Is IT That You Can’t Learn, Or You Won’t Learn? Technology-Enabled Monitoring and Heterogeneity in Sales Performance

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.0613

References

  • Adbi A, Liu X, Mishra A (2022) Technology licensing and productivity growth: Evidence from manufacturing firms in developing economies. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(1):214–234.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Adjerid I, Ayvaci MU, Özer Ö (2023) Value of algorithm-enabled process innovation: The case of sepsis. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 25(4):1545–1566.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Aiello JR, Kolb KJ (1995) Electronic performance monitoring and social context: Impact on productivity and stress. J. Appl. Psych. 80(3):339–353.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aiello JR, Svec CM (1993) Computer monitoring of work performance: Extending the social facilitation framework to electronic presence 1. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 23(7):537–548.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Autor DH (2003) Outsourcing at will: The contribution of unjust dismissal doctrine to the growth of employment outsourcing. J. Labor Econom. 21(1):1–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Attari I, Helm JE, Mejia J (2024) Hiding behind complexity: Supply chain, oversight, race, and the opioid crisis. Production Oper. Management 34(4):725–743.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Babar Y, Burtch G (2024) Recharging retail: Estimating consumer demand spillovers from electric vehicle charging stations. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 26(3):797–813.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Backhaus N (2019) Context sensitive technologies and electronic employee monitoring: A meta-analytic review. 2019 IEEE Internat. Conf. Engrg. Tech. Innovation (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Bardhan IR, Krishnan VV, Lin S (2007) Project performance and the enabling role of information technology: An exploratory study on the role of alignment. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 9(4):579–595.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bartels LK, Nordstrom CR (2012) Examining big brother’s purpose for using electronic performance monitoring. Performance Improvement Quart. 25(2):65–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Basu AK, Lal R, Srinivasan V, Staelin R (1985) Salesforce compensation plans: An agency theoretic perspective. Marketing Sci. 4(4):267–291.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Becker TE, Marique G (2014) Observer effects without demand characteristics: An inductive investigation of video monitoring and performance. J. Bus. Psych. 29:541–553.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Belot M, Schroeder M (2016) The spillover effects of monitoring: A field experiment. Management Sci. 62(1):37–45.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Benabou R, Tirole J (2003) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 70(3):489–520.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bray RL (2020) Operational transparency: Showing when work gets done. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 25(3):812–826.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Buell RW, Norton MI (2011) The labor illusion: How operational transparency increases perceived value. Management Sci. 57(9):1564–1579.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Burtch G, Carnahan S, Greenwood BN (2018) Can you gig it? An empirical examination of the gig economy and entrepreneurial activity. Management Sci. 64(12):5497–5520.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cao X, Zhang D, Huang L (2022) The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the behavior of online gig workers. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(5):2611–2628.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Caro F, Gürhan Kök A, Martínez-De-Albéniz V (2020) The future of retail operations. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(1):47–58.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chan TY, Li J, Pierce L (2014) Compensation and peer effects in competing sales teams. Management Sci. 60(8):1965–1984.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y-J, Dai T, Gizem Korpeoglu C, Körpeoğlu E, Sahin O, Tang CS, Xiao S (2020) OM forum—Innovative online platforms: Research opportunities. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(3):430–445.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chung DJ, Kim B, Syam NB (2020) A practical approach to sales compensation: What do we know now? What should we know in the future? Foundations Trends Marketing 14(1):1–52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chung DJ, Steenburgh T, Sudhir K (2014) Do bonuses enhance sales productivity? A dynamic structural analysis of bonus-based compensation plans. Marketing Sci. 33(2):165–187.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Churchill GA, Ford NM, Hartley SW, Walker OC (1985) The determinants of salesperson performance: A meta-analysis. J. Marketing Res. 22(2):103–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deci EL, Ryan RM (2013) Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Google Scholar
