How Firm Strategies Affect Consumer Biases in Online Reviews

References

• Anderson C (2012) The impact of social media on lodging performance. Report, The Center for Hospitality Research, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
• Anderson CK, Han S (2017) The billboard effect: Still alive and well. Cornell Hospitality Rep. 17(11):1–12.Google Scholar
• Anderson M, Magruder J (2012) Learning from the crowd: Regression discontinuity estimates of the effects of an online review database. Econom. J. (London) 122(563):957–989.Google Scholar
• Askalidis G, Kim SJ, Malthouse EC (2017) Understanding and overcoming biases in online review systems. Decision Support Systems 97:23–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banerjee AV (1992) A simple model of herd behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 107(3):797–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bilgram V, Brem A, Voigt K-I (2008) User-centric innovations in new product development—Systematic identification of lead users harnessing interactive and collaborative online-tools. Internat. J. Innovation Management 12(03):419–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blal I, Sturman MC (2014) The differential effects of the quality and quantity of online reviews on hotel room sales. Cornell Hospitality Quart. 55(4):365–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bless H, Clore GL, Schwarz N, Golisano V, Rabe C, Wölk M (1996) Mood and the use of scripts: Does a happy mood really lead to mindlessness? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 71(4):665–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bodenhausen GV, Kramer GP, Süsser K (1994) Happiness and stereotypic thinking in social judgment. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 66(4):621–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chevalier JA, Mayzlin D (2006) The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. 43(3):345–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cook KS, Cheshire C, Rice ER, Nakagawa S (2013) Social exchange theory. Handbook of Social Psychology (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ), 61–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danaher PJ, Haddrell V (1996) A comparison of question scales used for measuring customer satisfaction. Internat. J. Service Indust. Management 7(4):4–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Ipeirotis PG (2011) Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining text and reviewer characteristics. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. 23(10):1498–1512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godes D, Mayzlin D (2009) Firm-created word-of-mouth communication: Evidence from a field test. Marketing Sci. 28(4):721–739.Link, Google Scholar
• Godes D, Silva JC (2012) Sequential and temporal dynamics of online opinion. Marketing Sci. 31(3):448–473.Link, Google Scholar
• Guo Y, Barnes SJ, Jia Q (2017) Mining meaning from online ratings and reviews: Tourist satisfaction analysis using latent Dirichlet allocation. Tourism Management 59:467–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Han S, Anderson CK (2020) Customer motivation and response bias in online reviews. Cornell Hospitality Quart. 61(2):142–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu H-H, Kandampully J, Juwaheer TD (2009) Relationships and impacts of service quality, perceived value, customer satisfaction, and image: An empirical study. Service Indust. J. 29(2):111–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu N, Pavlou PA (2017) On self-selection biases in online product reviews. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 41(2):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Igniyte (2019) 30 essential online review facts and stats. Retrieved October 1, 2021, https://www.igniyte.co.uk/blog/30-online-review-facts-and-stats/.Google Scholar
• Kankanhalli A, Tan BC, Wei K-K (2005) Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: An empirical investigation. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 29(1):113–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khern-am-nuai W, Kannan K, Ghasemkhani H (2018) Extrinsic versus intrinsic rewards for contributing reviews in an online platform. Inform. Systems Res. 29(4):871–892.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim JM, Hyun S (2021) Differences in online reviews caused by distribution channels. Tourism Management 83:104230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein N, Marinescu I, Chamberlain A, Smart M (2018) Online reviews are biased. Here’s how to fix them. Harvard Bus. Rev. (March 6), https://hbr.org/2018/03/online-reviews-are-biased-heres-how-to-fix-them.Google Scholar
• Kramer MA (2007) Self-selection bias in reputation systems. IFIP Internat. Conf. Trust Management (Springer, New York), 255–268.Google Scholar
• Kumar N, Benbasat I (2006) Research note: The influence of recommendations and consumer reviews on evaluations of websites. Inform. Systems Res. 17(4):425–439.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee MK, Cheung CM, Lim KH, Sia CL (2006) Understanding customer knowledge sharing in web-based discussion boards: An exploratory study. Internet Res. 16(3):289–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li X, Hitt LM (2008) Self-selection and information role of online product reviews. Inform. Systems Res. 19(4):456–474.Link, Google Scholar
