A Hidden Markov Model of Customer Relationship Dynamics

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1070.0294

References

  • Aaker J., Fournier S., Brasel A. S. When good brands do bad. J. Consumer Res. (2004) 31(June):1–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allenby G. M., Ginter J. L. Using extremes to design products and segment markets. J. Marketing Res. (1995) 32(November):392–403CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allenby G. M., Leone R. P., Jen L. A dynamic model of purchase timing with application to direct marketing. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1999) 93(446):365–374CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andrews R. L., Currim I. S. A comparison of segment retention criteria for finite mixture models. J. Marketing Res. (2003) 39(May):235–243CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arnett D. B., German S., Hunt S. D. The identity salience model of relationship marketing success: The case of nonprofit marketing. J. Marketing (2003) 67(2):89–105CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Atchadé Y. F. An adaptive version for the metropolis adjusted Langevin algorithm with a truncated drift. Methodology and Comput. Appl. Probab. (2006) 8(2):235–254CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baade R. A., Sundberg J. O. What determines alumni generosity? Econom. Ed. Rev. (1996) 15(1):75–81CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Böckenholt U., Dillon W. R. Inferring latent brand dependencies. J. Marketing Res. (2000) 37(February):72–87CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Böckenholt U., Langeheine R. Latent change in recurrent choice data. Psychometrika (1996) 61(2):285–302CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bolton R. N. A dynamic model of the duration of the customer's relationship with a continuous service provider: The role of satisfaction. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(1):45–65LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bucklin R. E., Lattin J. M. A two-state model of purchase incidence and brand choice. Marketing Sci. (1991) 10(1):24–39LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bult J. R., Wansbeek T. Optmal selection for direct mail. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14 (4):378–394LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dekimpe M. G., Hanssens D. M. Time-series models in marketing: Past, present and future. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2000) 17(2–3):183–193CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dillon W. R., Böckenholt U., de Borrero M. S., Bozdogan H., DeSarbo W., Gupta S., Kamakura W., Kumar A., Ramaswamy V., Zenor M. Issues in the estimation and application of latent structure models of choice. Marketing Lett. (1994) 5(4):323–334CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Djurić P. M., Chun J.-H. An MCMC sampling approach to estimation of nonstationary hidden Markov models. IEEE Trans. Signal Processing (2002) 50(5):1113–1123CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Du R., Kamakura W. A. Household lifecycles and lifestyles in america. J. Marketing Res. (2006) 43(February):121–132CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dwyer R. F., Schurr P. H., Oh S. Developing buyer-seller relationships. J. Marketing (1987) 51(April):11–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Erdem T., Sun B. Testing for choice dynamics in panel data. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. (2001) 19(2):142–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fader P. S., Lattin J. M. Accounting for heterogeneity and nonstationarity in a cross-sectional model of consumer purchase behavior. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12(3):304–317LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fader P. S., Hardie B. G. S., Huang C.-Y. A dynamic changepoint model for new product sales forecasting. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(1):50–65LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Flanagan J. C. The critical incident technique. Psych. Bull. (1954) 51(4):327–359CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fournier S. Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. J. Consumer Res. (1998) 24(March):343–373CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frank R. E. Brand choice as a probability process. J. Bus. (1962) 35(January):43–56CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gelman A., Rubin D. B. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statist. Sci. (1992) 7:457–511CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (1997) 3rd ed.(Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Guadagni P. M., Little J. D. C. A logit model of brand choice Calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(3):203–238LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta S., Zeithaml V. A. Customer metrics and their impact on financial performance. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(6):718–739LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hamilton J. D. A new approach to the economic analysis of nonstationary time series and the business cycle. Econometrica (1989) 57(2):357–384CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison W. B., Mitchell S. K., Peterson S. P. Alumni donations and colleges' development expenditures: Does spending matter? (1995) 54(October):397–413Google Scholar
  • Heckman J. J., Rosen S. Heterogeneity and state dependence. Studies in Labor Markets (1981) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) 91–139Google Scholar
  • Hinde R. A.Towards Understanding Relationships (1979) (Academic, London) Google Scholar
  • Hughes J. P., Guttorp P. A class of stochastic models for relating synoptic atmospheric patterns to regional hydrologic phenomena. Water Resources Res. (1994) 30(5):1535–1546CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jain D., Singh S. S. Customer lifetime value research in marketing: A review and future direction. J. Interactive Marketing (2002) 16(2):34–46CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jeuland A. P., Bass F. M., Wright G. P. A multibrand stochastic model compounding heterogeneous Erlang timing and multinomial choice processes. Oper. Res. (1980) 28(2):255–277LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D., Miller D. T. Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psych. Rev. (1986) 93(2):136–153CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kamakura W. A., Russell G. J. A probabilistic choice model for market segmentation and elasticity structure. J. Marketing Res. (1989) 26(November):379–390CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keane M. P. Modeling heterogeneity and state dependence in consumer choice behavior. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. (1997) 15(July):310–327Google Scholar