  • DeHoratius N, Raman A (2007) Store manager incentive design and retail performance: An exploratory investigation. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 9(4):518–534.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dhanorkar S, Donohue K, Linderman K (2021) Online business-to-business markets for industrial product reuse: Evidence from an operational policy change. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(6):1373–1397.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dickinson D, Villeval M-C (2008) Does monitoring decrease work effort? The complementarity between agency and crowding-out theories. Games Econom. Behav. 63(1):56–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duflo E, Hanna R, Ryan S (2012) Incentives work: Getting teachers to come to school. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(4):1241–1278.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson AC, Bohmer RM, Pisano GP (2001) Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):685–716.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Enzle ME, Anderson SC (1993) Surveillant intentions and intrinsic motivation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 64(2):257–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ertekin N, Ketzenberg ME, Heim GR (2020) Assessing impacts of store and salesperson dimensions of retail service quality on consumer returns. Production Oper. Management 29(5):1232–1255.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Falk A, Kosfeld M (2006) The hidden costs of control. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1611–1630.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman MS, Pentland BT (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(1):94–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fisher M, Raman A (2022) Innovations in retail operations: Thirty years of lessons from production and operations management. Production Oper. Management 31(2):4452–4461.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fisher M, Gallino S, Netessine S (2021) Does online training work in retail? Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(4):876–894.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Frey BS (1993) Does monitoring increase work effort? The rivalry with trust and loyalty. Econom. Inq. 31(4):663–670.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gaimon C (2008) The management of technology: A production and operations management perspective. Production Oper. Management 17(1):1–11.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gardner J (2022) Two-stage differences in differences. Preprint, submitted July 13, https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.05943.Google Scholar
  • Ghosh M, John G (2000) Experimental evidence for agency models of salesforce compensation. Marketing Sci. 19(4):348–365.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gonzales AL, Hancock JT, Pennebaker JW (2010) Language style matching as a predictor of social dynamics in small groups. Communication Res. 37(1):3–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Griffith TL (1993) Monitoring and performance: A comparison of computer and supervisor monitoring 1. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 23(7):549–572.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hubbard TN (2000) The demand for monitoring technologies: The case of trucking. Quart J. Econom. 115(2):533–560.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Humphrey SE, Nahrgang JD, Morgeson FP (2007) Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. J. Appl. Psych. 92(5):1332–1356.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lal R, Srinivasan V (1993) Compensation plans for single- and multi-product salesforces: An application of the Holmstrom-Milgrom model. Management Sci. 39(7):777–793.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Larkin I, Pierce L, Gino F (2012) The psychological costs of pay‐for‐performance: Implications for the strategic compensation of employees. Strategic Management J. 33(10):1194–1214.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larson JR, Callahan C (1990) Performance monitoring: How it affects work productivity. J. Appl. Psych. 75(5):530–538.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li J, Lim N, Chen H (2020) Examining salesperson effort allocation in teams: A randomized field experiment. Marketing Sci. 39(6):1122–1141.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Liu M, Brynjolfsson E, Dowlatabadi J (2021) Do digital platforms reduce moral hazard? The case of Uber and Taxis. Management Sci. 67(8):4665–4685.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lee HS, Kesavan S, Kuhnen C (2022) When do group incentives for retail store managers work? Production Oper. Management 31(8):3077–3095.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lu Y, Luo X, Huang L, Wang D (2025) Can providing algorithmic performance information facilitate humans’ inventory ordering behaviors? Inform. Systems Res. Forthcoming.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Luo X, Qin MS, Fang Z, Qu Z (2021) Artificial intelligence coaches for sales agents: Caveats and solutions. J. Marketing 85(2):14–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mallo J, Nordstrom CR, Bartels LK, Traxler A (2007) The effect of age and task difficulty. Performance Improvement Quart. 20(1):49–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mantrala MK, Albers S, Caldieraro F, Jensen O, Joseph K, Krafft M, Narasimhan C, et al. (2010) Sales force modeling: State of the field and research agenda. Marketing Lett. 21(3):255–272.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mayya R, Huang P (2025) Startup accelerators, information asymmetry, and corporate venture capital investments. Management Sci. 71(11):9123–9144.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McAfee A (2003) When too much IT knowledge is a dangerous thing. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 44(2):83–89.Google Scholar
