A Policy-Sensitive Model of Parking Choice for Commercial Vehicles in Urban Areas

References

• Amer A, Chow JY (2017) A downtown on-street parking model with urban truck delivery behavior. Transportation Res. Part A: Policy Practice 102:51–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• American Transportation Research Institute (2018) Critical issues in the trucking industry. Report, American Transportation Research Institute, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
• Anderson CM, Das C, Tyrrell TJ (2006) Parking preferences among tourists in Newport, Rhode Island. Transportation Res. Part A: Policy Practice 40(4):334–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arnott R, Inci E (2006) An integrated model of downtown parking and traffic congestion. J. Urban Econom. 60(3):418–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Axhausen KW, Polak JW (1991) Choice of parking: Stated preference approach. Transportation 18(1):59–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva ME, Lerman SR (1985) Discrete Choice Analysis (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Benenson I, Martens K, Birfir S (2008) PARKAGENT: An agent-based model of parking in the city. Comput. Environ. Urban Systems 32(6):431–439.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bierlaire M (2016) PythonBiogeme: A short introduction. Technical report, Transport and Mobility Laboratory, School of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, Lausanne.Google Scholar
• Brom M, Gonzales C, Holguín-Veras J, Collura J (2009) Congestion: Are ports the one to blame for urban congestion? Presentation, 3rd METRANS National Urban Freight Conference, October 21, Long Beach, CA.Google Scholar
• Chaniotakis E, Pel AJ (2015) Drivers’ parking location choice under uncertain parking availability and search times: A stated preference experiment. Transportation Res. Part A: Policy Practice 82:228–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterjee A, Cohen H (2004) Accounting for commercial vehicles in urban transportation models. Technical report, Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Chen Q, Conway A (2016) Commercial vehicle parking availability and behaviour for residential delivery in New York City. Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting (Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Conte A, Scarsini M, Sürücü O (2016) The impact of time limitation: Insights from a queueing experiment. Judgment Decision Making 11(3):260–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dablanc L, Beziat A (2015) Parking for freight vehicles in dense urban centers: The issue of delivery areas in Paris. Technical report, French Institute of Science and Technology for Transport, Development and Networks IFSTTAR, Marne la Vallee, France.Google Scholar
• Dalla Chiara G (2018) Commercial vehicles parking in congested urban areas. PhD thesis, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore.Google Scholar
• Dalla Chiara G, Cheah L (2017) Data stories from urban loading bays. Eur. Trans. Res. Rev. 9:Article 50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dell’Olio L, Moura JL, Ibeas A, Cordera R, Holguín-veras J (2017) Receivers’ willingness-to-adopt novel urban goods distribution practices. Transportation Res. Part A: Policy Practice 102:130–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Euromonitor International (2016) Retailing in Singapore. Technical Report, Euromonitor International, London.Google Scholar
• Gao J, Ozbay K (2016) Modeling double parking impacts on urban street. Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting, vol. 12 (Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Gatta V, Marcucci E (2016) Behavioural implications of non-linear effects on urban freight transport policies: The case of retailers and transport providers in Rome. Case Stud. Transport Policy 4(1):22–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gillen DW (1978) Parking policy, parking location decisions and the distribution of congestion. Transportation 7(1):69–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golias J, Yannis G, Harvatis M (2002) Off-Street parking choice sensitivity. Transportation Planning Tech. 25(4):333–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guevara C, Ben-Akiva ME (2006) Endogeneity in residential location choice models. Transportation Res. Record: J. Transportation Res. Board 1977:60–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Habib KM, Morency C, Trépanier M (2012) Integrating parking behaviour in activity-based travel demand modelling: Investigation of the relationship between parking type choice and activity scheduling process. Transportation Res. Part A: Policy Practice 46(1):154–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Han L, Chin SM, Franzese O, Hwang H (2005) Estimating the impact of pickup- and delivery-related illegal parking activities on traffic. Transportation Res. Record: J. Transportation Res. Board 1906:49–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hensher DA, King J (2001) Parking demand and responsiveness to supply, pricing and location in the Sydney central business district. Transportation Res. Part A: Policy Practice 35(3):177–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hess S, Polak JW (2004) An analysis of parking behaviour using discrete choice models calibrated on SP datasets. Working paper, Imperial College London, London.Google Scholar
• Hickman AJ (1999) Methodology for calculating transport emissions and energy consumption. Technical Report SE/491/98, Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, UK.Google Scholar
• Hilvert O, Toledo T, Bekhor S (2012) Framework and model for parking decisions. Transportation Res. Record: J. Transportation Res. Board 2319:30–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holguín-Veras J, Aros-Vera F, Browne M (2015) Agent interactions and the response of supply chains to pricing and incentives. Econom. Transportation 4(3):147–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holguín-Veras J, Silas M, Polimeni J, Cruz B (2008) An investigation on the effectiveness of joint receiver–carrier policies to increase truck traffic in the off-peak hours. Part II: the behaviour of carriers. Networks Spatial Econom. 8(4):327–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hunt JD, Teply S (1993) A nested logit model of parking location choice. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 27(4):253–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibeas Á, Dell’Olio L, Bordagaray M, Ortúzar Jd D (2014) Modelling parking choices considering user heterogeneity. Transportation Res. Part A: Policy Practice 70:41–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iwan S, Kijewska K, Johansen BG, Eidhammer O, Malecki K, Konicki W, Thompson RG (2018) Analysis of the environmental impacts of unloading bays based on cellular automata simulation. Transportation Res. Part D: Transportation Environ. 61(Part A):104–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaller M, Holguín-Veras J, Hodge S (2013) Parking in the city. Transportation Res. Record: J. Transportation Res. Board 2379:46–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaller M, Wang XC, Holguín-Veras J (2015) Large urban freight traffic generators: Opportunities for city logistics initiatives. J. Transport Land Use 8(1):51–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kawamura K, Sriraj P, Surat H, Menninger M (2014) Analysis of factors that affect the frequency of truck parking violations in urban areas. Transportation Res. Record: J. Transportation Res. Board 2411:20–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kobus MB, Gutiérrez-i Puigarnau E, Rietveld P, Van Ommeren JN (2013) The on-street parking premium and car drivers’ choice between street and garage parking. Regional Sci. Urban Econom. 43(2):395–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lam WH, Li ZC, Huang HJ, Wong SC (2006) Modeling time-dependent travel choice problems in road networks with multiple user classes and multiple parking facilities. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 40(5):368–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lambe TA (1996) Driver choice of parking in the city. Socio-Econom. Planning Sci. 30(3):207–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Law AM (2015) Simulation Modeling and Analysis, 5th ed. (McGraw Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Musalem A, Olivares M, Schilkrut A (2013) Measuring the effect of queues on customer purchases. Management Sci. 59(8):1743–1763.Link, Google Scholar
• Manski CF, Lerman SR (1977) The estimation of choice probabilities from choice based samples. Econometrica 45(8):1977–1988.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marcucci E, Gatta V, Scaccia L (2015) Urban freight, parking and pricing policies: An evaluation from a transport providers’ perspective. Transportation Res. Part A: Policy Practice 74:239–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Millard-Ball A, Weinberger RR, Hampshire RC (2014) Is the curb 80% full or 20% empty? Assessing the impacts of San Francisco’s parking pricing experiment. Transportation Res. Part A: Policy Practice 63:76–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nourinejad M, Wenneman A, Habib KMN, Roorda MJ (2014) Truck parking in urban areas: Application of choice modelling within traffic microsimulation. Transportation Res. Part A: Policy Practice 64:54–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ottosson DB, Chen C, Wang T, Lin H (2013) The sensitivity of on-street parking demand in response to price changes: A case study in Seattle, WA. Transport Policy 25:222–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petrin A, Train KE (2010) A control function approach to endogeneity in consumer choice models. J. Marketing Res. 47(1):3–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qin H, Gao J, Zhang G, Chen Y, Wu S (2017) Nested logit model formation to analyze airport parking behavior based on stated preference survey studies. J. Air Transport Management 58:164–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quak HJH, de Koster MRBM (2009) Delivering goods in urban areas: how to deal with urban policy restrictions and the environment. Transportation Sci. 43(2):211–227.Link, Google Scholar
• San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (2011) SF park: Putting theory into practice. Report, San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, San Francisco.Google Scholar
• Shoup DC (2006) Cruising for parking. Transport Policy 13(6):479–486.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singapore Government (1995) Parking Places Act: Parking Places (Provision of Parking Places and Parking Spaces) Rules, Chapter 214, Section 8(1)(b).Google Scholar
• Singapore Land Transport Authority (2015) Singapore land transport statistics in brief. Technical report, Land and Transport Authority, Singapore.Google Scholar
• Singapore Land Transport Authority (2017) Motor vehicle population by type of vehicles. Technical report, LTA Customer Services Division, Singapore.Google Scholar
• Soto JJ, Márquez L, Macea LF (2018) Accounting for attitudes on parking choice: An integrated choice and latent variable approach. Transportation Res. Part A: Policy Practice 111:65–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stekhoven DJ, Buhlmann P (2012) MissForest—non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data. Bioinformatics 28(1):112–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun X, Ding J, Dalla Chiara G, Cheah L, Cheung N-M (2017) A generic framework for monitoring local freight traffic movements using computer vision-based techniques. 5th IEEE Internat. Conf. Models Tech. Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 63–68.Google Scholar
• Train KE (2003) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Triantafyllou M, Cherrett TJ, Browne M (2014) Urban freight consolidation centers. Transportation Res. Record: J. Transportation Res. Board 2411:34–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ucar I, Smeets B, Azcorra A (2019) simmer: Discrete-event simulation for R. J. Statist. Software 90(2):1–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Der Goot D (1982) A model to describe the choice of parking places. Transportation Res. Part A: General 16(2):109–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waraich R, Axhausen KW (2012) Agent-based parking choice model. Transportation Res. Record: J. Transportation Res. Board 2319:39–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zannat KE, Ahmed T, Mitra SK, Rafiq R, Hasan MA, Akhter K, Fahad ZH (2013) Parking demand and supply analysis of major shopping centers in Dhaka: A case study of new market shopping center along Mirpur Road. J. Bangladesh Institute Planners 6:161–172.Google Scholar