Move Fast and Break Things? The Contingent Nature of Product Acceleration in Nascent Markets

References

• Agarwal R, Bayus BL (2004) Creating and surviving in new industries. Business Strategy over the Industry Lifecycle vol. 21 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited), 107–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Gort M (2001) First-mover advantage and the speed of competitive entry, 1887–1986. J. Law Econom. 44(1):161–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Capron L, Lenox M, Yao DA (2018) Strategy and the institutional envelope. Strategy Sci. 3(2):ii–x.Link, Google Scholar
• Allen TJ (1966) Studies of the problem-solving process in engineering design. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2):72–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allison PD (2009) Fixed Effects Regression Models (SAGE Publications).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allison PD, Waterman RP (2002) Fixed–effects negative binomial regression models. Sociol. Methodology 32(1):247–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron DP (1995) Integrated strategy: Market and nonmarket components. California Management Rev. 37(2):47–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayus BL (1997) Speed-to-market and new product performance trade-offs. J. Production Innovation Management 14(6):485–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayus BL, Agarwal R (2007) The role of pre-entry experience, entry timing, and product technology strategies in explaining firm survival. Management Sci. 53(12):1887–1902.Link, Google Scholar
• Beach D, Pedersen RB (2019) Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Tripsas M (2012) The influence of prior industry affiliation on framing in nascent industries: The evolution of digital cameras. Strategic Management J. 33(3):277–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergek A, Berggren C, Magnusson T, Hobday M (2013) Technological discontinuities and the challenge for incumbent firms: Destruction, disruption or creative accumulation? Res. Policy 42(6–7):1210–1224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloch PH (1995) Seeking the ideal form: Product design and consumer response. J. Marketing 59(3):16–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandt P, Timmermans S (2021) Abductive logic of inquiry for quantitative research in the digital age. Sociol. Sci. 8:191–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM (1997) The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):1–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown WB, Karagozoglu N (1993) Leading the way to faster new product development. Acad. Management Perspective 7(1):36–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camuffo A, Cordova A, Gambardella A, Spina C (2020) A scientific approach to entrepreneurial decision making: Evidence from a randomized control trial. Management Sci. 66(2):564–586.Link, Google Scholar
• Carroll GR, Bigelow LS, Seidel M-DL, Tsai LB (1996) The fates of de novo and de alio producers in the American automobile industry 1885–1981. Strategic Management J. 17(S1):117–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cattani G (2006) Technological pre-adaptation, speciation, and emergence of new technologies: How corning invented and developed fiber optics. Industrial Corporate Change 15(2):285–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandy R, Hopstaken B, Narasimhan O, Prabhu J (2006) From invention to innovation: Conversion ability in product development. J. Marketing Res. 43(3):494–508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterji AK, Durand R, Levine DI, Touboul S (2016) Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers. Strategic Management J. 37(8):1597–1614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen L, Wang M, Cui L, Li S (2021) Experience base, strategy-by-doing and new product performance. Strategic Management J. 42(7):1379–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chiao B, Lerner J, Tirole J (2007) The rules of standard-setting organizations: An empirical analysis. RAND J. Econom. 38(4):905–930.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark KB, Fujimoto T (1991) Heavyweight product managers. McKinsey Quart. 1:42–60.Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 1:128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Castro JO, Khavul S, Bruton GD (2014) Shades of grey: How do informal firms navigate between macro and meso institutional environments? Strategic Entrepreneurial J. 8(1):75–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dencker JC, Gruber M, Shah SK (2009) Pre-entry knowledge, learning, and the survival of new firms. Organ. Sci. 20(3):516–537.Link, Google Scholar
• Dierickx I, Cool K (1989) Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Sci. 35(12):1504–1511.Link, Google Scholar
• Doh JP, Pearce JA (2004) Corporate entrepreneurship and real options in transitional policy environments: Theory development. J. Management Stud. 41(4):645–664.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dorobantu S, Kaul A, Zelner B (2017) Nonmarket strategy research through the lens of new institutional economics: An integrative review and future directions. Strategic Management J. 38(1):114–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dumaine B (1989) How managers can succeed through speed. Fortune 119(4):54.Google Scholar