• Li X, Hitt LM (2010) Price effects in online product reviews: An analytical model and empirical analysis. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 34(4):809–831.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang S, Zhang Z, Zhang Z, Law R, Sun W (2017) Consumer motivation in providing high-quality information: Building toward a novel design for travel guide websites. Asia Pacific J. Tourism Res. 22(6):693–707.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang T-P, Liu C-C, Wu C-H (2008) Can social exchange theory explain individual knowledge-sharing behavior? A meta-analysis. ICIS 2008 Proc., 171.Google Scholar
• Liu X, Schuckert M, Law R (2016) Online incentive hierarchies, review extremity, and review quality: Empirical evidence from the hotel sector. J. Travel Tourism Marketing 33(3):279–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu X, Schuckert M, Law R (2018) Utilitarianism and knowledge growth during status seeking: Evidence from text mining of online reviews. Tourism Management 66:38–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miguéns J, Baggio R, Costa C (2008) Social media and tourism destinations: TripAdvisor case study. Adv. Tourism Res. 26(28):1–6.Google Scholar
• Min Kim J, Han J, Jun M (2020) Differences in mobile and nonmobile reviews: The role of perceived costs in review-posting. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce 24(4):450–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moe WW, Schweidel DA (2012) Online product opinions: Incidence, evaluation, and evolution. Marketing Sci. 31(3):372–386.Link, Google Scholar
• Moon S, Park Y, Kim YS (2014) The impact of text product reviews on sales. Eur. J. Marketing 48(11/12):2176–2197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moors G, Kieruj ND, Vermunt JK (2014) The effect of labeling and numbering of response scales on the likelihood of response bias. Sociol. Methodology 44(1):369–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mudambi SM, Schuff D (2010) Research note: What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon.com. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 34(1):185–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy R (2019) Local consumer review survey 2019. Retrieved December 11, 2020, https://www.brightlocal.com/research/local-consumer-review-survey-2019/.Google Scholar
• Papathanassis A, Knolle F (2011) Exploring the adoption and processing of online holiday reviews: A grounded theory approach. Tourism Management 32(2):215–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosario AB, Sotgiu F, De Valck K, Bijmolt TH (2016) The effect of electronic word of mouth on sales: A meta-analytic review of platform, product, and metric factors. J. Marketing Res. 53(3):297–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneider MJ, Gupta S (2016) Forecasting sales of new and existing products using consumer reviews: A random projections approach. Internat. J. Forecasting 32(2):243–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schoenmueller V, Netzer O, Stahl F (2020) The polarity of online reviews: Prevalence, drivers and implications. J. Marketing Res. 57(5):853–877.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwarz N (1990) Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. Higgins ET, Sorrentino RM, eds. Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior, vol. 2 (The Guilford Press, New York), 527–561.Google Scholar
• Tian G, Lu L, McIntosh C (2021) What factors affect consumers’ dining sentiments and their ratings: Evidence from restaurant online review data. Food Quality Preference 88:104060.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trenz M, Berger B (2013) Analyzing online customer reviews—An interdisciplinary literature review and research agenda. Proc. 21st Eur. Conf. Inform. Systems.Google Scholar
• Vermeulen IE, Seegers D (2009) Tried and tested: The impact of online hotel reviews on consumer consideration. Tourism Management 30(1):123–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasko MM, Faraj S (2005) Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 29(1):35–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weijters B, Cabooter E, Schillewaert N (2010) The effect of rating scale format on response styles: The number of response categories and response category labels. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 27(3):236–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu T-Y, Lin CA (2017) Predicting the effects of EWOM and online brand messaging: Source trust, bandwagon effect and innovation adoption factors. Telematics Informatics 34(2):470–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xiang Z, Du Q, Ma Y, Fan W (2017) A comparative analysis of major online review platforms: Implications for social media analytics in hospitality and tourism. Tourism Management 58:51–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xiang Z, Schwartz Z, Gerdes JH Jr, Uysal M (2015) What can big data and text analytics tell us about hotel guest experience and satisfaction? Internat. J. Hospitality Management 44:120–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xiong G, Bharadwaj S (2014) Prerelease buzz evolution patterns and new product performance. Marketing Sci. 33(3):401–421.Link, Google Scholar
• Ye Q, Law R, Gu B, Chen W (2011) The influence of user-generated content on traveler behavior: An empirical investigation on the effects of e-word-of-mouth to hotel online bookings. Comput. Human Behav. 27(2):634–639.Crossref, Google Scholar