The Impact of Survey Participation on Subsequent Customer Behavior: An Empirical Investigation

References

• Almquist E., Wyner G. Boost your marketing ROI with experimental design. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2001) October):R0109KGoogle Scholar
• Bearden W. O., Madden C. S., Uscátgui K. The pool is drying up. Marketing Res. (1998) Spring):27–32Google Scholar
• Boatwright P., Borle S., Kadane J. B. A model of the joint distribution of purchase quantity and timing. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (2003) 98:564–572Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borle S., Boatwright P., Kadane J. B., Nunes J. C., Shmueli G. Effect of product assortment changes on customer retention. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(4):616–622Link, Google Scholar
• Casella G., George E. I. Explaining the Gibbs sampler. Amer. Statist. (1992) 49(4):327–335Google Scholar
• Chandon P., Morwitz V. G., Reinartz W. J. The short- and long-term effects of measuring intent to repurchase. J. Consumer Res. (2004) 31(3):566–572Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conway R. W., Maxwell W. L. A queuing model with state-dependent service rate. J. Indust. Engrg. (1961) 12:132–136Google Scholar
• Crosby L. A., Johnson S. L. The democratization of data. Marketing Management (2001) Spring):8–9Google Scholar
• Dholakia U. M., Morwitz V. G. The scope and persistence of mere measurement effects: Evidence from a field study of customer satisfaction measurement. J. Consumer Res. (2002) 29(2):159–167Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dholakia U. M., Morwitz V. G., Westbrook R. A. Survey participation effects on customer purchase behavior: Evidence for a positivity effect of firm-sponsored satisfaction surveys. (2005) . MSI Working Paper Series, MSI, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Feldman J. M., Lynch J. G. Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. J. Appl. Psych. (1988) 73(3):421–435Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fitzsimons G. J., Williams P. Asking questions can change choice behavior: Does it do so automatically or effortfully? J. Experiment. Psych.: Appl. (2000) 6(3):195–206Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friestad M., Wright P. The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. J. Consumer Res. (1994) 21(June):1–31Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gelfand A. E., Smith A. F. M. Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1990) 85:398–409Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janiszewski C., Chandon E. Transfer appropriate processing, response fluency, and the mere measurement effect. J. Marketing Res. (2007) 44(2):309–323Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morwitz V. G., Fitzsimons G. J. The mere measurement effect: Why does measuring intentions change actual behavior? J. Consumer Psych. (2004) 14(1&2):64–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morwitz V. G., Johnson E., Schmittlein D. Does measuring intent change behavior? J. Consumer Res. (1993) 20(June):41–61Google Scholar
• Shea C. Z., LeBourveau C. Jumping the “hurdles” of marketing research. Marketing Res. (2000) 22–30Google Scholar
• Shmueli G., Minka T. P., Kadane J. B., Borle S., Boatwright P. A useful distribution for fitting discrete data: Revival of the COM-Poisson. J. Roy. Statist. Soc., Ser. C (2005) 54(1):127–142Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shugan S. M. Errors in the variables, unobserved heterogeneity, and other ways of hiding statistical error. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(3):203–216Link, Google Scholar