An Operations Research–Based Teaching Unit for Grade 10: The ROAR Experience, Part I

References

• Beebe SA, Masterson JT, Harris TE, Sherblom J (1986) Communicating in Small Groups: Principles and Practices (Scott, Foresman Glenview, IL).Google Scholar
• Colaço S, Branco N, Pato MV (2018) Optimization problems at school: Some examples from the 1st to the 12th grades. Beliën J, Teixeira AP, WIttmann H, de Miranda JL, Laumanns M, Vaz Pato M, eds. Advances in Operations Research Education: European Studies (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland), 143–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis B (2009) Tools for Teaching (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Edwards TG, Chelst KR (2004) The HSOR project: Insinuating OR into high school mathematics classrooms. INFORMS Trans. Edu. 4(3):1–8.Link, Google Scholar
• Edwards TG, Chelst KR (2014) Linear programming with more than two decision variables. Math. Teacher 108(1):64–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards T, Chelst K (2015) Linear programming in the classroom using GeoGebra. Math. Teaching 8(8):8–11.Google Scholar
• Feichtner SB, Davis EA (1984) Why some groups fail: A survey of students’ experiences with learning groups. Organ. Behav. Teaching Rev. 9(4):58–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fornasiero M, Malucelli F (2020) Making high school students aware of optimization through games and puzzles. RAIRO Oper. Res. 54(2):585–595.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fornasiero M, Malucelli F, Pazzi R, Schettini T (2021) Empowering optimization skills through an orienteering competition. INFORMS Trans. Edu. 22(1):1–8.Link, Google Scholar
• Fylstra D, Lasdon L, Watson J, Waren A (1998) Design and use of the Microsoft Excel Solver. Interfaces 28(5):29–55.Link, Google Scholar
• Garvin C (2001) The potential impact of small-group research on social group work practice. Kelly TB, Berman-Rossi T, Palombo S, eds. Sympos. Assoc. Advancement of Social Work with Groups. Group Work: Strategies for Strengthening Resiliency (Haworth Press, New York), 51–70.Google Scholar
• GeoGebra (2021) Free mathematics software for learning and teaching. Accessed April 8, 2022, http://www.geogebra.org/.Google Scholar
• Getzel G, Kurland R, Salmon R (1987) Teaching and learning the practice of social group work: Four curriculum tools. Lassner J, Powell K, Finnegan E, eds. Social Group Work: Competence and Values in Practice (Routledge, New York), 35–50.Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver CE (2004) Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Edu. Psych. Rev. 16(3):235–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaiser G, Schwarz B (2010) Authentic modelling problems in mathematics education-examples and experiences. J. Math. Didakt. 31(1):51–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kolb DA, Boyatzis RE, Mainemelis C (2014) Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions. Perspectives on Thinking, Learning, and Cognitive Styles (Routledge), 227–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kurland R, Salmon R (1992) Group work vs. casework in a group: Principles and implications for teaching and practice. Soc. Work Groups 15(4):3–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lonati V, Malchiodi D, Monga M, Morpurgo A (2017) Learning greedy strategies at secondary schools: An active approach. Sforza A, Sterle C, eds. Optimization and Decision Science: Methodologies and Applications. Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics (Springer, Berlin), 223–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mentimeter (2021) Interactive presentation software. Accessed August 5, 2021, https://www.mentimeter.com.Google Scholar
• Microsoft Corporation (2019) Microsoft Excel. Accessed August 5, 2021, https://office.microsoft.com/excel.Google Scholar
• Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca, Università e della Ricerca (2018) Percorsi per le Competenze Trasversali e l’Orientamento–Linee guida. Accessed September 27, 2021, https://www.miur.gov.it/documents/20182/1306025/Linee+guida+PCTO+con+allegati.pdf/3e6b5514-c5e4-71de-8103-30250f17134a?version=1.0&t=1570548388496.Google Scholar
• Murphy KL, Mahoney SE, Chen CY, Mendoza-Diaz NV, Yang X(2005) A constructivist model of mentoring, coaching, and facilitating online discussions. Distance Edu. 26(3):341–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niss M (1992) Applications and modelling in school mathematics: Directionsfor future development. Wirszup I, Streit R, eds. Development in School Mathematics Education Around the World (NCTM, Reston, VA), 3:346–361.Google Scholar
• Petracca C (2015) Progetto Competenze. Progettare per Competenze, Unità di Apprendimento, Valutare e Certificare, Compiti di Realtà (Lisciani, Teramo, Italy).Google Scholar
• Raffaele A, Gobbi A (2021) Teaching operations research before university: A focus on grades 9–12. Oper. Res. Forum 2(1):13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberi G (2012) Progettare la didattica e accertare le competenze nella Secondaria di I grado. Accessed August 24, 2021, https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/301996621.pdf.Google Scholar
• Schettino A, Bonetto MC (2013) OR dissemination activities for the Italian secondary school, Book of Abstracts of EURO XXVI Conference, Rome, 260.Google Scholar
• Schuster A (2004) About traveling salesmen and telephone networks—Combinatorial optimization problems at high school. ZDM—Mathematics Education 36(2):77–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taranto E, Colajanni G, Gobbi A, Picchi M, Raffaele A (2022) Fostering students’ modelling and problem-solving skills through Operations Research, digital technologies, and collaborative learning. Under review.Google Scholar
• Trinchero R (2012) Progettazione di Unità di Apprendimento per Competenze. Accessed April 8, 2022, https://www.icrocchetta.org/attachments/article/706/Progettare%20e%20Valutare%20per%20Competenze%20010916.pdf.Google Scholar
• Wittmann EC (2021) Teaching units as the integrating core of mathematics education. Connecting Mathematics and Mathematics Education (Springer, Berlin), 25–36.Crossref, Google Scholar