Leveraging Private Enterprise: Incubation of New Industries to Address the Public Sector’s Mission-Oriented Grand Challenges

References

• Abernathy WJ, Utterback JM (1978) Patterns of industrial innovation. Tech. Rev. 80(7):40–47.Google Scholar
• Adner R, Kapoor R (2016) Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: Re‐examining technology S‐curves. Strategic Management J. 37(4):625–648.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adner R, Levinthal D (2001) Demand heterogeneity and technology evolution: Implications for product and process innovation. Management Sci. 47(5):611–628.Link, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R (2019) Human enterprise. Handbook of Research on Strategic Human Capital Resources (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Bayus BL (2002) The market evolution and sales takeoff of product innovations. Management Sci. 48(8):1024–1041.Link, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Audretsch D, Sarkar MB (2010) Knowledge spillovers and strategic entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship. J. 4(4):271–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Moeen M, Shah SK (2017) Athena’s birth: Triggers, actors, and actions preceding industry inception. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 11(3):287–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aldrich HE, Fiol CM (1994) Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Acad. Management Rev. 19(4):645–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alexy O, George G, Salter AJ (2013) Cui bono? The selective revealing of knowledge and its implications for innovative activity. Acad. Management Rev. 38(2):270–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arthur WB (2009) The Nature of Technology: What It Is and How It Evolves (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Aversa P, Furnari S, Jenkins M (2021) The primordial soup: Exploring the emotional micro-foundations of cluster genesis. Organ. Sci. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Fuchs E, Goldstein AP, Kearney M (2019) Funding breakthrough research: Promises and challenges of the “ARPA Model.” Innovation Policy Econom. 19(1):69–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2000) Design Rules (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin C, Hienerth C, von Hippel E (2006) How user innovations become commercial products: A theoretical investigation and case study. Res. Policy 35(9):1291–1313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayus BL, Agarwal R (2007) The role of pre-entry experience, entry timing, and product technology strategies in explaining firm survival. Management Sci. 53(12):1887–1902.Link, Google Scholar
• Bingham CB, Kahl SJ (2013) The process of schema emergence: Assimilation, deconstruction, unitization, and the plurality of analogies. Acad. Management J. 56(1):14–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonvillian WB (2018) DARPA and its ARPA-E and IARPA clones: A unique innovation organization model. Indust. Corporate Change 27(5):897–914.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Braun E, MacDonald S (1982) Revolution in Miniature: The History and Impact of Semiconductor Electronics. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Bresnahan TF, Malerba F (1999) Industrial dynamics and the evolution of firms’ and nations’ competitive capabilities in the world computer industry. Mowery DC, Nelson RR, eds. Sources of Industrial Leadership: Studies of Seven Industries (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 79–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bush V (1945) The Endless Frontier Report to the President on a Program for Postwar Scientific Research (Office of Scientific Research and Development, Washington, DC).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cabral S, Mahoney JT, McGahan AM, Potoski M (2019) Value creation and value appropriation in public and non-profit organizations. Strategic Management J. 40(4):465–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cattani G (2005) Preadaptation, firm heterogeneity, and technological performance: A study on the evolution of fiber optics, 1970–1995. Organ. Sci. 16(6):563–580.Link, Google Scholar
• Cattani G (2006) Technological pre-adaptation, speciation, and emergence of new technologies: How Corning invented and developed fiber optics. Indust. Corporate Change 15(2):285–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Nelson RR, Walsh JP (2000) Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent (or not). NBER Working Paper No. 7552, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Cortada JW (1993) Before the Computer: IBM, NCR, Burroughs, and Remington Rand and the Industry They Created, 1865–1956 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Clark KB (1985) The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution. Res. Policy 14(5):235–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• David PA, Hall BH, Toole AA (2000) Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Res. Policy 29(4-5):497–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeBakey ME (2000) The odyssey of the artificial heart. Artificial Organs 24(6):405–411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Di Stefano G, Gambardella A, Verona G (2012) Technology push and demand-pull perspectives in innovation studies: Current findings and future research directions. Res. Policy 41(8):1283–1295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dosi G (1982) Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Res. Policy 11(3):147–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drexler KE (1986) Engines of Creation: The Coming Era of Nanotechnology (Anchor Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Edquist C, Johnson B (1997) Institutions and organizations in systems of innovation. Edquist C, ed. Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions, and Organizations (Frances Pinter, London), 41–63.Google Scholar
