An Educational Game in Collaborative Logistics

References

• Allon G, Van Mieghem JA. The Mexico-China sourcing game: Teaching global dual sourcing. INFORMS Trans. Ed. (2010) 10(3):105–112Link, Google Scholar
• Audy JF, D'Amours S, Rousseau JM. Cost allocation in the establishment of a collaborative transportation agreement, an application to the furniture industry. J. OR Society (2010) 61:1559–1559Google Scholar
• Audy JF, D'Amours S, Rönnqvist M. An empirical study on coalition formation and cost/savings allocation. Int. J. Prod. Econom. (2012) 136:13–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Audy JF, Lehoux N, D'Amours S, Rönnqvist M. Why should we work together? OR/MS Today (2011) April):48–53Google Scholar
• Ben-Zvi T, Carton TC. From rhetoric to reality: Business games as educational tools. INFORMS Trans. Ed. (2007) 8(1):10–18Link, Google Scholar
• Cochran JJ, Greenberg HJ, Smith JC. Active learning for quantitative courses. Tutorials in Operations Research (2005) (INFORMS, Hanover, MD) 237–256Link, Google Scholar
• D'Amours S, Rönnqvist M, Camarinha-Matos LM, Boucher X, Afsarmanesh H. An educational game in collaborative logistics. 11th IFIP WG 5.5 Working Conf. Virtual Enterprises, PRO-VE 2010 (2010a) St. Etienne, France:755–764Crossref, Google Scholar
• D'Amours S, Rönnqvist M, Bjørndal M, Bjørndal E, Pardalos P, Rönnqvist M. Energy, natural resources, environmental economics. Issues in Collaborative Logistics (2010b) (Springer Verlag, Berlin) 395–409Google Scholar
• Dutta B, Ray D. Constrained egalitarian allocations. Games Econom. Behav. (1991) 3(4):403–422Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forsberg M, Frisk M, Rönnqvist M. FlowOpt—A decision support tool for strategic and tactical transportation planning in forestry. Int. J. For. Eng. (2005) 16:101–114Google Scholar
• Frisk M, Göthe-Lundgren M, Jörnsten K, Rönnqvist M. Cost allocation in collaborative forest transportation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2010) 205:448–458Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffin P. The use of classroom games in management science and operations research. INFORMS Trans. Ed. (2007) 8(1):1–2Link, Google Scholar
• Koster M. (1999) . Weighted constrained egalitarianism in TU-games, Center for Economic Research, Discussion Paper 107, Tilburg University, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
• Lehoux N, Audy J-A, D'Amours S, Rönnqvist M, Camarinha-Matos LM, Paraskakis I, Afsarmanesh H. Issues and experiences in logistics collaboration in Leveraging knowledge for innovations in collaborative networks. 10th IFIP WG 5.5 Working Conf. Virtual Enterprises, PRO-VE 2009 (2009) Thessaloniki, Greece:69–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owen G. On the core of linear production games. Math. Prog. (1975) 9:358–370Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapley LS, Kuhn HW, Tucker AW. A value for n-person game. Contributions to the Theory of Games (1953) 2(Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 307–317Google Scholar
• Simchi-Levi D, Kaminsky P, Simchi-Levi E. Designing and Managing the Supply Chain (2003) 2nd ed.(Irwin/McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Sniedovich M. OR/MS games: 1. A neglected educational resource. INFORMS Trans. Ed. (2002) 2(3):86–95Link, Google Scholar
• Sterman J. Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Management Sci. (1989) 35(3):321–339Link, Google Scholar
• Talluri K. The customer valuations game as a basis for teaching revenue management. INFORMS Trans. Ed. (2009) 9(3):117–123Link, Google Scholar
• Tijs SH, Driessen TSH. Game theory and cost allocation problems. Management Sci. (1986) 32(8):1015–1028Link, Google Scholar
• Wood SC. Online games to teach operations. INFORMS Trans. Ed. (2007) 8(1):3–9Link, Google Scholar
• Wood Supply gameAccessed on March 3, 2012, http://www.forac.ulaval.ca/index.php?id=19&L=1Google Scholar