Research Note—Attention Arousal Through Price Partitioning

References

• Anderson E. T., Simester D. Effects of $9 price endings on retail sales: Evidence from field experiments. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2003) 1(1):93–110Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson N. H. Integration theory and attitude change. Psych. Rev. (1971) 8(3):171–206Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ayres I., Nalebuff B. In praise of honest pricing. MIT Sloan Management Rev. (2003) 45(1):24–28Google Scholar
• Berlyne D. E.Conflict, Arousal, and Curiosity (1960) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berlyne D. E., Carterette E., Friedman M. Attention. Handbook of Perception (1974) 1(Academic, San Diego) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bettman J. R., Luce M. F., Payne J. W. Constructive consumer choice processes. J. Consumer Res. (1998) 25(3):187–217Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campanelli M. Who pays to get it there? Net profits: Your site's shipping and handling charges can make or break an online sale. Entrepreneur (2002) 30:34–36Google Scholar
• Daripa A., Kapur S. Pricing on the Internet. Oxford Rev. Econom. Pol. (2001) 17(2):202–216Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dholakia U. M., Simonson I. The effect of explicit reference points on consumer choice and online bidding behavior. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(2):206–217Link, Google Scholar
• Drumwright M. E. A demonstration of anomalies in evaluations of bundling. Marketing Lett. (1992) 3(4):311–321Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fishburn P. C. Lexicographic orders, utilities and decision rules: A survey. Management Sci. (1974) 20(7):1442–1471Link, Google Scholar
• Fiske S. T., Taylor S. E.Social Cognition (1991) 2nd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaeth G. J., Levin I. P., Chakraborty G., Levin A. M. Consumer evaluation of multi-product bundles: An information integration analysis. Marketing Lett. (1990) 2(1):47–57Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green P. E., Rao V. R. Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgmental data. J. Marketing Res. (1971) 8(3):355–363Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heath T. B., Chatterjee S., France K. R. Mental accounting and changes in price: The frame dependence of reference dependence. J. Consumer Res. (1995) 22(2):90–97Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hossain T., Morgan J. …Plus shipping and handling: Revenue (non) equivalence in field experiments on eBay. Adv. Econom. Anal. Pol. (2006) 6(2, article 3Google Scholar
• Hsee C. K., Loewenstein G. F., Blount S., Bazerman M. H. Preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of options: A review and theoretical analysis. Psych. Bull. (1999) 125(5):576–590Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johar G. V., Maheswaran D., Perracchio L. A. Mapping the frontiers: Theoretical advances in consumer research on memory, affect, and persuasion. J. Consumer Res. (2006) 33(2):139–149Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson E. J., Payne J. W. Effort and accuracy in choice. Management Sci. (1985) 31(4):395–414Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D.Attention and Effort (1973) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47(2):263–291Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Knetsch J. L., Thaler R. H. Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 6(4):728–741Google Scholar
• Kalyanaram G., Winer R. S. Empirical generalizations from reference price research. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(3):G161–169Link, Google Scholar
• Keeney R. L., Raiffa H.Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs (1993) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leclerc F., Hsee C. K., Nunes J. C. Narrow focusing: Why the relative position of a good in its category matters more than it should. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(2):194–205Link, Google Scholar
• Lee Y. H., Han C. Y. Partitioned pricing in advertising: Effects on brand and retailer attitudes. Marketing Lett. (2002) 13(1):27–40Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis M., Singh V., Fay S. An empirical study of the impact of nonlinear shipping and handling fees on purchase incidence and expenditure decisions. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(1):51–64Link, Google Scholar
• McFadden D., Zarembka P. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers of Econometrics (1974) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Mellers B. A., Richards V., Birnbaum M. H. Distributional theories of impression formation. Organ. Behav. Human Dec. Proc. (1992) 51(3):313–343Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morwitz V. G., Greenleaf E. A., Johnson E. J. Divide and prosper: Consumers' reactions to partitioned prices. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35(4):453–463Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prelec D., Loewenstein G. F. The red and the black: Mental accounting of savings and debt. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(1):4–28Link, Google Scholar
• Randall T., Terwiesch C., Ulrich K. T. User design of customized products. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(2):268–280Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenthal R., Rosnow R. J.Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis (1991) (McGraw-Hill, Boston) Google Scholar
• Russo J. E., Dosher B. Strategies for multiattribute binary choice. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition (1983) 9(4):676–696Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schindler R., Morrin M., Bechwati N. N. Shipping charges and shipping-charges skepticism: Implications for direct marketers' pricing formats. J. Interactive Marketing (2005) 19(1):41–53Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmalensee R. Commodity bundling by single product monopolies. J. Law Econom. (1982) 25(1):67–72Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shiv B., Carmon Z., Ariely D. Placebo effects of marketing actions: Consumers get what they pay for. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(4):383–393Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shugan S. M. The cost of thinking. J. Consumer Res. (1980) 7(2):99–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stremersch S., Tellis G. J. Strategic bundling of products and prices: A new synthesis for marketing. J. Marketing (2002) 66(1):55–72Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor S. E., Thompson S. C. Stalking the elusive “vividness” effect. Psych. Rev. (1982) 89(2):155–181Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler R. H. Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(3):199–214Link, Google Scholar
• Thaler R. H., Johnson E. J. Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Sci. (1990) 36(6):643–660Link, Google Scholar
• Tversky A. Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psych. Rev. (1972) 79(3):281–299Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science (1981) 211(4481):453–458Crossref, Google Scholar
• Urbany J. E., Dickson P. R. Consumer normal price estimation: Market versus personal standards. J. Consumer Res. (1991) 18(2):45–51Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wathieu L., Bertini M. Price as a stimulus to think: The case for willful overpricing. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(1):118–129Link, Google Scholar
• Winer R. S.Pricing (2005) (Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Xia L., Monroe K. B. Price partitioning on the Internet. J. Int. Marketing (2004) 18(4):63–73Google Scholar
• Yadav M. S. How buyers evaluate product bundles: A model of anchoring and adjustment. J. Consumer Res. (1994) 21(2):342–353Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yadav M. S., Monroe K. B. How buyers perceive savings in a bundle price: An examination of a bundle's transaction value. J. Marketing Res (1993) 30(3):350–358Crossref, Google Scholar