Governance Structures and Coordination Trade-offs: A Discriminating Alignment Theory of Innovation Ecosystem Architectures

References

• Adner R (2012) The Wide Lens: A New Strategy for Innovation (Penguin, New York).Google Scholar
• Adner R (2017) Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. J. Management 43(1):39–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adner R, Feiler D (2019) Interdependence, perception, and investment choices: An experimental approach to decision making in innovation ecosystems. Organ. Sci. 30(1):109–125.Link, Google Scholar
• Adner R, Kapoor R (2010) Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management J. 31(3):306–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adner R, Lieberman M (2021) Disruption through complements. Strategy Sci. 6(1):91–109.Link, Google Scholar
• Afuah A, Tucci CL (2023) Reflections on the 2022 AMR decade award: Crowdsourcing as a solution to distant search. Acad. Management Rev. 48(4):597–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal S, Kapoor R (2023) Value creation tradeoff in business ecosystems: Leveraging complementarities while managing interdependencies. Organ. Sci. 34(3):1216–1242.Link, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Croson R, Mahoney JT (2010) The role of incentives and communication in strategic alliances: An experimental investigation. Strategic Management J. 31(4):413–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alexy O, George G, Salter AJ (2013) Cui bono? The selective revealing of knowledge and its implications for innovative activity. Acad. Management Rev. 38(2):270–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alexy O, West J, Klapper H, Reitzig M (2018) Surrendering control to gain advantage: Reconciling openness and the resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 39(6):1704–1727.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Altman EJ, Nagle F, Tushman ML (2022) The translucent hand of managed ecosystems: Engaging communities for value creation and capture. Acad. Management Ann. 16(1):70–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson P, Tushman ML (1990) Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(4):604–633. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson C (2007) The Long Tail: How Endless Choice Is Creating Unlimited Demand (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
• Argyres NS, Bigelow L (2010) Innovation, modularity, and vertical deintegration: Evidence from the early US auto industry. Organ. Sci. 21(4):842–853.Link, Google Scholar
• Argyres NS, Mahoney JT, Nickerson J (2019) Strategic responses to shocks: Comparative adjustment costs, transaction costs, and opportunity costs. Strategic Management J. 40(3):357–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bae J, Gargiulo M (2004) Partner substitutability, alliance network structure, and firm profitability in the telecommunications industry. Acad. Management J. 47(6):843–859.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY (2024) Design Rules, Volume 2: How Technology Shapes Organizations (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2000) Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Woodard CJ (2009) The architecture of platforms: A unified view. Gawer A, ed. Platforms, Markets and Innovation (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 19–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barach MA, Kaul A, Leung MD, Lu S (2019) Strategic redundancy in the use of big data: Evidence from a two-sided labor market. Strategy Sci. 4(4):298–322.Link, Google Scholar
• Binken JL, Stremersch S (2009) The effect of superstar software on hardware sales in system markets. J. Marketing 73(2):88–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau K (2010) Open platform strategies and innovation: Granting access vs. devolving control. Management Sci. 56(10):1849–1872.Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ (2012) Let a thousand flowers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1409–1427.Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Hagiu A (2009) Platform rules: Multi-sided platforms as regulators. Gawer A, ed. Platforms, Markets and Innovation (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 163–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandenburger A (1996) Strategic and structural uncertainty in games. Zeckhauser RJ, Keeney RL, Sebenius JK, eds. Wise Choices: Decisions, Games, and Negotiations (Harvard Business School Press, Boston), 221–232.Google Scholar
• Brandenburger AM, Nalebuff BJ (1996) Co-Opetition (Doubleday, New York).Google Scholar
• Bremner RP, Eisenhardt KM (2022) Organizing form, experimentation, and performance: Innovation in the nascent civilian drone industry. Organ. Sci. 33(4):1645–1674.Link, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hu Y, Simester D (2011) Goodbye Pareto principle, hello long tail: The effect of search costs on the concentration of product sales. Management Sci. 57(8):1373–1386.Link, Google Scholar
• Carroll GR, Swaminathan A (2000) Why the microbrewery movement? Organizational dynamics of resource partitioning in the U.S. brewing industry. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(3):715–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cartwright E, Gillet J, Van Vugt M (2013) Leadership by example in the weak-link game. Econom. Inquiry 51(4):2028–2043.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatain O, Plaksenkova E (2026) Incentive alignment in ecosystems: The role of complementarity types and multi-sided bargaining. Strategic Management J. 47(1):228–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Richter JI, Patel PC (2021) Decentralized governance of digital platforms. J. Management 47(5):1305–1337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen L, Tong TW, Tang S, Han N (2022a) Governance and design of digital platforms: A review and future research directions on a meta-organization. J. Management 48(1):147–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen L, Yi J, Li S, Tong TW (2022b) Platform governance design in platform ecosystems: Implications for complementors’ multihoming decision. J. Management 48(3):630–656.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Church J, Gandal N (1992) Integration, complementary products, and variety. J. Econom. Management Strategy 1(4):651–675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clough DR (2018) Coordination and interorganizational networks in innovation ecosystems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France.Google Scholar
• Clough DR, Wu A (2022) Artificial intelligence, data-driven learning, and the decentralized structure of platform ecosystems. Acad. Management Rev. 47(1):184–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clough DR, Wu A (2024) Metaverse management as urban planning: Lessons from Paradise (Nevada). California Management Rev. 66(4):121–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clough DR, Zhong C (2026) When platforms aren’t forever: What drives established platform-based ecosystems into decline? Huang P, Mithas S, eds. Research Handbook on Platform Ecosystems (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK).Google Scholar
• Coase RH (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica 4(16):386–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper DJ, Weber RA (2020) Recent advances in experimental coordination games. Capra CM, Croson RTA, Rigdon ML, Rosenblat TS, eds. Handbook of Experimental Game Theory (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 149–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper R, DeJong DV, Forsythe R, Ross TW (1989) Communication in the battle of the sexes game: Some experimental results. RAND J. Econom. 20(4):568–587.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper R, DeJong DV, Forsythe R, Ross TW (1992) Communication in coordination games. Quart. J. Econom. 107(2):739–771.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cornelissen J (2017) Editor’s comments: Developing propositions, a process model, or a typology? Addressing the challenges of writing theory without a boilerplate. Acad. Management Rev. 42(1):1–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford VP (2019) Experiments on cognition, communication, coordination, and cooperation in relationships. Annual Rev. Econom. 11(1):167–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cusumano MA, Gawer A, Yoffie DB (2019) The Business of Platforms: Strategy in the Age of Digital Competition, Innovation, and Power (Harper Business, New York).Google Scholar
• Cuypers IR, Hennart JF, Silverman BS, Ertug G (2021) Transaction cost theory: Past progress, current challenges, and suggestions for the future. Acad. Management Ann. 15(1):111–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dattée B, Alexy O, Autio E (2018) Maneuvering in poor visibility: How firms play the ecosystem game when uncertainty is high. Acad. Management J. 61(2):466–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis JP, Eisenhardt KM, Bingham CB (2009) Optimal structure, market dynamism, and the strategy of simple rules. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(3):413–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dess GG, Beard DW (1984) Dimensions of organizational task environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(1):52–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doty DH, Glick WH (1994) Typologies as a unique form of theory building: Toward improved understanding and modeling. Acad. Management Rev. 19(2):230–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Economides N, Katsamakas E (2006) Two-sided competition of proprietary vs. open source technology platforms and the implications for the software industry. Management Sci. 52(7):1057–1071.Link, Google Scholar
• Eggers J (2012) Falling flat: Failed technologies and investment under uncertainty. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(1):47–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang TP, Wu A, Clough DR (2021) Platform diffusion at temporary gatherings: Social coordination and ecosystem emergence. Strategic Management J. 42(2):233–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell J (1987) Cheap talk, coordination, and entry. RAND J. Econom. 18(1):34–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell J, Rabin M (1996) Cheap talk. J. Econom. Perspect. 10(3):103–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell J, Saloner G (1988) Coordination through committees and markets. RAND J. Econom. 19(2):235–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell J, Monroe HK, Saloner G (1998) The vertical organization of industry: Systems competition versus component competition. J. Econom. Management Strategy 7(2):143–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ganco M, Kapoor R, Lee GK (2020) From rugged landscapes to rugged ecosystems: Structure of interdependencies and firms’ innovative search. Acad. Management Rev. 45(3):646–674.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gawer A (2014) Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Res. Policy 43(7):1239–1249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenstein S (2015) How the Internet Became Commercial: Innovation, Privatization, and the Birth of a New Network (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2008) Bigger and safer: The diffusion of competitive advantage. Strategic Management J. 30(1):1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagiu A, Spulber D (2013) First-party content and coordination in two-sided markets. Management Sci. 59(4):933–949.Link, Google Scholar
• Hannah DP, Eisenhardt KM (2018) How firms navigate cooperation and competition in nascent ecosystems. Strategic Management J. 39(12):3163–3192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He VF, Puranam P, Shrestha YR, von Krogh G (2020) Resolving governance disputes in communities: A study of software license decisions. Strategic Management J. 41(10):1837–1868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Campo-Rembado MA (2016) Integrative capabilities, vertical integration, and innovation over successive technology lifecycles. Organ. Sci. 27(2):249–264.Link, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Raubitschek RS (2018) Dynamic and integrative capabilities for profiting from innovation in digital platform-based ecosystems. Res. Policy 47(8):1391–1399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoetker G (2006) Do modular products lead to modular organizations? Strategic Management J. 27(6):501–518.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsieh YY, Vergne JP (2023) The future of the web? The coordination and early-stage growth of decentralized platforms. Strategic Management J. 44(3):829–857.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobides MG, Billinger S (2006) Designing the boundaries of the firm: From “make, buy, or ally” to the dynamic benefits of vertical architecture. Organ. Sci. 17(2):249–261.Link, Google Scholar
• Jacobides MG, Tae CJ (2015) Kingpins, bottlenecks, and value dynamics along a sector. Organ. Sci. 26(3):889–907.Link, Google Scholar
• Jacobides MG, Cennamo C, Gawer A (2018) Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management J. 39(8):2255–2276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobides MG, Cennamo C, Gawer A (2024) Externalities and complementarities in platforms and ecosystems: From structural solutions to endogenous failures. Res. Policy 53(1):104906.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobides MG, Knudsen T, Augier M (2006) Benefiting from innovation: Value creation, value appropriation and the role of industry architectures. Res. Policy 35(8):1200–1221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones C, Hesterly WS, Borgatti SP (1997) A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Acad. Management Rev. 22(4):911–945.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones SL, Leiponen A, Vasudeva G (2021) The evolution of cooperation in the face of conflict: Evidence from the innovation ecosystem for mobile telecom standards development. Strategic Management J. 42(4):710–740.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joseph J, Gaba V (2020) Organizational structure, information processing, and decision-making: A retrospective and road map for research. Acad. Management Ann. 14(1):267–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan A, Haenlein M (2024) To be or not to be: Will virtual worlds and the metaverse gain lasting traction? California Management Rev. 66(4):5–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kapoor R (2013) Collaborating with complementors: What do firms do. Adner R, Oxley JE, Silverman BS, eds. Collaboration and Competition in Business Ecosystems (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 3–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kapoor R (2018) Ecosystems: Broadening the locus of value creation. J. Organ. Design 7(1):12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kapoor R, Lee JM (2013) Coordinating and competing in ecosystems: How organizational forms shape new technology investments. Strategic Management J. 34(3):274–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karhu K, Gustafsson R, Lyytinen K (2018) Exploiting and defending open digital platforms with boundary resources: Android’s five platform forks. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):479–497.Link, Google Scholar
• Khanagha S, Ansari S, Paroutis S, Oviedo L (2022) Mutualism and the dynamics of new platform creation: A study of Cisco and fog computing. Strategic Management J. 43(3):476–506.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knez M, Camerer C (1994) Creating expectational assets in the laboratory: Coordination in “weakest-link” games. Strategic Management J. 15(S1):101–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kretschmer T, Leiponen A, Schilling M, Vasudeva G (2022) Platform ecosystems as meta-organizations: Implications for platform strategies. Strategic Management J. 43(3):405–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langlois RN (2006) The secret life of mundane transaction costs. Organ. Stud. 27(9):1389–1410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langlois RN, Robertson PL (1995) Firms, Markets and Economic Change: A Dynamic Theory of Business Institutions (Routledge, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee GK (2007) The significance of network resources in the race to enter emerging product markets: The convergence of telephony communications and computer networking, 1989–2001. Strategic Management J. 28(1):17–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee GK, Cole RE (2003) From a firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: The case of the Linux kernel development. Organ. Sci. 14(6):633–649.Link, Google Scholar
• Leiblein MJ, Reuer JJ, Zenger T (2018) What makes a decision strategic? Strategy Sci. 3(4):558–573.Link, Google Scholar
• Lemley MA (2006) Terms of use. Minnesota Law Rev. 91(2):459–483.Google Scholar
• Makadok R, Coff R (2009) Both market and hierarchy: An incentive-system theory of hybrid governance forms. Acad. Management Rev. 34(2):297–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mantovani A, Ruiz-Aliseda F (2016) Equilibrium innovation ecosystems: The dark side of collaborating with complementors. Management Sci. 62(2):531–549.Google Scholar
• McIntyre D, Srinivasan A (2017) Networks, platforms, and strategy: Emerging views and next steps. Strategic Management J. 38(1):141–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McIntyre D, Srinivasan A, Afuah A, Gawer A, Kretschmer T (2021) Multisided platforms as new organizational forms. Acad. Management Perspect. 35(4):566–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mezias JM, Mezias SJ (2000) Resource partitioning, the founding of specialist firms, and innovation: The American feature film industry, 1912–1929. Organ. Sci. 11(3):306–322.Link, Google Scholar
• Nagaraj A, Piezunka H (2024) The divergent effect of competition on platforms: Deterring recruits, motivating converts. Strategy Sci. 9(3):277–296.Link, Google Scholar
• Nickerson JA, Zenger TR (2004) A knowledge-based theory of the firm—The problem-solving perspective. Organ. Sci. 15(6):617–632.Link, Google Scholar
• O’Mahony S (2007) The governance of open source initiatives: What does it mean to be community managed? J. Management Governance 11:139–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Mahony S, Ferraro F (2007) The emergence of governance in an open source community. Acad. Management J. 50(5):1079–1106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Mahony S, Karp R (2022) From proprietary to collective governance: How do platform participation strategies evolve? Strategic Management J. 43(3):530–562.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ozalp H, Cennamo C, Gawer A (2018) Disruption in platform-based ecosystems. J. Management Stud. 55(7):1203–1241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ozcan P, Eisenhardt KM (2009) Origin of alliance portfolios: Entrepreneurs, network strategies, and firm performance. Acad. Management J. 52(2):246–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ozcan P, Hannah D (2020) Forced ecosystems and digital stepchildren: Reconfiguring advertising suppliers to realize disruptive social media technology. Strategy Sci. 5(3):193–217.Link, Google Scholar
• Ozcan P, Santos FM (2015) The market that never was: Turf wars and failed alliances in mobile payments. Strategic Management J. 36(10):1486–1512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker GG, Van Alstyne M, Jiang X (2017) Platform ecosystems: How developers invert the firm. MIS Quart. 41(1):255–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parkhe A (1993) Strategic alliance structuring: A game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation. Acad. Management J. 36(4):794–829.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pierce L (2009) Big losses in ecosystem niches: How core firm decisions drive complementary product shakeouts. Strategic Management J. 30(3):323–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pil FK, Cohen SK (2006) Modularity: Implications for imitation, innovation, and sustained advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 31(4):995–1011.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P (2018) The Microstructure of Organizations (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ranganathan R, Rosenkopf L (2014) Do ties really bind? The effect of knowledge and commercialization networks on opposition to standards. Acad. Management J. 57(2):515–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reineke P, Katila R, Eisenhardt KM (2025) Decentralization in organizations: A revolution or a mirage? Acad. Management Ann. 19(1):298–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reuer JJ, Klijn E, van den Bosch FA, Volberda HW (2011) Bringing corporate governance to international joint ventures. Global Strategy J. 1(1–2):54–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rietveld J, Schilling MA (2021) Platform competition: A systematic and interdisciplinary review of the literature. J. Management 47(6):1528–1563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rietveld J, Seamans R, Meggiorin K (2021) Market orchestrators: The effects of certification on platforms and their complementors. Strategy Sci. 6(3):244–264.Link, Google Scholar
• Sanchez R, Mahoney JT (1996) Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):63–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schelling TC (1980) The Strategy of Conflict (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Schilling MA (2000) Toward a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity. Acad. Management Rev. 25(2):312–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt J, Foss NJ (2025) Modularity, adaptation problems, and the governance and problem-solving capabilities of core firms in ecosystems. J. Management 51(4):1484–1513.Google Scholar
• Shipilov A, Gawer A (2020) Integrating research on interorganizational networks and ecosystems. Acad. Management Ann. 14(1):92–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simcoe T (2012) Standard setting committees: Consensus governance for shared technology platforms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(1):305–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simcoe T, Watson J (2019) Forking, fragmentation, and splintering. Strategy Sci. 4(4):283–297.Link, Google Scholar
• Soh PH (2010) Network patterns and competitive advantage before the emergence of a dominant design. Strategic Management J. 31(4):438–461.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stonig J, Schmid T, Müller-Stewens G (2022) From product system to ecosystem: How firms adapt to provide an integrated value proposition. Strategic Management J. 43(9):1927–1957.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tajedin H, Madhok A, Keyhani M (2019) A theory of digital firm-designed markets: Defying knowledge constraints with crowds and marketplaces. Strategy Sci. 4(4):323–342.Link, Google Scholar
• Tatarynowicz A, Sytch M, Gulati R (2016) Environmental demands and the emergence of social structure: Technological dynamism and interorganizational network forms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(1):52–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (2018) Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world. Res. Policy 47(8):1367–1387.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas LD, Autio E, Gann DM (2014) Architectural leverage: Putting platforms in context. Acad. Management Perspect. 28(2):198–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toh PK, Agarwal S (2023) The option value in complements within platform-based ecosystems. Strategic Management J. 44(2):576–609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toh PK, Miller CD (2017) Pawn to save a chariot, or drawbridge into the fort? Firms’ disclosure during standard setting and complementary technologies within ecosystems. Strategic Management J. 38(11):2213–2236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Townsend DM, Hunt RA, McMullen JS, Sarasvathy SD (2018) Uncertainty, knowledge problems, and entrepreneurial action. Acad. Management Ann. 12(2):659–687.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzunca B, Sharapov D, Tee R (2022) Governance rigidity, industry evolution, and value capture in platform ecosystems. Res. Policy 51(7):104560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van der Geest C, van Angeren J (2023) Architectural generativity: Leveraging complementor contributions to the platform architecture. California Management Rev. 65(2):71–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Huyck JB, Battalio RC, Beil RO (1990) Tacit coordination games, strategic uncertainty, and coordination failure. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(1):234–248.Google Scholar
• Wang RD, Miller CD (2020) Complementors’ engagement in an ecosystem: A study of publishers’ e-book offerings on Amazon Kindle. Strategic Management J. 41(1):3–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Yue LQ, Rajagopalan N, Wu B (2024) The entry-deterring effects of synergies in complementor acquisitions: Evidence from Apple’s digital platform market, the iOS app store. Strategic Management J. 45(13):2791–2817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wareham J, Fox PB, Cano Giner JL (2014) Technology ecosystem governance. Organ. Sci. 25(4):1195–1215.Link, Google Scholar
• West J, Wood D (2013) Evolving an open ecosystem: The rise and fall of the Symbian platform. Adner R, Oxley JE, Silverman BS, eds. Collaboration and Competition in Business Ecosystems (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 27–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1991) Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(2):269–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu A, Clough DR, Kaletsky S (2019) Nascent Platform Strategy: Overcoming the Chicken-or-Egg Problem (Harvard Business Review Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Ye H, Kankanhalli A (2018) User service innovation on mobile phone platforms. MIS Quart. 42(1):165–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yin PL, Davis JP, Muzyrya Y (2014) Entrepreneurial innovation: Killer apps in the iPhone ecosystem. Amer. Econom. Rev. Papers Proc. 104(5):255–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zenger TR, Felin T, Bigelow L (2011) Theories of the firm–market boundary. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):89–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Tong TW (2021) How vertical integration affects firm innovation: Quasi-experimental evidence. Organ. Sci. 32(2):455–479.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhelyazkov PI, Gulati R (2016) After the break-up: The relational and reputational consequences of withdrawals from venture capital syndicates. Acad. Management J. 59(1):277–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu F, Iansiti M (2012) Entry into platform‐based markets. Strategic Management J. 33(1):88–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu F, Liu Q (2018) Competing with complementors: An empirical look at Amazon.com. Strategic Management J. 39(10):2618–2642.Crossref, Google Scholar