How to Tell a (News) Story? Quantifying the Impact of News Format and Storytelling on Engagement

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2022.0650

References

  • Altay S, de Araujo E, Mercier H (2022) “If this account is true, it is most enormously wonderful”: Interestingness-if-true and the sharing of true and false news. Digital Journalism 10(3):373–394.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arguello J, Butler BS, Joyce E, Kraut R, Ling KS, Rosé C, Wang X (2006) Talk to me: Foundations for successful individual-group interactions in online communities. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (ACM, New York), 959–968.Google Scholar
  • Bae BC, Jang S, Kim Y, Park S (2021) A preliminary survey on story interestingness: Focusing on cognitive and emotional interest. Mitchell A, Vosmeer M, eds. Interactive Storytelling. ICIDS 2021, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 13138 (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 447–453.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Banerjee A, Urminsky O (2024) The language that drives engagement: A systematic large-scale analysis of headline experiments. Marketing Sci. 44(3):566–592.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baraniak K, Sydow M (2021) A dataset for sentiment analysis of entities in news headlines (SEN). Procedia Comput. Sci. 192: 3627–3636.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bartsch A, Hartmann T (2017) The role of cognitive and affective challenge in entertainment experience. Communication Res. 44(1):29–53.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bauman K, Tuzhilin A (2022) Know thy context: Parsing contextual information from user reviews for recommendation purposes. Inform. Systems Res. 33(1):179–202.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Becker AB, Bode L (2018) Satire as a source for learning? The differential impact of news versus satire exposure on net neutrality knowledge gain. Inform. Comm. Soc. 21(4):612–625.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger J, Milkman KL (2012) What makes online content viral? J. Marketing Res. 49(2):192–205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger J, Kim YD, Meyer R (2021) What makes content engaging? How emotional dynamics shape success. J. Consum. Res. 48(2):235–250.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boukes M, Boomgaarden HG, Moorman M, de Vreese CH (2022) Social media posts by TV shows: Engagement and trust implications. J. Broadcasting Electronic Media 66(2):226–244.Google Scholar
  • Boyd RL, Blackburn KG, Pennebaker JW (2020) The narrative arc: Revealing core narrative structures through text analysis. Sci. Adv. 6(32):eaba2196.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boyd RL, Ashokkumar A, Seraj S, Pennebaker JW (2022) The development and psychometric properties of LIWC-22. Accessed September 15, 2025, https://www.liwc.app.Google Scholar
  • Brugman BC, Burgers C, Beukeboom CJ, Konijn EA (2023) Humor in satirical news headlines: Analyzing humor form and content, and their relations with audience engagement. Mass Comm. Soc. 26(6):963–990.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burgers C, Brugman BC (2021) How satirical news impacts affective responses, learning, and persuasion: A three-level random-effects meta-analysis. Comm. Res. 49(7):966–993.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen J, Huys QJ, Stringaris A, Nielson DM (2023) On the misery of cognitive effort. Preprint, submitted March 5, https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/r9e4j_v1.Google Scholar
  • Coronel JC, O’Donnell MB, Pandey P, Carpini MXD, Falk EB (2021) Political humor, sharing, and remembering: Insights from neuroimaging. J. Comm. 71(1):129–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deng B, Chau M (2021) The effect of the expressed anger and sadness on online news believability. J. Management Inform. Systems 38(4):959–988.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dolan R, Conduit J, Fahy J, Goodman S (2016) Social media engagement behaviour: A uses and gratifications perspective. J. Strategic Marketing 24(3–4):261–277.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DuBay WH (2004) The principles of readability. Impact Inform. 949:1–72.Google Scholar
  • Duffy A, Ling R (2020) The gift of news: Phatic news sharing on social media for social cohesion. J. Stud. 21(1):72–87.Google Scholar
