Service-Dominant Logic and Performance-Based Contracting: A Systems Thinking Perspective

References

• Ashby WR (1956) An Introduction to Cybernetics (Chapman & Hall, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atefeh Y, Ila M, Stephen MS (2010) Co-creating logistics value: A service-dominant logic perspective. Internat. J. Logist. Management 21(3):375–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Badinelli R, Barile S, Ng I, Polese F, Saviano M, Di Nauta P (2012) Viable service systems and decision making in service management. J. Service Management 23(4):498–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barile S, Spohrer J, Polese F (2010) System thinking for service research advances. (Editorial column). Service Sci. 2(1/2):i–iii.Link, Google Scholar
• Beer S (1966) Decision and Control: The Meaning of Operational Research and Management Cybernetics (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Beer S, ed. (1989) The Viable System Model: Its Provenance, Development, Methodology and Pathology (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
• Berkowitz D, Gupta JND, Simson JT, McWilliams J (2003) Performance Based Logistics (Center for the Management of Science and Technology, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville).Google Scholar
• Blair D, Boardman J, Sauser B (2007) Communicating strategic intent with systemigrams: Addressing the network-enabled challenge. Systems Engrg. 10(4):309–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boardman JT, Cole AJ (1996) Integrated process improvement in design and manufacture using a systems approach. IEE Proc. Control Theory Appl. 143(2):171–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boardman J, Sauser B (2008) Systems Thinking: Coping with 21st Century Problems (Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boardman J, Sauser B (2013) Systemic Thinking: Building Maps for Worlds of Systems (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan HK (2011) Supply chain systems—Recent trend in research and applications. IEEE Systems J. 5(1):2–5.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Checkland P (2000) Systems Thinking, Systems Practice (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Checkland P, Holwell S (1998) Action research: Its nature and validity. Systemic Practice Action Res. 11(1):9–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Churchman CW (1971) The Design of Inquiring Systems (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Cilli M, Parnell GS, Cloutier R, Zigh TS (2015) A systems engineering perspective on the revised defense acquisition system. Systems Engrg. 18(6):584–603.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cloutier R, Sauser B, Bone M, Taylor A (2014) Transitioning systems thinking to model-based systems engineering: Systemigrams to SysML models. IEEE Trans. System, Man, Cybernetics: Systems 45(4):662–674.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coase RH (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica 4(16):386–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen MA, Agrawal N, Agrawal V (2006) Winning in the aftermarket. Harvard Bus. Rev. 84(May):129–138.Google Scholar
• Collins-Camargo C, Ensign K, Flaherty C (2008) National Quality Improvement Center on the privitization of child welfare services: A program description. Res. Social Work Practice 18(1):72–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drucker PF (1962) The economy’s dark continent. Fortune 5(April):265–270.Google Scholar
• Eigbe P, Sauser B, Boardman J (2010) Soft systems analysis of the integration of test and evaluation and program management: A study of a federal aviation administration’s strategy. Systems Engrg. 13(3):298–310.Google Scholar
• Fowler R (2008) Performance based life cycle product support—The new PBL. Presentation, North American Defense Logistics Conference, Crystal City, VA.Google Scholar
• Geary S, Vitasek K (2008) Performance-Based Logistics: A Contractor’s Guide to Life Cycle Product Support Management (Supply Chain Visions, Bellevue, WA).Google Scholar
• Gharajedaghi J (1999) Systems Thinking: Managing Chaos and Complexity: A Platform for Designing Business Architecture (Butterworth-Heinemann, Woburn, MA).Google Scholar
• Gravier MJ, Swartz SM (2009) The dark side of innovation: Exploring obsolescence and supply chain evolution for sustainment-dominated systems. J. High Tech. Management Res. 20(2):87–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guajardo J, Cohen M, Kim S-H, Netessine S (2012) Impact of performance-based contracting on product reliability: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. 58(5):961–979.Link, Google Scholar
• Hammar P, Sauser B, Boardman J (2008) Soft systems methodology applied to the process of systematic screening at US airports. J. Homeland Security June:1–12.Google Scholar
