Interactional Service Innovation with Social Media Users

References

• Alvesson M, Sköldberg K (2009) Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Aral S, Dellarocas C, Godes D (2013) Introduction to the special issue—social media and business transformation: A framework for research. Inform. Systems Res. 24(1):3–13.Link, Google Scholar
• Arthur WB (2011) The second economy. McKinsey Quart. 4(October):90–99.Google Scholar
• Barras R (1986) Towards a theory of innovation in services. Res. Policy 15(4):161–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartl M, Hück S, Ruppert S (2009) Netnography research—community insights in the cosmetic industry. Conf. Proc. ESOMAR Consumer Insights, Dubai, 1–12.Google Scholar
• Bastiat F (1860) Harmonies of Political Economy, Vol. 1 (J. Murray, London).Google Scholar
• Benkler Y (2002) Coase’s penguin, or, Linux and The Nature of the Firm. Yale Law J. 112(3):369–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benkler Y (2006) The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Benkler Y (2011) The Penguin and the Leviathan: How Cooperation Triumphs Over Self-Interest (Crown Business, New York).Google Scholar
• Bryson JR, Daniels PW, Warf B (2004) Service Worlds: People, Organisations, Technologies (Psychology Press, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(2):349–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlsson B (2004) The digital economy: What is new and what is not? Structural Change Econom. Dynam. 15(3):245–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatfield AT, Scholl HJJ, Brajawidagda U (2013) Tsunami early warnings via Twitter in government: Net-savvy citizens’ co-production of time-critical public information services. Government Inform. Quart. 30(4):377–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chathoth P, Altinay L, Harrington RJ, Okumus F, Chan ES (2013) Co-production versus co-creation: A process based continuum in the hotel service context. Internat. J. Hospitality Management 32(1):11–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Churchill J, von Hippel E, Sonnack M (2009) Lead user project handbook: A practical guide for lead user project teams. Retrieved December 1, 2014, https://evhippel.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/lead-user-project-handbook-full-version.pdf.Google Scholar
• Conboy K, Fitzgerald G, Mathiassen L (2012) Qualitative methods research in information systems: Motivations, themes, and contributions. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 21(2):113–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Criado JI, Sandoval-Almazan R, Gil-Garcia JR (2013) Government innovation through social media. Government Inform. Quart. 30(4):319–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cropanzano R, Mitchell MS (2005) Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. J. Management 31(6):874–900.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denzin NK (1970) The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods (Transaction Publishers, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Di Gangi PM, Wasko M (2009) Steal my idea! Organizational adoption of user innovations from a user innovation community: A case study of Dell IdeaStorm. Decision Support Systems 48(1):303–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Djellal F, Gallouj F (2010) Services, innovation and performance: General presentation. J. Innovation Econom. Management 5(1):5–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Echeverri P, Skålén P (2011) Co-creation and co-destruction: A practice-theory based study of interactive value formation. Marketing Theory 11(3):351–373.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edvardsson B, Gustafsson A, Kristensson P, Witell L (2011) Customer integration in service innovation. Djellal F, Gallouj F, eds. The Handbook of Innovation and Services: A Multi-Disciplinary Perspective (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 301–317.Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellonen HK, Kosonen M (2010) Treat your customers as equals! Fostering customer collaboration through social media. Internat. J. Electronic Marketing Retailing 3(3):221–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evan WM (1965) Toward a theory of inter-organization relations. Management Sci. 11(10):B-217–B-230.Link, Google Scholar
• Flick U (2008) Managing Quality in Qualitative Research (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg B (2006) Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry 12(2):219–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franke N, Piller FT (2003) Key research issues in user interaction with user toolkits in a mass customisation system. Internat. J. Tech. Management 26(5):578–599.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franke N, Schreier M (2010) Why customers value self-designed products: The importance of process effort and enjoyment. J. Product Innovation Management 27(7):1020–1031.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franke N, Shah S (2003) How communities support innovative activities: An exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Res. Policy 32(1):157–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Füller J, Bartl M, Ernst H, Mühlbacher H (2006) Community based innovation: How to integrate members of virtual communities into new product development. Electronic Commerce Res. 6(1):57–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gadrey J (1996) Services, La Productivité En Question (Desclée de Brouwer, Paris).Google Scholar
• Gadrey J, Gallouj F (1998) The provider-customer interface in business and professional services. Service Industries J. 18(2):1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gadrey J, Gallouj F, eds. (2002) Productivity, Innovation and Knowledge in Services: New Economic and Socio-economic Approaches (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallouj F, Djellal F (2011) The Handbook of Innovation and Services: A Multi-Disciplinary Perspective (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK).Google Scholar
• Giannakouris K, Smihily M (2013) Social media—Statistics on the use by enterprises. Accessed April 21, 2015, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Social_media_-_statistics_on_the_use_by_enterprises.Google Scholar
