Service Design for Value Networks: Enabling Value Cocreation Interactions in Healthcare

References

• Agarwal R, Selen W (2009) Dynamic capability building in service value networks for achieving service innovation. Decision Sci. 40(3):431–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akaka MA, Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2012) An exploration of networks in value cocreation: A service-ecosystems view. Vargo SL, Lusch RF, eds. Special Issue—Toward a Better Understanding of the Role of Value in Markets and Marketing, Review of Marketing Research, Vol. 9 (Emerald Books, Bingley, United Kingdom), 13–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson L, Ostrom AL, Corus C, Fisk RP, Gallan AS, Giraldo M, Mende Met al. (2013) Transformative service research: An agenda for the future. J. Bus. Res. 66(8):1203–1210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beirão G, Patrício L, Fisk RP (2017) Value cocreation in service ecosystems: A qualitative study of health care at the micro, meso and macro levels. J. Service Management 28(2):1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beloglazov A, Banerjee D, Hartman A, Buyya R (2015) Improving productivity in design and development of information technology (IT) service delivery simulation models. J. Service Res. 18(1):75–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry LL, Bendapudi N (2007) Health care: A fertile field for service research. J. Service Res. 10(2):111–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blomkvist J, Holmlid S, Segelström F (2010) Service design research: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Stickdorn M, Schneider J, eds. This Is Service Design Thinking (BIS Publishers, Amsterdam), 308–315.Google Scholar
• Breidbach CF, Maglio PP (2016) Technology-enabled value co-creation: An empirical analysis of actors, resources, and practices. Indust. Marketing Management 56(July):73–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown T (2008) Design thinking. Harvard Bus. Rev. 86(6):84–92.Google Scholar
• Chandler JD, Vargo SL (2011) Contextualization and value-in-context: How context frames exchange. Marketing Theory 11(1):35–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charmaz K (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Corbin J, Strauss A (2008) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 3rd ed. (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Demirkan H (2013) A smart healthcare systems framework. IT Professional 15(5):38–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forlizzi J, Zimmerman J, Evenson S (2008) Crafting a place for interaction design research in HCI. Design Issues 24(3):19–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frow P, McColl-Kennedy JR, Hilton T, Davidson A, Brozovic D (2014) Value propositions: A service ecosystems perspective. Marketing Theory 14(3):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gregor S, Hevner AR (2013) Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Quart. 37(2):337–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grönroos C (2008) Service logic revisited: Who creates value? And who co-creates? Eur. Bus. Rev. 20:298–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gummesson E (2006) Many-to-many marketing as a grand theory. Lusch RF, Vargo SL, eds. Moving Forward with a Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing (M. E. Sharp, Armonk, NY), 339–353.Google Scholar
• Gummesson E (2008) Extending service-dominant logic: From customer centricity to balanced centricity. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 36(1):15–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayrinena K, Sarantoa K, Nykanen P (2008) Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: A review of the research literature. Internat. J. Medical Informatics 77:291–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S (2004) Design science in information systems research. MIS Quart. 28(1):75–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kasanen E, Lukka K, Siitonen A (1993) The constructive approach in management accounting research. J. Management Accounting Res. 5:243–264.Google Scholar
• Kieliszewski CA, Maglio PP, Cefkin M (2012) On modeling value constellations to understand complex service system interactions. Eur. Management J. 30(5):438–450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kolp M, Wautelet Y, Faulkner S (2011) Sociocentric design of multiagent architectures. Yu E, Giorgini P, Mainden N, Mylopoulos J, eds. Social Modeling for Requirements Engineering (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 425–455.Google Scholar
• Lusch RF, Vargo SL, Tanniru M (2010) Service, value networks and learning. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 38(1):19–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maglio PP, Vargo SL, Caswell N, Spohrer J (2009) The service system is the basic abstraction of service science. Inform. Systems e-Bus. Management 7(4):395–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March ST, Smith GF (1995) Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems 15(4):251–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McColl-Kennedy JR, Vargo SL, Dagger TS, Sweeney JC, Kasteren YV (2012) Health care customer value cocreation practice styles. J. Service Res. 15(4):370–389.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meroni A, Sangiorgi D (2011) Design for Services (Gower, Surrey, UK).Google Scholar
• Morelli N, Tollestrup C (2007) New representation techniques for designing in a systemic perspective. Nordes 2007—Design Inquiries, No. 2 (Nordic Design Research, Stockholm, Sweden).Google Scholar
• Mylopoulos J, Chung L, Yu E (1999) Requirements analysis: From object-oriented to goal-oriented. Comm. ACM 42(1):31–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Normann R, Ramírez R (1993) From value chain to value constellation: Designing interactive strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev. 71(4):65–77.Google Scholar