  • Kim C.-J., Nelson C. R.State-Space Models with Regime Switching: Classical and Gibbs Sampling Approaches with Applications (1999) (M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Lewis M. The influence of loyalty programs and short-term promotions on customer retention. J. Marketing Res. (2004) 41(August):281–292CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Libai B., Narayandas D., Humby C. Toward an individual customer profitability model: A segment-based approach. J. Service Res. (2002) 5(1):69–76CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liechty J. C., Wedel M., Pieters R. The representation of local and global scanpaths in eye movements through Bayesian hidden Markov models. Psychometrika (2003) 68(4):519–541CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacDonald I. L., Zucchini W.Hidden Markov and Other Models for Discrete-Valued Time Series (1997) (Chapman and Hall, London) Google Scholar
  • McAlister L., Srivastava R., Horowitz J., Jones M., Kamakura W., Kulchitsky J., Ratchford B., Russell G., Sultan F., Yai T., Weiss D., Winer R. Incorporating choice dynamics in models of consumer behavior. Marketing Lett. (1991) 2(3):241–252CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Montgomery A. L., Li S., Srinivasan K., Liechty J. C. Predicting online purchase conversion using web path analysis. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):579–595LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moon S., Kamakura W. A., Ledolter J. Estimating promotion response when competitive promotions are unobservable. J. Marketing Res. (2007) . ForthcomingCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morgan R. M., Hunt S. D. The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. J. Marketing (1994) 58(3):20–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morrison D. G., Chen R. D. H., Karpis S. L., Britney K. E. A. Modeling retail customer behavior at merrill lynch. Marketing Sci. (1982) 1(2):123–141LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Naik P. A., Mantrala M. K., Sawyer A. G. Planning media schedules in the presence of dynamic advertising quality. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(3):214–235LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Netzer O. A hidden Markov model of customer relationship dynamics. (2004) . Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Newton M. A., Raftery A. E. Approximate Bayesian inference by the weighted likelihood bootstrap. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B (1994) 56(1):3–48Google Scholar
  • Okunade A. A. Logistic regression and probability of business school alumni donations: Micro-data evidence. Ed. Econom. (1993) 1:243–258Google Scholar
  • Okunade A. A., Berl R. L. Determinants of charitable giving of business school alumni. Res. Higher Ed. (1997) 38(April):201–214CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oliver R. L.Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer (1997) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Pauwels K., Currim I., Dekimpe M. G., Ghysels E., Hanssens D. M., Mizik N., Naik P. Modeling marketing dynamics by time series econometrics. Marketing Lett. (2004) 15(4):167–183CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeifer P. E., Carraway R. L. Modeling customer relationships using Markov chains. J. Interactive Marketing (2000) 14(2):43–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Poulsen C. S. Mixed Markov and latent Markov modeling applied to brand choice behavior. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1990) 7(1):5–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rabiner L. R. A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proc. IEEE (1989) 77(2):257–286CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rabiner L. R., Juang B.-H.Fundamentals of Speech Recognition (1993) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Ramaswamy V. Evolutionary preference segmentation with panel survey data: An application to new products. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1997) 14(1):57–80CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reinartz W., Kumar V. The impact of customer relationship characteristics on profitable lifetime duration. J. Marketing (2003) 67(1):77–99CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rossi P. E., Allenby G. M. Bayesian statistics and marketing. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(3):304–328LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rust R. T., Chung T. S. Marketing models of service and relationships. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(6):560–580LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rust R. T., Lemon K. N., Zeithaml V. A. Return on marketing: Using customer equity to focus marketing strategy. J. Marketing (2004) 68(1):109–127CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schmittlein D. C., Peterson R. A. Customer base analysis: An industrial purchase process application. Marketing Sci. (1994) 13(1):41–67LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Statist. (1978) 6(2):461–464CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scott L. S. Bayesian methods for hidden Markov models, recursive computing in the 21st century. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (2002) 97(475):337–351CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith A., Naik P. A., Tsai C.-L. Markov-switching model selection using Kullback-Leibler divergence. J. Econometrics (2006) 134(2):553–577CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Soukup J. D. A Markov analysis of fund-raising alternatives. J. Marketing Res. (1983) 20(August):314–319CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spiegelhalter D. J., Best N. G., Carlin B. P., van der Linde A. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B (2002) 64(3):583–639CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Srinivasan V., Kesavan R. An alternative interpretation of the linear learning model of brand choice. J. Consumer Res. (1976) 3(September):76–83CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Storm S. After years of cash flow, universities hit an ebb. New York Times (2003) 13(March):25Google Scholar
  • Taylor A. L., Martin J. C. Characteristics of alumni donors at a research I public university. Res. Higher Ed. (1995) 36(3):283–302CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomas J. S. The importance of linking customer acquisition to customer retention. J. Marketing Res. (2001) 39(May):262–268CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wedel M., Kamakura W. A.Market Segmentation: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations (2000) (Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Willemain T. R., Goyal A., Van Deven M., Thukral I. S. Alumni giving: The influences of reunion, class and year. Res. Higher Ed. (1994) 35(2):201–214Google Scholar
  • Winer R. S. A framework for customer relationship management. California Management Rev. (2001) 43(Summer):89–105CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xie J. X., Song M., Sirbu M., Wang Q. Kalman filter estimation of new product diffusion models. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34(August):378–393CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.