• Glaser B, Strauss A (1967) The Discovery Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Inquiry (Wiedenfeld and Nicholson, London).Google Scholar
• Graebner ME, Eisenhardt KM (2004) The seller’s side of the story: Acquisition as courtship and governance as syndicate in entrepreneurial firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(3):366–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant AM, Berry JW (2011) The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Acad. Management J. 54(1):73–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gudmundsdottir S (1996) The teller, the tale, and the one being told: The narrative nature of the research interview. Curriculum Inquiry 26(3):293–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harhoff D, Henkel J, von Hippel E (2003) Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: How users benefit by freely revealing their innovations. Res. Policy 32(10):1753–1769.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris L, Russell-Bennett R, Plé L, Chumpitaz Cáceres R (2010) Not always co-creation: Introducing interactional co-destruction of value in service-dominant logic. J. Services Marketing 24(6):430–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hawn C (2009) Take two aspirin and tweet me in the morning: How Twitter, Facebook, and other social media are reshaping health care. Health Affairs 28(2):361–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helms RW, Booij E, Spruit MR (2012) Reaching out: Involving users in innovation tasks through social media. ECIS 2012 Proc., Barcelona.Google Scholar
• Henderson R (1993) Underinvestment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation: Evidence from the photolithographic alignment equipment industry. RAND J. Econom. 24(2):248–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hienerth C, von Hippel E, Jensen MB (2014) User community vs. producer innovation development efficiency: A first empirical study. Res. Policy 43(1):190–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holstein JA, Gubrium JF (1995) The Active Interview (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howe J (2006) The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired Magazine 14(6):1–4.Google Scholar
• Kaasinen E, Koskela-Huotari K, Ikonen V, Niemelä M, Näkki P (2012) Three approaches to co-creating services with users. Freund LE, ed. Advances in the Human Side of Service Engineering (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL), 286–295.Google Scholar
• Kaplan AM, Haenlein M (2010) Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Bus. Horizons 53(1):59–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleemann F, Voß GG, Rieder K (2008) Un(der)paid innovators: The commercial utilization of consumer work through crowdsourcing. Sci., Tech. Innovation Stud. 4(1):5–26.Google Scholar
• Kozinets RV (2002) The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities. J. Marketing Res. 39(1):61–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kristensson P, Matthing J, Johansson N (2008) Key strategies for the successful involvement of customers in the co-creation of new technology-based services. Internat. J. Service Indust. Management 19(4):474–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee AS (1989) A scientific methodology for MIS case studies. MIS Quart. 13(1):33–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee AS, Baskerville RL (2003) Generalizing generalizability in information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 14(3):221–243.Link, Google Scholar
• Lehrer M, Ordanini A, DeFillippi R, Miozzo M (2012) Challenging the orthodoxy of value co-creation theory: A contingent view of co-production in design-intensive business services. Eur. Management J. 30(6):499–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leimeister JM, Huber M, Bretschneider U, Krcmar H (2009) Leveraging crowdsourcing: Activation-supporting components for IT-based ideas competition. J. Management Inform. Systems 26(1):197–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levina N, Vaast E (2008) Innovating or doing as told? Status differences and overlapping boundaries in offshore collaboration. MIS Quart. 32(2):307–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lilien GL, Morrison PD, Searls K, Sonnack M, von Hippel E (2002) Performance assessment of the lead user idea-generation process for new product development. Management Sci. 48(8):1042–1059.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu H, Maes P (2005) Interestmap: Harvesting social network profiles for recommendations. Workshop Beyond Personalization-IUI’05, San Diego.Google Scholar
• Lusch RF, Vargo SL (2014) Service-Dominant Logic: Premises, Perspectives, Possibilities (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lusch RF, Vargo SL, O’Brien M (2007) Competing through service: Insights from service-dominant logic. J. Retailing 83(1):5–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McMillan SJ (2006) Exploring models of interactivity from multiple research traditions: Users, documents, and systems. Lievrouw LA, Livingstone S, eds. Handbook of New Media (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 205–230.Google Scholar
• Mount M, Martinez MG (2014) Social media: A tool for open innovation. California Management Rev. 56(4):124–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nambisan S (2002) Designing virtual customer environments for new product development: Toward a theory. Acad. Management Rev. 27(3):392–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ngai EWT, Tao SSC, Moon KKL (2015) Social media research: Theories, constructs, and conceptual frameworks. Internat. J. Inform. Management 35(1):33–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Connor B, Balasubramanyan R, Routledge BR, Smith NA (2010) From tweets to polls: Linking text sentiment to public opinion time series. Proc. Internat. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Social Media, Washington, SC 11(May):122–129.Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (1993) CASE tools as organizational change: Investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development. MIS Quart. 17(3):309–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Panzar JC, Willig RD (1981) Economies of scope. Amer. Econom. Rev. 71(2):268–272.Google Scholar
