Predicting Purchase Timing, Product Choice, and Purchase Amount for a Firm's Adoption of a Radically Innovative Information Technology: An Analysis of Cloud Computing Services

References

• Ainslie A, Rossi PE. Similarities in choice behavior across product categories. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(2):91–106Link, Google Scholar
• Ali A. Pioneering versus incremental innovation: Review and research propositions. J. Product Innovation Management (1994) 11(1):46–61Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andrews RL, Currim IS. Multi-stage purchase decision models: Accommodating response heterogeneity, common demand shocks, and endogeneity using disaggregate data. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2009) 26(3):197–206Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armbrust M, Fox A, Griffith R, Joseph AD, Katz R, Konwinski A, Lee G, et al. A view of cloud computing. Comm. ACM (2010) 53(4):50–58Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora N, Allenby GM, Ginter JL. A hierarchical Bayes model of primary and secondary demand. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(1):29–44Link, Google Scholar
• Baumgartner H, Steenkamp J-BEM. Exploratory consumer buying behavior: Conceptulization and measurement. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1996) 13(2):121–137Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry LL, Parasuraman A. Marketing Services: Competing Through Quality (1991) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Boatwright P, Borle S, Kadane JB. A model of the joint distribution of purchase quantity and timing. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (2003) 98(463):564–572Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bucklin RE, Gupta S. Brand choice, purchase incidence, and segmentation: An integrated modeling approach. J. Marketing Res. (1992) 29(2):201–215Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandy R, Tellis GJ. Organizing for radical product innovation: The overlooked role of willingness to cannibalize. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35(4):474–487Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandy R, Tellis GJ. The incumbent's curse? Incumbency, size and radical product innovation. J. Marketing (2000) 64(3):1–17Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chiang J. A simultaneous approach to the whether, what and how much to buy questions. Marketing Sci. (1991) 10(4):297–315Link, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta PK. Investigating purchase incidence, brand choice and purchase quantity decisions of households. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12(2):184–208Link, Google Scholar
• Christensen C. The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. (1989) 13(3):319–390Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doney PM, Cannon JP. An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships. J. Marketing (1997) 61(2):35–51Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fichman RG. The role of aggregation in the measurement of IT-related organizational innovation. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(4):427–455Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galbraith JK. American Capitalism: The Concept of Countervailing Power (1952) (Houghton Mifflin, Boston) Google Scholar
• Geroski P, Machin S, Van Reenen J. The profitability of innovating firms. J. Econom. (1993) 24(2):198–211Google Scholar
• Goldsmith RE, Hofacker CF. Measuring consumer innovativeness. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1991) 19(3):209–222Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn J, Schakenraad J. The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15(4):291–309Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica (1979) 47(1):153–161Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holt A, Weiss K, Huberty K, Gelblum E, Flannery S, Devgan S, Malik A, et al. Cloud computing takes off: Market set to boom as migration accelerates. (2011) . Morgan Stanley blue paper, Morgan Stanley, New York. http://www.morganstanley.com/views/perspectives/cloud_computing.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Jain DC, Vilcassim NJ. Investigating household purchase timing decisions: A conditional hazard function approach. Marketing Sci. (1991) 10(1):1–23Link, Google Scholar
• Jen L, Chou C-H, Allenby GM. The importance of modeling temporal dependence of timing and quantity in direct marketing. J. Marketing Res. (2009) 46(4):482–493Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kannan PK, Wright GP. Modeling and testing structured markets: A nested logit model. Marketing Sci. (1991) 10(1):58–82Link, Google Scholar
• Kim Y, Telang R, Vogt WB, Krishnan R. An empirical analysis of mobile voice and SMS service: A structural model. Management Sci. (2010) 56(2):234–252Link, Google Scholar
• Kirton M. Adaptors and innovators—A description and measure. J. Appl. Psych. (1976) 61(5):622–629Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirton M. Adaptors and Innovators: Styles of Creativity and Problem-Solving (1989) (Routledge, London) Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthi L, Raj SP. A model of brand choice and purchase quantity price sensitivity. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7(1):1–20Link, Google Scholar
• Kumar V, Luo A, Malhotra NK. Integrating purchase timing, choice and quantity decisions models: A review of model specifications, estimations and applications. Review of Marketing Research (2008) 4(Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK) 63–91Google Scholar
• Kumar V, Shah D. Building and sustaining profitable customer loyalty for the 21st century. J. Retailing (2004) 80(4):317–329Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar V, Venkatesan R, Reinartz W. Knowing what to sell, when, and to whom. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2006) 84(3):131–137Google Scholar
