National Airspace Sector Occupancy and Conflict Analysis Models for Evaluating Scenarios under the Free-Flight Paradigm

References

• Brooker P. Aircraft Separation Assurance: Systems Design. J. Air Nav. (1982) 36:28–35Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corker K., Pisanich G., Bunzo M. A Cognitive System Model for Human/Automation Dynamics in Airspace Management. Proc. First European/U.S. Symposium on Air Traffic Management (1997) Saclay, France(June):16–19Google Scholar
• CSSI Corporation Find Crossings—User's Manual. (1996) March(Washington, D.C)Google Scholar
• Federal Aviation Administration 1997 Aviation System Capacity Plan. (1997) September(Washington, D.C.). Office of System Capacity and RequirementsGoogle Scholar
• Federal Aviation Administration/Eurocontrol A Concept Paper for Separation Safety Modeling. (1998) May(Washington, D.C.)Google Scholar
• Ford R. L. On the Use of Height Rules in Off-Route Airspace. J. Air Nav. (1982) 36:269–287Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodwin J. L., Ford R. L. Random Air Traffic Generation. J. Air Nav. (1984) 38:219–233Google Scholar
• Harrison D., Moek G. European Studies to Investigate the Feasibility of Using 1000-ft Vertical Separation Minima Above FL 290; Part II: Precision Radar Data Analysis and Collision Risk Assessment. J. Air Nav. (1988) 45:91–106Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hilburn B. G., Baker M. W. P., Pakela W. D., Parasuramam R. The Effect of Free-Flight on Air Traffic Control Mental Workload, Monitoring and System Performance. Proc. 10th International CEAS Conference on Free-Flight (1997) AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
• Hsu D. A. A Theoretical Framework for Analysis of Lateral Position Errors in VOR Jet Route Systems. J. Air Nav. (1982) 36:263–268Google Scholar
• Laudeman I. V., Palmer E. A. Quantitative Measurement of Observed Workload in the Analysis of Aircrew Performance. Int. J. Aviation Psychol. (1995) 5:187–197Crossref, Google Scholar
• Machol R. E. Thirty Years of Modeling Midair Collisions. Interfaces (1995) 25:151–172Link, Google Scholar
• Magill S. A. N. The Effect of Direct Routing on ATC Capacity. 2nd USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R & D Seminar (1998) December(Orlando, FL)Google Scholar
• MATHWORKS INC. Matlab 5.2 Users Manual. (1997) (Natick, MA)Google Scholar
• Nagaoka S. Effects of Measurement Errors in Estimating the Probability of Vertical Overlap. J. Air Nav. (1984) 38:235–243Google Scholar
• Office Of Technology Assessment Safe Skies for Tomorrow: Aviation Safety in a Competitive Environment. (1988) (Washington, D.C.). OTA-SET-381. U.S. Government Printing Office, JulyGoogle Scholar
• Polhemus N. W., Livingston D. Characterizing Cross-Track Error Distributions for Continental Jet Routes. J. Air Nav. (1981) 34:134–141Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe S., Ford R. L. Conflicts Between Random Flights in a Given Area. J. Air Nav. (1982) 35:47–71Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reich P. G. Analysis of Long-Range Air Traffic Systems: Separation Standards I. J. Inst. Nav. (1966) 19:88–98Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sherali H. D., Trani A. A., Sale S., Smith J. C. Development of Airspace Sector and Encounter Models to Support the Analysis of Aircraft Separation and Collision Risk. (1998) November). NEXTOR Research Report RR-98-16, submitted to the FAA Office of Operations Research and Investment Analysis under the FAA Research Grant Number 96-C-001, Department of Civil Engineering/Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityGoogle Scholar
• Smith K., Scallen S. F., Knecht W., Hancock P. An Index of Dynamic Density. J. Human Fact.Soc. (1998) 20:69–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snedecor G. W., Cochran W. G. Statistical Methods. (1980) (Ames, IA)Google Scholar
• Suchkov A., Embt D., Colligan W. Dynamic Density Study. (1997) December(CSSI Corporation)Google Scholar
• Ten-Have J. M., Harrison D., Cox M. E. European Studies to Investigate the Feasibility of Using 1000 ft Vertical Separation Minima Above FL 290. Part III: Further Results and Overall Conclusions. J. Air Nav. (1988) 46:245–261Google Scholar
• Tomlin C., Pappas G. J., Sastry S. Conflict Resolution for Air Traffic Management: A Study in Multiagent Hybrid Systems. IEEE Trans. Automatic Contr. (1998) 43:509–521Crossref, Google Scholar
• WYNDEMERE, INC. An Evaluation of Air Traffic Control Complexity. (1996) October). Final report for Contract Number NAS2-14284Google Scholar