An Empirical Examination of Goals and Performance-to-Goal Following the Introduction of an Incentive Bonus Plan with Participative Goal Setting

References

• Anthony R. N., Govindarajan V.Management Control Systems (1998) (Irwin McGraw-Hill, Boston) Google Scholar
• Baiman S., Evans J. H. Pre-decision information and participative management control systems. J. Accounting Res. (1983) 21(2):371–395Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banker R. D., Lee S. Y., Potter G. A field study of the impact of a performance-based incentive plan. J. Accounting Econom. (1996a) 21:195–226Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banker R. D., Potter G., Srinivasan D. An empirical investigation of an incentive plan that includes nonfinancial performance measures. Accounting Rev. (2000) 75(1):65–92Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banker R. D., Lee S. Y., Potter G., Srinivasan D. Contextual analysis of performance impacts of outcome-based incentive compensation. Acad. Management J. (1996b) 39(4):920–948Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banker R. D., Lee S. Y., Potter G., Srinivasan D. An empirical analysis of continuing improvements following the implementation of a performance-based compensation plan. J. Accounting Econom. (2001) 30(3):315–350Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banker R. D., Lee S. Y., Potter G., Srinivasan D. An empirical examination of the impacts from termination of a performance-based incentive plan. (2004) . Working paper, University of Pittsburgh, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
• Biglaiser G., Mezzetti C. Principals competing for an agent in the presence of adverse selection and moral hazard. J. Econom. Theory (1993) 61(2):302–330Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bryk A. S., Raudenbush S. W.Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods (1992) (Sage Publications, London) Google Scholar
• Chow C. W., Cooper J. C., Waller W. Participative budgeting: Effects of a truth-inducing pay scheme and information asymmetry on slack and performance. Accounting Rev. (1988) 63:111–122Google Scholar
• Dunk A. S. Budgetary participation, agreement on evaluation criteria and managerial performance: A research note. Accounting, Organ. Soc. (1990) 15(3):171–178Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans J. H. I., Hannan R. L., Krishnan R., Moser D. V. Honesty in managerial reporting. Accounting Rev. (2001) 76(4):537–559Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher J., Frederickson J. R., Peffer S. A. The effect of information asymmetry on negotiated budgets: An empirical investigation. Accounting, Organ. Soc. (2002) 27(1/2):27–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher J. G., Frederickson J. R., Peffer S. A. Budgeting: An experimental investigation of the effects of negotiation. Accounting Rev. (2000) 75(1):93–114Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher J. G., Frederickson J. R., Peffer S. A. Budget negotiations in multi-period settings. Accounting, Organ. Soc. (2006) 31(6):511–528Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hopwood A. G. An empirical study of the role of accounting data in performance evaluation. J. Accounting Res. (1972) 10:156–182Crossref, Google Scholar
• ICSCICSC Chain Store Sales Trends (2005) May 5(International Council of Shopping Centers, New York) Google Scholar
• Ittner C. D., Larcker D. F. Determinants of performance measure choices in worker incentive plans. J. Labor Econom. (2002) 20(2):S58–S90Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahn L. M., Sherer P. D. Contingent pay and managerial performance. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. (1990) 43(3):107–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kreft I., De Leeuw J.Introducing Multilevel Modeling (1998) (Sage Publications, London) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lambert R. A. Contracting theory and accounting. J. Accounting Econom. (2001) 32:3–87Crossref, Google Scholar
• Locke E. A., Bryan J. F., Kendall L. M. Goals and intentions as mediators of the effects of financial incentives on behavior. J. Appl. Psych. (1968) 52:104–121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matsumura E. M., Shin J. Y. An empirical analysis of a relative performance-based incentive plan: Evidence from a postal service. Accounting Rev. (2006) 81(3):533–566Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merchant K. A., Manzoni J.-F. The achievability of budget targets in profit centers: A field study. Accounting Rev. (1989) 64(3):539–558Google Scholar
• Merchant K. A., Van Der Stede W. A., Zheng L. Disciplinary constraints on the advancement of knowledge: The case of organizational incentive systems. Accounting, Organ. Soc. (2003) 28(2–3):251–286Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moers F. Discretion and bias in performance evaluation: The impact of diversity and subjectivity. Accounting, Organ. Soc. (2005) 30(1):67–80Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy K. J., Ashenfelter O., Card D. Executive compensation. Handbook of Labor Econom. (1999) 3B(Elsevier Science, New York) 2485–2563Chap. 38Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy K. J. Performance standards in incentive contracts. J. Accounting Econom. (2001) 30(3):245–278Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penno M. Asymmetry of pre-decision information and managerial accounting. J. Accounting Res. (1984) 22(1):177Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reichelstein S. Constructing incentive schemes for government contracts: An application of agency theory. Accounting Rev. (1992) 67(4):712–731Google Scholar
• Thompson K. R., Hochwarter W. A., Mathys N. J. Stretch targets: What makes them effective? Acad. Management Executive (1997) 11(3):48–60Google Scholar
• Van Der Stede W. A. The relationship between two consequences of budgetary controls: Budgetary slack creation and managerial short-term orientation. Accounting, Organ. Soc. (2000) 25(6):609–622Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walker K. B., Johnson E. N. The effects of a budget-based incentive compensation scheme on the budgeting behavior of managers and subordinates. J. Management Accounting Res. (1999) 11:1–28Google Scholar
• Weitzman M. The “ratchet principle” and performance incentives. Bell J. Econom. (1980) 11(1):302–308Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weitzman M. L. The new soviet incentive model. Bell J. Econom. (1976) 7(1):251–257Crossref, Google Scholar
• Young S. M. Participative budgeting: The effects of risk aversion and asymmetric information on budgetary slack. J. Accounting Res. (1985) 23(2):829–842Crossref, Google Scholar