Determinants for Value Cocreation and Collaborative Paths in Complex Service Systems: A Focus on (Smart) Cities

References

• Bagozzi RP, Yi Y (1988) On the evaluation of structure equation models. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 16:74–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakıcı T, Almirall E, Wareham J (2013) A smart city initiative: The case of Barcelona. J. Knowledge Econom. 4(2):135–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandura A (2001) Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Rev. Psych. 52(1):1–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barile S, Polese F (2010) Smart service systems and viable service systems: Applying systems theory to service science. Service Sci. 2(1-2):21–40.Link, Google Scholar
• Barile S, Saviano M, Caputo F (2014a) How are markets changing? The emergence of consumers market systems. 3rd Internat. Sympos. Advances in Business Management—Towards Systemic Approach, University of Perugia, January 21–23.Google Scholar
• Barile S, Saviano M, Polese F (2014b) Information asymmetry and co-creation in healthcare services. Australas Marketing J. 22(3):205–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barile S, Pels J, Polese F, Saviano M (2012) An introduction to the viable systems approach and its contribution to marketing. J. Bus. Marketing Management 5(2):54–78.Google Scholar
• Barrett P, Baldry D (2009) Facilities Management: Toward Best Practice (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Barrett M, Davidson E, Prabhu J, Vargo SL (2005) Service innovation in the digital age: Key contributions and future directions. MIS Quart. 39(1):135–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bifulco F, Tregua M, Amitrano CC (2014) Living labs for smart innovation: A user-centric approach. Freund L, Wojciech C, eds. Advances in the Human Side of Service Engineering (AHFE, Louisville, KY) 1:282–294.Google Scholar
• Briscoe G, Keränen K, Parry G (2012) Understanding complex service systems through different lenses: An overview. Eur. Management J. 30(5):418–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caputo F (2016) A focus on company-stakeholder relationships in the light of the stakeholder engagement framework. Vrontis D, Weber Y, Tsoukatos E, eds. Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Digital Ecosystems (EuroMed Press, Cyprus), 443–454.Google Scholar
• Caputo F (2018) Approccio Sistemico e Co-creazione di Valore in Sanità (Nuove Culture, Rome).Google Scholar
• Caputo F, Walletzky L (2017) Investigating the users’ approach to ICT platforms in the city management. Systems 5(1), https://doi.org/10.3390/systems5010001.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caputo F, Evangelista F, Russo G (2016a) Information sharing and communication strategies: A stakeholder engagement view. Vrontis D, Weber Y, Tsoukatos E, eds. Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Digital Ecosystems (EuroMed Press, Cyprus), 436–442.Google Scholar
• Caputo F, Evangelista F, Russo G (2018) The role of Information sharing and communication strategies for improving stakeholder engagement. Vrontis D, Weber Y, Tsoukatos V, Shams R, eds. Business Models for Strategic Innovation: Cross-Functional Perspectives (Routledge, London), 96–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caputo F, Walletzky L, Mouzhi G (2017a) Modelling service value process in smart city. IDIMT 2017: Interdisciplinary Information Management Talks, 375–382.Google Scholar
• Caputo F, Walletzky L, Stepanek P (2017b) How smart technologies and big data affect systems’ lives? Conceptual reflections on the Smart City’ ecosystem. Barile S, Espejo R, Perko I, Saviano M, Caputo F, eds. Cybernetics and Systems. Social and Business Decisions (Giappichelli-Routledge, London), 256–260.Google Scholar
• Caputo F, Del Giudice M, Evangelista F, Russo G (2016b) Corporate disclosure and intellectual capital: The light side of information asymmetry. Int. J. Managerial Financial Accounting 8(1):75–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caputo F, Formisano V, Buronova B, Walletzky L (2016c) Beyond the digital ecosystems view: Insights from Smart Communities. Vrontis D, Weber Y, Tsoukatos E, eds. Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Digital Ecosystems (EuroMed Press, Cyprus), 443–454.Google Scholar
• Carrubbo L, Clarizia F, Hysa X, Bilotta A. (2013) New ‘smarter’ solutions for the healthcare complex service system. Gummesson E, Mele C, Polese F, eds, System Theory and Service Science: Integrating Three Perspectives in a New Service Agenda (Giannini, Napoli, Italy), 14–17.Google Scholar
• Chourabi H, Nam T, Walker S, Gil-Garcia J, Mellouli S, Nahon K, Scholl HJ (2012) Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. 2012 45th Hawaii Internat. Conf. on System Science (HICSS, Maui, HI), 2289–2297.Google Scholar
• Del Giudice M, Caputo F, Evangelista F (2016) How decision systems changing? The contribution of Social Media to the management decisional liquefaction. J. Decision Systems 25(3):214–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Del Giudice M, Ahmad A, Scuotto V, Caputo F (2017) Influences of cognitive dimensions on the collaborative entry mode choice of small and medium-sized enterprises. Internat. Marketing Rev. 34(5):652–673.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Di Nauta P, Merola B, Caputo F, Evangelista F (2015) Reflections on the role of university to face the challenges of knowledge society for the local economic development. J. Knowledge Econom. 9(1):180–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dominici G, Yolles M, Caputo F (2017) Decoding the dynamics of value cocreation in consumer tribes. An agency theory approach. Cybernetics Systems 48(2):84–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edvardsson B, Tronvoll B, Gruber T (2011) Expanding understanding of service exchange and value co-creation: A social construction approach. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 39(2):327–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giddens A (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration (Polity Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Giffinger R, Gudrun H (2010) Smart cities ranking: An effective instrument for the positioning of the cities? ACE: Architecture. Cities and Environment 4(12):7–26.Google Scholar
