Institutional Complexity as a Driver for Innovation in Service Ecosystems

References

• Abernathy WJ, Clark KB (1985) Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Res. Policy 14(1):3–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akaka MA, Vargo SL (2013) Technology as an operant resource in service (eco)systems. Inform. Systems e-Bus. Management 12(3):367–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akaka MA, Corsaro D, Kelleher C, Maglio PP, Seo Y, Lusch RF, Vargo SL (2014) The role of symbols in value cocreation. Marketing Theory 14(3):311–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1983) The Social Psychology of Creativity (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arthur WB (2009) The Nature of Technology: What It Is, and How It Evolves (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Baker T, Nelson RE (2005) Creating something out of nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(3):329–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bassett-Jones N (2005) The paradox of diversity management, creativity and innovation. Creativity Innovation Management 14(2):169–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Lee M (2014) Advancing research on hybrid organizing—Insights from the study of social enterprises. Acad. Management Ann. 8(1):397–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Leca B, Boxenbaum E (2009) How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Acad. Management Ann. 3(1):65–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger PL, Luckman T (1966) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge (Penguin, London).Google Scholar
• Besharov ML, Smith WK (2014) Multiple institutional logics in organizations: Explaining their varied nature and implications. Acad. Management Rev. 39(3):364–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boltanski L, Thevenot L (2006) On Justification: Economies of Worth (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P (1990) The Logic of Practice (Polity Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandler JD, Vargo SL (2011) Contextualization and value-in-context: How context frames exchange. Marketing Theory 11(1):35–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chesbrough H (2005) Toward a science of services. Harvard Bus. Rev. 83(2):16–17.Google Scholar
• Clegg SR (1989) Frameworks of Power (Sage, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coombs R, Miles I (2000) Innovation, measurement and services: The new problematique. Metcalfe JS, Miles I, eds. Innovation Systems in the Service Economy: Measurement and Case Study Analysis (Kluwer, New York), 85–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Damanpour F, Evan WM (1984) Organizational innovation and performance: The problem of “organizational lag.” Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(3):392–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron gage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1991) Introduction. Powell WW, Dimaggio PJ, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 1–40.Google Scholar
• Edvardsson B, Kleinaltenkamp M, Tronvoll B, McHugh P, Windahl C (2014) Institutional logics matter when coordinating resource integration. Marketing Theory 14(3):291–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ehret M (2013) Emergence of business markets—A critical realist foundation. Indust. Marketing Management 42(3):316–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emirbayer M, Mische A (1998) What is agency? Amer. J. Sociol. 103(4):962–1023.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, Pentland BT (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(1):94–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedland R, Alford RR (1991) Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. Powell WW, Dimaggio PJ, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 232–263.Google Scholar
• Garud R, Karnøe P (2003) Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Res. Policy 32(2):277–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R, Hardy C, Maguire S (2007) Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: An introduction to the special issue. Organ. Stud. 28(7):957–969.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geertz C (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Giddens A (1984) The Constitution of Society (Polity Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Greenwood R, Suddaby R (2006) Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. Acad. Management J. 49(1):27–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwood R, Raynard M, Kodeih F, Micelotta ER, Lounsbury M (2011) Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):317–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hahn T, Preuss L, Pinkse J, Figge F (2014) Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Acad. Management Rev. 39(4):463–487.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hewlett SA, Marshall M, Sherbin L (2013) How diversity can drive innovation. Harvard Bus. Rev. 91(12):30–30.Google Scholar
• Hoffman AJ (1999) Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry. Acad. Management J. 42(4):351–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holland D, Lachiotte W, Skinner D, Cain C (1998) Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Holm P (1995) The dynamics of institutionalization: Transformation processes in Norwegian fisheries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(3):398–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski P, Smets M, Bednarek R, Burke G, Spee P (2013) Institutional ambidexterity: Leveraging institutional complexity in practice. Lounsbury M, Boxenbaum E, eds. Institutional Logics in Action, Part B, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 39 (Emerald, Bingley, UK), 37–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson V, Powell WW (2015) Poisedness and propagation: Organizational emergence and the transformation of civic order in 19th century New York City. Working Paper 21011, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Kirzner IM (1978) Competition and Entrepreneurship (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Kirzner IM (1997) Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. J. Econom. Literature 35(1):60–85.Google Scholar
