Using Technology to Persuade: Visual Representation Technologies and Consensus Seeking in Virtual Teams

References

• Al-Saadi J, Szykman J, Pierce RB, Kittaka C, Neil D, Chu DA, Remer L, et al.. (2005) Improving national air quality forecasts with satellite aerosol observations. Bull. Amer. Meteorological Soc. 86(9):1249–1261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alavi M, Tiwana A (2002) Knowledge integration in virtual teams: The potential role of KMS. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 53(12):1029–1037.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andres HP (2002) A comparison of face-to-face and virtual software development teams. Team Performance Management 8(1):39–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benbasat I, Dexter AS (1985) An experimental evaluation of graphical and color-enhanced information presentation. Management Sci. 31(11):1348–1364.Link, Google Scholar
• Benbasat I, Dexter AS (1986) An investigation of the effectiveness of color and graphical information presentation under varying time constraints. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 10(1):59–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bone PF, Ellen PS (1992) The generation and consequences of communication-evoked imagery. J. Consumer Res. 19(1):93–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caiazzo F, Ashok A, Waitz IA, Yim SHL, Barrett SRH (2013) Air pollution and early deaths in the United States. Part I: Quantifying the impact of major sectors in 2005. Atmospheric Environmemt 79:198–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cappel JJ, Windsor JC (2000) Ethical decision making: A comparison of computer-supported and face-to-face group. J. Bus. Ethics 28(2):95–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Card SK, Mackinlay JD, Shneiderman B (1999) Readings in Information Visualization: Using Vision to Think (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Chao LL, Martin A (2000) Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage 12(4):478–484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chao LL, Haxby JV, Martin A (1999) Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects. Nature Neuroscience 2(10):913–919.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chung CK, Pennebaker J (2014) Using computerized text analysis to track social processes. Holtgraves TM, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Language and Social Psychology (Oxford University Press, Oxford), 219–230.Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB (2009) Influence: Science and Practice, 5th ed. (Pearson, New York).Google Scholar
• Cramton CD (2001) The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organ. Sci. 12(3):346–371.Link, Google Scholar
• Crott HW, Szilvas K, Zuber JA (1991) Group decision, choice shift, and polarization in consulting, political, and local political scenarios: An experimental investigation and theoretical analysis. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 49(1):22–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daft RL, Lengel RH, Trevino LK (1987) Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information-systems. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 11(3):355–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennis AR, Fuller RM, Valacich JS (2008) Media, tasks, and communication processes: A theory of media synchronicity. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 32(3):575–600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennis AR, Wixom BH, Vandenberg RJ (2001) Understanding fit and appropriation effects in group support systems via meta-analysis. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 25(2):167–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennis AR, George JF, Jessup LM, Nunamaker JF, Vogel DR (1988) Information technology to support electronic meetings. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 12(4):591–624.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Driskell JE, Radtke PH, Salas E (2003) Virtual teams: Effects of technological mediation on team performance. Group Dynamics Theory Res. Practice 7(4):297–323.Google Scholar
• Durand R (2003) Predicting a firm’s forecasting ability: The roles of organizational illusion of control and organizational attention. Strategic Management J. 24(9):821–838.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dye TS, MacDonald CP, Anderson CB, Hafner HR, Wheeler NJM, Chan AC (2003) Guidelines for Developing an Air Quality (Ozone and PM2.5) Forecasting Program, EPA-456/R-03-002 (Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC).Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Acad. Management J. 32(3):543–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• El-Shinnawy M, Vinze AS (1998) Polarization and persuasive argumentation: A study of decision making in group settings. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 22(2):165–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emrich CG, Brower HH, Feldman JM, Garland H (2001) Images in words: Presidential rhetoric, charisma, and greatness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(3):527–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fogg BJ (1998) Persuasive computers: Perspectives and research directions. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (ACM Press/Addision-Wesley, New York), 225–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fogg BJ (1999) Persuasive technologies. Comm. ACM 42(5):26–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fogg BJ (2003) Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friendly M, Franklin PE, Hoffman D, Rubin DC (1982) The Toronto word pool: Norms for imagery, concreteness, orthographic variables, and grammatical usage for 1,080 words. Behav. Res. Methods Instrumentation 14(4):375–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furst S, Blackburn R, Rosen B (1999) Virtual team effectiveness: A proposed research agenda. Inform. Systems J. 9(4):249–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• George JF, Easton GK, Nunamaker JF Jr, Northcraft GB (1990) A study of collaborative group work with and without computer-based support. Inform. Systems Res. 1(4):394–415.Link, Google Scholar
• Gonzales AL, Hancock JT, Pennebaker JW (2010) Language style matching as a predictor of social dynamics in small groups. Comm. Res. 37(1):3–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green MC, Brock TC (2000) The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 79(5):701–721.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green MC, Brock TC (2002) In the mind's eye: Transportation-imagery model of narrative persuasion. Green MC, Strange JJ, Brock TC, eds. Narrative Impact: Social and Cognitive Foundations (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 315–341.Google Scholar
• Greene WH (2003) Econometric Analysis (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Grèzes J, Decety J (2002) Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study. Neuropsychologia 40(2):212–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman JR, Morris CG (1975) Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. Berkowitz L, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Academic Press, New York), 45–99.Google Scholar
• Hall JV, Brajer V, Lurmann FW (2008) The benefits of meeting federal clean air standards in the south coast and San Joaquin Valley air basins. Accessed September 3, 2008, http://publichealth.lacounty.gov/mch/AsthmaCoalition/docs/BenefitsofMeetingCleanAirStandards_11_06_08.pdf.Google Scholar
• Hogarth RM, Gibbs BJ, McKenzie CR, Marquis MA (1991) Learning from feedback: Exactingness and incentives. J. Exp. Psych. Learning Memory Cognition 17(4):734–752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmes EA, Mathews A, Mackintosh B, Dalgleish T (2008) The causal effect of mental imagery on emotion assessed using picture-word cues. Emotion 8(3):395–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ireland ME, Pennebaker JW (2010) Language style matching in writing: Synchrony in essays, correspondence, and poetry. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 99(3):549–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa SL (1989) The effect of task demands and graphical format on information processing strategies. Management Sci. 35(3):285–303.Link, Google Scholar
• Just MA, Newman SD, Keller TA, McEleney A, Carpenter PA (2004) Imagery in sentence comprehension: An fMRI study. Neuroimage 21:112–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Keller PA, Block LG (1997) Vividness effects: A resource-matching perspective. J. Consumer Res. 24(3):295–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keller PA, McGill AL (1994) Differences in the relative influence of product attributes under alternative processing conditions: Attribute importance vs. attribute ease of imagability. J. Consumer Psych. 3(1):29–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knight D, Pearce CL, Smith KG, Olian JD, Sims HP, Smith KA, Flood P (1999) Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus. Strategic Management J. 20(5):445–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kock N (2004) The psychobiological model: Toward a new theory of computer-mediated communication based on Darwinian evolution. Organ. Sci. 15(3):327–348.Link, Google Scholar
• Kosslyn SM (1994) Elements of Graph Design (W.H. Freeman, New York).Google Scholar
• Kosslyn SM, Sukel KE, Bly BM (1999) Squinting with the mind’s eye: Effects of stimulus resolution on imaginal and perceptual comparisons. Memory Cognition 27(2):276–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lahiri K, Teigland C (1987) On the normality of probability distributions of inflation and GNP forecasts. Internat. J. Forecasting 3(2):269–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larkin JH, Simon HA (1987) Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognition Sci. 11(1):65–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee AY (2004) The prevalence of metacognitive routes to judgment. J. Consumer Psych. 14(4):349–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee AY, Labroo AA (2004) The effect of conceptual and perceptual fluency on brand evaluation. J. Marketing Res. 41(2):151–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ludwig S, de Ruyter K, Mahr D, Wetzels M, Brüggen E, de Ruyck T (2014) Take their word for it: The symbolic role of linguistic style matches in user communities. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 38(4):1201–1217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lurie NH (2004) Decision making in information-rich environments: The role of information structure. J. Consumer Res. 30(4):473–486.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lurie NH, Mason CH (2007) Visual representation: Implications for decision making. J. Marketing 71(1):160–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacInnis DJ, Price LL (1987) The role of imagery in information processing: Review and extensions. J. Consumer Res. 13(4):473–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Magnussen S, Helstrup T (2007) Everyday Memory (Psychology Press, Hove, England).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Malhotra A, John R (2005) Perceived individual collaboration know-how development through information technology-enabled contextualization: Evidence from distributed teams. Inform. Systems Res. 16(1):9–27.Link, Google Scholar
• Martindale C (1975) Romantic Progression: The Psychology of Literary History (Hemisphere, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Martins LL, Gilson LL, Maynard MT (2004) Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? J. Management 30(6):805–835.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mellet E, Bricogne S, Crivello F, Mazoyer B, Denis M, Tzourio-Mazoyer N (2002) Neural basis of mental scanning of a topographic representation built from a text. Cerebral Cortex 12(12):1322–1330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miranda SM, Saunders CS (2003) The social construction of meaning: An alternative perspective on information sharing. Inform. Systems Res. 14(1):87–106.Link, Google Scholar