• Eggers JP (2014) Competing technologies and industry evolution: The benefits of making mistakes in the flat panel display industry. Strategic Management J. 35(2):159–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Management J. 50(1):25–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ethiraj SK (2007) Allocation of inventive effort in complex product systems. Strategic Management J. 28(6):563–584.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engler D, Cattani G, Porac J (2020) Studying the incubation of a new product market through realized and alternative histories. Strategy Sci. 5(3):160–192.Link, Google Scholar
• Enos JL (1962) Invention and innovation in the petroleum refining industry. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 299–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MP, Kelley MR (2006) The ex-ante assessment of knowledge spillovers: Government R&D policy, economic incentives and private firm behavior. Res. Policy 35(10):1509–1521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foray D, Mowery DC, Nelson RR (2012) Public R&D and social challenges: What lessons from mission RD programs? Res. Policy 41:1697–1702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forbes DP, Kirsch DA (2011) The study of emerging industries: Recognizing and responding to some central problems. J. Bus. Venturing 26(5):589–602.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fuchs ER (2010) Rethinking the role of the state in technology development: DARPA and the case for embedded network governance. Res. Policy 39(9):1133–1147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furman JL, Stern S (2011) Climbing atop the shoulders of giants: The impact of institutions on cumulative research. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(5):1933–1963.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furman JL, Murray F, Stern S (2012) Growing stem cells: the impact of federal funding policy on the US scientific frontier. J. Policy Anal. Management 31(3):661–705.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gao C, McDonald R (2020) Shaping nascent industries: Innovation strategy and regulatory uncertainty in personal genomics. Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 20-095, Harvard, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• George G, Howard-Grenville J, Joshi A, Tihanyi L (2016) Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research. Acad. Management J. 59(6):1880–1895.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golder PN, Shacham R, Mitra D (2009) Findings—Innovations’ origins: When, by whom, and how are radical innovations developed? Marketing Sci. 28(1):166–179.Link, Google Scholar
• Gort M, Klepper S (1982) Time paths in the diffusion of product innovations. Econom. J. (London) 92(367):630–653.Google Scholar
• Grant AM (2012) Leading with meaning: Beneficiary contact prosocial impact and the performance effects of transformational leadership. Acad. Management J. 55:458–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenstein S (2015) How the Internet Became Commercial: Innovation, Privatization, and the Birth of a New Network (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z (1957) Hybrid corn: An exploration in the economics of technological change. Econometrica 25(4):501–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grodal S, O’Mahony S (2017) How does a grand challenge become displaced? Explaining the duality of field mobilization. Acad. Management J. 60(5):1801–1827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grodal S, Gotsopoulos A, Suarez FF (2015) The coevolution of technologies and categories during industry emergence. Acad. Management Rev. 40(3):423–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gross DP, Sampat BN (2020) Organizing crisis innovation: Lessons from World War II. NBER Working Paper No. 27909, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Gulati R (2018) Structure that’s not stifling. Harvard Bus. Rev. 96(3):68–79.Google Scholar
• Hanna KE, ed. (1991) The Human Genome Project: The Formation of Federal Policies in the United States, 1986–1990. Biomedical Politics. (National Academies Press).Google Scholar
• Harmison L (1972) Dedication (Frank W. Hastings). Bull. New York Acad. Medicine 48(2):211–214.Google Scholar
• Hegyeli RJ, ed. (1969) Artificial Heart Program Conf. (National Institutes of Health, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Helfat CE (1997) Know‐how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: The case of R&D. Strategic Management J. 18(5):339–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hilbert D (1902) Mathematical problems. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 8(10):437–479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang KG, Murray FE (2009) Does patent strategy shape the long-run supply of public knowledge? Evidence from human genetics. Acad. Management J. 52(6):1193–1221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Human Genome Project, The (1990) The Human Genome Project: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Energy Research and Natural Resources (S.Hrg 101-894), United States Senate 101st Cong (July 11, 1990) (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Kim S, Agarwal R, Goldfarb B (2021) Creating competencies for radical technologies: Revisiting “incumbent-entrant” dynamics in the bionic prosthetic industry. Working Paper, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
• Klepper S (1996) Entry, exit, growth and innovation over the product life cycle. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(3):562–583.Google Scholar
• Klepper S (2015) Experimental Capitalism: The Nanoeconomics of American High-Tech Industries (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klepper S, Simons KL (2000) Dominance by birthright: Entry of prior radio producers and competitive ramifications in the US television receiver industry. Strategic Management. J. 21(10‐11):997–1016.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein PG (2008) Opportunity discovery, entrepreneurial action and economic organization. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 2(3):175–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langlois R, Steinmueller E (1999) The evolution of competitive advantage in the worldwide semiconductor industry. Sources of Industrial Leadership (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 19–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee BH, Struben J, Bingham CB (2018) Collective action and market formation: An integrative framework. Strategic Management J. 39(1):242–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lenox M, Chatterji A (2018) Can Business Save the Earth? Innovating Our Way to Sustainability (Stanford University Press, Redwood City, CA).Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.Link, Google Scholar