• Grönroos C (2008) Service logic revisited: who creates value? And who co-creates? Eur. Bus. Rev. 20(4):298–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gruhl D, Bailey J, Spohrer J, Maglio PP (2007) Steps toward a science of service systems. Computer 40(1):71–77.Google Scholar
• Gummesson E, Lusch RF, Vargo SL (2010) Transitioning from service management to service-dominant logic: Observations and recommendations. Internat. J. Quality Service Sci. 2(1):8–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Mena JA (2012) An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 40(3):414–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hancock G, Muller R (2006) A Second Course in Structural Equation Modelling (IAP Greenwich, London).Google Scholar
• Headd B (2003) Redefining business success: Distinguishing between closure and failure. Small Bus. Econom. 21(1):51–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ, Urzua S, Vytlacil E (2006) Understanding instrumental variables in models with essential heterogeneity. Rev. Econom. Statist. 88(3):389–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hernández-Muñoz JM, Vercher JB, Muñoz L, Galache JA, Presser M, Gómez LAH, Pettersson J (2011) Smart Cities at the Forefront of the Future Internet (Springer, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinkin TR (1995) A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. J. Management 21(5):967–988.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holling CS (2001) Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 4(5):390–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu LT, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria vs. new alternatives. Structural Equation Model. 6(1):1–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D (1996) PRELIS 2 User’s Reference Guide: A Program for Multivariate Data Screening and Data Summarization: A Preprocessor for LISREL (Scientific Software International, New York).Google Scholar
• Karwowski W, Ahram T, Amaba B (2014) A system-of-systems engineering approach to leadership and innovation: sustainable stem education and workforce development through the smart cities initiative. QScience Proc. 2013 (Bloomsbury Qatar Foundation Journals, Qatar).Google Scholar
• Kieliszewski CA, Maglio PP, Cefkin M (2012) On modeling value constellations to understand complex service system interactions. Eur. Management J. 30(5):438–450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Komninos N, Pallot M, Schaffers H (2013) Special issue on smart cities and the future Internet in Europe. J. Knowledge Econom. 4(2):119–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lages LF, Fernandes JC (2005) The SERPVAL scale: A multi-item instrument for measuring service personal values. J. Bus. Res. 58(11):1562–1572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lusch RF, Vargo SL (2006) Service-dominant logic: reactions, reflections and refinements. Marketing Theory 6(3):281–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lusch RF, Vargo SL (2012) The forum on markets and marketing (FMM)—Advancing service-dominant logic. Marketing Theory 12(2):193–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lusch RF, Vargo SL (2014) The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, Debate, and Directions (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
• MacCallum RC, Austin JT (2000) Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Rev. Psych. 51(1):201–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM (1996) Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psych. Methods 1:130–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matell MS, Jacoby J (1971) Is there an optimal number of alternatives for Likert scale items? Study. Ed. Psych. Measurement 31:657–674.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1957) Social Theory and Social Structure (Free Press, Glencoe, IL).Google Scholar
• Mitchell WJ (2000) Designing the digital city. Ishida T, Isbister K, eds. Digital Cities (Springer, Berlin), 1–6.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Møller C, Chaudhry SS, Jørgensen B (2008) Complex service design: A virtual enterprise architecture for logistics service. Inform. Systems Frontiers 10(5):503–518.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morvaj B, Lugaric L, Krajcar S (2011) Demonstrating smart buildings and smart grid features in a smart energy city. Energetics (IYCE) Proc. 3rd Internat. Youth Conf. 2011 (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1–8.Google Scholar
• Motta G, You L, Sacco D, Ma T (2014) City feed: A crowdsourcing system for city governance. IEEE 8th Internat. Sympos. on Service Oriented System Engineering (SOSE) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ) 439–445.Google Scholar
• Nam T, Pardo TA (2011) Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. Proc. 12th Annual Internat. Digital Government Research Conf.: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times (ACM, New York), 282–291.Google Scholar
• Ng I, Parry G, Wild P, McFarlane D, Tasker P, eds. (2011) Complex Engineering Service Systems: Concepts and Research (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Partridge HL (2004) Developing a human perspective to the digital divide in the ‘smart city. Partridge H, ed. Australian Library and Information Association Biennial Conference (Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia), 1–7. Google Scholar
• Paskaleva KA (2009) Enabling the smart city: The progress of city e-governance in Europe. Internat. J. Innovation Res. Dev. 1(4):405–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Payne AF, Storbacka K, Frow P (2008) Managing the co-creation of value. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 36(1):83–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pels J, Möller K, Saren M (2009) Do we really understand business marketing? Getting beyond the RM and BM matrimony. J. Bus. Indust. Marketing 24(5/6):322–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peñaloza L, Venkatesh A (2006) Further evolving the new dominant logic of marketing: from services to the social construction of markets. Marketing Theory 6(3):299–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polese F, Pels J, Brodie R (2011) Theoretical underpinning to successful value co-creation. Gummesson E, Mele C, Polese F, eds. Service-Dominant Logic, Network & Systems Theory and Service Science: Integrating Three Perspectives for a New Service Agenda (Giannini, Napoli, Italy).Google Scholar
• Polese F, Russo G, Carrubbo L (2009b) Service logic, value co-creation and networks: three dimensions fostering inter-organisational relationships: Competitiveness in the boating industry. Proc. 12th QMOD and Toulon-Verona Conf., Verona, Italy, 27–29.Google Scholar
• Polese F, Caputo F, Carrubbo L, Sarno D (2016) The value (co)creation as peak of social pyramid. 26th Annual RESER Conf., What’s Ahead in Service Research: New Perspectives for Business and Society, Naples, Italy, 8–10.Google Scholar
• Polese F, Moretta Tartaglione A, Sarno S, Carrubbo L, eds. (2009a) An efficient value chain, or a service value network? Best practices deriving from Zara. Managerial and Entrepreneurial Developments in the Mediterranean Area (EuroMed Press, Cyprus).Google Scholar
• Saviano M, Caputo F, Formisano V, Walletzký L (2016), From theory to practice in systems studies: A focus on Smart Cities. Caputo F, ed. Governing Business Systems. Theories and Challenges for Systems Thinking in Practice 4th Business Systems Laboratory Internat. Sympos. (Business Systems Laboratory, Avellino), 35–40.Google Scholar
• Saviano M, Parida R, Caputo F, Datta SK (2014) Healthcare as a worldwide concern. Insights on the Italian and Indian healthcare systems and PPPs from a VSA perspective. EuroMed J. Bus. 9(2):198–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schaffers H, Komninos N, Pallot M, Trousse B, Nilsson M, Oliveira A (2011) Smart cities and the future Internet: Toward cooperation frameworks for open innovation. Future Internet Assembly 6656(31):431–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scuotto V, Caputo F, Villasalero M, Del Giudice M (2018) A multiple buyer–supplier relationship in the context of SMEs’ digital supply chain management. Production Planning Control 28(16):1378–1388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro J (2006) Smart cities: Quality of life, productivity, and the growth effects of human capital. Rev. Econom. Statist. 88(2):324–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith KG, Carroll SJ, Ashford SJ (1995) Intra-and interorganizational cooperation: Toward a research agenda. Acad. Management J. 38(1):7–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sperber AD, Devellis RF, Boehlecke B (1994) Cross-cultural translation methodology and validation. J. Cross Cultural Psych. 25(4):501–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spohrer J, Maglio PP (2008) The emergence of service science: Toward systematic service innovations to accelerate co‐creation of value. Production Oper. Management 17(3):238–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sudman S, Bradburn NM, Schwarz N (1996) Thinking About Answers: The Application of Cognitive Processes to Survey Methodology (Jossey-Bass, New York).Google Scholar
• Tien JM (2008) On integration and adaptation in complex service systems. J. Systems Sci. Systems Engrg. 17(4):385–415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Townsend AM (2003) Smart Cities: Big Data, Civic Hackers, and the Quest for a New Utopia (WW Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Vargo SL (2008) Customer integration and value creation: Paradigmatic traps and perspectives. J. Service Res. 11(2):211–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vargo SL, Akaka MA (2012) Value cocreation and service systems (re)formation: A service ecosystems view. Service Sci. 4(3):207–217.Link, Google Scholar
• Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2004) Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. J. Marketing 68(1):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2006) Service-dominant logic: What it is, what it is not, what it might be. Lusch RF, Vargo SL, eds. The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, Debate and Directions (M.E. Sharpe Inc., Armonk, NY), 43–56.Google Scholar
• Vargo SL, Maglio PP, Akaka MA (2008) On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective. Eur. Management J. 26(3):145–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vrbka Z (2009) Advanced QA and testing approach based on service system paradigm. Gummesson E, Mele C, Polese F, eds. Service Science, S-D Logic and Network Theory (Giannini, Napoli, Italy).Google Scholar
• Winters JV (2010) Why are smart cities growing? Who moves and who stays. J. Regional Sci. 20(10):1–18.Google Scholar
• Wood DJ, Gray B (1991) Toward a comprehensive theory of collaboration. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 27(2):139–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woodall T (2003) Conceptualising ‘value for the customer’: An attributional, structural and dispositional analysis. Acad. Marketing Sci. Rev. 12:12–27.Google Scholar
• Yovanof GS, Hazapis GN (2009) An architectural framework and enabling wireless technologies for digital cities & intelligent urban environments. Wireless Personal Comm. 49(3):445–463.Crossref, Google Scholar