The Dark Side of Using Emergencies in Direct Marketing Campaigns for Blood Donation Services

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/serv.1120.0041

References

  • Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1991) 50:179–211CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Armitage CJ, Conner M. Social cognitive determinants of blood donation. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. (2001) 31(7):1431–1457CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Asgary A, Penfold G. Willingness to donate to victims of a hypothetical future earthquake disaster in Vancouver. Internat. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. (2011) 2(16):64–71Google Scholar
  • Baron J. The illusion of morality as self-interest: A reason to cooperate in social dilemmas. Psych. Sci. (1997) 8(4):330–335CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Basil DZ, Ridgway NM, Basil MD. Guilt and giving: A process model of empathy and efficacy. Psych. Marketing (2008) 25(1):1–23CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Batson CD, Thompson ER, Chen H. Moral hypocrisy: Addressing some alternatives. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2002) 77:525–537Google Scholar
  • Beard JG, Ragheb MG. Measuring leisure motivation. J. Leisure Res. (1983) 15(3):219–228Google Scholar
  • Bénabou R, Tirole J. Incentives and prosocial behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2006) 96(5):1652–1678CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bennett R, Kottasz R. Emergency fund-raising for disaster relief. Disaster Prevention Management (2000) 9(5):352–360CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Callero PL, Piliavin JA. Developing a commitment to blood donation: The impact of one's first experience. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. (1983) 13(1):1–16CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carlsmith JM, Gross AE. Some effects of guilt on compliance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1969) 11(3):232–239CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cheung CK, Chan CM. Social-cognitive factors of donating money to charity, with special attention to an international relief organization. Evaluation Program Planning (2000) 23(2):241–253CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clee MA, Wicklund RA. Consumer behavior and psychological reactance. J. Consumer Res. (1980) 6(4):389–405CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Groot JIM, Steg L. Morality and prosocial behavior: The role of awareness, responsibility, and norms in the norm activation model. J. Soc. Psych. (2009) 149(4):425–449CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • de Hooge IE, Nelissen RMA, Breugelmans SM, Zeelenberg M. What is moral about guilt? Acting prosocially at the disadvantage of others. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2011) 100(3):462–473CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Diamond WD, Gooding-Williams S. Using advertising constructs and methods to understand direct mail fundraising appeals. Nonprofit Management Leadership (2002) 12(3):225–242CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Diamond WD, Iyer ES. Creating effective direct mail charitable solicitations: The effects of enclosures and different appeals. J. Nonprofit Public Sector Marketing (2007) 18(1):81–100CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Diamond WD, Noble SM. Defensive responses to charitable direct mail solicitations. J. Interactive Marketing (2001) 15(3):2–12CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dolinski D, Grzyb T, Olejnik J, Prusakowski S, Urban K. Let's dialogue about penny: Effectiveness of dialogue involvement and legitimizing paltry contribution techniques. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. (2005) 35(6):1150–1170CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feeny S, Clarke M. What determines Australia's response to emergencies and natural disasters? Australian Econom. Rev. (2007) 40(1):24–36CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Giles M, McClenahan C, Cairns E, Mallet J. An application of the theory of planned behaviour to blood donation: The importance of self-efficacy. Health Ed. Res. (2004) 19(4):380–391CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hung IW, Wyer RS. Differences in perspective and the influence of charitable appeals: When imagining oneself as the victim is not beneficial. J. Marketing Res. (2009) 46(3):421–434CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karpen IO, Bove LL, Lukas BA. Linking service-dominant logic and strategic business practice: A conceptual model of a service-dominant orientation. J. Service Res. (2012) 15(1):21–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee LP, Allyn J, Call VRA. Giving time, money, and blood: Similarities and differences. Soc. Psych. Quart. (1999) 62(3):276–290CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lemmens KPH, Abraham C, Ruiter RAC, Veldhuizen IJT, Dehing CJG, Bos AER, Schaalma HP. Modelling antecedents of blood donation motivation among non-donors of varying age and education. British J. Psych. (2009) 100(Part 1):71–90CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lerner MJ. The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion (1980) (Plenum Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lindsey LLM. Anticipated guilt as behavioral motivation: An examination of appeals to help unknown others through bone marrow donation. Human Comm. Res. (2005) 31(4):453–481CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lindsey LLM, Ah YK, Hill JB. Anticipated guilt as motivation to help unknown others: An examination of empathy as moderator. Comm. Res. (2007) 34(4):468–480CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manstead ASR, Terry DJ, Hogg MA. The role of moral norm in the attitude-behavior relation. Attitudes, Behavior and Social Context (2000) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 11–30Google Scholar
