Contract Theory-Based Collection, Updating, and Packaging Combination Strategies in Data Trading

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/serv.2023.0018

References

  • Abu Alsheikh M, Niyato D, Leong D, Wang P, Han Z (2017) Privacy management and optimal pricing in people-centric sensing. IEEE J. Selected Areas Comm. 35(4):906–920.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alsheikh MA, Hoang DT, Niyato D, Leong D, Wang P, Han Z (2020) Optimal pricing of internet of things: A machine learning approach. IEEE J. Selected Areas Comm. 38(4):669–684.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • August T, Dao D, Kim K (2019) Market segmentation and software security: Pricing patching rights. Management Sci. 65(10):4575–4597.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Azcoitia SA, Laoutaris N (2022) A survey of data marketplaces and their business models. ACM SIGMOD Record 51(3):18–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bajari P, Chernozhukov V, Hortaçsu A, Suzuki J (2019) The impact of big data on firm performance: An empirical investigation. AEA Papers and Proc., vol. 109 (American Economic Association, Nashville, TN), 33–37.Google Scholar
  • Bataineh AS, Mizouni R, Bentahar J, El Barachi M (2020) Toward monetizing personal data: A two-sided market analysis. Future Generation Comput. Systems 111(2020):435–459.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhargava HK, Choudhary V (2008) Research note—When is versioning optimal for information goods? Management Sci. 54(5):1029–1035.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chellappa RK, Mehra A (2018) Cost drivers of versioning: Pricing and product line strategies for information goods. Management Sci. 64(5):2164–2180.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen YJ, Huang KW (2016) Pricing data services: Pricing by minutes, by gigs, or by megabytes per second? Inform. Systems Res. 27(3):596–617.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen YJ, Seshadri S (2007) Product development and pricing strategy for information goods under heterogeneous outside opportunities. Inform. Systems Res. 18(2):150–172.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen J, Pun H, Zhang Q (2023) Eliminate demand information disadvantage in a supplier encroachment supply chain with information acquisition. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 305(2):659–673.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cheng HK, Li S, Liu Y (2014) Optimal software free trial strategy: Limited version, time-locked, or hybrid? Production Oper. Management 24(3):504–517.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choudhary V (2010) Use of pricing schemes for differentiating information goods. Inform. Systems Res. 21(1):78–92.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • DAMA International (2009) The DAMA Guide to the Data Management Body of Knowledge (Technics Publications, Sedona, AZ).Google Scholar
  • de Véricourt F, Perakis G (2020) The management of data analytics services: New challenges and future directions. Service Sci. 12(4):121–129.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Domingos P (2012) A few useful things to know about machine learning. Comm. ACM 55(10):78–87.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dou Y, Hu YJ, Wu DJ (2017) Selling or leasing? Pricing information goods with depreciation of consumer valuation. Inform. Systems Res. 28(3):585–602.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Earley S (2017) DAMA-DMBOK: Data Management Body of Knowledge, 2nd ed. (Technics Publications, Sedona, AZ).Google Scholar
  • Fan W, Geerts F, Wijsen J (2012) Determining the currency of data. ACM Trans. Database Systems 37(4):25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fang F, Xu X (2011) An analysis of consumer training for feature rich products. Decision Support Systems 52(1):169–177.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guo X, Kong N, Wang H (2022b) Walrasian equilibrium-based pricing mechanism for health-data crowdsensing under information asymmetry. IEEE Trans. Comput. Soc. Systems 10(3):1277–1287.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guo J, Liu A, Ota K, Dong M, Deng X, Xiong NN (2022a) ITCN: An intelligent trust collaboration network system in IoT. IEEE Trans. Network Sci. Engrg. 9(1):203–218.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Han K, Graham EA, Vassallo D, Estrin D (2011) Enhancing motivation in a mobile participatory sensing project through gaming. 2011 IEEE Third Internat. Conf. Privacy Security Risk Trust 2011 IEEE Third Internat. Conf. Soc. Comput. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ), 1443–1448.Google Scholar