• Hofer AR, Knemeyer AM (2009) Controlling for logistics complexity: Scale development and validation. Internat. J. Logist. Management 20(2):187–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hypko P, Tilebein M, Gleich R (2010) Clarifying the concept of performance-based contracting in manufacturing industries. J. Service Management 21(5):625–655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaworski B, Kohli AK (2006) Co-creating the voice of the customer. Lusch RF, Vargo SL, eds. The Service Dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialogue, Debate, and Directions (M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY), 109–117.Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Cohen MA, Netessine S (2007) Performance contracting in after-sales service supply chains. Management Sci. 53(12):1843–1858.Link, Google Scholar
• Lambert DM, García-Dastugue SJ (2006) Cross functional business processes for the implementation of service-dominant logic. Lusch RF, Vargo SL, eds. The Service Dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialogue, Debate, and Directions (M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY), 150–165.Google Scholar
• Lasfer K, Pyster A, Sauser B (2011) The pre-kindergarten learning enterprise (PKLE). Internat. Acad. Conf., New Orleans, 373–383.Google Scholar
• Lusch RF (2011) Reframing supply chain management: A service-dominant logic perspective. J. Supply Chain Management 47(1):14–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lusch RF, Vargo SL (2006) Service-dominant logic as a foundation for a general theory. Lusch RF, Vargo SL, eds. The Service Dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialogue, Debate, and Directions (M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY), 406–420.Google Scholar
• Lusch RF, Vargo SL, O’Brien M (2007) Competing through service: Insights from service-dominat logic. J. Retailing 83(1):5–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maglio PP, Spohrer J (2007) Fundamentals of service science. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 36(1):18–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mansouri M, Sauser B, Boardman J (2009) Applications of systems thinking for resilience study in maritime transportation system of systems. Third Annual IEEE Internat. Systems Conf. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 211–217.Google Scholar
• Meentemeyer S, Sauser B, Boardman J (2009) Analyzing a system of systems characterization to define system of systems engineering practices. Internat. J. System Systems Engrg. 1(3):329–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mert T, Lauren SB (2011) Supply chain networks and service-dominant logic: Suggestions for future research. Internat. J. Physical Distribution Logist. Management 41(7):717–726.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mingers J, Rosenhead J (2004) Problem structuring methods in action. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 152(3):530–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mingers J, White L (2010) A review of the recent contribution of systems thinking to operational research and management science. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 207(3):1147–1161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nilsson F (2006) Logistic management in practice—Toward theories of complex logistics. Internat. J. Logist. Management 17(1):38–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nowicki D, Murynets I, Ramirez-Marquez JE, Randall WS (2011) Optimal cost avoidance investment and pricing strategies for performance based post-production service contracts. Proc. 8th Annual Acquisition Res. Sympos., Vol. 2 (Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA), 288–305.Google Scholar
• Polese F, Carrubbo L, Troisi O, eds. (2016) Service systems (Special issue). Systems 5(2).Google Scholar
• Ramsay DA, Boardman J, Cole AJ (1996) Reinforcing learning, using soft systemic frameworks. Internat. J. Project Management 14(1):31–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Randall WS (2013) Are the PBL prophets using science or alchemy to create life cycle affordability? A theoretical foundation for explaining PBL efficacy. Defense Acquisition Res. J. 20(3):325–348.Google Scholar
• Randall WS, Nowicki DR, Hawkins TG (2011) Explaining the effectiveness of performance-based logistics: A quantitative examination. Internat. J. Logist. Management 22(3):324–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Randall WS, Pohlen TL, Hanna JB (2010) Evolving a theory of performance-based logistics using insights from service dominant logic. J. Bus. Logist. 31(2):35–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Randall WS, Nowick DR, Deshpande G, Lusch RF (2014) Converting knowledge into value: Gaining insights from service dominant logic and neuroeconomics. Internat. J. Physical Distribution Logist. Management 44(8/9):655–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Randall WS, Hawkins TG, Haynie JJ, Nowicki DR, Armenakis AA, Geary SR (2015) Performance-based logistics and interfirm team processes: An empirical investigation. J. Bus. Logist. 36(2):212–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roels G, Karmarkar US, Carr S (2010) Contracting for collaborative services. Management Sci. 56(5):849–863.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenhead J, Mingers J (2001) Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
• Ruben BD, Kim JY (1975) General Systems Theory and Human Communication (Hayden Book Company, Rochelle Park, NJ).Google Scholar
• Sauser B, Mansouri M, Omer M (2011) Using systemigrams in problem definition: A case study in maritime resilience for homeland security. Internat. J. Homeland Security Emergency Management 8(1):1–19.Google Scholar
• Sauser B, Ramirez-Marquez J, Li Q (2011) Systemigram modeling of the small vessel security strategy for developing enterprise resilience. Marine Tech. Soc. J. 45(3):88–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Senge P (1990) The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization (Currency Doubleday, New York).Google Scholar
• Sherman DG, Cole AJ., Boardman J (1996) Assisting cultural reform in a project-based company using systemigrams. Internat. J. Project Management 14(1):23–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh P, Sandborn P (2006) Obsolescence driven design refresh planning for sustainment-dominated systems. Engrg. Economist 51(2):115–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sivadasan S, Sauser B (2009) Understanding plagiarism using Boardman’s Soft Systems Methodology. Amer. Soc. Engrg. Ed. Conf., Austin, TX.Google Scholar
• Sols A, Nowicki D, Verma D (2007) Defining the fundamental framework of an effective performance-based logistics contract. Engrg. Management J. 19(2):40–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sols A, Nowicki D, Verma D (2008) n-Dimensional effectiveness metric-compensating reward scheme in performance-based logistics contracts. Systems Engrg. 11(2):93–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song M, Di Benedetto CA (2008) Supplier’s involvement and success of radical new product development in new ventures. J. Oper. Management 26(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Squires A, Pyster A, Olwell D, Gelosh D, Enck S, Anthony J, Sauser B (2010) Applying systems thinking via systemigrams for defining the Body of Knowledge and Curriculum to Advance Systems Engineering (BKCASE) project. Internat. Sympos. Internat. Council Systems Engrg., Vol. 20 (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 739–753.Google Scholar
• Transportation Research Board (2009) Performance-based contracting for maintenance. Synthesis 389 report, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2004) Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. J. Marketing 68(1):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2008) Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 36(1):1–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2014) Inversions of service-dominate logic. Marketing Theory 14(3):239–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2016) Institutions and axioms: An extension and update of service-dominat logic. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 44(1):5–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vickers G (1965) The Art of Judgment: A Study of Policy Making (Chapman & Hall, London).Google Scholar
• von Bertalanffy L (1968) General Systems Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications (George Braziller, New York).Google Scholar
• von Bertalanffy L (1972) The history and status of general systems theory. Acad. Management J. 15(4):407–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang S, Li L, Jones JD (2014) Systemic thinking on services science, management and engineering: Applications and challenges in services systems research. IEEE Systems J. 8(3):803–820.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Warfield JN, Perino GH (1999) The problematique: Evolution of an idea. Systems Res. Behavioral Sci. 16(3):221–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1998) Transaction cost economics: How it works; where it is headed. De Economist 146(1):23–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wittmann CM, Nowicki DR, Pohlen TL, Randall WS (2014) Service-dominant logic and supply chain management: Are we there yet? Internat. J. Physical Distribution Logist. Management 44(1/2):113–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• World Bank (2008) Performance-based contracting for health services in developing countries: A toolkit. Report, World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar