E-procurement Service Provider Selection—An Analytic Network Process-Based Group Decision-Making Approach

References

• Agarwal A, Shankar R. On-line trust building in e-enabled supply chain. Supply Chain Management (2003) 8(4):324–334Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amin SH, Razmi J. An integrated fuzzy model for supplier management: A case study of ISP selection and evaluation. Expert Systems Appl. (2009) 36(4):8639–8648Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ayağ Z, Özdemir RG. A hybrid approach to concept selection through fuzzy analytic network process. Comput. Indust. Engrg. (2009) 56(1):368–379Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azadi M, Saen RF. A new chance-constrained data envelopment analysis for selecting third-party reverse logistics providers in the existence of dual-role factors. Expert Systems Appl. (2011) 38(10):12231–12236Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baki B, Çakar K. Determining the ERP package-selecting criteria: The case of Turkish manufacturing companies. Bus. Process Management J. (2005) 11(1):75–86Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barthélemy J. The hard and soft sides of IT outsourcing management. Eur. Management J. (2003) 21(5):539–548Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battenburg R. E-procurement adoption by European firms: A quantative analysis. J. Purchasing Supply Management (2007) 13(3):182–192Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bobylev N. Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of selected underground construction technologies using the analytic network process. Automation Construction (2011) 20(8):1030–1040Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bottero M, Comino E, Riggio V. Application of the analytic hierarchy process and the analytic network process for the assessment of different wastewater treatment systems. Environ. Model. Software (2011) 26(10):1211–1224Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlucci D, Schiuma G. Applying the analytic network process to disclose knowledge assets value creation dynamics. Expert Systems Appl. (2009) 36(4):7687–7694Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang HH, Wong KH. Adoption of e-procurement and participation of e-marketplace on firm performance: Trust as a moderator. Inform. Management (2010) 47(5--6):262–270Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang C-W, Wu C-R, Chen H-C. Analytic network process decision-making to assess slicing machine in terms of precision and control wafer quality. Robotics Comput.-Integrated Manufacturing (2009) 25(3):641–650Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang S-I, Yen DC, Ng CS-P, Chang W-T. An analysis of IT/IS outsourcing provider selection for small- and medium-sized enterprises in Taiwan. Inform. Management (2012) 49(5):199–209Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collins J, Millen R. Information systems outsourcing by large American industrial firms: Choices and impacts. Inform. Resources Management J. (1995) 8(1):5–13Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croom SR, Brandon-Jones A. Impact of e-procurement: Experiences from implementation in the UK public sector. J. Purchasing Supply Management (2007) 13(4):294–303Crossref, Google Scholar
• Das S, Chakraborty S. Selection of non-traditional machining processes using analytic network process. J. Manufacturing Systems (2011) 30(1):41–53Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davilla A, Gupta M, Palmer R. Moving procurement system to internet: The adoption and use of e-procurement technology models. Eur. Management J. (2003) 21(1):11–23Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer RF, Forman EH. Group decision support with the analytic hierarchy process. Decision Support Systems (1992) 8(2):99–124Crossref, Google Scholar
• Earl MJ. The risks of outsourcing IT. Sloan Management Rev. (1996) 37(3):26–32Google Scholar
• Faisal MN, Banwet DK, Shankar R. Information risks management in supply chains: An assessment and mitigation framework. J. Enterprise Inform. Management (2007) 20(6):677–699Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallouj C. Asymmetry of information and the service relationship: Selection and evaluation of the service provider. Internat. J. Service Indust. Management (1997) 8(1):42–64Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gunasekaran A, Ngai EWT. Adoption of e-procurement in Hong Kong: An empirical research. Internat. J. Production Econom. (2008) 113(1):159–175Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gunasekaran A, McGaughey RE, Ngai EWT, Rai BK. E-procurement adoption in the southcoast SMEs. Internat. J. Production Econom. (2009) 122(1):161–175Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heecks R. Synching or sinking? Global software outsourcing relationships. IEEE Software (2001) 18(2):54–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu C-W, Hu AH. Applying hazardous substance management to supplier selection using analytic network process. J. Cleaner Production (2009) 17(2):255–264Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jain SC. The Information Technology Act, 2000.. Gazette India Extraordinary (2000) June 9). http://www.mit.gov.in/sites/upload_files/dit/files/downloads/itact2000/itbill2000.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Jain SC. The Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003. Gazette India Extraordinary (2003) September 11). http://http://cvc.gov.in/cvcact.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Jasperson J, Carter PE, Zmud RW. A comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoptive behaviors associated with information technology enabled work systems. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(3):525–557Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jharkharia S, Shankar R. Selection of logistics service provider: An analytic network process (ANP) approach. Omega (2007) 35(3):274–289Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kannan G, Pokharel S, Kumar PS. A hybrid approach using ISM and fuzzy TOPSIS for the selection of reverse logistics provider. Resources, Conservation Recycling (2009) 54(1):28–36Crossref, Google Scholar