• Kumar V, Venkatesan R, Reinartz W. Performance implications of adopting a customer-focused sales campaign. J. Marketing (2008) 72(5):50–68Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee RP, Grewal R. Strategic responses to new technologies and their impact on firm performance. J. Marketing (2004) 68(4):157–171Crossref, Google Scholar
• Legris P, Ingham J, Collerette P. Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Inform. Management (2003) 40(3):191–204Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li S, Sun B, Montgomery AL. Cross-selling the right product to the right customer at the right time. J. Marketing Res. (2011) 48(4):683–700Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lilien LG, Kotler P, Sridhar Moorthy K. Marketing Models (2003) (Prentice Hall, New Delhi, India) Google Scholar
• Manchanda P, Ansari A, Gupta S. The “shopping basket”: A model of multicategory purchase incidence decisions. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(2):95–114Link, Google Scholar
• Maslow AH. A theory of human motivation. Psych. Rev. (1943) 50(4):370–396Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehta N, Chen X, Narasimhan O. Informing, transforming, and persuading: Disentangling the multiple effects of advertising on brand choice decisions. Marketing Sci. (2010) 27(3):334–355Link, Google Scholar
• Mell P, Grance T. The NIST definition of cloud computing. (2011) . Special Publication 800-145, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MDGoogle Scholar
• Morgan RM, Hunt SD. The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. J. Marketing (1994) 58(3):20–38Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neslin SA, Henderson C, Quelch J. Consumer promotions and the acceleration of product purchases. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(2):147–165Link, Google Scholar
• O'Neill S. Forrester: Public cloud growth to surge, especially SaaS. CIO (2011) April 26). http://www.cio.com/article/680673/Forrester_Public_Cloud_Growth_to_Surge_Especially_SaaSGoogle Scholar
• Raju PS. Optimum stimulation level: Its relationship to personality, demographics and exploratory behavior. J. Consumer Res. (1980) 7(3):272–282Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reinartz W, Kumar V. The impact of customer relationship characteristics on profitable lifetime duration. J. Marketing (2003) 67(1):77–99Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ried S, Kisker H. Sizing the cloud—A BT Futures report. (2011) . Report, Forrester Research, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Roehrich G. Consumer innovativeness: Concepts and measurements. J. Bus. Res. (2004) 57(6):671–695Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers E. Diffusion of Innovations (2003) (Simon & Schuster, New York) Google Scholar
• Roy R, Chintagunta PK, Haldar S. A framework for investigating habits, “the hand of the past,” and heterogeneity in dynamic brand choice. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15(3):280–299Link, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter JA. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (1942) (Harper, New York) Google Scholar
• Seetharaman PB. Probabilistic versus random-utility models of state dependence: An empirical comparison. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2003) 20(1):87–96Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seetharaman PB. Modeling multiple sources of state dependence in random utility models: A distributed lag approach. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(2):263–271Link, Google Scholar
• Seetharaman PB, Chintagunta PK. The proportional hazard model for purchase timing. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. (2003) 21(3):368–382Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shankar V, Carpenter GS, Krishnamurthi L. Late mover advantage: How innovative late entrants outsell pioneers. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35(1):54–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silva-Risso J, Ionova I. A nested logit model of product and transaction-type choice for planning automakers' pricing and promotions. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(4):545–566Link, Google Scholar
• Singh SS, Borle S, Jain D. Hierarchical Bayes models for estimation of customer lifetime value. (2010) . Working paper, Rice University, HoustonGoogle Scholar
• Sood A, Tellis GJ. Technological evolution and radical innovation. J. Marketing (2005) 69(3):152–168Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorescu B, Spanjol J. Innovation's effect on firm value and risk: Insights from consumer packaged goods. J. Marketing (2008) 72(2):114–132Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorescu A, Chandy R, Prabhu JC. Sources and financial consequences of radical innovation: Insights from pharmaceuticals. J. Marketing (2003) 67(4):82–101Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srinivasan R, Lilien GL, Rangaswamy A. Technological opportunism and radical technology adoption: An application to e-business. J. Marketing (2002) 66(3):47–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart TE. Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(8):791–811Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tellis GJ, Zufryden FS. Tackling the retailer decision maze: Which brands to discount, how much, when and why? Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(3):271–299Link, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Sci. (2000) 46(2):186–204Link, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas JM, Winer RS. Endogeneity in brand choice models. Management Sci. (1999) 45(10):1324–1338Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Krishnamurthi L. Customizing promotions in online stores. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):561–578Link, Google Scholar