Reassessing Constraint’s Meaning: A Framework for Reinterpreting Structural Holes’ Findings

References

• Acar W, Sankaran K (1999) The myth of the unique decomposability: Specializing the Herfindahl and entropy measures? Strategic Management J. 20(10):969–975.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adelman MA (1951) The measurement of industrial concentration. Rev. Econom. Statist. 33(4):269–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3):425–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Van Alstyne M (2011) The diversity-bandwidth trade-off. Amer. J. Sociol. 117(1):90–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arya B, Lin Z (2007) Understanding collaboration outcomes from an extended resource-based view perspective: The roles of organizational characteristics, partner attributes, and network structures. J. Management 33(5):697–723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bain JS (1951) Relation of profit rate to industry concentration: American manufacturing, 1936-1940. Quart. J. Econom. 65(3):293–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bain JS (1959) Industrial Organization (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Barabási A-L, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science (1979) 286(5439):509–512.Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, Calabrese T, Silverman BS (2000) Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management J. 21(3):267–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonacich P, Oliver A, Snijders TAB (1998) Controlling for size in centrality scores. Soc. Networks 20(2):135–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP (2005) Centrality and network flow. Soc. Networks 27(1):55–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyd B (1990) Corporate linkages and organizational environment: A test of the resource dependence model. Strategic Management J. 11(6):419–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1982) Toward a Structural Theory of Action: Network Models of Social Structure, Perception, and Action (Academic Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1983) Corporate Profits and Cooptation: Networks of Market Constraints and Directorate Ties in the American Economy (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1988) The stability of American markets. Amer. J. Sociol. 94(2):356–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1992) Structural Holes (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1997) The contingent value of social capital. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(2):339–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1998) The gender of social capital. Rational Soc. 10(1):5–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2000) The network structure of social capital. Staw BM, Sutton RI, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 22 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 345–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(2):349–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2005) Brokerage and Closure (Oxford University Press, Oxford, NY).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2007) Secondhand brokerage: Evidence of the importance of local structure for managers, bankers, and analysts. Acad. Management J. 50(1):119–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2008) Industry performance and indirect access to structural holes. Baum JAC, Rowley TJ, eds. Advances in Strategic Management, vol. 25 (JAI Press, Hartford, CT), 315–360.Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2012) Network-related personality and the agency question: Multirole evidence from a virtual world. Amer. J. Sociol. 118(3):543–591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS, Hogarth RM, Michaud C (2000) The social capital of French and American managers. Organ. Sci. 11(2):123–147.Link, Google Scholar
• Casciaro T, Piskorski MJ (2005) Power imbalance, mutual dependence, and constraint absorption: A closer look at resource dependence theory. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(2):167–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterjee S, Diaconis P, Sly A (2011) Random graphs with a given degree sequence. Ann. Appl. Probability 21(4):1400–1435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chung F, Lu L, Vu V (2003) Eigenvalues of random power law graphs. Ann. Combinatorial 7(1):21–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman JS (1990) Foundations of Social Theory (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Collins NR, Preston LE (1968) Concentration and Price-Cost Margins in Manufacturing Industries (University of California Press, Berkeley).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diamond DW (1984) Financial intermediation and delegated monitoring. Rev. Econom. Stud. 51(3):93–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Domowitz I, Hubbard RG, Petersen BC (1986) Business cycles and the relationship between concentration and price-cost margins. RAND J. Econom. 17(1):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards JR (2011) The fallacy of formative measurement. Organ. Res. Methods 14(2):370–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emerson RM (1962) Power dependence relations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 27(1):31–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdôs P, Rényi A (1960) On the evolution of random graphs. Math. Inst. Hungarian Acad. Sci. 5(1–2):17–61.Google Scholar
• Everett MG, Borgatti SP (2020) Unpacking Burt’s constraint measure. Soc. Networks 62:50–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang R, Landis B, Zhang Z, Anderson MH, Shaw JD, Kilduff M (2015) Integrating personality and social networks: A meta-analysis of personality, network position, and work outcomes in organizations. Organ. Sci. 26(4):1243–1260.Link, Google Scholar
• Faust K (1997) Centrality in affiliation networks. Soc. Networks 19(2):157–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faust K (2007) Very local structure in social networks. Sociol. Methodology 37(1):209–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman LC (1978) Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc. Networks 1(3):215–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gargiulo M, Benassi M (2000) Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital. Organ. Sci. 11(2):183–196.Link, Google Scholar
• Goldberg A, Srivastava SB, Manian VG, Monroe W, Potts C (2016) Fitting in or standing out? The tradeoffs of structural and cultural embeddedness. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 81(6):1190–1222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R (1995) Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Acad. Management J. 38(1):85–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R (1998) Alliances and networks. Strategic Management J. 19(4):293–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Nohria N, Zaheer A (2000) Strategic networks. Strategic Management J. 21(Special Issue):203–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagberg AA, Schult DA, Swart PJ (2008) Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using NetworkX. Varoquaux G, Vaught T, Millman J, eds. Proc. 7th Python Sci. Conf. (Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM), 11–15.Google Scholar
• Hanneman RA, Riddle M (2005) Introduction to Social Network Methods (University of California Riverside, Riverside).Google Scholar
• Hargadon A, Sutton RI (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):716–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He X, Meghanathan N (2016) Correlation of eigenvector centrality to other centrality measures randomsmall-world and real-world networks. Meghanathan N, Zizka J eds. Proc. 8th Internat. Conf. Networks Comm.(NeCoM 2016) and Comput. Sci. Inform. Tech. Conf. (AIRCC Publishing Corporation, Chennai, India).Google Scholar
• Herrera C, Zufiria PJ (2011) Generating scale-free networks with adjustable clustering coefficient via random walks. Proc. 2011 IEEE Network Sci. Workshop (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 167–172 Google Scholar
• Hillmann H, Aven BL (2011) Fragmented networks and entrepreneurship in late imperial Russia. Amer. J. Sociol. 117(2):484–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holland PW, Lelnhardt S (1979) Structural sociometry. Holland PW, Lelnhardt S, eds. Perspectives on Social Network Research (Academic Press, New York), 63–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holme P, Kim BJ (2002) Growing scale-free networks with tunable clustering. Phys. Rev. E 65(2):026107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M (2003) The role of network resources in market entry: Commercial banks’ entry into investment banking, 1991-1997. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(3):466–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalish Y, Robins G (2006) Psychological predispositions and network structure: The relationship between individual predispositions, structural holes and network closure. Soc. Networks 28(1):56–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalnins A (2018) Multicollinearity: How common factors cause Type 1 errors in multivariate regression. Strategic Management J. 39(8):2362–2385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khurana R (2002) Market triads. A theoretical and empirical analysis of market intermediation. J. Theory Soc. Behav. 32(2):239–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum AM (2012) Organizational misfits and the origins of brokerage in intrafirm networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(3):407–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum AM, Stuart TE (2014) Inside the black box of the corporate staff: Social networks and the implementation of corporate strategy. Strategic Management J. 35(1):24–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum AM, Jordan AH, Audia PG (2015) An altercentric perspective on the origins of brokerage in social networks: How perceived empathy moderates the self-monitoring effect. Organ. Sci. 26(4):1226–1242.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee JJ (2010) Heterogeneity, brokerage, and innovative performance: Endogenous formation of collaborative inventor networks. Organ. Sci. 21(4):804–822.Link, Google Scholar
• Martin T, Zhang X, Newman MEJ (2014) Localization and centrality in networks. Phys. Rev. E 90(5):052808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masterton G, Olsson EJ (2018) PageRank’s ability to track webpage quality: Reconciling Google’s wisdom-of-crowds justification with the scale-free structure of the web. Heliyon 4(11):e00978.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehra A, Kilduff M, Brass DJ (2001) The social networks of high and low self-monitors: Implications for workplace performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(1):121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohamadichamgavi J, Hajihashemi M, Samani KA (2024) An analysis of correlation and comparisons between centrality measures in network models. J. Soc. Structure 25(1):1–21.Google Scholar
• Noori A (2011) On the relation between centrality measures and consensus algorithms. Proc. Internat. Conf. High Performance Comput. Simulation (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 225–232.Google Scholar
• Obstfeld D (2005) Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(1):100–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pastor-Satorras R, Castellano C (2016) Distinct types of eigenvector localization in networks. Sci. Rep. 6(1):18847.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pastor-Satorras R, Castellano C (2020) The localization of non-backtracking centrality in networks and its physical consequences. Sci. Rep. 10(1):21639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Salancik GR (1978) The External Control of Organizations (Harper & Row, Publishers, New York).Google Scholar
• Piskorski MJ, Casciaro T (2006) When more power makes you worse off: Turning a profit in the American economy. Soc. Forces 85(2):1011–1034.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny JM (2001) Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(1):33–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollock TG, Lee PM, Jin K, Lashley K (2015) (Un)Tangled: Exploring the asymmetric coevolution of new venture capital firms’ reputation and status. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(3):482–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1980) Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors (The Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Quintane E, Carnabuci G (2016) How do brokers broker? Tertius gaudens, tertius iungens, and the temporality of structural holes. Organ. Sci. 27(6):1343–1360.Link, Google Scholar
• Sasovova Z, Mehra A, Borgatti SP, Schippers MC (2010) Network churn: The effects of self-monitoring personality on brokerage dynamics. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(4):639–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sasson A (2008) Exploring mediators: Effects of the composition of organizational affiliation on organization survival and mediator performance. Organ. Sci. 19(6):891–906.Link, Google Scholar
• Seibert SE, Kraimer ML, Liden RC (2001) A social capital theory of career success. Acad. Management J. 44(2):219–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shipilov AV (2009) Firm scope experience, historic multimarket contact with partners, centrality, and the relationship between structural holes and performance. Organ. Sci. 20(1):85–106.Link, Google Scholar
• Shipilov AV, Li SX (2008) Can you have your cake and eat it, too? Structural holes’ influence on status accumulation and market performance in collaborative networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(1):73–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shipilov AV, Li SX, Greve HR (2011) The prince and the pauper: Search and brokerage in the initiation of status-heterophilous ties. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1418–1434.Link, Google Scholar
• Shipilov A, Li SX, Bothner MS, Truong N (2023) Network advantage: Uncontested structural holes and organizational performance in market crises. Strategic Management J. 44(13):3122–3154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snyder M, Gangestad S, Simpson JA (1983) Choosing friends as activity partners: The role of self-monitoring. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 45(5):1061.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soda G, Usai A, Zaheer A (2004) Network memory: The influence of past and current networks on performance. Acad. Management J. 47(6):893–906.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stigler GJ (1964) A theory of oligopoly. J. Political Econom. 72(1):44–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tatarynowicz A, Sytch M, Gulati R (2016) Environmental demands and the emergence of social structure: Technological dynamism and interorganizational network forms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(1):52–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Triandis HC (1995) Individualism & Collectivism (Westview Press, Boulder, CO).Google Scholar
• Vissa B, Chacar AS (2009) Leveraging ties: The contingent value of entrepreneurial teams’ external advice networks on Indian software venture performance. Strategic Management J. 30(11):1179–1191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393(6684):440–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whinston MD (2006) Lectures on Antitrust Economics (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xia J, Li S (2013) The divestiture of acquired subunits: A resource dependence approach. Strategic Management J. 34(2):131–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xiao Z, Tsui AS (2007) When brokers may not work: The cultural contingency of social capital in Chinese high-tech firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(1):1–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahavi T, Lavie D (2013) Intra-industry diversification and firm performance. Strategic Management J. 34(8):978–998.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zaheer A, Bell GG (2005) Benefiting from network position: Firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management J. 26(9):809–825.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang EY, Aven BL, Kleinbaum AM (2024) License to broker: How mobility eliminates gender gaps in network advantage. Admin. Sci. Quart. 69(2):227–270.Crossref, Google Scholar