• Lipartito K (2014) Historical sources and data. Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 284–304.Google Scholar
• Lippmann S, Aldrich HE (2014) History and evolutionary theory. Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 124–146.Google Scholar
• Locke EA, Latham GP (1990) A Theory of Goal Setting & Task Performance (Prentice-Hall Inc, New York).Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M, Ventresca M, Hirsch PM (2003) Social movements, field frames, and industry emergence: A cultural–political perspective on US recycling. Socio-economic Rev. 1(1):71–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGuire S, Hardy C, Lawrence TB (2004) Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Acad. Management J. 47(5):657–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKellar S (2018) Artificial Hearts: The Allure and Ambivalence of a Controversial Medical Technology (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Makadok R, Burton R, Barney J (2018) A practical guide for making theory contributions in strategic management. Strategic Management J. 39(6):1530–1545.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malerba F (2002) Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Res. Policy 31(2):247–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malerba F, ed. (2004) Sectoral Systems of Innovation: Concepts, Issues and Analyses of Six Major sectors in Europe (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malerba F, Nelson R (2011) Learning and catching up in different sectoral systems: Evidence from six industries. Indust. Corporate Change 20(6):1645–1675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malerba F, Nelson R, Orsenigo L, Winter S (2016) Innovation and Industry Evolution: History-Friendly Models (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markham SK, Griffin A (1998) The breakfast of champions: Associations between champions and product development environments practices and performance. J. Product Innovation Management 15(5):436–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mazzucato M (2011) Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths (Perseus Books, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mazzucato M (2018) Mission-oriented innovation policies: Challenges and opportunities. Indust. Corporate Change 27(5):803–815.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCloskey DN (2016) Bourgeois Equality: How Ideas Not Capital or Institutions Enriched the World, vol. 3. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merges RP, Nelson RR (1994) On limiting or encouraging rivalry in technical progress: The effect of patent scope decisions. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 25(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RC (1973) Theory of rational option pricing. Bell J. Econom. Management Sci. 4(1):141–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell W (1991) Dual clocks: Entry order influences on incumbent and newcomer market share and survival when specialized assets retain their value. Strategic Management J. 12(2):85–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Modic D, Feldman MP (2017) Mapping the human brain: Comparing the US and EU Grand Challenges. Sci. Public Policy 44(3):440–449.Google Scholar
• Mody CC (2006) Corporations, universities, and instrumental communities: Commercializing probe microscopy, 1981-1996. Tech. Culture 47(1):56–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moeen M (2017) Entry into nascent industries: Disentangling a firm’s capability portfolio at the time of investment vs. market entry. Strategic Management J. 38(10):1986–2004.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moeen M, Agarwal R (2017) Incubation of an industry: Heterogeneous knowledge bases and modes of value capture. Strategic Management J. 38(3):566–587.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moeen M, Mitchell W (2020) How do pre‐entrants to the industry incubation stage choose between alliances and acquisitions for technical capabilities and specialized complementary assets? Strategic Management J. 41(8):1450–1489.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moeen M, Agarwal R, Shah SK (2020) Building industries by building knowledge: Uncertainty reduction over industry milestones. Strategy Sci. 5(3):147–291.Link, Google Scholar
• Mokyr J (2002) The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Mowery DC (2012) Defense-related R&D as a model for “Grand Challenges” technology policies. Res. Policy 41(10):1703–1715.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowery DC, Simcoe T (2002) Is the internet a US invention? An economic and technological history of computer networking. Res. Policy 31(8–9):1369–1387.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray F, Aghion P, Dewatripont M, Kolev J, Stern S (2016) Of mice and academics: Examining the effect of openness on innovation. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 8(1):212–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• National Science and Technology Council (2000) National nanotechnology initiative: Leading to the next industrial revolution. A report by the Interagency Working Group on Nanoscience Engineering and Technology Committee on Technology. Report, National Science and Technology Council, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Nelson RR (1961) Uncertainty, learning, and the economics of parallel research and development efforts. Rev. Econom. Statist. 43(4):351–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, ed. (1993) National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis (Oxford University Press on Demand, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Nelson RR (1994) The coevolution of technology, industrial structure, and supporting institutions. Indust. Corporate Change 3(1):47–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR (2020) A perspective on the evolution of evolutionary economics. Indust. Corporate Change 29(5):1101–1118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• New York Times (1988) Senators doctors Kennedy and Hatch. (July 15), Section A.Google Scholar
