The Effects of Sister-Store Presence and Market Competition on Product Assortment: Evidence from Book Retailing
Published Online:9 Sep 2021https://doi.org/10.1287/serv.2021.0275
References
- (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
- Barnes & Noble (2013) Annual report. Accessed October 25, 2019, http://beta.barnesandnobleinc.com/for_investors/annual_reports/2013_bn_annual_report.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2007) Enhanced routines for instrumental variables/generalized method of moments estimation and testing. Stata J. 7(4):465–506.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Product proliferation: An empirical analysis of product line determinants and market outcomes. Marketing Sci. 18(2):137–153.Link, Google Scholar
- (2005) Own-brand and cross-brand retail pass-through. Marketing Sci. 24(1):123–137.Link, Google Scholar
- (2001) Reducing assortment: An attribute-based approach. J. Marketing 65(3):50–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Effect of product assortment changes on consumer retention. Marketing Sci. 24(4):616–622.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) How does assortment affect grocery store choice? J. Marketing Res. 46(2):177–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) Consumers’ perceptions of the assortment offered in a grocery category: The impact of item reduction. J. Marketing Res. 35(2):166–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Battle of the retail channels: How product selection and geography drive cross-channel competition. Management Sci. 55(11):1755–1765.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) Competing in the age of omnichannel retailing. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 54(4):23–29.Google Scholar
- Deloitte (2014) The omnichannel opportunity: Unlocking the power of connected customers. Accessed October 25, 2019, http://www2.deloitte.com.Google Scholar
- eMarketer (2014) The state of omni channel retail: Retailers playing catch up with consumers. Accessed July 15, 2017, http://www.globalecommerceformerchants.com.Google Scholar
- (1991) Consumer responses to retail stockouts. J. Retailing 67(2):138–147.Google Scholar
- (1999) The impact of product variety on automobile assembly operations: Empirical evidence and simulation analysis. Management Sci. 45(6):771–786.Link, Google Scholar
- (2002) Retail out-of-stocks: A worldwide examination of extent, causes and consumer responses. Grocery Manufacturers of America, Washington, D.C. Accessed October 25, 2019, http://itsoutofstock.com.Google Scholar
- (2010) An empirical analysis of assortment similarities across U.S. supermarkets. Marketing Sci. 29(5):858–879.Link, Google Scholar
- (1999) Product line extensions and competitive market interactions: An empirical analysis. J. Econometrics 89(1–2):339–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) Dynamic relationships with customers: High variety strategies. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 26(1):45–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Resource-seeking agglomeration: A study of market entry in the lodging industry. Strategic Management J. 25(7):689–699.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Multi-unit ownership in franchising: Evidence from the fast-food industry in Texas. RAND J. Econom. 35(4):747–761.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Optimal and competitive assortments with endogenous pricing under hierarchical consumer choice models. Management Sci. 57(9):1546–1563.Link, Google Scholar
- (2008) Assortment planning: Review of literature and industry practice. Agrawal N, Smith SA, eds. Retail Supply Chain Management (Springer, New York), 99–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Competition and product quality in the supermarket industry. Quart. J. Econom. 126(3):1539–1591.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Mintel (2010) Book retailing – US. Accessed July 15, 2017, http://reports.mintel.com.Google Scholar
- (2009) Competing retailers and inventory: An empirical investigation of General Motors’ dealerships in isolated U.S. markets. Management Sci. 55(9):1586–1604.Link, Google Scholar
- Oracle (2010) Oracle retail assortment planning. Accessed October 25, 2019, http://www.oracle.com.Google Scholar
- (2012) Best-sellers lists: How they work and who they (mostly) work for. The Sacramento Bee (January 22), p. 10.Google Scholar
- (2001) An empirical analysis of firm’s product line decisions. J. Marketing Res. 38(1):110–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Quora (2011) Borders group: Why is Barnes & Noble performing well as a business while borders has filed for bankruptcy? Accessed July 15, 2017, http://www.quora.com.Google Scholar
- (2013) Impact of variety and distribution system characteristics on inventory levels at U.S. retailers. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(2):1991–2004.Link, Google Scholar
- (2011) Managing product variety and collocation in a competitive environment: An empirical investigation of consumer electronics retailing. Management Sci. 57(6):1009–1024.Link, Google Scholar
- (2006) The demand for books estimated by means of consumer survey data. J. Cultural Econom. 30:141–155.Google Scholar
- (1979) The anatomy of a stockout. J. Retailing 55(2):59–70.Google Scholar
- (2006) The short- and long-term impact of an assortment reduction on category sales. J. Marketing Res. 43(4):536–548.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. Andrews DWK, Stock JH, eds. Identification and Inference for Econometric Models (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 80–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) The effect of product variety and inventory levels on retail store sales: A longitudinal study. Production Oper. Management 19(5):546–560.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Product variety and competition in the retail market for eyeglasses. J. Indust. Econom. 57(2):217–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Brand-level effects of stock keeping unit reductions. J. Marketing Res. 44(4):545–559.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Market structure and competition in the retail discount industry. J. Marketing Res. 46(8):453–466.Crossref, Google Scholar

