Optimal Liver Acceptance for Risk-Sensitive Patients

References

• Ahn JH, Hornberger J (1996) Involving patients in the cadaveric kidney transplant allocation process: A decision-theoretic perspective. Management Sci. 42(5):629–641.Link, Google Scholar
• Alagoz O, Maillart LM, Schaefer AJ, Roberts MS (2004) The optimal timing of living-donor liver transplantation. Management Sci. 50(10):1420–1430.Link, Google Scholar
• Alagoz O, Bryce CL, Schaefer AJ, Chang CH, Angus DC, Roberts MS (2005) Incorporating biological natural history in simulation models: Empiric estimates of the progression of end-stage liver disease. Medical Decision Making 25(6):620–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alagoz O, Maillart LM, Schaefer AJ, Roberts MS (2007) Determining the acceptance of cadaveric livers using an implicit model of the waiting list. Oper. Res. 55(1):24–36.Link, Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Risk-Bearing (Yrjö Hahnsson Foundation, Helsinki).Google Scholar
• Ata B, Skaro A, Tayur S (2017a) OrganJet: Overcoming geographical disparities in access to deceased donor kidneys in the United States. Management Sci. 63(9):2776–2794.Link, Google Scholar
• Ata B, Friedewald JJ, Randa AC (2017b) Organ transplantation. Working paper (University of Chicago, Chicago), http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3010216.Google Scholar
• Avila-Godoy GM, Fernandez-Gaucherand E (1998) Controlled Markov chains with exponential risk-sensitive criteria: Modularity, structured policies and applications. Proc. 37th IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 778–783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barlow RE, Proschan F (1965) Mathematical Theory of Reliability (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Bäuerle N, Rieder U (2014) More risk-sensitive Markov decision processes. Math. Oper. Res. 39(1):105–120.Link, Google Scholar
• Cher DJ, Miyamoto J, Lenert LA (1997) Incorporating risk attitudes into Markov process decision models: Importance for individual decision making. Medical Decision Making 17(3):355–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clemen RT, Reilly T (2014) Making Hard Decisions with DecisionTools (Cengage Learning, Boston).Google Scholar
• Cox DR (1972) Regression models in life-tables. J. Royal Statist. Soc. B. 34(2):187–220.Google Scholar
• David I, Yechiali U (1985) A time-dependent stopping problem with application to live organ transplants. Oper. Res. 33(3):491–504.Link, Google Scholar
• David I, Yechiali U (1995) One attribute sequential assignment match processes in discrete time. Oper. Res. 43(5):879–884.Link, Google Scholar
• Davis AE, Mehrotra S, Friedewald JJ, Daskin MS, Skaro AI, Abecassis MM, Ladner DP (2015) Improving geographic equity in kidney transplantation using alternative kidney sharing and optimization modeling. Medical Decision Making 35(6):797–807.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Demirci MC, Schaefer AJ, Romeijn HE, Roberts MS (2012) An exact method for balancing efficiency and equity in the liver allocation hierarchy. INFORMS J. Comput. 24(2):260–275.Link, Google Scholar
• Hellinger JF (1989) Expected utility theory and risky choices with health outcomes. Medical Care 27(3):273–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hornberger J, Ahn JH (1997) Deciding eligibility for transplantation when a donor kidney becomes available. Medical Decision Making 17(2):160–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard DH (2002) Why do transplant surgeons turn down organs? A model of the accept/reject decision. J. Health Econom. 21(6):957–969.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard RA, Matheson JE (1972) Risk-sensitive Markov decision processes. Management Sci. 18(7):356–369.Link, Google Scholar
• International Association of Living Organ Donors (IALOD) (2006) Living liver donation. Retrieved November 17, 2006, http://www.livingdonorsonline.org.Google Scholar
• Ibrahim S, Chen CL, Wang CC, Wang SH, Lin CC, Liu YW, Yang CH, Yong CC, Concejero A, Cheng YF (2005) Liver regeneration and splenic enlargement in donors after living-donor liver transplantation. World J. Surgery 29(12):1658–1666.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaquette SC (1976) A utility criterion for Markov decision processes. Management Sci. 23(1):43–49.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim SJ, Kim DG, Chung ES, Lee YJ, Moon IS, Lee MD (2006) Adult living donor liver transplantation using the right lobe. Transplantation Proc. 38(7):2117–2120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kochanek KD, Murphy SL, Xu J, Tejada-Vera B (2016) Deaths: Final data for 2014. National Vital Statistics. Report 65(4), National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD.Google Scholar
