Can They Take It With Them? The Portability of Star Knowledge Workers' Performance

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0809

References

  • Acemoglu D., Pischke J.-S. Why do firms train? Theory and evidence. Quart. J. Econom. (1998) 113(1):79–119CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allison P. D., Long J. S. Departmental effects on scientific productivity. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1990) 55(4):469–478CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Asquith P., Mullins D. Equity issues and offering dilution. J. Financial Econom. (1986) 15(1/2):61–89CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baks K. P. On the performance of mutual fund managers. (2003) . Working paper, Emory University, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  • Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management (1991) 17(1):99–120CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barrett A., O'Connell P. J. Does training generally work? The returns to in-company training. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. (2001) 54(3):647–662CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker G. S. Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. J. Political Econom. (1962) 70(5):9–49CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker G. S.The Economic Approach to Human Behavior (1976) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berman S. L., Down J., Hill C. W. L. Tacit knowledge as a source of competitive advantage in the national basketball association. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(1):13–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bradley M., Desai A., Kim E. H. Synergistic gains from corporate acquisitions and their division between the stockholders of target and acquiring firms. J. Financial Econom. (1988) 21(1):3–40CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brindisi L. J. Shareholder value and executive compensation. Planning Rev. (1985) 13(5):14–17CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown L., Chen D. How good is the All-America Research Team in forecast earnings? J. Bus. Forecasting (1991) 9:14–18Google Scholar
  • Brown S. J., Warner J. B. Measuring security price performance. J. Financial Econom. (1980) 8(3):205–258CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S. Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. Amer. J. Sociol. (1987) 92(6):1287–1335CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cassing J., Douglas R. W. Implications of the auction mechanism in baseball's free agent draft. Southern Econom. J. (1980) 47(1):110–121CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Castanias R., Helfat C. Managerial resources and rents. J. Management (1991) 17(1):155–171CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chapman K., Southwick L. Testing the matching hypothesis: The case of major league baseball. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1991) 89(5):1352–1360Google Scholar
  • Chaudhuri S., Tabrizi B. Capturing the real value in high-tech acquisitions. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1999) 77(5):123–130Google Scholar
  • Clark K. B., Fujimoto T.Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization, and Management in the World Auto Industry (1991) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):128–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cole J. R., Cole S.Social Stratification in Science (1973) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cowen A. P., Groysberg B., Healy P. Which types of analyst firms are more optimistic? J. Accounting Econom. (2006) 41(1–2):119–146CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cymrot D. J., Dunlevy J. A. Are free agents perspicacious peregrinators? Rev. Econom. Statist. (1987) 69(1):50–58CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dorfman J. Analysts devote more time to selling as firms keep scorecard on performance. Wall Street Journal (1991) October 29):1Google Scholar
  • Drucker P. F.On the Profession of Management (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Dyckman T., Philbrick D., Stephan J. A comparison of event study methodologies using daily stock returns: A simulation approach. J. Accounting Res. (1984) 22(Supplement):1–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eccles R. G., Crane D. B.Doing Deals: Investment Banks at Work (1988) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Ernst H., Vitt J. The influence of corporate acquisitions on the behaviour of key inventors. R&D Management (2000) 30(2):105–120CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ernst H., Leptien C., Vitt J. Inventors are not alike: The distribution of patenting output among industrial R&D personnel. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2000) 47(2):184–199CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Felin T., Hesterly W. S. The knowledge-based view, heterogeneity, and new value creation: Philosophical considerations on the locus of knowledge. Acad. Management Rev. (2007) 32(1):195–218CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fraenkel F. Personal interview conducted by Boris Groysberg. (2000) May 15Google Scholar
  • Friedberg R. M. You can't take it with you? Immigrant assimilation and the portability of human capital. J. Labor Econom. (2000) 18(2):221–251CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galbraith J. R.Organization Design (1977) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Garen J. E.Empirical Studies of the Job Matching Hypothesis (1988) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) Google Scholar
  • Glenn A., McGarrity J. P., Weller J. Firm-specific human capital, job matching, and turnover: Evidence from major league baseball, 1900–1992. Econom. Inquiry (2001) 39(1):86–93CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (2000) 4th ed.(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Greenwood R., Hinings C. R., Brown J. “P2-Form” strategic management: Corporate practices in professional partnerships. Acad. Management J. (1990) 33(4):725–755CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Groysberg B., Abrahams R. Lift outs: How to acquire a high-functioning team. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2006) 84(12):133–140Google Scholar
  • Groysberg B., Lee L.-E. The effects of colleague quality on top performance: The case of security analysts. J. Organ. Behav. (2008) . ForthcomingCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hackman J. R.Groups That Work (and Those That Don't): Creating Conditions for Effective Teamwork (1990) 1st ed.(Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) Google Scholar
  • Harding F.Creating Rainmakers: The Manager's Guide to Training Professionals to Attract New Clients (1998) (Adams Media Corporation, Holbrook, MA) Google Scholar
  • Haspeslagh P., Jemison D.Managing Acquisitions (1991) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Henderson R., Cockburn I. Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15(Special issue: Competitive organizational behavior):63–84CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henning J. F.Maximizing Law Firm Profitability: Hiring, Training and Developing Productive Lawyers (1993) (Law Journal Seminars Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Hill L. A.Becoming a Manager: Mastery of a New Identity (1992) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Howard G. G. What makes a good analyst? Well…. Institutional Investor (1967) May):10–15Google Scholar
  • Huber P. J. The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under non-standard conditions. Proc. Fifth Berkeley Sympos. Math. Statist. Probab. (1967) 1(University of California Press, Berkeley) 221–233Google Scholar
  • Huckman R. S., Pisano G. P. The firm specificity of individual performance: Evidence from cardiac surgery. Management Sci. (2006) 52(4):473–488LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hunter J. E., Schmidt F. L., Judiesch M. K. Individual differences in output variability as a function of job complexity. J. Appl. Psych. (1990) 75(1):28–42CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huselid M. A. The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38(3):635–672CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ibarra H. Race, opportunity, and diversity of social circles in managerial networks. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38(3):673–703CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ichniowski C., Shaw K., Prennushi G. The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: A study of steel finishing lines. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1997) 87(3):291–313Google Scholar
  • Institutional Investor The 1991 All-America fixed income research team. (1991) October):81–87Google Scholar
  • Jacob J., Lys T. Z., Neale M. A. Expertise in forecasting performance of security analysts. J. Accounting Econom. (1999) 28(1):51–82CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan S., Murray F., Henderson R. Discontinuities and senior management: Assessing the role of recognition in pharmaceutical firm response to biotechnology. Indust. Corporate Change (2003) 12(2):203–233CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim L. S. The dynamics of Samsung's technological learning in semiconductors. California Management Rev. (1997) 39:86–100CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kitayama S., Markus H. R., Matsumoto H., Norasakkunkit V. Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: Self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1997) 72(6):1245–1267CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(5):502–518LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kordana K. A. Law firms and associate careers: Tournament theory versus the production-imperative model. Yale Law J. (1995) 104(7):1907–1934CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krautmann A. C., Oppenheimer M. Free agency and the allocation of labor in major league baseball. Managerial & Decision Econom. (1994) 15(5):459–469CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laderman J. M. Who can you trust? Wall street's spin game. Bus. Week (1998) October 5):148–156Google Scholar
  • Lazear E. P. Raids and offer matching. Res. Labor Econom. (1986) 8:141–165Google Scholar
  • Lippman S. A., Rumelt R. P. Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. Bell J. Econom. (1982) 13(2):418–438CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Long J. S., McGinnis R. Organizational context and scientific productivity. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1981) 46(4):422–442CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Louis M. R. Surprise and sense making: What newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1980) 25(2):226–251CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lurie S. B. What makes a good analyst? Institutional Investor (1967) July):33Google Scholar
  • MacDonald D. N., Reynolds M. O. Are baseball players paid their marginal products? Managerial & Decision Econom. (1994) 15(5):443–457CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mailath G. J., Postlewaite A. Workers versus firms: Bargaining over a firm's value. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1990) 57(191):369–380CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maister D. H.Managing the Professional Service Firm (1993) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • March J. G., Simon H. A.Organizations (1958) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • McGregor J. I can't believe they took the whole team. Bus. Week (2006) December 18):120Google Scholar
