Brand Effects on Choice and Choice Set Formation Under Uncertainty
Published Online:1 Sep 2007https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1060.0260
References
- Managing Brand Equity (1991) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
- The effects of in-store displays and feature advertising on consideration sets. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1995) 12(1):67–80Crossref, Google Scholar
- Studying consideration effects in empirical choice models using scanner panel data. J. Marketing Res. (1995) 32:30–41Crossref, Google Scholar
- Discrete choice models with latent choice sets. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1995) 12:9–24Crossref, Google Scholar
- Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Predict Travel Demand (1985) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
- A consumer-side experimental examination of signaling theory: Do consumers perceive warranties as signals of quality? J. Consumer Res. (1993) 20:111–123Crossref, Google Scholar
- Markov chain Monte Carlo and model of consideration set and parameter heterogeneity. J. Econometrics (1999) 89:223–248Crossref, Google Scholar
- The effect of attribute variation on consumer choice consistency. Marketing Lett. (1999) 10(2):139–147Crossref, Google Scholar
- Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. J. Law Econom. (1974) 16:67–88Crossref, Google Scholar
- Decision making under uncertainty: Capturing dynamic brand choice processes in turbulent consumer goods markets. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15(1):1–20Link, Google Scholar
- Brand equity as a signaling phenomenon. J. Consumer Psych. (1998) 7(2):131–157Crossref, Google Scholar
- Brand credibility and its role in brand choice and consideration. J. Consumer Res. (2004) 31(June):191–199Crossref, Google Scholar
- The impact of brand credibility on consumer price sensitivity. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2002) 19:1–19Crossref, Google Scholar
- Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):545–560Link, Google Scholar
- An evaluation cost model of consideration sets. J. Consumer Res. (1990) 16:393–408Crossref, Google Scholar
- , Manski C., McFadden D. Statistical models for discrete panel data. The Structural Analysis of Discrete Data (1981) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 114–178Google Scholar
- The relationship of reputation and credibility to brand success. J. Consumer Marketing (1995) 14:5–10Crossref, Google Scholar
- The Theory of Buyer Behavior (1969) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
- Internet shopping agents: Virtual co-location and competition. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(1):85–106Link, Google Scholar
- , Maddala G. S., Rao C. R., Vinod H. D. Simulation estimation for panel data models with limited dependent Varaibles. Handbook of Statistics (1993) (North Holland Publisher, New York) 545–571Google Scholar
- Branding and Brand Equity (2002) (MSI, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
- The role of market forces in assuring contractual performance. J. Political Econom. (1981) 89(4):615–639Crossref, Google Scholar
- Marketing Management (1997) 7th ed.(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
- Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications in Marketing, Transportation and Environmental Valuation (2000) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
- Structure of random utility models. Theory Decision (1977) 8:229–254Crossref, Google Scholar
- Price uncertainty and consumer search: A structural model of consideration set formation. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(1):58–84Link, Google Scholar
- Theory of destination choice-set formation under informational constraints. Transportation Res. Record (1979) 750:6–12Google Scholar
- Risk reduction and umbrella branding. J. Bus. (1992) 65:31–50Crossref, Google Scholar
- Information and consumer behavior. J. Political Econom. (1970) 78:311–329Crossref, Google Scholar
- Advertising as information. J. Political Econom. (1974) 81:729–754Crossref, Google Scholar
- Brand alliances as signals of product quality. Sloan Management Rev. (1994) 35(Fall):87–97Google Scholar
- Development and testing of a model of consideration set composition. J. Marketing Res. (1991) 28:429–440Crossref, Google Scholar
- Studying consideration in consumer decision process: Progress and challenges. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1995) 12:3–7Crossref, Google Scholar
- Modeling multiattribute utility, risk and belief dynamics for new consumer durable brand choice. Management Sci. (1988) 34:167–185Link, Google Scholar
- Consumer Behavior (1984) (Scott, Foresman, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
- Consideration set influences on consumer decision making and choice: Issues, models and suggestions. Marketing Lett. (1991) 2(3):181–197Crossref, Google Scholar
- The cost of thinking. J. Consumer Res. (1980) 7:99–111Crossref, Google Scholar
- Market Signaling: Informational Transfer in Hiring and Related Screening Processes (1974) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
- An empirical test of a model of external search in automobiles. J. Consumer Res. (1991) 18:233–242Crossref, Google Scholar
- Probabilistic choice set formation in transportation Demand models. (1984) . Unpublished doctoral thesis, department of Civil Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Choice set generation within the generalized extreme value family of discrete choice models. Transportation Res. Part B (2001) 35:643–666Crossref, Google Scholar
- Incorporating random constraints in discrete choice models of choice set generation. Transportation Res. B (1987a) 21B:91–102Crossref, Google Scholar
- Empirical test of a constrained choice discrete model: Mode choice in São Paulo. Transportation Res. B (1987b) 21B:103–115Crossref, Google Scholar
- The role of the scale parameter in the estimation and use of multinomial logit models. J. Marketing Res. (1993) 30:305–314Crossref, Google Scholar
- The Theory of Industrial Organization (1990) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
- Umbrella branding as a signal of new product quality: An example of signalling by posting a bond. RAND J. Econom. (1988) 19:458–466Crossref, Google Scholar
- Electronic tickets, smart cards, and online prepayments: When and how to advance sell. Marketing Sci. (2001) 20(3):219–243Link, Google Scholar