  • McAfee A (2006) Mastering the three worlds of Information Technology. Harvard Bus. Rev. 84(11):141–149.Google Scholar
  • Misra S, Nair HS (2011) A structural model of sales-force compensation dynamics: Estimation and field implementation. Quant. Marketing Econom. 9(3):211–257.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Misra S, Coughlan AT, Narasimhan C (2005) Salesforce compensation: An analytical and empirical examination of the agency theoretic approach. Quant. Marketing Econom. 3(1):5–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Musalem A, Olivares M, Schilkrut A (2021) Retail in high definition: Monitoring customer assistance through video analytics. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(5):1025–1042.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nagin DS, Rebitzer JB, Sanders S, Taylor LJ (2002) Monitoring, motivation, and management: The determinants of opportunistic behavior in a field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(4):850–873.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson R, Winter S (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA). Google Scholar
  • Pennebaker JW, Mehl MR, Niederhoffer KG (2003) Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Rev. Psych. 54(1):547–577.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perdikaki O, Kesavan S, Swaminathan JM (2012) Effect of traffic on sales and conversion rates of retail stores. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 14(1):145–162.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Perdikaki O, Kumar S, Sriskandarajah C (2017) Managing retail budget allocation between store labor and marketing activities. Production Oper. Management 26(9):1615–1631.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pierce L, Snow DC, McAfee A (2015) Cleaning house: The impact of Information Technology monitoring on employee theft and productivity. Management Sci. 61(10):2299–2319.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Prendergast C (1999) The provision of incentives in firms. J. Econom. Lit. 37(1):7–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ravid DM, White JC, Tomczak DL, Miles AF, Behrend TS (2023) A meta‐analysis of the effects of electronic performance monitoring on work outcomes. Pers. Psych. 76(1):5–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roels G, Su X (2014) Optimal design of social comparison effects: Setting reference groups and reference points. Management Sci. 60(3):606–627.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Selling Power (2023) Selling Power’s 500 largest sales forces in America in 2023. Accessed April 12, 2024, https://www.sellingpower.com/lists/2023/largest-sales-organizations-selling-power-500.Google Scholar
  • Siegel R, König CJ, Lazar V (2022) The impact of electronic monitoring on employees’ job satisfaction, stress, performance, and counterproductive work behavior: A meta-analysis. Comput. Hum. Behav. Rep. 8:100227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Song H, Tucker AL, Murrell KL, Vinson DR (2018) Closing the productivity gap: Improving worker productivity through public relative performance feedback and validation of best practices. Management Sci. 64(6):2628–2649.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Staats BR, Dai H, Hofmann D, Milkman KL (2017) Motivating process compliance through individual electronic monitoring: An empirical examination of hand hygiene in healthcare. Management Sci. 63(5):1563–1585.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stamatopoulos I, Bassamboo A, Moreno A (2021) The effects of menu costs on retail performance: Evidence from adoption of the electronic shelf label technology. Management Sci. 67(1):242–256.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stanton JM, Julian AL (2002) The impact of electronic monitoring on quality and quantity of performance. Comput. Human Behav. 18(1):85–101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sylwester K, Purver M (2015) Twitter language use reflects psychological differences between Democrats and Republicans. PLoS One 10(9):e0137422.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tan TF, Netessine S (2019) When you work with a superman, will you also fly? An empirical study of the impact of coworkers on performance. Management Sci. 65(8):3495–3517.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tan TF, Netessine S (2020) At your service on the table: Impact of tabletop technology on restaurant performance. Management Sci. 66(10):4496–4515.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yang R, Mai Y, Lee CY, Teo CP (2020) Tractable compensation plan under asymmetric information. Production Oper. Management 29(5):1212–1218.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yoeli E, Hoffman M, Rand DG, Nowak MA (2013) Powering up with indirect reciprocity in a large-scale field experiment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110(supplement_2):10424–10429.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zamoff ME, Greenwood BN, Burtch G (2022) Who watches the watchmen: Evidence of the effect of body-worn cameras on New York City policing. J. Law Econom. Organ. 38(1):161–195.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zeng X, Yang C, Tu C, Liu Z, Sun M (2018) Chinese LIWC lexicon expansion via hierarchical classification of word embeddings with sememe attention. Proc. AAAI Conf. Artificial Intelligence 32(1).Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.