When Fixed Price Meets Priority Auctions: Competing Firms with Different Pricing and Service Rules

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/stsy.2018.0021

References

  • Abhishek V, Kash I, Key P (2012) Fixed and market pricing for cloud services. Proc. IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ), 157–162.Google Scholar
  • Afèche P (2013) Incentive-compatible revenue management in queueing systems: Optimal strategic delay. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(3):423–443.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Afèche P, Mendelson H (2004) Pricing and priority auctions in queueing systems with a generalized delay cost structure. Management Sci. 50(7):869–882.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Afèche P, Pavlin JM (2016) Optimal price/lead-time menus for queues with customer choice: Segmentation, pooling, and strategic delay. Management Sci. 62(8):2412–2436.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Aliprantis CD, Border K (2006) Infinite Dimensional Analysis: A Hitchhiker’s Guide (Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin).Google Scholar
  • Amazon (2015) Amazon EC2 instance purchasing options. Accessed June 26, 2015, http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/purchasing-options.Google Scholar
  • Balachandran K (1972) Purchasing priorities in queues. Management Sci. 18(5 part 1):319–326.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Caldentey R, Vulcano G (2007) Online auction and list price revenue management. Management Sci. 53(5):795–813.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chohan UW (2014) Dididache—hailing the future, one cab at a time. Accessed May 8, 2018, https://www.mcgill.ca/channels/channels/news/dididache-di-di-da-che-hailing-future-one-cab-time-235312.Google Scholar
  • Doroudi S, Akan M, Harchol-Balte M, Karp J, Borgs C, Chayes JT (2013) Priority pricing in queues with a continuous distribution of customer valuations. Technical Report CMUCS-13-109, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  • Etzion H, Pinker E, Seidmann A (2006) Analyzing the simultaneous use of auctions and posted prices for online selling. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 8(1):68–91.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gautam N (2012) Analysis of Queues: Methods and Applications (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL).Google Scholar
  • Gavirneni S, Kulkarni VG (2016) Self‐selecting priority queues with Burr distributed waiting costs. Production Oper. Management 25(6):979–992.Google Scholar
  • Glazer A, Hassin R (1986) Stable priority purchasing in queues. Oper. Res. Lett. 4(6):285–288.Google Scholar
  • Glicksberg IL (1952) A further generalization of the kakutani fixed point theorem, with application to nash equilibrium points. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 3(1):170–174.Google Scholar
  • Hassin R (1995) Decentralized regulation of a queue. Management Sci. 41(1):163–173.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hassin R, Haviv M (2003) To Queue or Not to Queue: Equilibrium Behavior in Queueing Systems, vol. 59 (Springer, Berlin).Google Scholar
  • Kilcioglu C, Maglaras C (2015) Revenue maximization for cloud computing services. ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Rev. 43(3):76–76.Google Scholar
  • Kilcioglu C, Rao JM (2016) Competition on price and quality in cloud computing. Proc. 25th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Geneva), 1123–1132.Google Scholar
  • Kittsteiner T, Moldovanu B (2005) Priority auctions and queue disciplines that depend on processing time. Management Sci. 51(2):236–248.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kleinrock L (1967) Optimum bribing for queue position. Oper. Res. 15(2):304–318.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Krishna V (2009) Auction Theory (Academic Press, San Diego).Google Scholar
  • Lui FT (1985) An equilibrium queuing model of bribery. J. Political Econom. 93(4):760–781.Google Scholar
  • Maglaras C, Yao J, Zeevi A (2018) Optimal price and delay differentiation in large-scale queueing systems. Management Sci. 64(5):2427–2444.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mendelson H, Whang S (1990) Optimal incentive-compatible priority pricing for the M/M/1 queue. Oper. Res. 38(5):870–883.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Microsoft (2017) Azure pricing. Accessed April 4, 2017, https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing.Google Scholar
  • Mirrlees JA (1971) An exploration in the theory of optimum income taxation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 38(2):175–208.Google Scholar
  • Mussa M, Rosen S (1978) Monopoly and product quality. J. Econom. Theory 18(2):301–317.Google Scholar
  • Myerson RB (1981) Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. 6(1):58–73.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nazerzadeh H, Randhawa R (2018) Asymptotic optimality of two service grades for customer differentiation in queueing systems. Working paper, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  • Nisan N, Roughgarden T, Tardos E, Vazirani VV (2007) Algorithmic Game Theory, vol. 1 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Palmer X (2015) [How to]: Call a cab with didi chuxing and kuaidi dache. Accessed April 4, 2017, http://www.smartshanghai.com/articles/smsh/how-to-call-a-taxi-with-didi-chuxing-and-kuaidi-dache.Google Scholar
  • Rockafellar RT (1997) Convex Analysis (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Springwise (2013) In China, cab passengers bid tips to secure a float home. Accessed April 4, 2017, https://www.springwise.com/china-taxi-passengers-bid-tips-secure-ride-home/.Google Scholar
  • Tian M (2015) Didi dache-kuaidi dache wants to do more than just drive you home. Accessed April 4, 2017, http://knowledge.ckgsb.edu.cn/2015/05/12/china-business-strategy/didi-dache-and-kuaidi-dache-to-do-more-than-just-drive-you-home/.Google Scholar
  • Van Mieghem JA (2000) Price and service discrimination in queuing systems: Incentive compatibility of gcμ scheduling. Management Sci. 46(9):1249–1267.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wang W, Li B, Liang B. (2012) Towards optimal capacity segmentation with hybrid cloud pricing. 2012 IEEE 32nd Internat. Conf. Distributed Comput. Systems (ICDCS) (IEEE, New York), 425–434.Google Scholar
  • Yahalom T, Harrison JM, Kumar S (2006) Designing and pricing incentive compatible grades of service in queueing systems. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  • Yang L, Debo L, Gupta V (2015) Trading time in a congested environment. Research Paper 15-07, University of Chicago Booth School of Business, Chicago.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.