• Norman JC (1985) The Hastings file: A search for solutions (Frank and the Artificial Heart Program). Indian J. Thoracic Cardiovascular Surgery 4(1):52–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• North DC (1990) A transaction cost theory of politics. J. Theoret. Politics 2(4):355–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olson M (1965) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Collective Action (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostrom E (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Polidoro F Jr, Toh PK (2011) Letting rivals come close or warding them off? The effects of substitution threat on imitation deterrence. Acad. Management J. 54(2):369–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pratt MG, Ashforth BE (2003) Fostering meaningfulness in working and at work. Cameron KS, Dutton JE, Quinn RE, eds. Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline (Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco), 309–327.Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N (1969) The direction of technological change: inducement mechanisms and focusing devices. Econom. Development Cultural Change 18(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N (1982) Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N (1992) Economic experiments. Indust. Corporate Change 1(1):181–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N, Birdzell LE (1986) How the West Grew Rich: The Economic Transformation of the Industrial World (IB Tauris Co., Ltd., London).Google Scholar
• Roy R, Lampert C, Sarkar MB (2019) The pre‐commercialization emergence of the combination of product features in the charge‐coupled device image sensor. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 13(4):448–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sampat BN (2012) Mission-oriented biomedical research at the NIH. Res. Policy 41(10):1729–1741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanderson SW, Simons KL (2014) Light emitting diodes and the lighting revolution: The emergence of a solid-state lighting industry. Res. Policy 43(10):1730–1746.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J (1942) Creative Destruction. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (Harper & Brothers, New York).Google Scholar
• Schot J, Steinmueller WE (2018) Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Res. Policy 47(9):1554–1567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seidel VP, O’Mahony S (2014) Managing the repertoire: Stories, metaphors, prototypes and concept coherence in product innovation. Organ. Sci. 25(3):691–712.Link, Google Scholar
• Shackle GLS (1979) Imagination and the Nature of Choice (Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh).Google Scholar
• Shah SK (2003) Community-based innovation, product development: Finding from open source software and consumer sporting goods. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
• Shah SK, Tripsas M (2007) The accidental entrepreneur: The emergent and collective process of user entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship. J. 1(1‐2):123–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shah SK, Agarwal R, Echambadi R (2019) Jewels in the crown: Exploring the motivations and team building processes of employee entrepreneurs. Strategic Management J. 40(9):1417–1452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shah S, Agarwal R, Sonka ST (2017) A time and a place: Non-profit engagement in the creation of markets and industry emergence. Preprint, submitted October 17, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2959714.Google Scholar
• Shane S (2000) Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organ. Sci. 11(4):448–469.Link, Google Scholar
• Sine WD, Lee BH (2009) Tilting at windmills? The environmental movement and the emergence of the US wind energy sector. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(1):123–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stokes DE (1997) Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Stuart TE, Hoang H, Hybels RC (1999) Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):315–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (1977) Technology transfer by multinational firms: The resource cost of transferring technological know-how. Econom. J. (London) 87(346):242–261.Google Scholar
• Thomke SH (2003) Experimentation Matters: Unlocking the Potential of New Technologies for Innovation (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Tripsas M (2008) Customer preference discontinuities: A trigger for radical technological change. Management Decision Econom. 29(2‐3):79–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Anderson P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(3):439–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M, Nadler D (1986) Organizing for innovation. Calif. Management Rev. 28(3):74–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Utterback JM, Suárez F (1993) Innovation, competition, and industry structure. Res. Policy 22(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E (1986) Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Sci. 32(7):791–805.Link, Google Scholar
• Weintraub A (2004) Robert Swanson and Herbert Boyer: Giving birth to biotech. Bloomberg BusinessWeek (October 18), https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2004-10-17/robert-swanson-and-herbert-boyer-giving-birth-to-biotech.Google Scholar
• Wry T, Lounsbury M, Glynn MA (2011) Legitimating nascent collective identities: Coordinating cultural entrepreneurship. Organ. Sci. 22(2):449–463.Link, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Vakili K, McGahan AM (2016) Healthcare’s grand challenge: Stimulating basic science on diseases that primarily afflict the poor. Acad. Management J. 59(6):1917–1939.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yates J (2014) Understanding historical methods in organization studies. Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 265–283.Google Scholar
• Zucker LG, Darby MR, Brewer MB (1994) Intellectual capital and the birth of US biotechnology enterprises. NBER Working Paper No. 4653, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar