Estimating and Mitigating the Congestion Effect of Curbside Pick-ups and Drop-Offs: A Causal Inference Approach

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2022.0195

References

  • Abrevaya J, Hsu YC, Lieli RP (2015) Estimating conditional average treatment effects. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 33(4):485–505.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal S, Mani D, Telang R (2023) The impact of ride-hailing services on congestion: Evidence from Indian cities. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 25(3):862–883.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ahmed MM, Ghasemzadeh A (2018) The impacts of heavy rain on speed and headway behaviors: An investigation using the SHRP2 naturalistic driving study data. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 91:371–384.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anurag K, Kalin P, Mohammadreza K, Pragun V, Arun K (2019) Mind the curb: Findings from commercial vehicle curb usage in California. Transportation Research Board (TRB) 98th Annual Meeting (Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Arnott R, Rowse J (2013) Curbside parking time limits. Transportation Res. Part A Policy Practice 55:89–110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Babar Y, Burtch G (2020) Examining the heterogeneous impact of ride-hailing services on public transit use. Inform. Systems Res. 31(3):820–834.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Beirigo BA, Schulte F, Negenborn RR (2022) A learning-based optimization approach for autonomous ridesharing platforms with service-level contracts and on-demand hiring of idle vehicles. Transportation Sci. 56(3):677–703.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Beojone CV, Geroliminis N (2021) On the inefficiency of ride-sourcing services toward urban congestion. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 124:102890.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burtch G, Carnahan S, Greenwood BN (2018) Can you gig it? An empirical examination of the gig economy and entrepreneurial activity. Management Sci. 64(12):5497–5520.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Butrina P, Le Vine S, Henao A, Sperling J, Young SE (2020) Municipal adaptation to changing curbside demands: Exploratory findings from semi-structured interviews with ten US cities. Transportation Policy 92:1–7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Castiglione J, Chang T, Cooper D, Hobson J, Logan W, Young E, Charlton B, et al. (2016) TNCs Today: A Profile of San Francisco Transportation Network Company Activity (San Francisco County Transportation Authority, San Francisco).Google Scholar
  • Castiglione J, Cooper D, Sana B, Tischler D, Chang T, Erhardt GD, Roy S, Chen M, Mucci A (2018) TNCs & congestion. San Francisco County Transportation Authority, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  • Chai H, Rodier C, Song J, Zhang M, Jaller M (2020) Automated vehicles and central business district parking: The effects of drop-off-travel on traffic flow and vehicle emissions [supporting data set]. UC Davis, National Center for Sustainable Transportation, Davis, CA.Google Scholar
  • Chernozhukov V, Chetverikov D, Demirer M, Duflo E, Hansen C, Newey W (2017) Double/debiased/Neyman machine learning of treatment effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(5):261–265.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chernozhukov V, Chetverikov D, Demirer M, Duflo E, Hansen C, Newey W, Robins J (2018) Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters. Econometrics J. 21(1):C1–C68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chung HD, Zhou YM, Ethiraj S (2023) Platform governance in the presence of within-complementor interdependencies: Evidence from the rideshare industry. Management Sci. 70(2):799–814.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Covert TR, Sweeney RL (2023) Relinquishing riches: Auctions vs. informal negotiations in Texas oil and gas leasing. Amer. Econom. Rev. 113(3):628–663.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dong T, Luo Q, Xu Z, Yin Y, Wang J (2022) Strategic driver repositioning in ride-hailing networks with dual sourcing. Preprint, submitted February 21, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4040164.Google Scholar
  • Dube A, Jacobs J, Naidu S, Suri S (2020) Monopsony in online labor markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. Insights 2(1):33–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ellickson PB, Kar W, Reeder JC III (2023) Estimating marketing component effects: Double machine learning from targeted digital promotions. Marketing Sci. 42(4):704–728.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Erhardt GD, Roy S, Cooper D, Sana B, Chen M, Castiglione J (2019) Do transportation network companies decrease or increase congestion? Sci. Adv. 5(5):eaau2670.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Golias I, Karlaftis M (2001) The taxi market in Athens, Greece, and its impacts on urban traffic. Transp. Quart. 55(1):63–71.Google Scholar