  • Marjanovic Z, Greenglass ER, Struthers CW, Faye C. Helping following natural disasters: A social-motivational analysis. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. (2009) 39(11):2604–2625CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McMellon CA, Long M. Sympathy, patriotism and cynicism: Post-9/11 New York City newspaper advertising content and consumer reactions. J. Current Issues Res. Advertising (2006) 28(1):1–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Muller A, Kräussl R. The value of corporate philanthropy during times of crisis: The sensegiving effect of employee involvement. J. Bus. Ethics (2011) 103(2):203–220CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Muller A, Whiteman G. Exploring the geography of corporate philanthropic disaster response: A study of Fortune Global 500 firms. J. Bus. Ethics (2009) 84(4):589–603CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nairn A, Berthon P. Creating the customer: The influence of advertising on consumer market segments—Evidence and ethics. J. Bus. Ethics (2003) 42(1):83–99CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nguyen DD, Devita DA, Hirschler NV, Murphy EL. Blood donor satisfaction and intention of future donation. Transfusion (2008) 48(4):742–748CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oosterhof L, Heuvelman A, Peters O. Donation to disaster relief campaigns: Underlying social cognitive factors exposed. Evaluation Program Planning (2009) 32(2):148–157CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oswalt RM, Napoliello M. Motivations of blood donors and nondonors. J. Appl. Psych. (1974) 59(1):122–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Payne SF. Handling the press. Disaster Prevention Management (1994) 3(1):24–32CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Piferi RL, Jobe RL, Jones WH. Giving to others during national tragedy: The effects of altruistic and egoistic motivations on long-term giving. J. Soc. Personal Relationships (2006) 23(1):171–184CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Priller E, Schupp J. Soziale und ökonomische Merkmale von Geld- und Blutspendern in Deutschland. DIW Wochenbericht (2011) 78(29):3–10Google Scholar
  • Sargeant A, Jay E, Lee S. Benchmarking charity performance: Returns from direct marketing in fundraising. J. Nonprofit Public Sector Marketing (2006) 16(1/2):77–94CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Slovic P, Vastfjall D. Affect, moral intuition, and risk. Psych. Inquiry (2010) 21(4):387–398CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sojka BN, Sojka P. The blood donation experience: Self-reported motives and obstacles for donating blood. Vox Sanguinis (2008) 94(1):56–63Google Scholar
  • Trafimow D, Sheeran P, Lombardo B, Finlay KA, Brown J, Armitage CJ. Affective and cognitive control of persons and behaviours. British J. Soc. Psych. (2004) 43(2):207–224CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tran S, Lewalski EA, Dwyre DM, Hagar Y, Beckett L, Janatpour KA, Holland PV. Does donating blood for the first time during a national emergency create a better commitment to donating again? Vox Sanguinis (2010) 98(3, Part 1):e219–e224CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • UNICEF Japan Committee for UNICEF emergency relief and reconstruction support six-month report. (2011) . Report, Japan Committee for UNICEF, Tokyo. http://www.unicef.or.jp/kinkyu/japan/en/pdf/uf_6_report_e_all.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Van Diepen M, Donkers B, Franses PH. Does irritation induced by charitable direct mailings reduce donations? Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2009a) 26(3):180–188CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Diepen M, Donkers B, Franses PH. Dynamic and competitive effects of direct mailings: A charitable giving application. J. Marketing Res. (2009b) 46(1):120–133CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vargo SL, Lusch RF. Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (2008a) 36(1):1–10CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vargo SL, Lusch RF. Why “service”? J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (2008b) 36(1):25–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • White K, Peloza J. Self-benefit versus other-benefit marketing appeals: Their effectiveness in generating charitable support. J. Marketing (2009) 73(4):109–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • White K, MacDonnell R, Ellard JH. Belief in a just world: Consumer intentions and behaviors toward ethical products. J. Marketing (2012) 76(1):103–118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wunderink SR. Individual financial donations to charities in the Netherlands: Why, how and how much. J. Nonprofit Public Sector Marketing (2002) 10(2):21–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zagefka H, Noor M, Brown R, de Moura GR, Hopthrow T. Donating to disaster victims: Responses to natural and humanly caused events. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. (2011) 41(3):353–363CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.