• Eggers J, Moeen M (2021) Entry strategy for nascent industries: Introduction to a virtual special issue. Strategic Management J. 42(2).Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Brown SL (1998) Time pacing: Competing in markets that won’t stand still. Harvard Bus. Rev. 76(2):59–70.Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Tabrizi BN (1995) Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(1):84–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenman M (2013) Understanding aesthetic innovation in the context of technological evolution. Acad. Management Rev. 38(3):332–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farquhar PH (1989) Managing brand equity. Marketing Res. 1(3).Google Scholar
• Farrell J, Saloner G (1985) Standardization, compatibility, and innovation. RAND J. Econom. •••:70–83.Google Scholar
• Fee PR, Mialon HM, Williams MA (2004) What is a barrier to entry? Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(2):461–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fortune A, Mitchell W (2012) Unpacking firm exit at the firm and industry levels: The adaptation and selection of firm capabilities. Strategic Management J. 33(7):794–819.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furr NR (2019) Product adaptation during new industry emergence: The role of start-up team preentry experience. Organ. Sci. 30(5):1076–1096.Link, Google Scholar
• Furr NR, Eisenhardt KM (2021) Strategy and uncertainty: Resource-based view, strategy-creation view, and the hybrid between them. J. Management 47(7):1915–1935.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furr N, Kapoor R (2018) Capabilities, technologies, and firm exit during industry shakeout: Evidence from the global solar photovoltaic industry. Strategic Management J. 39(1):33–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gambardella A, Heaton S, Novelli E, Teece DJ (2021) Profiting from enabling technologies? Strategy Sci. 6(1):75–90.Link, Google Scholar
• Gao C, McDonald R (2022) Shaping nascent industries: Innovation strategy and regulatory uncertainty in personal genomics. Admin. Sci. Quart. 67(4):915–967.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gimmon E, Levie J (2021) Early indicators of very long-term venture performance: A 20-year panel study. Acad. Managment Discovery 7(2):203–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gordon SC, Hafer C (2007) Corporate influence and the regulatory mandate. J. Politics 69(2):300–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gort M, Klepper S (1982) Time paths in the diffusion of product innovations. Econom. J. (London) 92(367):630–653.Google Scholar
• Graebner M, Knott A, Lieberman M, Mitchell W (2017) Call for papers: Question-driven and phenomenon-based empirical strategy research. Strategic Management J.Google Scholar
• Greenstein S (2007) Economic experiments and neutrality in Internet access. Innovative Policy Econom. 8:59–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hawk A, Pacheco-De-Almeida G, Yeung B (2013) Fast-mover advantages: Speed capabilities and entry into the emerging submarket of Atlantic Basin LNG. Strategic Management J. 34(13):1531–1550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Raubitschek RS (2000) Product sequencing: Co-evolution of knowledge, capabilities and products. Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):961–979.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Raubitschek RS (2018) Dynamic and integrative capabilities for profiting from innovation in digital platform-based ecosystems. Res. Policy 47(8):1391–1399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hiatt SR, Park S (2013) Lords of the harvest: Third-party influence and regulatory approval of genetically modified organisms. Acad. Management J. 56(4):923–944.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Hitt MA (1999) Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):825–842.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffmann VH, Trautmann T, Hamprecht J (2009) Regulatory uncertainty: A reason to postpone investments? Not necessarily. J. Management Stud. 46(7):1227–1253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holburn GL, Vanden Bergh RG (2014) Integrated market and nonmarket strategies: Political campaign contributions around merger and acquisition events in the energy sector. Strategic Management J. 35(3):450–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iansiti M, Clark KB (1994) Integration and dynamic capability: Evidence from product development in automobiles and mainframe computers. Industrial Corporate Change 3(3):557–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Isobe T, Makino S, Montgomery DB (2000) Resource commitment, entry timing, and market performance of foreign direct investments in emerging economies: The case of Japanese international joint ventures in China. Acad. Management J. 43(3):468–484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kapoor R, Furr NR (2015) Complementarities and competition: Unpacking the drivers of entrants’ technology choices in the solar photovoltaic industry. Strategic Management J. 36(3):416–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kapoor R, Klueter T (2021) Unbundling and managing uncertainty surrounding emerging technologies. Strategy Sci. 6(1):62–74.Link, Google Scholar