• Parent M, Plangger K, Bal A (2011) The new WTP: Willingness to participate. Bus. Horizons 54(3):219–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patton MQ (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Penrose ET (1995) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piller FT, Ihl C, Vossen A (2010) A typology of customer co-creation in the innovation process. Working paper, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.Google Scholar
• Piller FT, Vossen A, Ihl C (2012) From social media to social product development: The impact of social media on co-creation of innovation. Die Unternehmung 66(1):7–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pine BJ, Gilmore JH (1999) The Experience Economy: Work is Theatre and Every Business a Stage (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Piskorski MJ (2014) A Social Strategy: How We Profit from Social Media (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prahalad CK, Ramaswamy V (2004) Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. J. Interactive Marketing 18(3):5–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rafaeli S (1988) Interactivity: From new media to communication. Hawkins RP, Wiemann JM, Pingree S, eds. Sage Annual Review of Communication Research: Advancing Communication Science: Merging Mass and Interpersonal Processes, Vol. 16 (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 110–134.Google Scholar
• Ramaswamy V (2010) Competing through co-creation: Innovation at two companies. Strategy Leadership 38(2):22–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramirez R (1999) Value co-production: Intellectual origins and implications for practice and research. Strategic Management J. 20(1):49–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ricardo D (1817) Principles of Political Economy and Taxation (J. Murray, London).Google Scholar
• Richardson R, Kramer EH (2006) Abduction as the type of inference that characterizes the development of a grounded theory. Qualitative Res. 6(4):497–513.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rowley JE (2002) Reflections on customer knowledge management in e-business. Qualitative Market Res.: Internat. J. 5(4):268–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saldaña J (2012) The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Sanday PR (1979) The ethnographic paradigm(s). Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(4):527–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Savona M, Steinmueller WE (2013) Service output, innovation and productivity: A time-based conceptual framework. Structural Change Econom. Dynam. 27(6):118–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter JA (1934) The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry Into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle, Vol. 55 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Shirky C (2010) Cognitive Surplus: Creativity and Generosity in a Connected Age (Penguin, New York).Google Scholar
• Silva L, Hirschheim R (2007) Fighting against windmills: Strategic information systems and organizational deep structures. MIS Quart. 31(2):327–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Still K, Isomursu M, Koskela-Huotari K, Huhtamäki J (2011) Social media supported indicators for user-driven service innovation. VTT Sympos. Service Innovation, Espoo, Finland, 208–217.Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Sundbo J (2008) Customer-based innovation of knowledge e-services: The importance of after-innovation. Internat. J. Services Tech. Management 9(3):218–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sundbo J, Toivonen M (2011) User-Based Innovation in Services (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor C (1985) Philosophical Papers: Volume 2, Philosophy and the Human Sciences (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomke S, Von Hippel E (2002) Innovators. Harvard Bus. Rev. 80(4):74–81.Google Scholar
• Toffler A (1980) The Third Wave (Morrow, New York).Google Scholar
• Tuarob S, Tucker CS (2014) Discovering next generation product innovations by identifying lead user preferences expressed through large scale social media data. ASME 2014 Internat. Design Engrg. Tech. Conf. Comput. Informat. Engrg. Conf., Buffalo, New York (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Anderson P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(3):439–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reichertz J (2009) Abduction: The logic of discovery of grounded theory. Forum: Qualitative Soc. Res. 11(1):13.Google Scholar
• van Osch W, Coursaris CK (2014) Social media research: An assessment of the domain’s productivity and intellectual evolution. Comm. Monographs 81(3):285–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vargo SL, Lusch RF, Akaka MA (2010) Advancing service science with service-dominant logic. The Handbook of Innovation and Services: A Multi-disciplinary Perspective (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 133–156.Google Scholar
• von Hippel E (1986) Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Sci. 32(7):791–805.Link, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E (1988) The Sources of Innovation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• von Hippel E (2005) Democratizing Innovation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E, Katz R (2002) Shifting innovation to users via toolkits. Management Sci. 48(7):821–833.Link, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E, von Krogh G (2003) Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organ. Sci. 14(2):209–223.Link, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E, von Krogh G (2013) Crossroads—Identifying viable “need-solution pairs”: Problem solving without problem formulation. Organ. Sci. 27(1):207–221.Google Scholar
• Wren DA (1967) Interface and interorganizational coordination. Acad. Management J. 10(1):69–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xiang Z, Gretzel U (2010) Role of social media in online travel information search. Tourism Management 31(2):179–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu M, Walton J (2005) Gaining customer knowledge through analytical CRM. Indust. Management Data Systems 105(7):955–971.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yin RK (2008) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar