Adoption Factors of Digital Services—A Systematic Literature Review

References

• Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 50(2):179–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bardhan IR, Demirkan H, Kannan PK, Kauffman RJ, Sougstad R (2010) An interdisciplinary perspective on IT services management and service science. J. Management Inform. Systems 26(4):13–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartels J, Reinders MJ (2011) Consumer innovativeness and its correlates: A propositional inventory for future research. J. Bus. Res. 64(6):601–609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bauer RA (1967) Consumer behavior as risk taking. Cox D, ed. Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Blut M, Beatty SE, Evanschitzky H, Brock C (2014) The impact of service characteristics on the switching costs—Customer loyalty link. J. Retailing 90(2):275–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyer KK, Frohlich MT (2009) Analysis of effects of operational execution on repeat purchasing for heterogeneous customer segments. Production Oper. Management 15(2):229–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bruner GC, Kumar A (2007) Gadget lovers. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 35(3):329–339.Google Scholar
• Buell RW, Norton MI (2011) The labor illusion: How operational transparency increases perceived value. Management Sci. 57(9):1564–1579.Link, Google Scholar
• Campbell D, Frei F (2010) Cost structure, customer profitability, and retention implications of self-service distribution channels: Evidence from customer behavior in an online banking channel. Management Sci. 56(1):4–24.Link, Google Scholar
• Chase RB, Tansik DA (1983) The customer contact model for organization design. Management Sci. 29(9):1037–1050.Google Scholar
• Chen L, Baird A, Rai A (2019) Mobile health (mHealth) channel preference: An integrated perspective of approach–avoidance beliefs and regulatory focus. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 20(12):1743–1773.Google Scholar
• Chesbrough H, Spohrer J (2006) A research manifesto for services science. Comm. ACM 49(7):35–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chiu YTH, Hofer KM (2015) Service innovation and usage intention: A cross-market analysis. J. Service Management 26(3):516–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collier JE, Sherrell DL (2010) Examining the influence of control and convenience in a self-service setting. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 38(4):490–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crist JD, Michaels C, Gelfand DE, Phillips LR (2007) Defining and measuring service awareness among elders and caregivers of Mexican descent. Res. Theory Nursing Practice 21(2):119.Google Scholar
• Curran JM, Meuter ML (2005) Self-service technology adoption: Comparing three technologies. J. Services Marketing 19(2):103–113.Google Scholar
• Curran JM, Meuter ML, Surprenant CF (2003) Intentions to use self-service technologies: A confluence of multiple attitudes. J. Service Res. 5(3):209–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dabholkar PA (1996) Consumer evaluations of new technology-based self-service options: An investigation of alternative models of service quality. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 13(1):29–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dabholkar PA, Bagozzi RP (2002) An attitudinal model of technology-based self-service: Moderating effects of consumer traits and situational factors. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 30(3):184–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. 13(3):319–340.Google Scholar
• Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Sci. 35(8):982–1003.Link, Google Scholar
• Dimitriadis S, Kyrezis N (2010) Linking trust to use intention for technology-enabled bank channels: The role of trusting intentions. Psych. Marketing 27(8):799–820.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dong B, Evans KR, Zou S (2008) The effects of customer participation in co-created service recovery. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 36(1):123–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Chaiken S (1993) The Psychology of Attitudes (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Fort Worth, TX).Google Scholar
• Eichengreen B, Gupta P (2013) The two waves of service-sector growth. Oxford Econom. Papers 65(1):96–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Etgar M (2008) A descriptive model of the consumer co-production process. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 36(1):97–108.Google Scholar
• Evanschitzky H, Iyer GR, Pillai KG, Kenning P, Schütte R (2015) Consumer trial, continuous use, and economic benefits of a retail service innovation: The case of the personal shopping assistant. J. Product Innovation Management 32(3):459–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Featherman MS, Pavlou PA (2003) Predicting e-services adoption: A perceived risk facets perspective. Internat. J. Human Comput. Stud. 59(4):451–474.Google Scholar
• Featherman MS, Valacich JS, Wells JD (2006) Is that authentic or artificial? Understanding consumer perceptions of risk in e-service encounters. Inform. Systems J. 16(2):107–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fenigstein A, Scheier MF, Buss AH (1975) Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. J. Consulting Clinical Psych. 43(4):522.Google Scholar
• Flavián C, Pérez-Rueda A, Belanche D, Casaló LV (2022) Intention to use analytical artificial intelligence (AI) in services—The effect of technology readiness and awareness. J. Service Management 33(2):293–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frambach RT, Roest HC, Krishnan TV (2007) The impact of consumer internet experience on channel preference and usage intentions across the different stages of the buying process. J. Interactive Marketing 21(2):26–41.Google Scholar