  • Dunbar RI, Launay J, Curry O (2016) The complexity of jokes is limited by cognitive constraints on mentalizing. Human Nature 27(2):130–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Durlauf SN, Young HP, eds. (2004) Social Dynamics, vol. 4 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Eppler MJ, Mengis J (2004) The concept of information overload: A review of literature from Organization Science, Accounting, Marketing, MIS, and related disciplines. Inform. Soc. 20(5):325–344.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Erkan G, Radev DR (2004) LexRank: Graph-based lexical centrality as salience in text summarization. J. Artificial Intelligence Res. 22:457–479.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Escalas JE, Bettman JR (2003) You are what they eat: The influence of reference groups on consumers’ connections to brands. J. Consumer Psych. 13(3):339–348.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fong H, Gui G (2024) Modeling story expectations to understand engagement: A generative framework using LLMs. Preprint, submitted December 13, https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.15239.Google Scholar
  • Ghose A, Han SP (2011) An empirical analysis of user content generation and usage behavior on the mobile internet. Management Sci. 57(9):1671–1691.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ghose A, Ipeirotis PG (2011) Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining text and reviewer characteristics. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. 23(10):1498–1512.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gunning R (1952) The Technique of Clear Writing (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Hagar N, Diakopoulos N, DeWilde B (2022) Anticipating attention: On the predictability of news headline tests. Digital Journalism 10(4):647–668.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Han Y, Lappas T, Sabnis G (2020) The importance of interactions between content characteristics and creator characteristics for studying virality in social media. Inform. Systems Res. 31(2):576–588.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hanson G, Haridakis P (2008) YouTube users watching and sharing the news: A uses and gratifications approach. J. Electronic Publishing 11(3).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hardy BW, Gottfried JA, Winneg KM, Jamieson KH (2014) Stephen Colbert’s civics lesson: How Colbert Super PAC taught viewers about campaign finance. Mass Comm. Soc. 17(3):329–353.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S (2004) Design science in information systems research. MIS Quart. 28(1):75–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Horner CG, Galletta D, Crawford J, Shirsat A (2021) Emotions: The unexplored fuel of fake news on social media. J. Management Inform. Systems 38(4):1039–1066.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Horwitz J (2013) Faking news, India’s version of The Onion, acquired by news portal Firstpost. Next Web (May 31), https://thenextweb.com/news/indias-version-of-the-onion-acquired-by-news-portal-firspost-com.Google Scholar
  • Hu Y, Hong Y (2022) SHEDR: An end-to-end deep neural event detection and recommendation framework for hyperlocal news using social media. INFORMS J. Comput. 34(2):790–806.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hull DM, Schuetz SW, Lowry PB (2023) Tell me a story: The effects that narratives exert on meaningful-engagement outcomes in antiphishing training. Comput. Security 129:103252.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hvalshagen M, Lukyanenko R, Samuel BM (2023) Empowering users with narratives: Examining the efficacy of narratives for understanding data-oriented conceptual models. Inform. Systems Res. 34(3):890–909.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jiang Y, Ho YC, Yan X, Tan Y (2021) What’s in a “username”? Examining the effect of perceived anonymity on herding in crowdfunding. Inform. Systems Res. 33(1):1–17.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jockers M (2015) Syuzhet: Extract sentiment and plot arcs from text. Accessed September 15, 2025, https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/syuzhet/syuzhet.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Johnson SL, Safadi H, Faraj S (2015) The emergence of online community leadership. Inform. Systems Res. 26(1):165–187.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D, Fredrickson BL, Schreiber CA, Redelmeier DA (1993) When more pain is preferred to less: Adding a better end. Psych. Sci. 4(6):401–405.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim N, Kim HK, Wojcieszak M, Igartua JJ, Lim CM (2019) The presence of the protagonist: Explaining narrative perspective effects through social presence. Media Psych. 23(6):891–914.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knight S, Rocklage MD, Bart Y (2024) Narrative reversals and story success. Sci. Adv. 10(34):eadl2013.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ko H, Cho CH, Roberts MS (2005) Internet uses and gratifications: A structural equation model of interactive advertising. J. Advertising 34(2):57–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kormelink TG, Meijer IC (2015) Truthful or engaging? Surpassing the dilemma of reality versus storytelling in journalism. Digital Journalism 3(2):158–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuiken J, Schuth A, Spitters M, Marx M (2017) Effective headlines of newspaper articles in a digital environment. Digital Journalism 5(10):1300–1314.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kulkarni S, Thomas R, Komorowski M, Lewis J (2023) Innovating online journalism: New ways of storytelling. Journalism Practice 17(9):1845–1863.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kumar N, Qiu L, Kumar S (2022) A hashtag is worth a thousand words: An empirical investigation of social media strategies in trademarking hashtags. Inform. Systems Res. 33(4):1403–1427.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kunda Z (1990) The case for motivated reasoning. Psych. Bull. 108(3):480–498.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee CS, Ma L (2012) News sharing in social media: The effect of gratifications and prior experience. Comput. Human Behav. 28(2):331–339.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee D, Hosanagar K, Nair HS (2018) Advertising content and consumer engagement on social media: Evidence from Facebook. Management Sci. 64(11):5105–5131.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Legg AM, Sweeny K (2014) Do you want the good news or the bad news first? The nature and consequences of news order preferences. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 40(3):279–288.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li Z, Choi BCF (2024) Encouraging eco-driving with post-trip visualized storytelling: An experiment combining eye-tracking and a driving simulator. Inform. Systems Res. 35(4):1848–1872.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lischka JA (2021) Logics in social media news making: How social media editors marry the Facebook logic with journalistic standards. Journalism 22(2):430–447.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mallipeddi R, Janakiraman R, Kumar S, Gupta S (2021a) The effects of social media tone on engagement: Evidence from Indian general election 2014. Inform. Systems Res. 32(1):212–237.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mallipeddi R, Kumar S, Sriskandarajah C, Zhu Y (2021b) A framework for analyzing influencer marketing in social networks: Selection and scheduling of influencers. Management Sci. 68(1):75–104.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Marshall LL, Kidd RF (1981) Good news or bad news first? Soc. Behav. Personality 9(2):223–226.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McQuail D (1994) The rise of media of mass communication. McQuail D, ed. Mass Communication Theory: An Introduction (SAGE Publications, London), 1–29.Google Scholar
  • Mendoza M, Parra D, Soto Á (2020) GENE: Graph generation conditioned on named entities for polarity and controversy detection in social media. Inform. Processing Management 57(6):102366.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mudambi SM, Schuff D (2010) What makes a helpful review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon.com. MIS Quart. 34(1):185–200.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mukherjee P, Dutta S, De Bruyn A (2022) Did clickbait crack the code on virality? J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 50(3):482–502.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mousoulidou M, Taxitari L, Christodoulou A (2024) Social media news headlines and their influence on well-being: Emotional states, emotion regulation, and resilience. Eur. J. Investigation Health Psych. Ed. 14(6):1647–1665.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nabi RL, Green MC (2015) The role of a narrative’s emotional flow in promoting persuasive outcomes. Media Psych. 18(2):137–162.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newman N (2022) How publishers are learning to create and distribute news on TikTok. Reuters Inst., Univ. Oxford (December 8), https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/how-publishers-are-learning-create-and-distribute-news-tiktok.Google Scholar
  • Oh H, Goh KY, Phan TQ (2022) Are you what you tweet? The impact of sentiment on digital news consumption and social media sharing. Inform. Systems Res. 34(1):111–136.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ørmen J, Gregersen AL (2019) News as narratives. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pahwa N (2013) Firstpost acquires satire site fakingnews.com. MediaNama (May 31), https://www.medianama.com/2013/05/223-firstpost-fakingnews/.Google Scholar
  • Panda N, Ofitserov V (2012) Ranking search results (patent no. US8682892B1). U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, https://patents.google.com/patent/US8682892B1.Google Scholar
  • Park K, Kwak H, An J, Chawla S (2021) How-to present news on social media: A causal analysis of editing news headlines for boosting user engagement. Proc. 15th Internat. AAAI Conf. Web Soc. Media (AAAI Press, Washington, DC), 491–502.Google Scholar
