Investigating Endogeneity Bias in Marketing

References

• Allenby G. M., Arora N., Ginter J. L. Incorporating prior knowledge into the analysis of conjoint studies. J. Marketing Res. (1995) 32:152–162Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J. O., Wolpert R. L.The Likelihood Principle (1984) (Instititute of Mathematical Statistics, Hayward, CA) Institute of Mathematical Statistics Lecture Notes—Monograph SeriesCrossref, Google Scholar
• Chaloner K., Verdinelli I. Bayesian experimental design: A review. Statist. Sci. (1995) 10(3):273–304Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher R. A. On the mathematical foundations of theoretical statistics. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. A (1922) 222:309–368Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gelman A., Carlin J. B., Stern H. S., Rubin D. B.Bayesian Data Analysis (2004) (Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL) Google Scholar
• Hauser J. R., Toubia O. The impact of utility balance and endogeneity in conjoint analysis. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24:498–507Link, Google Scholar
• Heckman J. J. The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables, and a simple estimator for such models. Ann. Econom. Soc. Measurement (1976) 5:475–492Google Scholar
• Judge G. G., Hill R. C., Griffiths W. E., Lutkepohl H., Lee T.-C.Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Econometrics (1988) 2nd ed.(John Wiley & Sons, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manchanda P., Rossi P. E., Chintagunta P. K. Response modeling with nonrandom marketing-mix variables. J. Marketing Res. (2004) 41:467–478Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossi P. E., Allenby G. M., McCulloch R.Bayesian Statistics and Marketing (2005) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubin D. B. Inference and missing data. Biometrika (1976) 63:581–592Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sawtooth Software (2003) . ACA/Hierarchical Bayes v2.0, Technical paper, http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/technicaldownloads.shtml\#acahbtechGoogle Scholar
• Zanutto E. L., Bradlow E. T. Data pruning in consumer choice. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2006) 4(3):267–287Crossref, Google Scholar