Is Information Transparency a Blessing or a Curse Under Trade Credit in Competing Supply Chains?

References

• Astvansh V, Jindal N (2022) Differential effects of received trade credit and provided trade credit on firm value. Production Oper. Management 31(2):781–798.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bastos R, Pindado J (2013) Trade credit during a financial crisis: A panel data analysis. J. Bus. Res. 66(5):614–620.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen YJ, Tang CS (2015) The economic value of market information for farmers in developing economies. Production Oper. Management 24(9):1441–1452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deng S, Fu K, Xu J, Zhu K (2021) The supply chain effects of trade credit under uncertain demands. Omega 98:102113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feasey R, de Streel A (2020) Data Sharing for Digital Markets Contestability: Towards a Governance Framework (CERRE, Bruxelles, Germany).Google Scholar
• Fu K, Wang C, Xu J (2022) The impact of trade credit on information sharing in a supply chain. Omega 110:102633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gal-Or E, Geylani T, Dukes AJ (2008) Information sharing in a channel with partially informed retailers. Marketing Sci. 27(4):642–658.Link, Google Scholar
• Gong Z, Li X (2024) Should price data be shared? Preprint, submitted September 27, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4949695.Google Scholar
• Guan X, Huang S, Chen YJ (2022) Acquisition transparency and induced supplier encroachment. Omega 108:102564.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ha AY, Tong S (2008) Contracting and information sharing under supply chain competition. Management Sci. 54(4):701–715.Link, Google Scholar
• Ha AY, Tian Q, Tong S (2017) Information sharing in competing supply chains with production cost reduction. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(2):246–262.Link, Google Scholar
• Ha AY, Tong S, Zhang H (2011) Sharing demand information in competing supply chains with production diseconomies. Management Sci. 57(3):566–581.Link, Google Scholar
• Huang R, Lai G, Wang X, Xiao W (2025) Platform financing vs. trade credit for lending to third-party sellers. Management Sci. 71(7):5589–5604.Link, Google Scholar
• Jacobson T, Von Schedvin E (2015) Trade credit and the propagation of corporate failure: An empirical analysis. Econometrica 83(4):1315–1371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang B, Sudhir K, Zou T (2021) Effects of cost-information transparency on intertemporal price discrimination. Production Oper. Management 30(2):390–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang B, Tian L, Xu Y, Zhang F (2016) To share or not to share: Demand forecast sharing in a distribution channel. Marketing Sci. 35(5):800–809.Link, Google Scholar
• Jiang ZZ, Zhao J, Yi Z, Zhao Y (2023) Inducing information transparency: The roles of gray market and dual-channel. Ann. Oper. Res. 329(1):277–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jing B, Chen X, Cai G (2012) Equilibrium financing in a distribution channel with capital constraint. Production Oper. Management 21(6):1090–1101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kouvelis P, Zhao W (2012) Financing the newsvendor: Supplier vs. bank, and the structure of optimal trade credit contracts. Oper. Res. 60(3):566–580.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee HH, Zhou J, Wang J (2018) Trade credit financing under competition and its impact on firm performance in supply chains. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(1):36–52.Link, Google Scholar
• Li L (2002) Information sharing in a supply chain with horizontal competition. Management Sci. 48(9):1196–1212.Link, Google Scholar
• Li L, Zhang H (2002) Supply chain information sharing in a competitive environment. Song J-S, Yao DD, eds. Supply Chain Structures: Coordination, Information and Optimization (Springer, New York), 161–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ma S, Li G, Sethi SP, Zhao X (2022) Advance booking discount strategies: Competition, information transparency and spot market. Transportation Res. Part E Logist. Transportation Rev. 158:102589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mittendorf B, Shin J, Yoon DH (2013) Manufacturer marketing initiatives and retailer information sharing. Quant. Marketing Econom. 11:263–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ning J (2022) Strategic trade credit in a supply chain with buyer competition. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(4):2183–2201.Link, Google Scholar
• Petersen MA, Rajan RG (1997) Trade credit: Theories and evidence. Rev. Financial Stud. 10(3):661–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peura H, Yang SA, Lai G (2017) Trade credit in competition: A horizontal benefit. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(2):263–289.Link, Google Scholar
• Priya B, Biswas I, Agrawal A (2023) The over-ordering problem in trade credit: Role of return policies. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 309(2):731–744.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shao L, Wu X, Zhang F (2020) Sourcing competition under cost uncertainty and information asymmetry. Production Oper. Management 29(2):447–461.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tai PD, Duc TTH, Buddhakulsomsiri J (2022) Value of information sharing in supply chain under promotional competition. Internat. Trans. Oper. Res. 29(4):2649–2681.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tang Y, Sethi SP, Wang Y (2023) Games of supplier encroachment channel selection and e-tailer’s information sharing. Production Oper. Management 32(11):3650–3664.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang X, Xu F (2023) The value of smart contract in trade finance. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 25(6):2056–2073.Google Scholar
• Yang SA, Birge JR (2018) Trade credit, risk sharing, and inventory financing portfolios. Management Sci. 64(8):3667–3689.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Yang R, Yi Z, Wang Y (2024) Driving growth in competing supply chains: Leveraging upstream demand expansion and downstream information sharing. Preprint, submitted September 18, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4928659.Google Scholar
• Zhong Y, Yang T, Zillmann S, Cao B (2022) The role of government regulatory policies in financing capital-constrained retailers under competition. Transportation Res. Part E Logist. Transportation Rev. 157:102572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou ZZ, Zhu KX (2010) The effects of information transparency on suppliers, manufacturers, and consumers in online markets. Marketing Sci. 29(6):1125–1137.Link, Google Scholar