  • Mikhail M. B., Walther B. R., Willis R. H. Do security analysts improve their performance with experience? J. Accounting Res. (1997) 35(Supplement):131–157CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitchell M. L., Netter J. M. The role of financial economics in securities fraud cases: Applications at the securities and exchange commission. Bus. Lawyer (1994) 49:545–590Google Scholar
  • Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(2):242–266CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nakosteen R. A., Zimmer M. Migration and income: The question of self-selection. Southern Econom. J. (1980) 46(3):840–851CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Narin F. Technology indicators and corporate strategy. Rev. Bus. (1993) 14(3):19–23Google Scholar
  • Narin F., Breitzman A. Inventive productivity. Res. Policy (1995) 24(4):507–519CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson R., Winter S.An Evolutional Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Peteraf M. A. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14(3):179–191CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J.Competitive Advantage Through People: Unleashing the Power of the Work Force (1994) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J.The Human Equation: Building Profits by Putting People First (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Puranam P., Singh H., Zollo M. A bird in the hand or two in the bush?: Integration trade-offs in technology-grafting acquisitions. Eur. Management J. (2003) 21(2):179–184CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Puranam P., Singh H., Zollo M. Organizing for innovation: Managing the coordination-autonomy dilemma in technology acquisitions. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(2):263–280CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ravid S. A. Information, blockbusters, and stars: A study of the film industry. J. Bus. (1999) 72(4):463–492CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rees A.The Economics of Work and Pay (1973) (Harper and Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Robinson C., Tomes N. Self-selection and interprovincial migration in Canada. Canadian J. Econom. (1982) 15(3):474–502CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roll R. The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers. J. Bus. (1986) 59(2):197–216CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosen S. The economics of superstars. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1981) 71(5):845–858Google Scholar
  • Sessa D. All-star analysts 1999 survey: Early mornings, late nights mark an analyst's days. Wall Street Journal (1999) June 29):R13Google Scholar
  • Siconolfi M. Shearson research analysts finish first on “All-America Team” for third year. Wall Street Journal (1992) October 13):C18Google Scholar
  • Simonton D. K. Talent and its development: An emergenic and epigenetic model. Psych. Rev. (1999) 106(3):435–457CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sinha P., Brown L. D., Das S. A re-examination of financial analysts' differential earnings forecast accuracy. Contemporary Accounting Res. (1997) 14(1):1–42CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sirower M.The Synergy Trap: How Companies Lose the Acquisition Game (1997) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Song J., Almeida P., Wu G. Learning-by-hiring: When is mobility more likely to facilitate interfirm knowledge transfer? Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):351–365LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Spence A. M.Market Signaling: Informational Transfer in Hiring and Related Screening Processes (1974) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Topel R. Specific capital, mobility, and wages: Wages rise with job seniority. J. Political Econom. (1991) 99(1):145–176CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Maanen J., Schein E. H., Staw B. M. Toward a theory of organizational socialization. Research in Organizational Behavior (1979) 1(JIP Press, New York) 209–264Google Scholar
  • Warner J. B., Watts R. L., Wruck K. H. Stock prices and top management changes. J. Financial Econom. (1988) 20(1):461–492CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick K. E., Roberts K. H. Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38(3):357–381CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weisman R. The business of lift outs. Boston Globe (2006) November 19):B1Google Scholar
  • White H. Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models. Econometrica (1982) 50(1):1–25CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E. Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. J. Law Econom. (1979) 22(2):233–261CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zander U., Kogut B. Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirial test. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(1):76–92LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zollo M., Singh H. Deliberate learning in corporate acquisitions: Post-acquisition strategies and integration capability in U.S. bank mergers. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25(13):1233–1256CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zuckerman H., Merton R. K. Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system. Minerva (1971) 9(1):66–100CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.