• Giebelhausen M, Robinson SG, Sirianni NJ, Brady MK (2014) Touch vs. tech: When technology functions as a barrier or a benefit to service encounters. J. Marketing 78(4):113–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glover S, Benbasat I (2010) A comprehensive model of perceived risk of e-commerce transactions. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce 15(2):47–78.Google Scholar
• Goldsmith RE, Hofacker CF (1991) Measuring consumer innovativeness. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 19(3):209–221.Google Scholar
• Gounaris S, Koritos CD (2012) Adoption of technologically based innovations: The neglected role of bounded rationality. J. Product Innovation Management 29(5):821–838.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta R, Gupta D, Jain K, Momaya KS (2021) User involvement in technology-based service innovations in telecom: Cases from India. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 1–12.Google Scholar
• Hatzakis EDM, Nair SK, Pinedo M (2010) Operations in financial services—An overview. Production Oper. Management 19(6):633–664.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heidenreich S, Handrich M (2015a) Adoption of technology-based services: The role of customers’ willingness to co-create. J. Service Management 26(1):44–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heidenreich S, Handrich M (2015b) What about passive innovation resistance? Investigating adoption-related behavior from a resistance perspective. J. Product Innovation Management 32(6):878–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Higgins ET (1998) Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 30 (Elsevier), 1–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill TP (1977) On goods and services. Rev. Income Wealth 23(4):315–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirschman EC (1980) Innovativeness, novelty seeking, and consumer creativity. J. Consumer Res. 7(3):283–295.Google Scholar
• Igbaria M, Parasuraman S, Baroudi JJ (1996) A motivational model of microcomputer usage. J. Management Inform. Systems 13(1):127–143.Google Scholar
• Jain G, Paul J, Shrivastava A (2021) Hyper-personalization, co-creation, digital clienteling and transformation. J. Bus. Res. 124:12–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Telang R (2012) Does the web reduce customer service cost? Empirical evidence from a call center. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3):721–737.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee J, Allaway A (2002) Effects of personal control on adoption of self-service technology innovations. J. Services Marketing 16(6):553–572.Google Scholar
• Li M, Choi TY, Rabinovich E, Crawford A (2013) Self-service operations at retail stores: The role of inter-customer interactions. Production Oper. Management 22(4):888–914.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lusch RF, Nambisan S (2015) Service innovation: A service-dominant logic perspective. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 39(1):155–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mallat N (2007) Exploring consumer adoption of mobile payments—A qualitative study. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 16(4):413–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mani Z, Chouk I (2018) Consumer resistance to innovation in services: Challenges and barriers in the internet of things era. J. Product Innovation Management 35(5):780–807.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayer RC, Davis JH, Schoorman FD (1995) An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Management Rev. 20(3):709–734.Google Scholar
• McKnight DH, Cummings LL, Chervany NL (1998) Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Acad. Management Rev. 23(3):473–490.Google Scholar
• McKnight DH, Choudhury V, Kacmar C (2002) The impact of initial consumer trust on intentions to transact with a web site: A trust building model. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 11(3–4):297–323.Google Scholar
• Meuter ML, Bitner MJ, Ostrom AL, Brown SW (2005) Choosing among alternative service delivery modes: An investigation of customer trial of self-service technologies. J. Marketing 69(2):61–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meuter ML, Ostrom AL, Roundtree RI, Bitner MJ (2000) Self-service technologies: Understanding customer satisfaction with technology-based service encounters. J. Marketing 64(3):50–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moeller S (2010) Characteristics of services—A new approach uncovers their value. J. Services Marketing 24(5):359–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore GC, Benbasat I (1991) Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inform. Systems Res. 2(3):192–222.Google Scholar
• Murray KB, Schlacter JL (1990) The impact of services versus goods on consumers’ assessment of perceived risk and variability. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 18(1):51–65.Google Scholar
• Muthitcharoen AM, Palvia PC, Grover V (2011) Building a model of technology preference: The case of channel choices. Decision Sci. 42(1):205–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nysveen H, Pedersen PE, Thorbjernsen H (2005) Intentions to use mobile services: Antecedents and cross-service comparisons. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 33(3):330–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oh H, Jeong M, Baloglu S (2013) Tourists’ adoption of self-service technologies at resort hotels. J. Bus. Res. 66(6):692–699.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer et al. (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372(71).Google Scholar
• Parasuraman A (2000) Technology Readiness Index (TRI) a multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. J. Service Res. 2(4):307–320.Google Scholar
• Parasuraman A, Colby CL (2015) An updated and streamlined technology readiness index: TRI 2.0. J. Service Res. 18(1):59–74.Google Scholar
• Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL (1988) SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. J. Retailing 64(1):12–40.Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA (2003) Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce 7(3):101–134.Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA, Gefen D (2005) Psychological contract violation in online marketplaces: Antecedents, consequences, and moderating role. Inform. Systems Res. 16(4):372–399.Google Scholar
• Rijsdijk SA, Hultink EJ, Diamantopoulos A (2007) Product intelligence: Its conceptualization, measurement and impact on consumer satisfaction. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 35(3):340–356.Google Scholar
• Quinn JB (1988) Technology in services: Past myths and future challenges. Tech. Forecasting Soc. Change 34(4):327–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers EM (1995) Diffusion of Innovations, 4th ed. (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed. (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Rogers M (2004) Networks, firm size and innovation. Small Bus. Econom. 22(2):141–153.Google Scholar
• Rogers EM, Shoemaker FF (1971) Communication of Innovations: A Cross-Cultural Approach (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Rust RT, Chung TS (2006) Marketing models of service and relationships. Marketing Sci. 25(6):560–580.Link, Google Scholar
• Salo M, Frank L (2017) User behaviours after critical mobile application incidents: The relationship with situational context. Inform. Systems J. 27(1):5–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scherer A, Wünderlich NV, von Wangenheim F (2015) The value of self-service: Long-term effects of technology-based self-service usage on customer retention. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 39(1):177–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seiders K, Voss GB, Godfrey AL, Grewal D (2007) SERVCON: Development and validation of a multidimensional service convenience scale. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 35(1):144–156.Google Scholar
• Spohrer J (2017) IBM’s service journey: A summary sketch. Indust. Marketing Management 60:167–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Talke K, Heidenreich S (2014) How to overcome pro-change bias: Incorporating passive and active innovation resistance in innovation decision models. J. Product Innovation Management 31(5):894–907.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor JW (1974) The role of risk in consumer behavior: A comprehensive and operational theory of risk taking in consumer behavior. J. Marketing 38(2):54–60.Google Scholar
• Trenz M, Veit DJ, Tan C-W (2020) Disentangling the impact of omnichannel integration on consumer behavior in integrated sales channels. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 44(3):1207–1258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2004) Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. J. Marketing 68(1):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2008) Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 36(1):1–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V (2006) Where to go from here? Thoughts on future directions for research on individual-level technology adoption with a focus on decision making. Decision Sci. 37(4):497–518.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 27(3):425–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Thong JYL, Chan FKY, Hu PJH (2016) Managing citizens’ uncertainty in e-government services: The mediating and moderating roles of transparency and trust. Inform. Systems Res. 27(1):87–111.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang C, Harris J, Patterson PG (2012) Customer choice of self‐service technology: The roles of situational influences and past experience. J. Service Management 23(1):54–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Welch EW, Hinnant CC, Moon MJ (2005) Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. J. Public Administration Res. Theory 15(3):371–391.Google Scholar
• World Bank (2020) Anteile der Wirtschaftssektoren am globalen Bruttoinlandsprodukt (BIP) von 2008 bis 2018 [Graph]. In Statista. Accessed July 30, 2020, https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/248027/umfrage/anteile-der-wirtschaftssektoren-am-globalen-bruttoinlandsprodukt-bip/.Google Scholar
• Xu JD, Benbasat I, Cenfetelli RT (2014) The influences of online service technologies and task complexity on efficiency and personalization. Inform. Systems Res. 25(2):420–436.Link, Google Scholar
• Yen HR (2005) An attribute-based model of quality satisfaction for internet self-service technology. Service Indust. J. 25(5):641–659.Google Scholar
• Yousafzai SY, Pallister JG, Foxall GR (2005) Strategies for building and communicating trust in electronic banking: A field experiment. Psych. Marketing 22(2):181–201.Google Scholar
• Zhao H, Seibert SE, Hills GE (2005) The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. J. Appl. Psych. 90(6):1265.Google Scholar
• Zhu Z, Nakata C, Sivakumar K, Grewal D (2007) Self-service technology effectiveness: The role of design features and individual traits. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 35(4):492–506.Crossref, Google Scholar