Leveraging User-Generated Content for Product Promotion: The Effects of Firm-Highlighted Reviews

References

• Alba JW, Broniarczyk SM, Shimp TA, Urbany JE (1994) The influence of prior beliefs, frequency cues, and magnitude cues on consumers’ perceptions of comparative price data. J. Consumer Res. 21(2):219–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson NH (1965) Primacy effects in personality impression formation using a generalized order effect paradigm. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 2(1):1–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Awad NF, Ragowsky A (2008) Establishing trust in electronic commerce though online word of mouth: An examination across genders. J. Management Inform. Systems 24(2):101–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Basuroy S, Chatterjee S, Ravid SA (2003) How critical are critical reviews? The box office effects of film critics, star power, and budgets. J. Marketing 67(4):103–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boehler CN, Appelbaum LG, Krebs RM, Chen L-C, Woldorff MG (2011) The role of stimulus salience and attentional capture across the neural hierarchy in a stop-signal task. PLoS ONE 6(10):e26386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boerman SC, Van Reijmersdal EA, Neijens PC (2012) Sponsorship disclosure: Effects of duration on persuasion knowledge and brand responses. J. Comm. 62(6):1047–1064.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boerman SC, Willemsen LM, Van Der Aa EP (2017) ‘This post is sponsored’ effects of sponsorship disclosure on persuasion knowledge and electronic word of mouth in the context of Facebook. J. Interactive Marketing 38:82–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boush DM, Friestad M, Rose GM (1994) Adolescent skepticism toward TV advertising and knowledge of advertiser tactics. J. Consumer Res. 21(1):165–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown CL, Krishna A (2004) The skeptical shopper: A metacognitive account for the effects of default options on choice. J. Consumer Res. 31(3):529–539.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell MC, Kirmani A (2000) Consumers’ use of persuasion knowledge: The effects of accessibility and cognitive capacity on perceptions of an influence agent. J. Consumer Res. 27(1):69–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell MC, Mohr GS, Verlegh PWJ (2013) Can disclosures lead consumers to resist covert persuasion? The important roles of disclosure timing and type of response. J. Consumer Psych. 23(4):483–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chaiken S, Maheswaran D (1994) Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 66(3):460–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Xie J (2008) Online consumer review: A new element of marketing communications mix. Management Sci. 54(3):477–491.Link, Google Scholar
• Chevalier JA, Mayzlin D (2006) The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. 43(3):345–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clemons E, Gao G, Hitt L (2006) When online reviews meet hyperdifferentiation: A study of the craft beer industry. J. Management Inform. Systems 23(2):149–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Darke PR, Ritchie RJB (2007) The defensive consumer: Advertising deception, defensive processing, and distrust. J. Marketing Res. 44(1):114–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeCarlo TE (2005) The effects of sales message and suspicion of ulterior motives on salesperson evaluation. J. Consumer Psych. 15(3):238–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C (2006) Strategic manipulation of Internet opinion forums: Implications for consumers and firms. Management Sci. 52(10):1577–1593.Link, Google Scholar
• Duan W, Gu B, Whinston AB (2008) Do online reviews matter? — An empirical investigation of panel data. Decision Support Systems 45:1007–1016.Crossref, Google Scholar
• eMarketer (2010) Purchaser influence survey. Accessed February 2, 2015, http://www.emarketer.com/Article/Moms-Place-Trust-Other-Consumers/1007509.Google Scholar
• eMarketer (2017) Online reviews. Accessed March 1, 2018, https://retail.emarketer.com/article/before-purchase-thats-review-read/591b66e3ebd400097ccd5fb9.Google Scholar
• Erdem T, Swait J (2004) Brand credibility, brand consideration, and choice. J. Consumer Res. 31(June):191–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Federal Trade Commission (FTC) (2013) .com disclosures. How to make effective disclosures in digital advertising. Accessed December 14, 2016, https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/press-releases/ftcstaff-revises-online-advertising-disclosure-guidelines/130312dotcomdisclosures.pdf.Google Scholar
• Forehand MR, Grier S (2003) When is honesty the best policy? The effect of stated company intent on consumer skepticism. J. Consumer Psych. 13(3):349–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friestad M, Wright P (1994) Persuasion knowledge: Lay people’s and researchers’ beliefs about the psychology of advertising. J. Consumers Res. 22(1):62–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godes D, Mayzlin D (2009) Firm-created word-of-mouth communication: Evidence from a field test. Marketing Sci. 28(4):721–739.Link, Google Scholar
• Goldberg M, Hartwick J (1990) The effects of advertiser reputation and extremity of advertising claim on advertising effectiveness. J. Consumer Res. 17(3):172–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gu B, Park J, Konana P (2012) The impact of external word-of-mouth sources on retailer sales of high-involvement products. Inform. Systems Res. 23(1):182–196.Link, Google Scholar
• Hastak M, Mazis MB (2004) Effects of consumer testimonials in weight loss, dietary supplement and business opportunity advertisements. Report, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Herbig P, Milewicz J (1995) The relationship of reputation and credibility to brand success. J. Consumer Marketing 12(4):5–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hibbert S, Smith A, Davies A, Ireland F (2007) Guilt appeals: Persuasion knowledge and charitable giving. Psych. Marketing 24(8):723–742.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho-Dac NN, Carson SJ, Moore WL (2013) The effects of positive and negative online customer reviews: Do brand strength and category maturity matter? J. Marketing 77(6):37–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hwang Y, Jeong S-H (2016) ‘This is a sponsored blog post, but all opinions are my own’: The effects of sponsorship disclosure on responses to sponsored blog posts. Comput. Human Behav. 62:528–535.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jabr W, Zheng E (2014) Know yourself and know your enemy: An analysis of firm recommendations and consumer reviews in a competitive environment. MIS Quart. 38(3):635–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa SL (1990) Graphic displays in decision making—The visual salience effect. Behav. Decision Making 3(4):247–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang Z, Benbasat I (2007) Investigating the influence of the functional mechanisms of online product presentations. Inform. Systems Res. 18(4):454–470.Link, Google Scholar
• Kelley HH (1973) The Process of causal attribution. Amer. Psych. 28(February):107–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirmani A, Campbell MC (2004) Goal seeker and persuasion sentry: How consumer targets respond to interpersonal marketing persuasion. J. Consumer Res. 31:573–582.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klayman J, Ha YW (1987) Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psych. Rev. 94(2):211–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kramer RM (1998) Paranoid cognition in social systems: Thinking and acting in the shadow of doubt. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 2(4):251–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krosnick JA, Alwin DF (1987) An evaluation of a cognitive theory of response-order effects in survey measurement. Public Opinion Quart. 51(2):201–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lafferty BA, Goldsmith RE (1999) Corporate credibility’s role in consumers’ attitudes and purchase intentions when a high versus a low credibility endorser is used in the ad. J. Bus. Res. 44:109–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence B, Fournier S, Brunelb F (2013) When companies don’t make the ad: A multimethod inquiry into the differential effectiveness of consumer-generated advertising. J. Advertising 42(4):292–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee KT, Koo DM (2012) Effects of attribute and valence of e-WOM on message adoption: Moderating roles of subjective knowledge and regulatory focus. Comput. Human Behav. 28:1974–1984.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu L-C, Chang W-P, Chang H-H (2014) Consumer attitudes toward blogger’s sponsored recommendations and purchase intention: The effect of sponsorship type, product type, and brand awareness. Comput. Human Behav. 34:258–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maddux JE, Rogers RW (1980) Effects of source expertness, physical attractiveness, and supporting arguments on persuasion: a case of gains over beauty. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 39(2):235–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Main KJ, Dahl DW, Darke PR (2007) Consumer responses to flattery during sales transactions: Empirical evidence of the sinister attribution error. J. Consumer Psych. 17(1):59–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgante JD, Zolfaghari R, Johnson SP (2012) A critical test of temporal and spatial accuracy of the Tobii T60XL eye tracker. Infancy 17(1):9–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mudambi SM, Schuff D (2010) What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon.com. MIS Quart. 34(1):185–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murdock BB Jr (1962) The serial Position effect of free recall. J. Experiment. Psych. 64(5):482–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickerson RS (1998) Confirmation bias; A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev. General Psych. 2(2):175–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ohanian R (1990) Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers’ perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. J. Advertising 19(3):39–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA, Dimoka A (2006) The nature and role of feedback text comments in online marketplaces: Implications for trust building, price premiums, and seller differentiation. Inform. Systems Res. 17(4):392–414.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosnow RL (1966) Whatever happened to the ‘Law of Primacy.’ J. Comm. 16:10–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Settle RB, Golden LL (1974) Attribution theory and advertiser credibility. J. Marketing Res. 11(May):181–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shimp TA, Wood SL, Smarandescu L (2007) Self-generated advertisements: Testimonials and the perils of consumer exaggeration. J. Advertising Res. 47(4):453–461.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sujan M, Bettman JR, Sujan H (1986) Effects of consumer expectations on information processing in selling encounters. J. Marketing Res. 23:346–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun M (2012) How does variance of product ratings matter? Management Sci. 58(4):696–707.Link, Google Scholar
• Tesser A, Martin L, Mendolia M. (1995) The impact of thought on attitude extremity and attitude-behavior consistency. Petty R, Krosnick JA, eds. Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale, NJ), 73–92.Google Scholar
• Thompson DV, Malaviya P (2013) Consumer-generated ads: Does awareness of advertising co-creation help or hurt persuasion? J. Marketing 77(May):33–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weitz BA, Castleberry SB, Tanner JFJ (2001) Selling: Building Partnerships (McGraw-Hill Irwin, New York).Google Scholar
• Xu AJ, Wyer RS (2010) Puffery in advertisements: The effects of media context, communication norms, and consumer knowledge. J. Consumer Res. 37(August):329–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yi C, Jiang Z, Benbasat I (2015) Enticing and engaging consumers via online product presentations: The effects of restricted interaction design. J. Management Inform. Systems 31(4):213–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yi C, Jiang Z, Benbasat I (2017) Designing for diagnosticity and serendipity: An investigation of social product-search mechanisms. Inform. Systems Res. 28(2):413–429.Link, Google Scholar
• Yin D, Mitra S, Zhang H (2016) Research note–When do consumers value positive vs. negative reviews? An empirical investigation of confirmation bias in online word of mouth. Inform. Systems Res. 27(1):131–144.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhu F, Zhang X (2010) Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. J. Marketing 74(2):131–148.Crossref, Google Scholar