  • Han R, Wang J, Bai L, Liu J, Choi J (2021) Age of information and performance analysis for UAV-aided IoT systems. IEEE Internet Things J. 8(19):14447–14457.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • He J, Ma Q, Zhang M, Huang J (2021) Optimal fresh data sampling and trading. 2021 19th Internat. Sympos. Model. Optim. Mobile Ad Hoc Wireless Networks (WiOpt) (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Huang S, Wang Y, Zhang X (2023) Contracting with countervailing incentives under asymmetric cost information in a dual-channel supply chain. Transportation Res. Part E Logist. Transportation Rev. 171(2023):103038.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hui Y, Su Z, Guo S (2019) Utility based data computing scheme to provide sensing service in internet of things. IEEE Trans. Emerging Topics Comput. 7(2):337–348.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jiao Y, Wang P, Feng S, Niyato D (2018) Profit maximization mechanism and data management for data analytics services. IEEE Internet Things J. 5(3):2001–2014.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jin Y, Pang Z (2016) Smart data pricing: The value of shared data plans. Service Sci. 8(4):386–405.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jones R, Mendelson H (2011) Information goods vs. industrial goods: Cost structure and competition. Management Sci. 57(1):164–176.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lahiri A, Dey D (2018) Versioning and information dissemination: A new perspective. Inform. Systems Res. 29(4):965–983.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Li B, Liu J (2021) Achieving information freshness with selfish and rational users in mobile crowd-learning. IEEE J. Selected Areas Comm. 39(5):1266–1276.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li Y, Li F, Yang S, Wu Y, Chen H, Sharif K, Wang W (2021) MP-coopetition: Competitive and cooperative mechanism for multiple platforms in mobile crowd sensing. IEEE Trans. Services Comput. 14(6):1864–1876.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luo T, Tan HP, Xia L (2014) Profit-maximizing incentive for participatory sensing. IEEE INFOCOM 2014 IEEE Conf. Comput. Comm. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ), 127–135.Google Scholar
  • Mehta S, Dawande M, Janakiraman G, Mookerjee V (2021) How to sell a data set? Pricing policies for data monetization. Inform. Systems Res. 32(4):1099–1499.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mehta S, Dawande M, Janakiraman G, Mookerjee V (2022) An approximation scheme for data monetization. Production Oper. Management 31(6):2412–2428.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moody D, Walsh P (1999) Measuring the value of information—An asset valuation approach. ECIS’99 Proc. Seventh Eur. Conf. Inform. Systems (DBLP: ECIS, Copenhagen), 496–512.Google Scholar
  • Nie J, Luo J, Xiong Z, Niyato D, Wang P (2019) A Stackelberg game approach toward socially-aware incentive mechanisms for mobile crowdsensing. IEEE Trans. Wireless Comm. 18(1):724–738.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Niyato D, Hoang DT, Luong NC, Wang P, Kim DI, Han Z (2016) Smart data pricing models for the internet of things: A bundling strategy approach. IEEE Network 3(2):18–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rang W, Yang D, Cheng D, Wang Y (2021) Data life aware model updating strategy for stream-based online deep learning. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Systems 32(10):2571–2581.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ray J, Menon S, Mookerjee V (2020) Bargaining over data: When does making the buyer more informed help? Inform. Systems Res. 31(1):1–15.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ray J, Samuel J, Menon S, Mookerjee V (2016) The design of feature-limited demonstration software: Choosing the right features to include. Production Oper. Management 26(1):9–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Razniewski S (2016) Optimizing update frequencies for decaying information. Proc. 25th ACM Internat. Conf. Inform. Knowledge Management (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 1191–1200.Google Scholar
  • Reddy S, Estrin D, Hansen M, Srivastava M (2010) Examining micro-payments for participatory sensing data collections. Proc. 12th ACM Internat. Conf. Ubiquitous Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 33–36.Google Scholar
  • Shen B, Shen Y, Ji W (2019) Profit optimization in service-oriented data market: A Stackelberg game approach. Future Generation Comput. Systems 95(2019):17–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stahl F, Vossen G (2016) Fair knapsack pricing for data marketplaces. Pokorný J, Ivanović M, Thalheim B, Šaloun P, eds. Advances in Databases and Information Systems. ADBIS 2016, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9809 (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 46–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sundararajan A (2004) Nonlinear pricing of information goods. Management Sci. 50(12):1660–1673.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tang Q, Shao Z, Huang L, Yin W, Dou Y (2020) Identifying influencing factors for data transactions: A case study from shanghai data exchange. J. Systems Sci. Systems Engrg. 29(2020):697–708.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Varian HR (2014) Big data: New tricks for econometrics. J. Econom. Perspect. 28(2):3–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang X, Duan L (2022) Dynamic pricing and mean field analysis for controlling age of information. IEEE ACM Trans. Networking 30(6):2588–2600.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang Z, Zheng ZE, Jiang W, Tang S (2021a) Blockchain enabled data sharing in supply chains: Model, operationalization, and tutorial. Production Oper. Management 30(7):1965–1985.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang Z, Li J, Hu J, Ren J, Wang Q, Li Z, Li Y (2021b) Toward privacy-driven truthful incentives for mobile crowdsensing under untrusted platform. IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. 22(2):1198–1212.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wei XD, Nault BR (2014) Monopoly versioning of information goods when consumers have group tastes. Production Oper. Management 23(6):1067–1081.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wu J, Tawarmalani M, Kannan KN (2019) Cardinality bundling with Spence-Mirrlees reservation prices. Management Sci. 65(4):1891–1908.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Xiao Z, He D, Du J (2021) A Stackelberg game pricing through balancing trilateral profits in big data market. IEEE Internet Things J. 8(16):12658–12668.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xin M, Sundararajan A (2020) Nonlinear pricing of software with local demand inelasticity. Inform. Systems Res. 31(4):1224–1239.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Xing A, Wang H (2023) Pricing and sample set strategies of data providers under quality information asymmetry. J. Oper. Res. Soc., ePub ahead of print March 22, https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2023.2189907.Google Scholar
  • Xu C, Si Y, Zhu L, Zhang C, Sharif K, Zhang C (2019) Pay as how you behave: A truthful incentive mechanism for mobile crowdsensing. IEEE Internet Things J. 6(6):10053–10063.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang G, He S, Shi Z, Chen J (2017) Promoting cooperation by the social incentive mechanism in mobile crowdsensing. IEEE Comm. Magazine 55(3):86–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yu H, Zhang M (2017) Data pricing strategy based on data quality. Comput. Indust. Engrg. 112(2017):1–10.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang X, Hou W, Zhang W (2022) Simultaneous or sequential? Multihoming launch strategies for mobile applications with consideration of promotion and switching costs. Internat. J. Production Res. 60(3):977–998.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang L, Li Z, Chen X (2020a) Incentive mechanism design for edge-cloud collaboration in mobile crowd sensing. IEEE INFOCOM 2020 IEEE Conf. Comput. Comm. Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS) (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ), 1197–1201.Google Scholar
  • Zhang M, Arafa A, Huang J, Poor HV (2021a) Pricing fresh data. IEEE J. Selected Areas Comm. 39(5):1211–1225.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang M, Arafa A, Wei E, Berry RA (2021b) Optimal and quantized mechanism design for fresh data acquisition. IEEE J. Selected Areas Comm. 39(5):1226–1239.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang Y, Niyato D, Wang P, Han Z (2020b) Data services sales design with mixed bundling strategy: A multidimensional adverse selection approach. IEEE Internet Things J. 7(9):8826–8836.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhao S, You Z, Zhu Q (2022) Effects of asymmetric cost information on collection outsourcing of used products for remanufacturing. Transportation Res. Part E Logist. Transportation Rev. 162(2022):102729.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.