholar
• Hannan M, Freeman J (1984) Structural inertia and organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 49(2):149–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat C, Lieberman M (2002) The birth of capabilities: Market entry and the importance of pre‐history. Indust. Corporate Change 11(4):725–760.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat C, Finkelstein S, Mitchell W, Peteraf M, Singh H, Teece D, Winter S (2007) Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations (Blackwell, Malden, MA).Google Scholar
• Henderson R, Clark K (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobides M, Cennamo C, Gawer A (2018) Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management J. 39(8):2255–2276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobides M, Cennamo C, Gawer A (2024) Externalities and complementarities in platforms and ecosystems: From structural solutions to endogenous failures. Res. Policy 53(1):104906.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kapacinskaite A, Mostajabi A (2024) Competing with the platform: Complementor positioning and cross-platform response to entry. Strategic Management J. 45(12):2577–2607.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kapoor R, Agarwal S (2017) Sustaining superior performance in business ecosystems: Evidence from application software developers in the iOS and Android smartphone ecosystems. Organ. Sci. 28(3):531–551.Link, Google Scholar
• King A, Tucci C (2002) Incumbent entry into new market niches: The role of experience and managerial choice in the creation of dynamic capabilities. Management Sci. 48(2):171–186.Link, Google Scholar
• Landsman V, Stremersch S (2011) Multihoming in two-sided markets: An empirical inquiry in the video game console industry. J. Marketing 75(6):39–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee R (2013) Vertical integration and exclusivity in platform and two-sided markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(7):2960–3000.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonard‐Barton D (1992) Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management J. 13(S1):111–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li H, Zhu F (2021) Information transparency, multihoming, and platform competition: A natural experiment in the daily deals market. Management Sci. 67(7):4384–4407.Link, Google Scholar
• Lucas R (1967) Adjustment costs and the theory of supply. J. Political Econom. 75(4, Part 1):321–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahoney J, Qian L (2013) Market frictions as building blocks of an organizational economics approach to strategic management. Strategic Management J. 34(9):1019–1041.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Menon A, Yao D (2017) Elevating repositioning costs: Strategy dynamics and competitive interactions. Strategic Management J. 38(10):1953–1963.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miric M, Ozalp H, Yilmaz E (2023) Trade-offs to using standardized tools: Innovation enablers or creativity constraints? Strategic Management J. 44(4):909–942.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell W (1989) Whether and when? Probability and timing of incumbents’ entry into emerging industrial subfields. Admin. Sci. Quart. 34(2):208–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mollick E (2012) People and process, suits and innovators: The role of individuals in firm performance. Strategic Management J. 33(9):1001–1015.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R, Winter S (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Nickerson J, Silverman B (2003) Why firms want to organize efficiently and what keeps them from doing so: Inappropriate governance, performance, and adaptation in a deregulated industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(3):433–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ozalp H, Cennamo C, Gawer A (2018) Disruption in platform-based ecosystems. J. Management Stud. 55(7):1203–1241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ozalp H, Eggers JP, Malerba F (2023) Hitting reset: Industry evolution, generational technology cycles, and the dynamic value of firm experience. Strategic Management J. 44(5):1–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Panico C, Cennamo C (2022) User preferences and strategic interactions in platform ecosystems. Strategic Management J. 43(3):507–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pierce L (2009) Big losses in ecosystem niches: How core firm decisions drive complementary product shakeouts. Strategic Management J. 30(3):323–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polidoro F, Yang W (2024) Porting learning from interdependencies back home: Performance implications for complementors in platform ecosystems. Strategic Management J. 45(9):1791–1821.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter M (1985) Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Rietveld J, Eggers JP (2018) Demand heterogeneity in platform markets: Implications for complementors. Organ. Sci. 29(2):304–322.Link, Google Scholar
• Rietveld J, Schilling M, Bellavitis C (2019) Platform strategy: Managing ecosystem value through selective promotion of complements. Organ. Sci. 30(6):1232–1251.Link, Google Scholar
• Saadatmand F, Lindgren R, Schultze U (2019) Configurations of platform organizations: Implications for complementor engagement. Res. Policy 48(8):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srinivasan A, Venkatraman V (2018) Architectural convergence and platform evolution: Empirical test of complementor moves in videogames. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 67(2):266–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tavalaei M, Cennamo C (2021) In search of complementarities within and across platform ecosystems: Complementors’ relative standing and performance in mobile apps ecosystems. Long Range Planning 54(5):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 18(7):509–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tschang F (2007) Balancing the tensions between rationalization and creativity in the video games industry. Organ. Sci. 18(6):989–1005.Link, Google Scholar
• Tushman M, Anderson P (1986) Technological continuities and organization environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(3):439–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Kippersluis H, Reitveld C (2018) Beyond plausibly exogenous. Econometrics J. 21(3):316–331.Google Scholar
• Venkataraman V, Ceccagnoli M, Forman C (2018) Multihoming within platform ecosystems: The strategic role of human capital. Working paper, Georgia Tech Scheller College of Business, Atlanta.Google Scholar
• Venkatraman N, Lee CH (2004) Preferential linkage and network evolution: A conceptual model and empirical test in the U.S. video game sector. Acad. Management J. 47(6):876–892.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang R, Miller C (2020) Complementors’ engagement in an ecosystem: A study of publishers’ ebook offerings on Amazon Kindle. Strategic Management J. 41(1):3–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wareham J, Fox P, Cano Giner J (2014) Technology ecosystem governance. Organ. Sci. 25(4):1195–1215.Link, Google Scholar
• Wen W, Zhu F (2019) Threat of platform owner entry and complementor responses: Evidence from the mobile app market. Strategic Management J. 40(9):1336–1367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wagner D (2001) Two games for the price of one? Adventures in cross-platform development for Ready 2 Rumble Boxing: Round 2. Game Developer Magazine March:28–36.Google Scholar
• Winter S (1984) Schumpeterian competition in alternative technological regimes. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 5(3–4):287–320.Crossref, Google Scholar