  • Park CW, Macinnis DJ, Priester J, Eisingerich AB, Iacobucci D (2010) Brand attachment and brand attitude strength: Conceptual and empirical differentiation of two critical brand equity drivers. J. Marketing 74(6):1–17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peifer JT, Myrick JG (2021) Risky satire: Examining how a traditional news outlet’s use of satire can affect audience perceptions and future engagement with the news source. Journalism 22(7):1629–1646.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pew Research Center (2023) Social media and news fact sheet. Report, Pew Research Center, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Raghunath (2013) #BreakitFakeit: Fakingnews is now a part of Firstpost. Firstpost (May 31), https://www.firstpost.com/tech/breakitfakeit-faking-news-is-now-a-part-of-firstpost-829523.html.Google Scholar
  • Reagan AJ, Mitchell L, Kiley D, Danforth CM, Dodds PS (2016) The emotional arcs of stories are dominated by six basic shapes. EPJ Data Sci. 5(1):1–12.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rieis J, de Souza F, de Melo PV, Prates R, Kwak H, An J (2015) Breaking the news: First impressions matter on online news. Proc. Internat. AAAI Conf. Web and Social Media 9(1):357–366.Google Scholar
  • Rinker TW (2017) Readability: Tools to calculate readability scores. Accessed September 15, 2025, https://github.com/trinker/readability.Google Scholar
  • Robertson CE, Pröllochs N, Schwarzenegger K, Pärnamets P, Van Bavel JJ, Feuerriegel S (2023) Negativity drives online news consumption. Nature Human Behav. 7(5):812–822.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rubin AM (2002) The uses-and-gratifications perspective of media effects. Bryant J, Zillmann D, eds. Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research, 2nd ed. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ), 525–548.Google Scholar
  • Russo V, Bilucaglia M, Circi R, Bellati M, Valesi R, Laureanti R, Licitra G, Zito M (2022) The role of the emotional sequence in the communication of the territorial cheeses: A neuromarketing approach. Foods 11(15):2349.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schanke S, Burtch G, Ray G (2021) Estimating the impact of “humanizing” customer service chatbots. Inform. Systems Res. 32(3):736–751.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • She J, Zhang T (2019) The impact of headline features on the attraction of online financial articles. Internat. J. Web Inform. Systems 15(5):510–534.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • She J, Zhang T, Chen Q, Zhang J, Fan W, Wang H, Chang Q (2022) Which social media posts generate the most buzz? Evidence from WeChat. Internet Res. 32(1):273–291.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shulman HC, Markowitz DM, Rogers T (2024) Reading dies in complexity: Online news consumers prefer simple writing. Sci. Adv. 10(23):eadn2555.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Song H, Schwarz N (2008) If it’s hard to read, it’s hard to do: Processing fluency affects effort prediction and motivation. Psych. Sci. 19(10):986–988.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steiner M (2020) Soft presentation of hard news? A content analysis of political Facebook posts. Media Comm. 8(3):244–257.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Surber JR, Schroeder M (2007) Effect of prior domain knowledge and headings on processing of informative text. Contemporary Ed. Psych. 32(3):485–498.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Toubia O, Berger J, Eliashberg J (2021) How quantifying the shape of stories predicts their success. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118(26):2011695118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tucker CE (2015) The reach and persuasiveness of viral video ads. Marketing Sci. 34(2):281–296.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V (2025) Leveraging context: Re-thinking research processes to make “contributions to theory”. Inform. Systems Res. 36(3):1871–1886.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wahl-Jorgensen K, Schmidt TR (2019) News and storytelling. The Handbook of Journalism Studies (Routledge, New York). 261–276.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wakefield KL, Raghubir P, Inman JJ (2022) Have we got a deal for you: Do you want the good news or bad news first? J. Service Res. 26(2):251–269.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wylie A (2018) The Gunning Fog Index: How low should you go? Medium (March 12), https://medium.com/@annwylie/the-gunning-fog-index-how-low-should-you-go-bd9d9df52279.Google Scholar
  • Zifla E, Schuff D, Mudambi S, Wattal S (2024) Not just for fun: The effect of pseudo-reviews on consumer behavior. Comput. Human Behav. 155(4):108166.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu F, Zhou X, Li Y, Choi B (2023) Outwitting Shakespeare: Unpacking the mechanics of immersive storytelling with physiological measurements. Proc. 44th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta).Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.