A Dynamic Model of Sponsored Search Advertising

References

• Ansari A., Mela C. F. E-customization. J. Marketing Res. (2003) 40(2):131–145Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arcidiacono P., Miller R. A. CCP estimation of dynamic discrete choice models with unobserved heterogeneity. (2010) . Working paper, Duke University, Durham, NCGoogle Scholar
• Athey S., Ellison G. Position auctions with consumer search. (2008) . Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Bajari P., Lanier Benkard C., Levin J. Estimating dynamic models of imperfect competition. Econometrica (2007) 75(5):1331–1370Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bajari P., Chernozhukov V., Hong H., Nekipelov D. Identification and efficient semiparametric estimation of a dynamic discrete game. (2009) . Working paper, University of Minnesota, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
• Ben-Akiva M., Lerman S.Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand (1985) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Bradlow E. T., Schmittlein D. C. The little engines that could: Modeling the performance of World Wide Web search engines. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19(1):43–62Link, Google Scholar
• Bresnahan T. F., Reiss P. C. Entry and competition in concentrated markets. J. Political Econom. (1991) 99(5):977–1009Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg B. J. Advertising frequency decisions in a discrete Markov process under a budget constraint. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35(3):399–406Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg B. J., Dubé J.-P., Mela C. F. Do digital video recorders influence sales? J. Marketing Res. (2010) 47(6):998–1010Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y., He C. Paid placement: Advertising and search on the Internet. (2006) . Working paper, University of Colorado, BoulderGoogle Scholar
• Chung D., Steenburgh T., Sudhir K. Do bonuses enhance sales productivity? A dynamic structural analysis of bonus-based compensation plans. (2010) . Working paper, Yale University, New Haven, CTCrossref, Google Scholar
• comScore comScore releases January 2009 U.S. search engine rankings. (2009) . Press release (February 18), http://ir.comscore.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=366442Google Scholar
• comScore comScore releases January 2010 U.S. search engine rankings. (2010) . Press release (February 11), http://ir.comscore.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=444505Google Scholar
• Doraszelski U., Escobar J. A theory of regular Markov perfect equilibria in dynamic stochastic games: Genericity, stability, and purification. Theoretical Econom. (2010) 53(3):369–402Google Scholar
• Doraszelski U., Satterthwaite M. Computable Markov-perfect industry dynamics. RAND J. Econom. (2010) 41(2):215–243Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé J.-P., Hitsch G. J., Chintagunta P. K. Tipping and concentration in markets with indirect network effects. Marketing Sci. (2010a) 29(2):216–249Link, Google Scholar
• Dubé J.-P., Hitsch G. J., Jindal P. Estimating durable goods adoption decisions from stated preference data. (2010b) . Working paper, University of Chicago, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
• Dubé J.-P., Sudhir K., Ching A., Crawford G., Draganska M., Fox J., Hartmann W., et al. Recent advances in structural econometric modeling: Dynamics, product positioning and entry. Marketing Lett. (2005) 16(3–4):209–224Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edelman B., Ostrovsky M., Schwarz M. Internet advertising and the generalized second-price auction: Selling billions of dollars worth of keywords. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2007) 97(1):242–259Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farias V., Saure D., Weintraub G. Y. An approximate dynamic programming approach to solving dynamic oligopoly models. (2010) . Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
• Feng J. Optimal mechanism for selling a set of commonly ranked objects. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(3):501–512Link, Google Scholar
• Ghose A., Yang S. An empirical analysis of search engine advertising: Sponsored search in electronic markets. Management Sci. (2009) 55(10):1605–1622Link, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A., Tucker C. Search engine advertising: Channel substitution when pricing ads to context. Management Sci. (2011) 57(3):458–470Link, Google Scholar
• Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (2003) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Hong H., Shum M. Using price distributions to estimate search costs. RAND J. Econom. (2006) 37(2):257–276Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horsky D., Simon L. S. Advertising and the diffusion of new products. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(1):1–17Link, Google Scholar
• Hortaçsu A., Syverson C. Product differentiation, search costs, and competition in the mutual fund industry: A case study of S&P 500 index funds. Quart. J. Econom. (2004) 119(2):403–456Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hotz V. J., Miller R. A. Conditional choice probabilities and the estimation of dynamic models. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1993) 60(3):497–529Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyengar G., Kumar A. Characterizing optimal adword auctions. (2006) . Working paper, Columbia University, New YorkCrossref, Google Scholar
• Jofre-Bonet M., Pesendorfer M. Estimation of a dynamic auction game. Econometrica (2003) 71(5):1443–1489Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kamakura W. A., Russell G. J. A probabilistic choice model for market segmentation and elasticity structure. J. Marketing Res. (1989) 26(4):379–390Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katona Z., Sarvary M. The race for sponsored links: Bidding patterns for search advertising. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(2):199–215Link, Google Scholar
• Kempe D., Wilbur K. C. What can television networks learn from search engines? How to select, order, and price advertisements to maximize advertiser welfare. (2010) . Working paper, University of Southern California, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
• Kim J. B., Albuquerque P., Bronnenberg B. J. Online demand under limited consumer search. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(6):100–1023Link, Google Scholar
• McFadden D. L. Modeling the choice of residential location. (1977) . Discussion Paper 477, Cowles Foundation, Yale University, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
• Misra S., Nair H. A structural model of sales-force compensation dynamics: Estimation and field implementation. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2011) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Narcisse E. Magid: Casual free to pay conversion rate too low. (2007) . GameDaily.com (September 20), http://www.gamedaily.com/articles/features/magid-casual-free-to-pay-conversion-rate-too-low/70943/?biz=1Google Scholar
• Pancras J., Sudhir K. Optimal marketing strategies for a customer data intermediary. J. Marketing Res. (2007) 44(4):560–578Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pesendorfer M., Schmidt-Dengler P. Asymptotic least squares estimators for dynamic games. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2008) 75(3):901–928Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rochet J.-C., Tirole J. Two-sided markets: A progress report. RAND J. Econom. (2006) 37(3):645–667Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rust J., Engle R. F., McFadden D. L. Structural estimation of Markov decision processes. Handbook of Econometrics (1994) IV(Elsevier Science, Amsterdam) 3081–3143Google Scholar
• Rutz O. J., Bucklin R. E. A model of individual keyword performance in paid search advertising. (2007) . Working paper, Yale University, New Haven, CTCrossref, Google Scholar
• Rutz O. J., Bucklin R. E. From generic to branded: A model of spillover dynamics in paid search advertising. J. Marketing Res. (2011) . ForthcomingCrossref, Google Scholar
• Ryan S. The costs of environmental regulation in a concentrated industry. (2010) . Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
• TNS Media Intelligence TNS Media Intelligence reports U.S. advertising expenditures grew 0.2 percent in 2007. (2008) . Press release (March 25), http://www.tnsglobal.com/_assets/files/TNS_Market_Research_2007_Year_end_press_release.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Train K. E.Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (2003) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• VanBoskirk S. U.S. interactive marketing forecast, 2007 to 2012. (2007) . Forrester Research (October 10), http://www.forrester.com/rb/Research/us_interactive_marketing_forecast%2C_2007_to_2012/q/id/42463/t/2Google Scholar
• Varian H. R. Position auction. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (2007) 25(6):1163–1178Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vickrey W. Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. J. Finance (1961) 16(1):8–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yao S., Mela C. F. Online auction demand. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(5):861–885Link, Google Scholar
• Zanutto E. L., Bradlow E. T. Data pruning in consumer choice models. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2006) 4(3):267–287Crossref, Google Scholar