• Kodeih F, Greenwood R (2014) Responding to institutional complexity: The role of identity. Organ. Stud. 35(1):7–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koskela-Huotari K, Vargo SL (2016) Institutions as resource context. J. Service Theory Practice 26(2):163–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraatz MS, Block ES (2008) Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin K, Suddaby R, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Sage, London), 243–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laud G, Karpen IO, Mulye R, Rahman K (2015) The role of embeddedness for resource integration: Complementing S-D logic research through a social capital perspective. Marketing Theory 15(4):509–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence TB, Suddaby R (2006) Institutions and institutional work. Glegg SR, Hardy C, Lawrence TB, Nord WR, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 215–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lusch RF, Vargo SL (2014) Service-Dominant Logic: Premises, Perspectives and Possibilities (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Maglio PP, Spohrer J (2008) Fundamentals of service science. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 36(1):18–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maglio PP, Vargo SL, Caswell N, Spohrer J (2009) The service system is the basic abstraction of service science. Inform. Systems e-Bus. Management 7(4):395–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(2):340–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milliken FJ, Martins LL (1996) Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Acad. Management Rev. 21(2):402–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mokyr J (2002) The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• North DC (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver C (1991) Strategic responses to institutional processes. Acad. Management Rev. 16(1):145–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (1992) The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. 3(3):398–427.Link, Google Scholar
• Ostrom E (2005) Understanding Institutional Diversity (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Pache A-C, Santos F (2010) When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Acad. Management Rev. 35(3):455–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Padgett JF, Powell WW (2012) The Emergence of Organizations and Markets (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penrose E (1995) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, 3rd. ed. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peters BG (2012) Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism (Bloomsbury Publishing, New York).Google Scholar
• Roberts J (2003) The manufacture of corporate social responsibility: Constructing corporate sensibility. Organization 10(2):249–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarasvathy SD (2001) Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Acad. Management Rev. 26(2):243–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schreier M, Prügl R (2008) Extending lead—User theory: Antecedents and consequences of consumers’ lead userness. J. Product Innovation Management 25(4):331–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott WR (2014) Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests and Identities (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Seo M-G, Creed WED (2002) Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 27(2):222–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sewell WH (1992) A theory of structure: Duality, agency and transformation. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(1):1–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith WK, Gonin M, Besharov ML (2013) Managing social-business tensions: A review and research agenda for social enterprise. Bus. Ethics Quart. 23(3):407–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spohrer J, Maglio PP (2008) The emergence of service science: Toward systematic service innovations to accelerate co-creation of value. Production Oper. Management 17(3):238–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spohrer JC, Maglio PP (2010) Toward a science of service systems. Maglio PP, Kieliszewski JA, Spohrer JC, eds. Handbook of Service Science (Springer, New York), 157–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swidler A (1986) Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 51(2):273–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management J. 28(13):1319–1350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thornton PH, Ocasio W (2008) Institutional logics. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin K, Suddaby R, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 99–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thornton PH, Ocasio W, Lounsbury M (2012) The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven AH, Poole MS (1995) Explaining development and change in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 20(3):510–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vargo SL, Akaka MA (2009) Service-dominant logic as a foundation for service science: Clarifications. Service Sci. 1(1):32–41.Link, Google Scholar
• Vargo SL, Akaka MA (2012) Value cocreation and service systems (re)formation: A service ecosystems view. Service Sci. 4(3):207–217.Link, Google Scholar
• Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2004) Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. J. Marketing 69(1):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2008) Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 36(1):1–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2011) It’s all b2b … and beyond: Toward a systems perspective of the market. Indust. Marketing Management 40(2):181–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2016) Institutions and axioms: An extension and update of service-dominant logic. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 44(1):5–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vargo SL, Lusch RF, Akaka MA (2010) Advancing service science with service-dominant logic. Maglio PP, Kieliszewski JA, Spohrer JC, eds. Handbook of Service Science (Springer, New York), 133–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vargo SL, Wieland H, Akaka MA (2015) Innovation through institutionalization: A service ecosystems perspective. Indust. Marketing Management 44(1):63–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vican S, Pernell-Gallagher K (2013) Instantiation of institutional logics: The “business case” for diversity and the prevalence of diversity mentoring practices. Lounsbury M, Boxenbaum E, eds. Institutional Logics in Action, Part B, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 39 (Emerald, Bingley, UK), 233–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams KY, O’Reilly CA (1998) Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Res. Organ. Behav. 20(1):77–140.Google Scholar
• Zucker LG (1977) The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 42(5):726–743.Crossref, Google Scholar