• King WR. Developing a sourcing strategy for IS: A behavioural decision process and framework. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2001) 48(1):15–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knudsen D. Aligning corporate strategy, procurement strategy and e-procurement tools. Internat. J. Physical Distribution Logist. Management (2003) 33(8):720–734Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar V, Maheshwari B, Kumar U. An investigation of critical management issues in ERP implementation: Empirical evidence from Canadian organizations. Technovation (2003) 23(10):793–807Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lacity MC, Hirschheim R. The information systems outsourcing bandwagon. Sloan Management Rev. (1993) 35(1):73–86Google Scholar
• Lacity MC, Willcocks LP. Interpreting information technology sourcing decisions from a transaction cost perspective: Findings and critique. Accounting, Management Inform. Tech. (1995) 5(3/4):203–214Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lacity MC, Willcocks LP. Information systems sourcing: Examining the privatization option in US public administration. Inform. Systems J. (1997) 7(2):85–108Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lacity MC, Willcocks LP, Feeny DF. The value of selective sourcing. Sloan Management Rev. (1996) 37(3):13–25Google Scholar
• Lee H, Lee S, Park Y. Selection of technology acquisition mode using the analytic network process. Math. Comput. Model. (2009) 49(5--6):1274–1282Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liou JJH, Chuang Y-T. Developing a hybrid multi-criteria model for selection of outsourcing providers. Expert Systems Appl. (2010) 37(5):3755–3761Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liou JJH, Wang HS, Hsu CC, Yin SL. A hybrid model for selection of an outsourcing provider. Appl. Math. Model. (2011) 35(10):5121–5133Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu W. Trustworthy service selection and composition—Reducing the entropy of service-oriented Web. Proc. 3rd IEEE Internat. Conf. Indust. Informatics (INDIN) (2005) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ) 104–109Google Scholar
• Liu H-T, Wang W-K. An integrated fuzzy approach for provider evaluation and selection in third-party logistics. Expert Systems Appl. (2009) 36(3):4387–4398Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marchand N, Jacobsen H-A. An economic model to study dependencies between independent software vendors and application service providers. Electronic Commerce Res. (2001) 1(3):315–334Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meade LM, Sarkis J. Analyzing organizational project alternatives for agile manufacturing processes: An analytic network approach. Internat. J. Production Res. (1999) 37(2):241–261Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olson DL. Evaluation of ERP outsourcing. Comput. Oper. Res. (2007) 34(12):3715–3724Crossref, Google Scholar
• Öztayşi BK, Kaya T, Kahraman TC. Performance comparison based on customer relationship management using analytic network process. Expert Systems Appl. (2011) 38(8):9788–9798Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (1980) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. The Analytic Network Process: Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback (1996) (RWS Publications, Pittsburgh) Google Scholar
• Smith MA, Kumar RL. A theory of application service provider (ASP) use from a client perspective. Inform. Management (2004) 41(8):977–1002Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teo TSH, Lin S, Lai K. Adopters and non-adopters of e-procurement in Singapore: An empirical study. Omega (2009) 37(5):972–987Crossref, Google Scholar
• United Nations E-procurement. (2006) . Report, Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific Asian Development Bank Institute Public Procurement Service of the Republic of Korea, Bangkok. http://www.unescap.org/idd/Pubs/st_escap_2406.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Verdecho M-J, Alfaro-Saiz J-J, Rodríguez-Rodríguez R, Ortiz-Bas A. The analytic network process for managing inter-enterprise collaboration: A case study in a collaborative enterprise network. Expert Systems Appl. (2012) 39(1):626–637Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu W-W, Lee Y-T. Selecting knowledge management strategies by using the analytic network process. Expert Systems Appl. (2007) 32(3):841–847Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu WY, Shih H-A, Chan H-C. The analytic network process for partner selection criteria in strategic alliances. Expert Systems Appl. (2009) 36(3, Part 1):4646–4653Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wuyts S, Stremersch S, Van den Bulte C, Franses PH. Vertical marketing systems for complex products: A triadic perspective. J. Marketing Res. (2004) 41(4):479–487Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yu Y, Yu H-C, Itoga H, Lin T-R. Decision-making factors for effective industrial e-procurement. Tech. Soc. (2008) 30(2):163–169Crossref, Google Scholar