  • Goodchild A, MacKenzie D, Ranjbari A, Machado J, Chiara GD (2019) Curb allocation change project. Final report, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
  • Gordon BR, Moakler R, Zettelmeyer F (2023) Close enough? A large-scale exploration of non-experimental approaches to advertising measurement. Marketing Sci. 42(4):768–793.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwood BN, Wattal S (2017) Show me the way to go home: An empirical investigation of ride-sharing and alcohol related motor vehicle fatalities. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 41(1):163–187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Han LD, Chin SM, Franzese O, Hwang H (2005) Estimating the impact of pickup-and delivery-related illegal parking activities on traffic. Transportation Res. Record 1906(1):49–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman JH, Friedman JH (2009) The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, vol. 2 (Springer, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • He F, Yan X, Liu Y, Ma L (2016) A traffic congestion assessment method for urban road networks based on speed performance index. Procedia Engrg. 137:425–433.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iqbal M (2019) Uber revenue and usage statistics. Accessed December 12, 2023, https://www.businessofapps.com/data/uber-statistics/.Google Scholar
  • Jaller M, Rodier C, Zhang M, Lin H, Lewis K (2021) Fighting for curb space: Parking, ride-hailing, urban freight deliveries, and other users. UC Davis, National Center for Sustainable Transportation, Davis, CA.Google Scholar
  • Kallus N (2023) Treatment effect risk: Bounds and inference. Management Sci. 69(8):4363–4971.Google Scholar
  • Kim T, Sharda S, Zhou X, Pendyala RM (2020) A stepwise interpretable machine learning framework using linear regression (LR) and long short-term memory (LSTM): Citywide demand-side prediction of yellow taxi and for-hire vehicle (FHV) service. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 120:102786.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Künzel SR, Sekhon JS, Bickel PJ, Yu B (2019) Metalearners for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects using machine learning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116(10):4156–4165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu J, Ma W, Qian S (2023) Optimal curbside pricing for managing ride-hailing pickups and drop-offs. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 146:103960.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu W, Zhang F, Yang H (2021) Modeling and managing the joint equilibrium of destination and parking choices under hybrid supply of curbside and shared parking. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 130:103301.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lu R (2019) Pushed from the curb: Optimizing curb space for use for ride-sourcing vehicles. Transportation Research Board (TRB) 98th Annual Meeting (Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Ma W, Qian S (2020) Measuring and reducing the disequilibrium levels of dynamic networks with ride-sourcing vehicle data. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 110:222–246.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ma W, Qian ZS (2018) Estimating multi-year 24/7 origin-destination demand using high-granular multi-source traffic data. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 96:96–121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ma W, Pi X, Qian S (2020) Estimating multi-class dynamic origin-destination demand through a forward-backward algorithm on computational graphs. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 119:102747.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manzoor E, Chen GH, Lee D, Smith MD (2023) Influence via ethos: On the persuasive power of reputation in deliberation online. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print May 8, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4762.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McCormack E, Goodchild A, Sheth M, Hurwitz D, Jashami H, Cobb DP (2019) Developing design guidelines for commercial vehicle envelopes on urban streets. Pacific Northwest Transportation Consortium, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
  • Mitman MF, Davis S, Armet IB, Knopf E (2018) Curbside management practitioners guide. Technical report, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Morgan SL, Winship C (2015) Counterfactuals and Causal Inference (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Oprescu M, Syrgkanis V, Wu ZS (2019) Orthogonal random forest for causal inference. Internat. Conf. Machine Learning (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 4932–4941.Google Scholar
  • Park S, Tafti A, Shmueli G (2023) Transporting causal effects across populations using structural causal modeling: An illustration to work-from-home productivity. Inform. Systems Res., ePub ahead of print August 9, https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2023.1236.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pearl J (2000) Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Pearl J (2009) Causality (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearl J (2019) The seven tools of causal inference, with reflections on machine learning. Commun. AC. 62(3):54–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearl J, Bareinboim E (2022) External validity: From do-calculus to transportability across populations. Probabilistic and Causal Inference: The Works of Judea Pearl (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 451–482.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rahaim J (2019) Transportation impact analysis guidelines. Technical report, San Francisco Planning Department, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  • Retallack AE, Ostendorf B (2019) Current understanding of the effects of congestion on traffic accidents. Internat. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16(18):3400.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rong L, Cheng H, Wang J (2017) Taxi call prediction for online taxicab platforms. Asia-Pacific Web (APWeb) Web-Age Inform. Management (WAIM) Joint Conf. Web Big Data (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 214–224.Google Scholar
  • Schaller B, Maguire T, Stein D, Ng W, Blakeley M (2011) Parking pricing and curbside management in New York City. Technical report, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Smith A, Wylie A, Salzberg A, Womeldorff E, Rubendall G, Ballus-Armet I (2019) A data driven approach to understanding and planning for curb space utility. Technical report, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Spirtes P (2010) Introduction to causal inference. J. Machine Learning Res. 11(54), 1643–1662.Google Scholar
  • Tafti A, Shmueli G (2020) Beyond overall treatment effects: Leveraging covariates in randomized experiments guided by causal structure. Inform. Systems Res. 31(4):1183–1199.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tan W, Zhang J (2021) Good days, bad days: Stock market fluctuation and taxi tipping decisions. Management Sci. 67(6):3965–3984.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tirachini A (2020) Ride-hailing, travel behaviour and sustainable mobility: An international review. Transportation 47(4):2011–2047.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wager S, Athey S (2018) Estimation and inference of heterogeneous treatment effects using random forests. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 113(523):1228–1242.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wijayaratna S (2015) Impacts of on-street parking on road capacity. Australasian Transport Res. Forum 2015 Proc. (Australasian Transport Res. Forum, Canberra, Australia), 1–15.Google Scholar
  • Xu Y, Ghose A, Xiao B (2023) Mobile payment adoption: An empirical investigation of Alipay. Inform. Systems Res., ePub ahead of print July 7, https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.0156.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Xu Z, Yin Y, Zha L (2017) Optimal parking provision for ride-sourcing services. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 105:559–578.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xu Z, Chen Z, Yin Y, Ye J (2021) Equilibrium analysis of urban traffic networks with ride-sourcing services. Transportation Sci. 55(6):1260–1279.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yao L, Chu Z, Li S, Li Y, Gao J, Zhang A (2021) A survey on causal inference. ACM Trans. Knowledge Discovery Data 15(5):1–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yao L, Li S, Li Y, Xue H, Gao J, Zhang A (2019) On the estimation of treatment effect with text covariates. Internat. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence. (International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, California).Google Scholar
  • Yuan K, Knoop VL, Hoogendoorn SP (2015) Capacity drop: Relationship between speed in congestion and the queue discharge rate. Transportation Res. Record 2491(1):72–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zalewski AJ, Buckley SM, Weinberger RR (2012) Regulating curb space: Developing a framework to understand and improve curbside management, Technical report, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Zhang K, Nie YM (2022) Mitigating traffic congestion induced by transportation network companies: A policy analysis. Transportation Res. Part A Policy Practice 159:96–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang Y, Li B, Qian S (2023) Ridesharing and digital resilience for urban anomalies: Evidence from the New York City taxi market. Inform. Systems Res. 34(4):1775–1790.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang K, Mittal A, Djavadian S, Twumasi-Boakye R, Nie YM (2023) Ride-hail vehicle routing (river) as a congestion game. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 177:102819.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.