• Montoya-Weiss MM, Massey AP, Song M (2001) Getting it together: Temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams. Acad. Management J. 44(6):1251–1262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neidell M (2010) Air quality warnings and outdoor activities: Evidence from Southern California using a regression discontinuity design. J. Epidemiology Community Health 64(10):921–926.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Craven KM, Kanwisher N (2000) Mental imagery of faces and places activates corresponding stimulus-specific brain regions. J. Cognition Neuroscience 12(6):1013–1023.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Keefe DJ (1990) Persuasion: Theory and Research (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Oinas-Kukkonen H, Harjumaa M (2009) Persuasive systems design: Key issues, process model, and system features. Comm. Association Inform. Systems 24(1):485–500.Google Scholar
• Paivio A, Csapo K (1973) Picture superiority in free recall: Imagery or dual coding? Cognitive Psych. 5(2):176–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pandey AV, Manivannan A, Nov O, Satterthwaite M, Bertini E (2014) The persuasive power of data visualization. IEEE Trans. Visualization Comput. Graphics 20(12):2211–2220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pennebaker JW, Booth RJ, Francis ME (2007) Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC 2007) (LIWC.net, Austin, TX).Google Scholar
• Petrova PA, Cialdini RB (2008) Evoking the imagination as a strategy of influence. Haugtvedt CP, Herr P, Kardes FR, eds. Handbook of Consumer Psychology (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
• Powell A, Piccoli G, Ives B (2004) Virtual teams: A review of current literature and directions for future research. Data Base Adv. Inform. Systems 35(1):6–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarker S, Sarker S, Chatterjee S, Valacich JS (2010) Media effects on group collaboration: An empirical examination in an ethical decision-making context. Decision Sci. 41(4):887–931.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt JB, Montoya-Weiss MM, Massey AP (2001) New product development decision-making effectiveness: Comparing individuals, face-to-face teams, and virtual teams. Decision Sci. 32(4):575–600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwarz N (2004) Metacognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. J. Consumer Psych. 14(4):332–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seyranian V, Bligh MC (2008) Presidential charismatic leadership: Exploring the rhetoric of social change. Leadership Quart. 19(1):54–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sherman SJ, Cialdini RB, Schwartzman DF, Reynolds KD (1985) Imagining can heighten or lower the perceived likelihood of contracting a disease. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 11(1):118–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sia CL, Tan BCY, Wei KK (2002) Group polarization and computer-mediated communication: Effects of communication cues, social presence, and anonymity. Inform. Systems Res. 13(1):70–90.Link, Google Scholar
• Simons HW (1976) Persuasion: Understanding, Practice, and Analysis (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Sloman SA (1996) The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psych. Bull. 119(1):3–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sproull L, Kiesler S (1986) Reducing social-context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Sci. 32(11):1492–1512.Link, Google Scholar
• Stigliani I, Ravasi D (2012) Organizing thoughts and connecting brains: Material practices and the transition from individual to group-level prospective sensemaking. Acad. Management J. 55(5):1232–1259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Straub D, Karahanna E (1998) Knowledge worker communications and recipient availability: Toward a task closure explanation of media choice. Organ. Sci. 9(2):160–175.Link, Google Scholar
• Tan BCY, Wei KK, Watson RT, Clapper DL, McLean ER (1998) Computer-mediated communication and majority influence: Assessing the impact in an individualistic and a collectivistic culture. Management Sci. 44(9):1263–1278.Link, Google Scholar
• Thomas JJ, Cook KA (2005) Illuminating the Path the Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics (IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA).Google Scholar
• Todd P, Benbasat I (1999) Evaluating the impact of DSS, cognitive effort, and incentives on strategy selection. Inform. Systems Res. 10(4):356–374.Link, Google Scholar
• Tormala ZL, Petty RE, Briñol P (2002) Ease of retrieval effects in persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 28(12):1700–1712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Von Glinow MA, Shapiro DL, Brett JM (2004) Can we talk, and should we? Managing emotional conflict in multicultural teams. Acad. Management Rev. 29(4):578–592.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weldon MS, Bellinger KD (1997) Collective memory: Collaborative and individual processes in remembering. J. Exp. Psych. Learning Memory Cognition 23(5):1160–1175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Alavi M (2001) Media and group cohesion: Relative influences on social presence, task participation, and group consensus. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 25(3):371–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Lowry PB, Zhou L, Fu X (2007) The impact of individualism–collectivism, social presence, and group diversity on group decision making under majority influence. J. Management Inform. Systems 23(4):53–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Venkatesh V, Brown SA (2011) Designing collaborative systems to enhance team performance. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 12(8):556–584.Google Scholar
• Zigurs I, Poole MS, DeSanctis GL (1988) A study of influence in computer-mediated group decision making. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 12(4):625–644.Crossref, Google Scholar