• King A, Goldfarb B, Simcoe T (2021) Learning from testimony on quantitative research in management. Acad. Management Rev. 46(3):465–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klepper S, Simons KL (2000) Dominance by birthright: Entry of prior radio producers and competitive ramifications in the U.S. television receiver industry. Strategic Management J. 21:997–1016.Google Scholar
• Knight FH (1921) Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, vol. 31 (Houghton Mifflin).Google Scholar
• Lane PJ, Salk JE, Lyles MA (2001) Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures. Strategic Management J. 22(12):1139–1161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lashley K, Pollock TG (2020) Waiting to inhale: Reducing stigma in the medical cannabis industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(2):434–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee H, Shah S (2021) Lighting the way: Illuminating how new ventures in nascent industries experiment. Academy of Management Proceedings, vol. 2021 (Academy of Management, Briarcliff Manor, NY), 10644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee BH, Hiatt SR, Lounsbury M (2017) Market mediators and the trade-offs of legitimacy-seeking behaviors in a nascent category. Organ. Sci. 28(3):447–470.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee H, Smith KG, Grimm CM, Schomburg A (2000) Timing, order and durability of new product advantages with imitation. Strategic Management J. 21(1):23–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leiponen AE (2008) Competing through cooperation: The organization of standard setting in wireless telecommunications. Management Sci. 54(11):1904–1919.Link, Google Scholar
• Lieberman MB, Montgomery DB (1988) First-mover advantages. Strategic Management J. 9(S1):41–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madsen TL, Walker G (2007) Incumbent and entrant rivalry in a deregulated industry. Organ. Sci. 18(4):667–687.Link, Google Scholar
• McDonald RM, Eisenhardt KM (2020) Parallel play: Startups, nascent markets, and effective business-model design. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(2):483–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonald R, Gao C (2019) Pivoting isn’t enough? Managing strategic reorientation in new ventures. Organ. Sci. 30(6):1289–1318.Link, Google Scholar
• Milliken FJ (1987) Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: State, effect, and response uncertainty. Acad. Management Rev. 12(1):133–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell W (1991) Dual clocks: Entry order influences on incumbent and newcomer market share and survival when specialized assets retain their value. Strategic Management J. 12(2):85–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moeen M (2017) Entry into nascent industries: Disentangling a firm’s capability portfolio at the time of investment vs. market entry. Strategic Management J. 38(10):1986–2004.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moeen M, Agarwal R, Shah SK (2020) Building industries by building knowledge: Uncertainty reduction over industry milestones. Strategy Sci. 5(3):218–244.Link, Google Scholar
• Murray F, Tripsas M (2004) The Exploratory Processes of Entrepreneurial Firms: The Role of Purposeful Experimentation (Emerald Group Publishing Limited).Google Scholar
• Navis C, Glynn MA (2010) How new market categories emerge: Temporal dynamics of legitimacy, identity, and entrepreneurship in satellite radio, 1990–2005. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(3):439–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nicholls-Nixon CL, Cooper AC, Woo CY (2000) Strategic experimentation: Understanding change and performance in new ventures. J. Bus. Venturing 15(5–6):493–521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver C (1990) Determinants of interorganizational relationships: Integration and future directions. Acad. Management Rev. 15(2):241–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ozcan P, Eisenhardt KM (2009) Origin of alliance portfolios: Entrepreneurs, network strategies, and firm performance. Acad. Management J. 52(2):246–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pillai SD, Goldfarb B, Kirsch DA (2020) The origins of firm strategy: Learning by economic experimentation and strategic pivots in the early automobile industry. Strategic Management J. 41(3):369–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ries E (2011) The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses (Currency).Google Scholar
• Rindova V, Courtney H (2020) To shape or adapt: Knowledge problems, epistemologies, and strategic postures under knightian uncertainty. Acad. Management Rev. 45(4):787–807.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Petkova AP (2007) When is a new thing a good thing? technological change, product form design, and perceptions of value for product innovations. Organ. Sci. 18(2):217–232.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N (1992) Economic experiments. Indust. Corp. Change. 1(1):181–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N (1996) The Mosaic of Economic Growth (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
• Rothaermel FT, Hill CW (2005) Technological discontinuities and complementary assets: A longitudinal study of industry and firm performance. Organ. Sci. 16(1):52–70.Link, Google Scholar
• Rysman M, Simcoe T (2008) Patents and the performance of voluntary standard-setting organizations. Management Sci. 54(11):1920–1934.Link, Google Scholar
• Satell G (2019) Why ‘move fast and break things’ doesn’t work anymore. Harvard Business Review (December 10), https://hbr.org/2019/12/why-move-fast-and-break-things-doesnt-work-anymore.Google Scholar
• Schilling MA (2003) Technological leapfrogging: Lessons from the us video game console industry. California Management Rev. 45(3):6–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmalensee R (1982) Product differentiation advantages of pioneering brands. Amer. Econom. Rev. 72(3):349–365.Google Scholar
• Schoonhoven CB, Eisenhardt KM, Lyman K (1990) Speeding products to market: Waiting time to first product introduction in new firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):177–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schuler DA (1996) Corporate political strategy and foreign competition: The case of the steel industry. Acad. Management J. 39(3):720–737.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sethi R (2000) New product quality and product development teams. J. Marketing 64(2):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharma A, Saboo AR, Kumar V (2018) Investigating the influence of characteristics of the new product introduction process on firm value: The case of the pharmaceutical industry. J. Marketing 82(5):66–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shermon A, Moeen M (2022) Zooming in or zooming out: Entrants’ product portfolios in the nascent drone industry. Strategic Management J. 43(11):2217–2252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slager R, Gond J-P, Moon J (2012) Standardization as institutional work: The regulatory power of a responsible investment standard. Organ. Stud. 33(5–6):763–790.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sohl T, Folta TB (2021) Market exit and the potential for resource redeployment: Evidence from the global retail sector. Strategic Management J. 42(12):2273–2293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spradley JP (1979) The Ethnographic Interview (Holt, Rinehart & Winston).Google Scholar
• Stern S (2006) Economic experiments: The role of entrepreneurship in economic prosperity. Melbourne Rev. J. Bus. Public Policy 2(2):53–56.Google Scholar
• Suarez FF, Lanzolla G (2007) The role of environmental dynamics in building a first mover advantage theory. Acad. Management Rev. 32(2):377–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suarez FF, Utterback JM (1995) Dominant designs and the survival of firms. Strategic Management J. 16(6):415–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suarez FF, Grodal S, Gotsopoulos A (2015) Perfect timing? Dominant category, dominant design, and the window of opportunity for firm entry. Strategic Management J. 36(3):437–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taneja H (2019) The era of “move fast and break things” is over. Harvard Business Review (January 22), https://hbr.org/2019/01/the-era-of-move-fast-and-break-things-is-over.Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (2018) Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world. Res. Policy 47(8):1367–1387.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomke SH (1998) Managing experimentation in the design of new products. Management Sci. 44(6):743–762.Link, Google Scholar
• Thomke SH (2003) Experimentation Matters: Unlocking the Potential of New Technologies for Innovation (Harvard Business Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Usero B, Fernandez Z (2009) First come, first served: How market and non-market actions influence pioneer market share. J. Bus. Res. 62(11):1139–1145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Utterback JM, Suárez FF (1993) Innovation, competition, and industry structure. Res. Policy 22(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzunca B, Rigtering JC, Ozcan P (2018) Sharing and shaping: A cross-country comparison of how sharing economy firms shape their institutional environment to gain legitimacy. Acad. Management Discovery 4(3):248–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Willman P, Coen D, Currie D, Siner M (2003) The evolution of regulatory relationships; regulatory institutions and firm behaviour in privatized industries. Industrial Corporate Change 12(1):69–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wormald A, Shah S, Braguinsky S, Agarwal R (2022) Pioneering digital platform ecosystems: The role of aligned capabilities and motives in shaping key choices and performance outcomes. Preprint, submitted July 8, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3437787.Google Scholar
• Yao DA (1988) Beyond the reach of the invisible hand: Impediments to economic activity, market failures, and profitability. Strategic Management J. 9(S1):59–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao EY, Ishihara M, Jennings PD, Lounsbury M (2018) Optimal distinctiveness in the console video game industry: An exemplar-based model of proto-category evolution. Organ. Sci. 29(4):588–611.Link, Google Scholar
• Zuzul T, Tripsas M (2020) Start-up inertia vs. flexibility: The role of founder identity in a nascent industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(2):395–433.Crossref, Google Scholar