Value-Driven Strategic Sourcing Based on Service-Dominant Logic

References

• Anderson PH, Rask M (2003) Supply chain management: New organizational practices for changing procurement realities. J. Purchasing Supply Management 9(2):83–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney JB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1):99–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beer S (1984) The viable system model: Its provenance, development, methodology and pathology. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 35(1):7–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowman C, Ambrosini V (2000) Value creation versus value capture: Towards a coherent definition of value in strategy. British J. Management 11(March):1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandenburger AM, Nalebuff BJ (2011) Co-opetition (Crown Business, New York).Google Scholar
• Cardoso J, Lopes R, Poels G (2014) Service Systems: Concepts, Modeling, and Programming (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carrubbo L, Iandolo F, Pitardi V, Calabrese M (2017) The viable decision maker for CAS survival: How to change and adapt through fitting process. J. Service Theory Practice 27(5):1006–1023.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen IJ, Paulraj A, Lado A (2004) Strategic purchasing, supply management and firm performance. J. Oper. Management 22(5):505–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox A (2001) Understanding buyer and supplier power: A framework for procurement and supply competence. J. Supply Chain Management 37(1):8–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox A (2015) Sourcing portfolio analysis and power positioning: Towards a “paradigm shift” in category management and strategic sourcing. Supply Chain Management: Internat. J. 20(6):717–736.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox A, Ireland P (2015) Value Sourcing: From Spend Management to Supply Management, Kindle E-Book (Earlsgate Press, Stratford-upon-Avon, UK).Google Scholar
• Dyer JH, Singh H (1998) The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23(4):660–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellram LM (1990) The supplier selection decision in strategic partnerships. J. Purchasing Materials Management 26(4):8–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eltantawy R, Giunipero L, Handfield R (2014) Strategic sourcing management’s mindset: Strategic sourcing orientation and its implications. Internat. J. Phys. Distribution Logist. Management 44(10):768–795.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gregor S, Hevner AR (2013) Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Quart. 37(2):337–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat C, Finkelstein S, Mitchell W, Peteraf M, Singh H, Teece D, Winter S (2007) Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations (Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Malden, MA).Google Scholar
• Hevner R, March ST, Park J, Ram S (2004) Design science in information systems research. MIS Quart. 28(1):75–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill C, Jones G (2012) Strategic Management: An Integrated Approach, 10th ed. (Cengage Learning, Boston).Google Scholar
• Jacobs J (1974) Dependency and vulnerability: An exchange approach to the control of organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 19(1):45–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kocabasoglu C, Suresh NC (2006) Strategic sourcing: An empirical investigation of the concept and its practices in US manufacturing firms. J. Supply Chain Management 42(2):4–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraljic P (1983) Purchasing must become supply management. Harvard Bus. Rev. 61(5):109–117.Google Scholar
• Lusch RF, Vargo SL (2006) Service-dominant logic: Reactions, reflections and refinements. Marketing Theory 6(3):281–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lusch RF, Stephen L, Vargo SL, Matthew O (2007) Competing through service: Insights from service-dominant logic. J. Retailing 83(1):2–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maglio PP, Spohrer J (2008) Fundamentals of service science. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 36(1):18–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y (2012) Designing business models and similar strategic objects: The contribution of IS. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 14(5):237–244.Google Scholar
• Peffers K, Tuunanen T, Rothenberger MA, Chatterjee S (2007) A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Management Inform. Systems 24(3):45–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poels G (2010) The resource-service-system model for service science. Trujillo J, Dobbie G, Kangassalo H, Hartmann S, Kirchberg M, Rossi M, Reinhartz-Berger Iet al., eds. Advances in Conceptual Modeling—Applications and Challenges. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 6413 (Springer, Berlin), 117–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polese F, Di Nauta P (2013) A viable systems approach to relationship management in SD logic and service science. Bus. Admin. Rev. (Schäffer-Poeschel) 73(2):113–129.Google Scholar
• Rafati L, Poels G (2015) Towards model-based strategic sourcing. Oshri I, Kotlarsky J, Willcocks LP, eds. Achieving Success and Innovation in Global Sourcing: Perspectives and Practices (Springer International Publishing, Zurich), 29–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rafati L, Poels G (2016) Service-dominant strategic sourcing: Value creation versus cost saving. Borangiu T, Dragoicea M, Nóvoa H, eds. Exploring Services Science. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, Vol. 247 (Springer International Publishing, Zurich), 30–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rafati L, Poels G (2017) Service oriented enterprise engineering: A modeling discipline based on the viable system approach (vSa) for strategic sourcing decision-making. Internat. J. Inform. Systems Service Sector. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Schuh C, Kromoser R, Strohmer MF, Pérez RR, Triplat A, eds. (2008) The Purchasing Chessboard™. The Purchasing Chessboard: 64 Methods to Reduce Cost and Increase Value with Suppliers, 1st ed. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin), 55–207.Google Scholar
• Spohrer J, Barile S, Polese F (2010) System thinking for service research advances. Service Sci. 1(2):130–135.Google Scholar
• Teixeira JG, Patricio L, Huang K-H, Fisk RP, Nóbrega L, Constantine L (2016) The MINDS method: Integrating management and interaction design perspectives for service design. J. Service Res. 20(3):240–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thalheim B (2012) The science and art of conceptual modelling. Hameurlain A, Küng J, Wagner R, Liddle SW, Schewe K-D, Zhou X, eds. Transactions on Large-Scale Data-and Knowledge-Centered Systems, Vol. 6 (Springer, Berlin), 76–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Weele AJ (2009) Purchasing and Supply Chain Management: Analysis, Strategy, Planning and Practice (Cengage Learning, Boston).Google Scholar
• Vargo SL, Akaka MA (2009) Service-dominant logic as a foundation for service science: Clarifications. Service Sci. 1(1):32–41.Link, Google Scholar
• Vargo SL, Akaka MA (2012) Value co-creation and service systems (re)formation: A service ecosystems view. Service Sci. 4(3):207–217.Link, Google Scholar
• Venable J, Pries-Heje J, Baskerville S (2016) FEDS: A framework for evaluation in design science research. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 25(1):77–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Von Bertalanffy L (1972) The history and status of general systems theory. Acad. Management J. 15(4):407–426.Crossref, Google Scholar