• Ostrom AL, Parasuraman A, Bowen DE, Patrício L, Voss CA (2015) Service research priorities in a rapidly changing context. J. Service Res. 18(2):127–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostrom AL, Bitner MJ, Brown S, Burkhard KA, Goul M, Smith-Daniels V, Demirkan H, Rabinovich E (2010) Moving forward and making a difference: Research priorities for the science of service. J. Service Res. 13(1):4–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patrício L, Fisk RP (2013) Creating new services. Russell-Bennett R, Fisk RP, Harris L, eds. Serving Customers: Global Services Marketing Perspectives (Tilde University Press, Brisbane, Australia), 185–207.Google Scholar
• Patrício L, Gustafsson A, Fisk RP (2018) Upframing service design and innovation for research impact. J. Service Res. 21(1):3–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patrício L, Fisk RP, Cunha JFE, Constantine L (2011) Multilevel service design: From customer value constellation to service experience blueprint. J. Service Res. 14(2):180–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Payne A, Storbacka K, Frow P (2008) Managing the co-creation of value. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 36(1):83–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• PDS-PMOH (2014) 2nd PDS anniversary—Statistics. Accessed March 8, 2018, http://spms.min-saude.pt/blog/2014/07/07/2o-aniversario-plataforma-de-dados-da-saude/.Google Scholar
• Peffers K, Rothenberger M, Tuunanen T, Vaezi R (2012) Design science research evaluation. Peffers K, Rothenberger M, Kuechler B, eds. Design Science Research in Information Systems: Advances in Theory and Practice, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 7286 (Springer, Berlin), 398–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peffers K, Tuunanen T, Rothenberger MA, Chartterjee S (2007) A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Management Inform. Systems 24(3):45–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pinho N, Beirão G, Patrício L, Fisk RP (2014) Understanding value co-creation in complex services with many actors. J. Service Management 25(4):470–493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Plé L, Cáceres RC (2010) Not always co-creation: Introducing interactional co-destruction of value in service-dominant logic. J. Services Marketing 24(6):430–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sampson SE (2012) Visualizing service operations. J. Service Res. 15(2):182–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanders L (2008) An evolving map of design practice and design research. Interactions 15(6):13–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sangiorgi D, Patrício L, Fisk RP (2017) Designing for interdependence, participation and emergence in complex service systems. Sangiorgi D, Prediville A, eds. Designing for Service: Key Issues and New Directions (Bloomsbury Academic, London), 49–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spohrer JC, Maglio PP, Bailey JH, Gruhl D (2007) Steps toward a science of service systems. IEEE Comput. 40(1):71–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stickdorn M, Schneider J (2010) This Is Service Design Thinking (BIS Publishers, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
• Sweeney JC, Danaher TS, McColl-Kennedy JR (2015) Customer effort in value cocreation activities: Improving quality of life and behavioral intentions of health care customers. J. Service Res. 18(3):318–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teixeira J, Patrício L, Nunes N, Nóbrega L, Fisk RP, Constantine L (2012) Customer experience modeling: From customer experience to service design. J. Service Management 23(3):362–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teixeira JG, Patrício L, Huang KH, Fisk RP, Nóbrega L, Constantine L (2017) The MINDS method: Integrating management and interaction design perspectives for service design. J. Service Res. 20(3):240–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thorbjørnsen H, Pedersen PE, Nysveen H (2009) Categorizing networked services: The role of intrinsic-, user network- and complement network attributes. Eur. J. Marketing 43(3/4):371–397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Aken J (2004) Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: The quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules. J. Management Stud. 41(2):219–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Aken J, Chandrasekaran A, Halman J (2016) Conducting and publishing design science research: Inaugural essay of the design science department of the journal of operations management. J. Oper. Management 47–48(November):1–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Riel ACR, Calabretta G, Driessen PH, Hillebrand B, Humphreys A, Krafft M, Beckers SFM (2013) Consumer perceptions of service constellations: Implications for service innovation. J. Service Management 24(3):314–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2004) Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. J. Marketing 68(1):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2008) Service dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 36(1):1–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2016) Institutions and axioms: An extension and update of service-dominant logic. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 44(1):5–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wetter-Edman K, Sangiorgi D, Edvardsson B, Holmlid S, Grönroos C, Mattelmäki T (2014) Design for value co-creation: Exploring synergies between design for service and service logic. Service Sci. 6(2):106–121.Link, Google Scholar
• Wünderlich NV, Heinonen K, Ostrom AL, Patrícío L, Sousa R, Voss C, Lemmink JGAM (2015) “Futurizing” smart service: Implications for service researchers and managers. J. Services Marketing 29(6/7):442–447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yu E, Sangiorgi D (2018) Service design as an approach to implement the value cocreation perspective in new service development. J. Service Res. 21(1):40–58.Crossref, Google Scholar