Self-Organized Pedestrian Crowd Dynamics: Experiments, Simulations, and Design Solutions

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.1040.0108

References

  • Akçelik R. An investigation on pedestrian movement characteristics at mid-block signalised crossings. (2001) . Technical reportGoogle Scholar
  • AlGadhi S. A. H., Mahmassani H. S., Koshi M. Modelling crowd behavior and movement: Application to Makkah pilgrimage. Proc. 11th Internat. Sympos. Transportation Traffic Theory (1990) (Elsevier, New York) 59–78Google Scholar
  • AlGadhi S. A. H., Mahmassani H. S., Herman R., Schreckenberg M., Sharma S. D. A speed-concentration relation for bi-directional crowd movements with strong interaction. Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics (2002) (Springer, Berlin, Germany) 3–20Google Scholar
  • Ando K., Oto H., Aoki T. Forecasting the flow of people [in Japanese]. Railway Res. Rev. (1988) 45(8):8–13Google Scholar
  • Antonini G., Venegas S., Thiran J. P., Bierlaire M. A discrete choice pedestrian behavior model for pedestrian detection in visual tracking systems. Advanced Concepts for Intelligent Visual Systems (ACIVS 2004) (2004) Sept.(Brussels, Belgium) Google Scholar
  • Armitage A., Binnie T. D., Kerridge J., Lei L., Galea E. Measuring pedestrian trajectories with low cost infrared detectors: Preliminary results. Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2003 (2003) (CMS Press London, Greenwich, U.K.) 101–110Google Scholar
  • Batty M., Desyllas J., Duxbury E. The discrete dynamics of small-scale spatial events: Agent-based models of mobility in carnivals and street parades. Internat. J. Geographical Inform. Sci. (2003) 17(7):673–697CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boeminghaus D. Fußgängerbereiche + Gestaltungselemente (1982) (Krämer, Stuttgart, Germany) Google Scholar
  • Bolay K. Nichtlineare Phänomene in einem fluid-dynamischen Verkehrsmodell. (1998) . Master’s thesis, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  • Borgers A., Timmermans H. A model of pedestrian route choice and demand for retail facilities within inner-city shopping areas. Geographical Anal. (1986a) 18:115–128CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borgers A., Timmermans H. City centre entry points, store location patterns and pedestrian route choice behaviour: A microlevel simulation model. Socio-Econom. Planning Sci. (1986b) 20:25–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brilon W., Großmann M., Blanke H. Verfahren für die Berechnung der Leistungsfähigkeit und Qualität des Verkehrsablaufes auf Straßen. Straßenbau und Straßenverkehrstechnik (1993) (Heft 669. Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Abt. Straßenbau, Bonn, Germany) Google Scholar
  • Bryan J. L. Convergence clusters. Fire J. (1985) November):27–30Google Scholar
  • Canter D.Fires and Human Behaviour (1990) (David Fulton, London, U.K.) Google Scholar
  • Coleman J. S. Foundations of Social Theory (1990) (Belkamp, Cambridge, MA) . Chapters 9 and 33Google Scholar
  • Daamen W., Hoogendoorn S. P. Controlled experiments to derive walking behaviour. Proc. 7th TRAIL Congress (2002) (DUP Science, Delft, Germany) 115–145Google Scholar
  • Daamen W., Hoogendoorn S. P. Controlled experiments to derive walking behaviour. Eur. J. Transport Infrastructure Res. (2003a) 3(1):39–59Google Scholar
  • Daamen W., Hoogendoorn S. P. Experimental research of pedestrian walking behaviour. Transportation Res. Record (2003b) 1828:22–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Das S., Manski C. F., Manuszak M. D. Walk or wait? An empirical analysis of street crossing decisions. J. Appl. Econometrics (2004) 19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis D. G., Braaksma J. P. Adjusting for luggage-laden pedestrians in airport terminals. Transportation Res. A (1988) 22:375–388CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dzubiella J., Löwen H. Pattern formation in driven colloidal mixtures: Tilted driving forces and re-entrant crystal freezing. J. Physics: Condensed Matter (2002) 14:9383–9395CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elliott D., Smith D. Football stadia disasters in the United Kingdom: Learning from tragedy? Indust. Environ. Crisis Quart. (1993) 7(3):205–229Google Scholar
  • Escobar R., de la Rosa A. Architectural design for the survival optimization of panicking fleeing victims. 7th Eur. Conf. Artificial Life (ECAL 2003) (2003) Sept. 14–17(Dortmund, Germany) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fruin J. J. Designing for pedestrians: A level-of-service concept. (1971) 1–15Highway Research Record, Number 355: Pedestrians, Highway Research Board. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  • Galea E. R. Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics (2003) (CMS Press, London, U.K.) Google Scholar
  • Goffman E. Relations in Public: Microstudies in the Public Order (1971) (Basic, New York) Google Scholar
  • Gonzales L. Deep Survival: Who Lives, Who Dies, and Why (2003) (Norton)Google Scholar
  • Hankin B. D., Wright R. A. Passenger flow in subways. Oper. Res. Quart. (1958) 9:81–88CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hans J. Katastrophen: Wenn der Mensch den Kopf verliert. GEO (2003) 9(September):160–161Google Scholar
  • Helbing D. A mathematical model for the behavior of pedestrians. Behavioral Sci. (1991) 36:298–310CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helbing D. Stochastische Methoden, nichtlineare Dynamik und quantitative Modelle sozialer Prozesse. (1992a) . Ph.D. thesis, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  • Helbing D. A fluid-dynamic model for the movement of pedestrians. Complex Systems (1992b) 6:391–415Google Scholar
  • Helbing D. Models for pedestrian behavior. Natural Structures. Principles, Strategies, and Models in Architecture and Nature (1992c) (Sonderforschungsbereich 230, Stuttgart, Germany) 93–98Part IIGoogle Scholar
  • Helbing D. Quantitative sociodynamics. Stochastic Methods and Models of Social Interaction Processes (1995) (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, Netherlands) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helbing D. Verkehrsdynamik (1997) (Springer, Berlin, Germany) . [Traffic Dynamics]CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helbing D., Molnár P. Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. Physical Rev. E (1995) 51:4282–4286CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helbing D., Molnár P., Schweitzer F. Self-organization phenomena in pedestrian crowds. Self-Organization of Complex Structures: From Individual to Collective Dynamics (1997) (Gordon and Breach, London, U.K.) 569–577Google Scholar
  • Helbing D., Platkowski T. Self-organization in space and induced by fluctuations. Internat. J. Chaos Theory Appl. (2000) 5:25–39Google Scholar
  • Helbing D., Platkowski T. Drift- or fluctuation-induced ordering and self-organization in driven many-particle systems. Europhysics Lett. (2002) 60:227–233CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helbing D., Vicsek T. Optimal self-organization. New J. Physics (1999) 1:13.1–13.17CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helbing D., Farkas I., Vicsek T. Freezing by heating in a driven mesoscopic system. Physical Rev. Lett. (2000a) 84:1240–1243CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helbing D., Farkas I., Vicsek T. Simulating dynamical features of escape panic. Nature (2000b) 407:487–490CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helbing D., Johansson A., Buzna L. Pedestrian dynamics and evacuation: Empirical results, simulations, and design solutions. Internat. Sympos. Transportation Traffic Theory (2004) 16Submitted toGoogle Scholar
  • Helbing D., Keltsch J., Molnár P. Modelling the evolution of human trail systems. Nature (1997) 388:47–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helbing D., Farkás I. J., Molnár P., Vicsek T., Schreckenberg M., Sharma S. D. Simulation of pedestrian crowds in normal and evacuation situations. Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics (2002) (Springer, Berlin, Germany) 21–58Google Scholar
  • Helbing D., Isobe M., Nagatani T., Takimoto K. Lattice gas simulation of experimentally studied evacuation dynamics. Physical Rev. E (2003) 67:067101CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helbing D., Molnár P., Farkas I., Bolay K. Self-organizing pedestrian movement. Environ. Planning B (2001) 28:361–383CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoogendoorn S. P. Walker behaviour modelling by differential games. Proc. Comput. Physics Transport Interface Dynam. Sem (2002) (Springer, Berlin, Germany) Google Scholar
  • Hoogendoorn S. P., Bovy P. H. L., Daamen W., Schreckenberg M., Sharma S. D. Microscopic pedestrian wayfinding and dynamics modelling. Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics (2002) (Springer, Berlin, Germany) 123–154Google Scholar
  • Hoogendoorn S. P., Daamen W., Bovy P. H. L., Galea E. R. Microscopic pedestrian traffic data collection and analysis by walking experiments: Behaviour at bottlenecks. Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2003 (2003) (CMS Press, London, U.K.) 89–100Google Scholar
  • Isobe M., Helbing D., Nagatani T. Many-particle simulation of the evacuation process from a room without visibility. Physical Rev. E (2004) 69:066132CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jacobs B. D., ’t Hart P., Parker D. J., Handmer J. W. Disaster at Hillsborough Stadium: A comparative analysis. Hazard Management and Emergency Planning (1992) (James & James Science, London, U.K) . Chap. 10Google Scholar
  • Johnson N. Modeling walking behavior at the path level. (2002) . Major thesis, Department of Computer Science, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VAGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson N. R. Panic at “The Who concert stampede”: An empirical assessment. Soc. Problems (1987) 34(4):362–373CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kadanoff L. P. Simulating hydrodynamics: A pedestrian model. J. Statist. Physics (1985) 39:267–283CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keating J. P. The myth of panic. Fire J. (1982) May):57–61Google Scholar
  • Keßel A., Klüpfel H., Meyer-König T., Schreckenberg M. A concept for coupling empirical data and microscopic simulation of pedestrian flows. Proc. Internat. Conf. Monitoring Management Visitor Flows Recreational Protected Areas (2002) Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  • Kirsch H. Leistungsfähigkeit und Dimensionierung von Fußgängerwegen (1964) 33(Straßenbau und Straßenverkehrstechnik, Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Abt. Straßenbau, Bonn) Google Scholar
  • Klüpfel H., Meyer-König T., Schreckenberg M., Fukui M., Sugiyama Y., Schreckenberg M., Wolf D. E. Microscopic modelling of pedestrian motion—Comparison of an evacuation exercise in a primary school to simulation results. Traffic and Granular Flow ’01 (2003) (Springer, Berlin, Germany) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • LeBon G. The Crowd (1960) (Viking, New York) Google Scholar
  • Masoud O., Papanikolopoulos N. P. A robust real-time multi-level model-based pedestrian tracking system. Proc. ITS America 7th Annual Meeting (1997) Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer-König T., Klüpfel H., Schreckenberg M., Schreckenberg M., Sharma S. D. Assessment and analysis of evacuation processes on passenger ships by microscopic simulation. Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics(PED) (2002) (Springer, Berlin, Germany) 297–302Google Scholar
  • Miller D. L. Introduction to Collective Behavior (1985) (Wadsworth, Belmont, CA) . Fig. 3.3 and Chap. 9Google Scholar
  • Mintz A. Non-adaptive group behavior. J. Abnormal Normal Soc. Psych. (1951) 46:150–159CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Molnár P. Modellierung und Simulation der Dynamik von Fußgängerströmen (1996a) (Shaker, Aachen, Germany) Google Scholar
  • Molnár P, Doran J., Gilbert N., Mueller U., Troitzsch K. Microsimulation of pedestrian dynamics. Social Science Microsimulation (1996b) (Springer, Berlin, Germany) Google Scholar
  • Murakami Y., Minami K., Kawasoe T., Ishida T. Multi-agent simulation for crisis management. Knowledge Media Networking (KMN ’02) (2002) Kyoto, Japan:135–139CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nagatani T., Takimoto K., Isobe M., Helbing D. Evacuation process from a room with two exits. (2003) . Working paper, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Division of Thermal Science, University of Shizuoka, Hamamatsu, JapanGoogle Scholar
  • Pauls J. The movement of people in buildings and design solutions for means of egress. Fire Tech. (1984) 20:27–47CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Predtetschenski W. M., Milinski A. I.Personenströme in Gebäuden—Berechnungsmethoden für die Projektierung (1971) (Rudolf Müller, Köln-Braunsfeld, Germany) Google Scholar
  • Quarantelli E. The behavior of panic participants. Sociology Soc. Res. (1957) 41:187–194Google Scholar
  • Quinn M. J., Metoyer R. A., Hunter-Zaworski K., Galea E. R. Parallel implementation of the social forces model. Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2003 (2003) (CMS Press, London, U.K.) 63–74Google Scholar
  • Rigoll G., Eickeler S., Yalcin I. K. Performance of the Duisburg statistical object tracker on test data for PETS2000. Performance Evaluation of Tracking and Surveillance (PETS 2000). Proc. IEEE (2000) Google Scholar
  • Ristow G. H., Herrmann H. J. Density patterns in two-dimensional hoppers. Physical Rev. E (1994) 50:R5–CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saloma C., Perez G. J., Tapang G., Lim M., Palmes-Saloma C. Self-organized queuing and scale-free behavior in real escape panic. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA (PNAS) (2003) 100(21):11947–11952CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schubert H. Planungsmaßnahmen für den Fußgängerverkehr in den Städten. Straßenbau und Straßenverkehrstechnik (1967) (Heft 56. Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Abt. Straßenbau, Bonn, Germany) Google Scholar
  • Smith R. A., Dickie J. F.Engineering for Crowd Safety (1993) (Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
  • Stanley H. E., Ostrowsky N.On Growth and Form (1986) (Martinus Nijhoff, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Teknomo K. Microscopic pedestrian flow characteristics: Development of an image processing data collection and simulation model. (2002) . Ph.D. dissertation, Tohoku University, JapanGoogle Scholar
  • Teknomo K., Takeyama Y., Inamura H. Determination of pedestrian flow performance based on video tracking and microscopic simulations. Proc. Infrastructure Planning Conf. (2000) 23(1(Ashikaga, Japan)639–642Google Scholar
  • To K., Lai P.-Y., Pak H. K. Jamming of granular flow in a two-dimensional hopper. Physical Rev. Lett. (2000) 86:71–74CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Transportation Research Board Highway capacity manual. (1985) . Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  • Virkler M. R., Elayadath S., Akçelik R. Pedestrian density characteristics and shockwaves. Proc. 2nd Internat. Sympos. Highway Capacity (1994) 2(Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.) 671–684Google Scholar
  • Waldau N. Massenpanik in Gebäuden: Grundlagen und Simulationsmodelle, Planungskriterien zur Orientierung in Gebäuden bei steigender Stressbelastung. (2002) . Diploma thesis, Technische Universität Wien, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  • Werner T., Helbing D., Galea E. R. The social force pedestrian model applied to real life scenarios. Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2003 (2003) (CMS Press, London, U.K.) 17–26Google Scholar
  • Whyte W. H. City. Rediscovering the Center (1988) (Doubleday, New York)Google Scholar
  • Willis A., Kukla R., Hine J., Kerridge J. Developing the behavioural rules for an agent-based model of pedestrian movement. Twenty-fifth Eur. Transport Congress (2000) (Cambridge, U.K)Google Scholar
  • Wolf D. E., Grassberger P.Friction, Arching, Contact Dynamics (1997) (World Scientific, Singapore) Google Scholar
  • Xiang Z., Wai F. K., Chor C. H. Pedestrian speed-flow model on escalators and staircases in Singapore MRT stations. (2003) Google Scholar
  • Yin J. H., Velastin S. A., Davies A. C. Image processing techniques for crowd density estimation using a reference image. Proc. 2nd Asia-Pacific Conf. Comput. Vision (1995) 3:6–10Google Scholar
  • Yoshida K., Murayama M., Itakaki T. Study on evaluation of escape route in passenger ships by evacuation simulation and full-scale trials. Proc. 9th Interflame Conf. (2001) Edinburgh, ScotlandGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.