• Kong N, Schaefer AJ, Hunsaker B, Roberts MS (2010) Maximizing the efficiency of the U.S. liver allocation system through region design. Management Sci. 56(12):2111–2122.Link, Google Scholar
• Luce RD, Raiffa H (1957) Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• McNeil BJ, Weichselbaum R, Pauker SG (1978) Fallacy of the five-year survival in lung cancer. New England J. Medicine 299(25):1397–1401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pauker SG (1976) Coronary artery surgery: The use of decision analysis. Ann. Internal Medicine 85(1):8–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porteus EL (1975) On the optimality of structure policies in countable stage decision processes. Management Sci. 22(2):148–157.Link, Google Scholar
• Pratt JW (1964) Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica 32(1-2):122–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puterman ML (1994) Markov Decision Processes (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raiffa H (1968) Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choices Under Uncertainty (Addison Wesley, Menlo Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Righter R (1989) A resource allocation problem in a random environment. Oper. Res. 37(2):329–338.Link, Google Scholar
• Roberts MS, Angus DC, Weissfeld L, Bryce CL, Valenta Z (2004) Survival after liver transplantation in the United States: A disease-specific analysis of the UNOS database. Liver Transplantation 10(7):886–889.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruszczyński A (2010) Risk-averse dynamic programming for Markov decision processes. Math. Programming 125(2):235–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saka G (2010) Increasing and assessing the impact of patient choice in liver transplantation. Doctoral dissertation (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh).Google Scholar
• Sandıkçı B, Maillart LM, Schaefer AJ, Alagoz O, Roberts MS (2008) Estimating the patient’s price of privacy in liver transplantation. Oper. Res. 56(6):1393–1410.Link, Google Scholar
• Sandıkçı B, Maillart LM, Schaefer AJ, Roberts M (2013) Alleviating the patient’s price of privacy through a partially observed waiting list. Management Sci. 59(8):1836–1854.Link, Google Scholar
• Stahl JE, Kong N, Shechter SM, Schaefer AJ, Roberts MS (2005) A methodological framework for optimally reorganizing liver transplant regions. Medical Decision Making 25(1):35–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Su X, SA Zenios, Chertow GM (2004) Incorporating recipient choice in kidney transplantation. J. Amer. Soc. Nephrology 15(6):1656–1663.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Su X, Zenios S (2004) Patient choice in kidney allocation: The role of the queueing discipline. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 6(4):280–301.Link, Google Scholar
• Su X, Zenios SA (2005) Patient choice in kidney allocation: A sequential stochastic assignment model. Oper. Res. 53(3):443–455.Link, Google Scholar
• Tilson V, Tilson DA (2013) Use of a Markov decision process model for treatment selection in an asymptomatic disease with consideration of risk sensitivity. Socio-Econom. Planning Sci. 47(3):172–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) (2017) United Network for Organ Sharing. Accessed March 1, 2017, http://www.unos.org.Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (2017) Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN). Accessed March 1, 2017, http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/data/.Google Scholar
• Yokoi H, Isaji S, Yamagiwa K, Tabata M, Sakurai H, Usui M, Mizuno S, Uemoto S (2005) Donor outcome and liver regeneration after right-lobe graft donation. Transplant Internat. 18(8):915–922.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zenios SA, Wein LM, Chertow GM (1999) Evidence-based organ allocation. Amer. J. Medicine 107(1):52–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zenios SA, Chertow GM, Wein LM (2000) Dynamic allocation of kidneys to candidates on the transplant waiting list. Oper. Res. 48(4):549–569.Link, Google Scholar