Fuzzy Modeling of Service System Engagements

References

• Badinelli R. A stochastic model of resource allocation for service systems. Service Sci. (2010) 2(1/2):76–91Link, Google Scholar
• Barile S. Management sistemico vitale (2009) (Giappichelli, Torino, Italy) Google Scholar
• Barile S, Polese F. Linking the viable system and many-to-many network approaches to service-dominant logic and service science. Internat. J. Quality Service Sci. (2010) 2(1):23–42Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bettencourt LA, Ostrom AL, Brown SW, Roundtree RI. Client co-production in knowledge-intensive business services. Calif. Management Rev. (2002) 44(4):100–128Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charnes A, Cooper W, Lewin A, Seiford L. Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology, and Applications (1994) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Färe R, Grosskopf S. Network DEA. Socio-Econom. Planning Sci. (2000) 34(1):35–49Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fitzsimmons JA. Consumer participation and productivity in service operations. Interfaces (1985) 15(3):60–67Link, Google Scholar
• Gaimon C. Planning information technology-knowledge worker systems. Management Sci. (1997) 43(9):1308–1328Link, Google Scholar
• Golany B, Hackman ST, Passy U. An efficiency measurement framework for multi-stage production systems. Ann. Oper. Res. (2006) 145(1):51–68Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golinelli GM. Viable Systems Approach (VSA): Governing Business Dynamics (2010) (Wolters Kluwer Italia, Milan) Google Scholar
• Hsu C. Service Science: Design for Scaling and Transformation (2009) (World Scientific, Singapore) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Korhonen P, Syrjänen M. Resource allocation based on efficiency analysis. Management Sci. (2004) 50(8):1134–1144Link, Google Scholar
• Liu S, Lin Y. Grey Information: Theory and Practical Applications (2006) (Springer, London) Google Scholar
• Lusch RF, Vargo S, Tanniru M. Service, value networks, and learning. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (2010) 38(1):19–31Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maglio PP, Vargo SL, Caswell N, Spohrer J. The service system is the basic abstraction of service science. Inform. Systems E-Bus. Management (2009) 7(4):395–406Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ng I, Badinelli R, Polese F, Dinauta P, Lobler H, Halliday S. S-D logic research directions and opportunities: The perspective of systems, complexity and engineering. Marketing Theory (2012) . ePub ahead of print April 3Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qiu RG. Towards ontology-driven knowledge synthesis for heterogeneous information systems. J. Intelligent Manufacturing (2006) 17(1):99–109Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qiu RG. Computational thinking of service systems: Dynamics and adaptiveness modeling. Service Sci. (2009) 1(1):42–55Link, Google Scholar
• Ross TJ, Booker JM, Parkinson WJ. Fuzzy Logic and Probability Applications: A Practical Guide (2002) (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sakawa M, Nishizaki I, Katagiri H. Fuzzy Stochastic Multiobjective Programming (2011) (Springer, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sampson SE, Salvendy G, Karwowski W. A unified service theory. Introduction to Service Engineering (2010) (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ) 31–47Google Scholar
• Tang V, Zhou R, Norell Bergendahl M, Grimheden M, Leifer L, Skogstad P, Lindemann U. First-principles for services and product-services-systems: An R&D agenda. Proc. 17th Internat. Conf. Engrg. Design (2009) 6(Design Society, Glasgow, Scotland) 461–472Google Scholar
• Tsoulakis LH, Uhrig RE. Fuzzy and Neural Approaches in Engineering (1997) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Vargo SL, Akaka MA. Service-dominant logic as a foundation for service science: Clarifications. Service Sci. (2009) 1(1):32–41Link, Google Scholar
• White SW, Badinelli RD. A model for efficiency-based resource integration in services. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2012) 217(2):439–447Crossref, Google Scholar