Artificial Intelligence and Strategic Decision-Making: Evidence from Entrepreneurs and Investors

References

• Abadie A, Athey S, Imbens GW, Wooldridge JM (2023) When should you adjust standard errors for clustering? Quart. J. Econom. 138(1):1–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Afuah A, Tucci CL (2012) Crowdsourcing as a solution to distant search. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):355–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Bacco F, Camuffo A, Coali A, Gambardella A, Msangi H, Sonka ST, Temu A, Waized B, Wormald A (2023) Does a theory-of-value add value? Evidence from a randomized control trial with Tanzanian entrepreneurs. Preprint, submitted April 20, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4412041.Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Gans J, Goldfarb A (2018) Prediction Machines: The Simple Economics of Artificial Intelligence (Harvard Business Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Gans JS, Goldfarb A (2023) Artificial intelligence adoption and system-wide change. J. Econom. Management Strategy 33(2):327–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen R, Choudhury P (2022) Algorithm-augmented work and domain experience: The countervailing forces of ability and aversion. Organ. Sci. 33(1):149–169.Link, Google Scholar
• Argyle LP, Busby EC, Fulda N, Gubler JR, Rytting C, Wingate D (2023) Out of one, many: Using language models to simulate human samples. Political Anal. 31(3):337–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bapna S (2019) Complementarity of signals in early-stage equity investment decisions: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Management Sci. 65(2):933–952.Link, Google Scholar
• Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1):99–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumann O, Schmidt J, Stieglitz N (2019) Effective search on rugged performance landscapes: A review and outlook. J. Management 45(1):285–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berg JM, Raj M, Seamans R (2023) Capturing value from artificial intelligence. Acad. Management Discoveries 9(4):424–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein S, Korteweg A, Laws K (2017) Attracting early-stage investors: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. J. Finance 72(2):509–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bingham CB, Eisenhardt KM (2011) Rational heuristics: The ‘simple rules’ that strategists learn from process experience. Strategic Management J. 32(13):1437–1464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Sadun R, Van Reenen J (2012) The organization of firms across countries. Quart. J. Econom. 127(4):1663–1705.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boiko DA, MacKnight R, Gomes G (2023) Emergent autonomous scientific research capabilities of large language models. Preprint, submitted April 11, https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.05332.Google Scholar
• Borgeaud S, Mensch A, Hoffmann J, Cai T, Rutherford E, Millican K, van den Driessche G, et al. (2021) Improving language models by retrieving from trillions of tokens. Preprint, submitted December 8, https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.04426.Google Scholar
• Bostrom N (2014) Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Boussioux L, Lane JN, Zhang M, Jacimovic V, Lakhani KR (2023) The crowdless future? How generative AI is shaping the future of human crowdsourcing. Preprint, submitted August 8, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4533642.Google Scholar
• Brand J, Israeli A, Ngwe D (2023) Using GPT for market research. Preprint, submitted March 30, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4395751.Google Scholar
• Brooks T, Peebles B, Homes C, DePue W, Guo Y, Jing L, Schnurr D, et al. (2024) Video generation models as world simulators. Accessed February 23, 2024, https://openai.com/research/video-generation-models-as-world-simulators.Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Li D, Raymond L (2023) Generative AI at work. NBER Working Paper No. 31161, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Bubeck S, Chandrasekaran V, Eldan R, Gehrke J, Horvitz E, Kamar E, Lee P, et al. (2023) Sparks of artificial general intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4. Preprint, submitted March 22, https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.12712.Google Scholar
• Camuffo A, Cordova A, Gambardella A, Spina C (2020) A scientific approach to entrepreneurial decision making: Evidence from a randomized control trial. Management Sci. 66(2):564–586.Link, Google Scholar
• Carlile PR (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. 13(4):442–455.Link, Google Scholar
• Choudhary V, Marchetti A, Shrestha YR, Puranam P (2023) Human–AI ensembles: When can they work? J. Management, ePub ahead of print October 3, https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063231194968.Google Scholar
• Choudhury P, Wang D, Carlson NA, Khanna T (2019) Machine learning approaches to facial and text analysis: Discovering CEO oral communication styles. Strategic Management J. 40(11):1705–1732.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cowgill B (2019) Bias and productivity in humans and machines. Preprint, submitted August 10, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3433737.Google Scholar
• Craik KJW (1943) The Nature of Explanation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA (2012) Organizational structure as a determinant of performance: Evidence from mutual funds. Strategic Management J. 33(6):611–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA (2018) What makes a decision strategic? Strategic representations. Strategy Sci. 3(4):606–619.Link, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA (2020) Certum quod factum: How formal models contribute to the theoretical and empirical robustness of organization theory. J. Management 46(7):1289–1301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Eggers JP (2013) Organizational decision making: An information aggregation view. Management Sci. 59(10):2257–2277.Link, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Laureiro-Martínez D (2018) Individual and organizational antecedents of strategic foresight: A representational approach. Strategy Sci. 3(3):513–532.Link, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Levinthal DA (2016) Mental representation and the discovery of new strategies. Strategic Management J. 37(10):2031–2049.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Ostler J (2020) A contingency theory of representational complexity in organizations. Organ. Sci. 31(5):1198–1219.Link, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Steinberger T (2022) Organizations as artificial intelligences: The use of artificial intelligence analogies in organization theory. Acad. Management Ann. 16(1):1–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Hinrichs N, Heshmati M (2024) External representations in strategic decision making: Understanding strategy’s reliance on visuals. Strategic Management J. 45(11):2191–2226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dell’Acqua F, McFowland E, Mollick E, Lifshitz-Assaf H, Kellogg KC, Rajendran S, Lisa K, Candelon F, Lakhani KR (2023) Navigating the jagged technological frontier: Field experimental evidence of the effects of AI on knowledge worker productivity and quality. Working Paper No. 24-013, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• DeStefano T, Kellogg KC, Menietti M, Vendraminelli L (2022) Why providing humans with interpretable algorithms may, counterintuitively, lead to lower decision-making performance. Preprint, submitted October 13, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4246077.Google Scholar
• Doshi AR, Hauser O (2023) Generative artificial intelligence enhances creativity. Preprint, submitted August 14, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4535536.Google Scholar
• Doshi AR, Bell JJ, Mirzayev E, Vanneste B (2024) Generative artificial intelligence and evaluating strategic decisions. Preprint, submitted February 15, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4714776.Google Scholar
• Dougherty D (1992) Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. 3(2):179–202.Link, Google Scholar
• Ehrig T, Schmidt J (2022) Theory-based learning and experimentation: How strategists can systematically generate knowledge at the edge between the known and the unknown. Strategic Management J. 43(7):1287–1318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eicke A-K, Foege JN, Nüesch S (2024) Iterative alternative evaluation within human–artificial intelligence problem-solving: An extension to Raisch and Fomina’s ‘Combining human and artificial intelligence.’ Acad. Management Rev., ePub ahead of print July 12, 2024, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2024.0135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang C, Kim J-H, Milliken FJ (2014) When bad news is sugarcoated: Information distortion, organizational search and the behavioral theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 35(8):1186–1201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Holweg M (2024) Theory is all you need: AI, human cognition, and causal reasoning. Preprint, submitted April 4, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4737265.Google Scholar
• Felin T, Zenger TR (2009) Entrepreneurs as theorists: On the origins of collective beliefs and novel strategies. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 3(2):127–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Zenger TR (2017) The theory-based view: Economic actors as theorists. Strategy Sci. 2(4):258–271.Link, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Gambardella A, Zenger TR (2020) Value laboratory: A tool for entrepreneurial strategy. Management Bus. Rev. 1(2):68–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Kauffman S, Koppl R, Longo G (2014) Economic opportunity and evolution: Beyond landscapes and bounded rationality. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 8(4):269–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fine CH (1998) Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage (Perseus Books, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Gaessler F, Piezunka H (2023) Training with AI: Evidence from chess computers. Strategic Management J. 44(11):2724–2750.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G (2012) Toward a behavioral theory of strategy. Organ. Sci. 23(1):267–285.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal DA (2000) Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):113–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Menon A (2016) Evolution cum agency: Toward a model of strategic foresight. Strategy Sci. 1(3):207–233.Link, Google Scholar
• Girotra K, Meincke L, Terwiesch C, Ulrich KT (2023) Ideas are dimes a dozen: Large language models for idea generation in innovation. Preprint, submitted August 2, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4526071.Google Scholar
• Horton JJ (2023) Large language models as simulated economic agents: What can we learn from Homo silicus? Preprint, submitted January 18, https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.07543.Google Scholar
• Hua W, Fan L, Li L, Mei K, Ji J, Ge Y, Hemphill L, Zhang Y (2024) War and peace (WarAgent): Large language model-based multi-agent simulation of world wars. Preprint, submitted November 28, https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.17227.Google Scholar
• Huang J, Chang KC-C (2023) Toward reasoning in large language models. Preprint, submitted December 20, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.10403.Google Scholar
• Huang L, Pearce JL (2015) Managing the unknowable: The effectiveness of early-stage investor gut feel in entrepreneurial investment decisions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(4):634–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huff AS (1990) Mapping Strategic Thought (Wiley, Chichester, NY).Google Scholar
• Jia N, Luo X, Fang Z, Liao C (2024) When and how artificial intelligence augments employee creativity. Acad. Management J. 67(1):5–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kang X, Kim H (2024) Machine predictions and causal explanations: Evidence from a field experiment. Working paper, INSEAD, Singapore.Google Scholar
• Kaplan S (2011) Strategy and PowerPoint: An inquiry into the epistemic culture and machinery of strategy making. Organ. Sci. 22(2):320–346.Link, Google Scholar
• Katz DM, Bommarito MJ, Gao S, Arredondo P (2023) GPT-4 passes the bar exam. Preprint, submitted March 15, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4389233.Google Scholar
• Keum DD, See KE (2017) The influence of hierarchy on idea generation and selection in the innovation process. Organ. Sci. 28(4):653–669.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim H (2024) Learning from data in entrepreneurial experimentation. Accessed August 1, https://papers.kimhyunjin.com/kim_data_experimentation.pdf.Google Scholar
• Kim H, Glaeser EL, Hillis A, Kominers SD, Luca M (2024) Decision authority and the returns to algorithms. Strategic Management J. 45(4):619–648.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knuth DE (1974) Computer programming as an art. Comm. ACM 17(12):667–673.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koning R, Hasan S, Chatterji A (2022) Experimentation and start-up performance: Evidence from A/B testing. Management Sci. 68(9):6434–6453.Link, Google Scholar
• Lebovitz S, Lifshitz-Assaf H, Levina N (2022) To engage or not to engage with AI for critical judgments: How professionals deal with opacity when using AI for medical diagnosis. Organ. Sci. 33(1):126–148.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (2011) A behavioral approach to strategy: What’s the alternative? Strategic Management J. 32(13):1517–1523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewin K (1952) Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers by Kurt Lewin (Tavistock, London).Google Scholar
• Ludwig J, Mullainathan S (2024) Machine learning as a tool for hypothesis generation. Quart. J. Econom. 139(2):751–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahoney JT, Pandian JR (1992) The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management J. 13(5):363–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malerba F, Nelson RR, Orsenigo L, Winter SG (2016) Innovation and the Evolution of Industries: History-Friendly Models (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manning BS, Zhu K, Horton JJ (2024) Automated social science: Language models as scientist and subjects. Preprint, submitted April 17, https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.11794.Google Scholar
