Acquisition-Induced Kill Zones

References

• Affeldt P, Kesler R (2021) Competitors’ reactions to big tech acquisitions: Evidence from mobile apps. DIW Berlin Discussion Paper No. 1987, DIW Berlin German Institute for Economic Research, Berlin.Google Scholar
• Argentesi E, Buccirossi P, Calvano E, Duso T, Marrazzo A, Nava S (2019) Merger policy in digital markets: An ex-post assessment. DIW Berlin Discussion Paper No. 1836, DIW Berlin German Institute for Economic Research, Berlin.Google Scholar
• Arrow K (1962) Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 609–626.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bryan KA, Hovenkamp E (2020) Antitrust limits on startup acquisitions. Rev. Indust. Organ. 56(4):615–636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bulow J, Geanakoplos J, Klemperer P (1985) Holding idle capacity to deter entry. Econom. J. 95(377):178–182.Google Scholar
• Cabral LMB (2018) Standing on the shoulders of dwarfs: Dominant firms and innovation incentives. Preprint, submitted August 21, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3235598.Google Scholar
• Cabral L (2021) Merger policy in digital industries. Inform. Econom. Policy 54:100866.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cabral L (2024) Big tech acquisitions. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 103:103127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caffara C, Crawford G, Valleti T (2020) “How tech rolls”: Potential competition and “reverse” killer acquisitions. Competition Pol. Internat. (May 26), https://www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/how-tech-rolls-potential-competition-and-reverse-killer-acquisitions/.Google Scholar
• Callander S, Matouschek N (2022) The novelty of innovation: Competition, disruption, and antitrust policy. Management Sci. 68(1):37–51.Link, Google Scholar
• Cosnita-Langlais A, Tropeano J-P (2012) Do remedies affect the efficiency defense? An optimal merger-control analysis. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 30(1):58–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crémer J, de Montjoye Y-A, Schweitzer H (2019) Competition policy for the digital era. Final report, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
• Cunningham C, Ederer F, Ma S (2021) Killer acquisitions. J. Political Econom. 129(3):649–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D.D.C. (2021) FTC v Facebook. Case No. 1:20-cv-03590-JEB. Accessed December 8, 2021, https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/cases/2021-09-08_redacted_substitute_amended_complaint_ecf_no._82.pdf.Google Scholar
• Denicolo V, Polo M (2025) Acquisitions, innovation and the entrenchment of monopoly. RAND J. Econom. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.70038.Google Scholar
• Dijk ESR, Moraga-González JL, Motchenkova E (2024) How do start-up acquisitions affect the direction of innovation? J. Indust. Econom. 72(1):118–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dijk ESR, Moraga-González JL, Motchenkova E (2025) Start-up acquisitions, strategic R&D, and the entrant’s and incumbent’s direction of innovation. J. Econom. Management Strategy 34(2):428–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisfeld L (2025) Entry and acquisitions in software markets. Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 25-93, Swiss Finance Institute, Zurich.Google Scholar
• Fumagalli C, Motta M, Tarantino E (2022) Shelving or developing? The acquisition of potential competitors under financial constraints. Working Paper No. 637, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance, Naples, Italy.Google Scholar
• Furman J, Coyle D, Fletcher A, McAuley D, Marsden P (2019) Unlocking digital competition. Report of the Digital Competition Expert Panel, HM Treasury, London.Google Scholar
• Gautier A, Lamesch J (2021) Mergers in the digital economy. Inform. Econom. Policy 54:100890.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert RJ, Katz ML (2022) Dynamic merger policy and pre-merger product choice by an entrant. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 81:102812.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert R, Newbery D (1982) Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly. Amer. Econom. Rev. 72(3):514–526.Google Scholar
• Hollenbeck B (2020) Horizontal mergers and innovation in concentrated industries. Quant. Marketing Econom. 18:1–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kamepalli S-K, Rajan R, Zingales L (2021) Kill zone. NBER Working Paper No. 27146, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Katz M (2021) Big tech mergers: Innovation, competition for the market, and the acquisition of emerging competitors. Inform. Econom. Policy 54:100883.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koski H, Kassi O, Braesemann F (2020) Killers on the road of emerging start-ups—Implications for market entry and venture capital financing. ETLA Working Papers 81, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
• Lefouili Y, Madio L (2026) Mergers and investments: Where do we stand? Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 105:103269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Letina I, Schmutzler A, Seibel R (2024) Killer acquisitions and beyond: Policy effects on innovation strategies. Internat. Econom. Rev. 65(2):591–622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moraga-González JL, Motchenkova E, Nevrekar S (2022) Mergers and innovation portfolios. RAND J. Econom. 53(4):641–677.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Motta M, Peitz M (2021) Big tech mergers. Inform. Econom. Policy 54:100868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Motta M, Shelegia S (2021) The “kill zone”: Copying, acquisition and start-ups. CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP16151, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.Google Scholar
• Nocke V, Rhodes A (2026) Optimal merger remedies. Working paper, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.Google Scholar
• Pan L, Teh C, Wang C (2025) Innovation incentives with multiple entrants. Accessed March 1, 2026, https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/dghyej3tdzjrgrhw7ehsa/Multi_Arrow.pdf?rlkey=6gx5buda1i22c5put3qbbz8aq&st=t8454bls&dl=0.Google Scholar
• Rasmusen E (1988) Entry for buyout. J. Indust. Econom. 36(3):281–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott-Morton F, Bouvier P, Ezrachi A, Jullien B, Katz R, Kimmelman G (2019) Committee for the study of digital platforms: Market structure and antitrust subcommittee report. Report, Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State, University of Chicago Booth School of Business, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Silicon Valley Indicators (2025) Number of new startup companies, Silicon Valley, San Francisco, and California. Accessed September 27, 2025, https://siliconvalleyindicators.org/data/economy/innovation-entrepreneurship/startups/number-of-seed-or-early-stage-startups-and-total-number-of-startup-companies/.Google Scholar
• Teh C, Wang C (2025) Startup acquisitions and innovation. Working paper, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.Google Scholar
• Vergé T (2010) Horizontal mergers, structural remedies, and consumer welfare in a Cournot oligopoly with assets. J. Indust. Econom. 58(4):723–741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wickelgren A (2021) Optimal merger standards for potential competition: The effect of ex ante investment incentives. Working paper, University of Texas at Austin, Austin.Google Scholar