Request Username
Can't sign in? Forgot your username?
Enter your email address below and we will send you your username
Clear and consistent mathematical notation improves readability, supports accurate peer review and production, and helps readers understand and reproduce scholarly work. Authors are encouraged to select notation and mathematical expressions that communicate ideas as clearly and efficiently as possible.
These recommendations are intended to supplement Preparing Manuscript & Figure Files. Authors should additionally consult journal-specific submission guidelines before finalizing a submission.
Mathematical notation should prioritize clarity, consistency, and readability.
Authors are encouraged to:
Notation should support the communication of ideas rather than maximize compactness or symbolic density.
Mathematical notation should remain consistent across the main text, appendices, tables, figures, algorithms, and supplementary materials.
For manuscripts containing substantial mathematical content, authors are encouraged to prepare submissions in LaTeX whenever practical.
INFORMS manuscript templates and class files are available to support consistent manuscript preparation and formatting.
Variables are generally set in italic type, while mathematical operators, function names, abbreviations, and descriptive subscripts are typically set in upright (roman) type.
Vectors are typically presented in boldface type to distinguish them from scalar variables.
Authors should:
Single-letter variables are often preferable for readability, particularly in dense mathematical expressions. However, descriptive multi-character notation may be appropriate when it improves clarity or reflects standard usage within a field.
When multi-word notation is necessary, authors are encouraged to use consistent conventions that clearly distinguish variables from ordinary text.
Greek letters and specialized mathematical symbols should be selected carefully to avoid ambiguity or visual confusion.
Authors should pay particular attention to:
Care should be taken to distinguish visually similar characters and symbols, such as lowercase “l” and the numeral “1,” uppercase “O” and the numeral “0,” or Greek and Latin characters with similar appearance.
Equations should be presented in a manner that supports readability and logical flow.
Long or complex expressions should generally be displayed separately from the surrounding paragraph text rather than embedded inline.
Displayed equations should:
Displayed equations that form part of a sentence should be punctuated consistently with the surrounding grammatical structure.
Authors are encouraged to simplify lengthy expressions when appropriate by introducing auxiliary notation or intermediate definitions.
Inline mathematical expressions should be kept concise whenever possible.
Complex fractions, exponents, or nested expressions that interrupt reading flow may be clearer when reformulated or displayed separately.
Authors should avoid beginning sentences with mathematical notation or symbols whenever possible. Rewriting the sentence structure often improves readability and accessibility.
Authors are encouraged to number only equations that are referenced or discussed elsewhere in the manuscript. Equation numbering should be applied consistently throughout the manuscript.
Standard mathematical operators and function names (for example, log, ln, exp, sin, max, min, Pr, and Cov) should be clearly distinguished from variables.
Authors should ensure that custom operators, abbreviations, optimization problem labels, and other specialized notation are introduced consistently and defined when first used.
Algorithms and pseudocode should be formatted consistently and presented in a readable structure with clear indentation, notation, and labeling conventions.
Authors are encouraged to use notation and formatting that remain understandable in both print and digital publication formats.
INFORMS encourages authors to prepare mathematical content in ways that improve readability and accessibility for all readers, including readers using assistive technologies.
To improve accessibility, authors should:
Dense notation should be introduced progressively to support readability in both visual and assistive reading environments.
Additional accessibility guidance is available in Preparing Manuscript & Figure Files.
Because abstracts are widely distributed through indexing and metadata systems, authors should avoid mathematical notation in abstracts whenever possible.
If formulas or symbols are necessary, their use should be kept concise and limited to essential content.
The reuse of commonly accepted notation, terminology, algorithms, and standard methodological frameworks is generally appropriate within scholarly communication, and reuse of notation for consistency is encouraged.
However, authors should appropriately acknowledge prior sources when mathematical models, analytical methods, proofs, algorithms, or conceptual frameworks originate from prior work and are not widely regarded as common knowledge within the field.
Changing notation or terminology does not eliminate the obligation to provide attribution where substantive intellectual contributions originate elsewhere.
Authors should clearly indicate whether a model, algorithm, proof, or other analytical contribution originates from prior literature or represents an original contribution of the submitted work.
Additional guidance is available in Originality, Attribution & Copyright.
Certain journals or article types may have additional expectations regarding mathematical presentation, notation, appendices, or equation formatting.
For example, some journals may:
Authors should consult the journal-specific submission guidelines for additional requirements.
September 2, 2026.