• Martignoni D, Menon A, Siggelkow N (2016) Consequences of misspecified mental models: Contrasting effects and the role of cognitive fit. Strategic Management J. 37(13):2545–2568.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McElheran K, Li JF, Brynjolfsson E, Kroff Z, Dinlersoz E, Foster L, Zolas N (2024) AI adoption in America: Who, what, and where. J. Econom. Management Strategy 33(2):375–415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore RK (2005) Results from a survey of attendees at ASRU 1997 and 2003. Proc. Interspeech 2005 (Lisbon, Portugal).Google Scholar
• Newell A, Simon HA (1976) Computer science as empirical inquiry: Symbols and search. Comm. ACM 19(3):113–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Noy S, Zhang W (2023) Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. Science 381(6654):187–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W, Rhee L, Boynton D (2020) March and the pursuit of organizational intelligence: The interplay between procedural rationality and sensible foolishness. Indust. Corporate Change 29(1):225–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olenick M, Zemsky P (2023) Can GenAI do strategy? Harvard Bus. Rev. (November 24), https://hbr.org/2023/11/can-genai-do-strategy.Google Scholar
• OpenAI (2023) GPT-4 technical report. Preprint, submitted March 15, https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774.Google Scholar
• Otis N, Clarke RP, Delecourt S, Holtz D, Koning R (2024) The uneven impact of generative AI on entrepreneurial performance. Preprint, submitted January 17, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4671369.Google Scholar
• Piezunka H, Schilke O (2023) The dual function of organizational structure: Aggregating and shaping individuals’ votes. Organ. Sci. 34(5):1914–1937.Link, Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1979) How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev. 57(2):137–145.Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1991) Toward a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management J. 12(S2):95–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Posen HE, Keil T, Kim S, Meissner F (2018) Renewing research on problemistic search: A review and research agenda. Acad. Management Ann. 12(1):208–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P (2021) Human–AI collaborative decision-making as an organization design problem. J. Organ. Design 10(2):75–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raisch S, Fomina K (2024) Combining human and artificial intelligence: Hybrid problem-solving in organizations. Acad. Management Rev., ePub ahead of print January 5, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2021.0421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reitzig M, Maciejovsky B (2015) Corporate hierarchy and vertical information flow inside the firm—A behavioral view. Strategic Management J. 36(13):1979–1999.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ries E (2011) The Lean Startup (Crown Business, New York).Google Scholar
• Risi S, Preuss M (2020) From chess and Atari to StarCraft and beyond: How game AI is driving the world of AI. KI—Künstliche Intelligenz 34(1):7–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schoemaker PJH (1995) Scenario planning: A tool for strategic thinking. Sloan Management Rev. 36:25–40.Google Scholar
• Schwenk CR (1984) Devil’s advocacy in managerial decision-making. J. Management Stud. 21(2):153–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Securities and Exchange Commission (2020) Staff report on algorithmic trading in U.S. capital markets. Accessed January 22, 2024, https://www.sec.gov/files/algo_trading_report_2020.pdf.Google Scholar
• Shmueli G (2010) To explain or to predict? Statist. Sci. 25(3):289–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shrestha YR, He VF, Puranam P, von Krogh G (2021) Algorithm supported induction for building theory: How can we use prediction models to theorize? Organ. Sci. 32(3):856–880.Link, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1947) Administrative Behavior (MacMillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart. J. Econom. 69(1):99–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1969) The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Sun J, Zhang DJ, Hu H, Van Mieghem JA (2022) Predicting human discretion to adjust algorithmic prescription: A large-scale field experiment in warehouse operations. Management Sci. 68(2):846–865.Link, Google Scholar
• Surowiecki J (2004) The Wisdom of Crowds (Doubleday, New York).Google Scholar
• Tripsas M, Gavetti G (2000) Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):1147–1161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wei J, Tay Y, Bommasani R, Raffel C, Zoph B, Borgeaud S, Yogatama D, et al. (2022) Emergent abilities of large language models. Preprint, submitted June 15, https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.07682.Google Scholar
• Zellweger T, Zenger T (2023) Entrepreneurs as scientists: A pragmatist approach to producing value out of uncertainty. Acad. Management Rev. 48(3):379–408.Crossref, Google Scholar