Who Are the Gatekeepers? An Examination of Diversity in INFORMS Journal Editorial Boards

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/serv.2021.0274

References

  • Alkhawtani RHM, Kwee TC, Kwee RM (2021) Gender diversity among editorial boards of radiology-related journals. Clinical Imaging 75:30–33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beath C, Chan Y, Davison RM, Dennis A, Recker J (2021) Editorial board diversity at the Basket of Eight journals: A report to the College of Senior Scholars. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems, vol 48, https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04830.Google Scholar
  • Bhaumik S, Jagnoor J (2019) Diversity in the editorial boards of global health journals. BMJ Global Health 4(5):e001909.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhaumik S, Mathew RJ (2014) Representation of women as editors in the Cochrane collaboration. J. Evidence-Based Medicine 7(4):249–251.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell LG, Mehtani S, Dozier ME, Rinehart J (2013) Gender-heterogeneous working groups produce higher quality science. PLoS One 8(10):e79147.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cho AH, Johnson SA, Schuman CE, Adler JM, Gonzalez O, Graves SJ, Huebner JR, et al. (2014) Women are underrepresented on the editorial boards of journals in environmental biology and natural resource management. PeerJ 2:e542.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cholewiak SA, Ipeirotis P, Silva V (2020) scholarly 0.3.3. Retrieved July 28, 2020, https://pypi.org/project/scholarly/.Google Scholar
  • Clauset A, Arbesman S, Larremore DB (2015) Systematic inequality and hierarchy in faculty hiring networks. Sci. Adv. 1(1):e1400005.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute (2021) 20 U.S. Code § 1067k - Definitions. Retrieved March 12, 2021, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/20/1067k.Google Scholar
  • Dhanani A, Jones MJ (2017) Editorial boards of accounting journals: Gender diversity and internationalisation. Accounting Auditing Accountability J. 30(5):1008–1040.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Diestel R (2017) Graph Theory (Springer, Berlin).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fox CW, Duffy MA, Fairbairn DJ, Meyer JA (2019) Gender diversity of editorial boards and gender differences in the peer review process at six journals of ecology and evolution. Ecology Evolution 9(24):13636–13649.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harris CA, Banerjee T, Cramer M, Manz S, Ward ST, Dimick J, Telem DA (2019) Editorial (spring) board? Gender composition in high-impact general surgery journals over 20 years. Ann. Surgery 269(3):582–588.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harzing AW, Metz I (2011) Gender and geographical diversity in the editorial board of the Journal of International Business Studies. AIB Insights 11(3):3–7.Google Scholar
  • Hofstra B, Kulkarni VV, Munoz-Najar Galvez S, He B, Jurafsky D, McFarland DA (2020) The diversity-innovation paradox in science. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117(17):9284–9291.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hong L, Page SE (2004) Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101(46):16385–16389.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jadidi M, Karimi F, Lietz H, Wagner C (2018) Gender disparities in science? Dropout, productivity, collaborations and success of male and female computer scientists. Adv. Complex Systems 21(03n04):1750011.Google Scholar
  • Jalilianhasanpour R, Charkhchi P, Mirbolouk M, Yousem DM (2019) Underrepresentation of women on radiology editorial boards. J. Amer. College Radiology 16(1):115–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lin T (2012) Cracking open the scientific process. New York Times (January 16), https://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/17/science/open-science-challenges-journal-tradition-with-web-collaboration.html.Google Scholar
  • Lloyd G (2021) Active INFORMS member demographic report provided by author via personal communication, March 9.Google Scholar
  • Mauleón E, Hillán L, Moreno L, Gómez I, Bordons M (2012) Assessing gender balance among journal authors and editorial board members. Scientometrics 95(1):87–114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McLeod L, Lobel P, Alisa S (1992) The effects of ethnic diversity on idea generation in small groups. Acad. Management Proc. 1992(1):227–231.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Metz I, Harzing AW (2009) Gender diversity in editorial boards of management journals. Acad. Management Learn. Ed. 8(4):540–557.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Metz I, Harzing AW (2012) An update of gender diversity in editorial boards: A longitudinal study of management journals. Personnel Rev. 41(3):283–300.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nafade V, Sen P, Pai M (2019) Global health journals need to address equity, diversity and inclusion. BMJ Global Health 4(5):e002018.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newman MEJ (2001) The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98(2):404–409.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phillips KW, Medin D, Lee CD, Bang M, Bishop S, Lee DN (2014) How diversity works. Sci. Amer. 311(4):42–47.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pink S, Sarukkai M (2021) Gender asymmetries in academic collaboration networks. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  • Piper CL, Scheel JR, Lee CI, Forman HP (2018) Representation of women on radiology journal editorial boards: A 40-year analysis. Academic Radiology 25(12):1640–1645.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sarigöl E, Pfitzner R, Scholtes I, Garas A, Schweitzer F (2014) Predicting scientific success based on coauthorship networks. EPJ Data Sci. 3(1):9.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Servia-Rodriguez S, Noulas A, Mascolo C, Fernandez-Vilas A, Diaz-Redondo RP (2015) The evolution of your success lies at the centre of your co-authorship network. PLoS One 10(3):e0114302.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith-Doerr L, Alegria SN, Sacco T (2017) How diversity matters in the US science and engineering workforce: A critical review considering integration in teams, fields, and organizational contexts. Engaging Sci. Tech. Soc. 3:139–153.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stephens M (2020) name-tools 0.1.7. Retrieved July 28, 2020, https://pypi.org/project/name-tools/.Google Scholar
  • Stewart AJ, Valian V (2018) An Inclusive Academy: Achieving Diversity and Excellence (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Svensson G, Slåtten T, Tronvoll B (2007) “Ethnocentricity” in top journals of services management. Managing Service Quality 17(5):563–578.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Svensson G, Slåtten T, Tronvoll B (2008) “Scientific identity” and “ethnocentricity” in top journals of logistics management. Internat. J. Physical Distribution Logist. Management 38(8):588–600.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Topaz CM, Sen S (2016) Gender representation on journal editorial boards in the mathematical sciences. PLoS One 11(8):e0161357.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Travis GDL, Collins HM (2016) New light on old boys: Cognitive and institutional particularism in the peer review system. Sci. Tech. Human Values 16(3):322–341.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2020a) Labor force characteristics by race and ethnicity, 2019. Report, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, DC. Retrieved March 6, 2021, https://www.bls.gov/opub/reports/race-and-ethnicity/2019/home.htm.Google Scholar
  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2020b) Labor force statistics from the current population survey. Report, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, DC. Retrieved June 16, 2021, https://www.bls.gov/cps/lfcharacteristics.htm#laborforce.Google Scholar
  • Wapman H (2020) webweb d3.v5. Retrieved July 28, 2020, https://webwebpage.github.io/.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.