The Seeds of Negativity: Knowledge and Money

References

• Baron D. P. Service-induced campaign contributions and the electoral equilibrium. Quart. J. Econom. (1989) 104(1):45–72Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumeister R. F., Bratslavsky E., Finkenauer C., Vohs K. D. Bad is strong than good. Rev. General Psych. (2001) 5(4):323–370Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benoit W. L.Seeing Spots: A Functional Analysis of Presidential Television Advertisements, 1952–1996 (1999) (Praegar, Westport, CT) Google Scholar
• Bradley R. A., Terry M. E. Rank analysis of incomplete block designs, I: The method of paired comparisons. Biometrika (1952) 39(3/4):324–345Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buell E. H., Sigelman L.Attack Politics: Negativity in Presidential Campaigns Since 1960 (2008) 2nd ed.(University of Kansas Press, Lawrence) Google Scholar
• Cacioppo J. T., Gardner W. L., Berntson G. G. Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. (1997) 1(1):3–25Crossref, Google Scholar
• Che H., Iyer G., Shanmugam R. Negative advertising and voter choice. (2007) . Working paper, University of California, Berkeley, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
• Chen Y., Joshi Y. V., Raju J. S., Zhang Z. J. A theory of combative advertising. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(1):1–19Link, Google Scholar
• Damore D. F. Candidate strategy and the decision to go negative. Political Res. Quart. (2002) 55(3):669–686Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glickman M. E. Parameter estimation in large dynamic paired comparison experiments. Appl. Statist. (1999) 48(3):377–394Google Scholar
• Glickman M. E. Dynamic paired comparison models with stochastic variances. J. Appl. Statist. (2001) 28(6):673–689Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldstein K., Freedman P. Campaign advertising and voter turnout: New evidence for a stimulation effect. J. Politics (2002a) 64(3):721–740Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldstein K., Freedman P. Lessons learned: Campaign advertising in the 2000 elections. Political Comm. (2002b) 19(1):5–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gordon B., Hartmann W. Structural equilibrium analysis of political advertising. (2010) . Working paper, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Grewal D., Kavanoor S., Fern E. F., Costley C., Barnes J. Comparative versus noncomparative advertising: A meta-analysis. J. Marketing (1997) 61(4):1–15Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrington J. E., Hess G. D. A spatial theory of positive and negative campaigning. Games Econom. Behav. (1996) 17(2):209–229Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holbrook A. L., Krosnick J. A., Visser P. S., Gardner W. L., Cacioppo J. T. Attitudes toward presidential candidates and political parties: Initial optimism, inertial first impressions, and a focus on flaws. Amer. J. Political Sci. (2001) 45(4):930–950Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ito T. A., Cacioppo J. T. Electrophysiological evidence of implicit and explicit categorization processes. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (2000) 36(6):660–676Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ito T. A., Larsen J. T., Smith N. K., Cacioppo J. T. Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1998) 75(4):887–900Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein J. G., Ahluwalia R. Negativity in the evaluation of political candidates. J. Marketing (2005) 69(1):131–142Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lau R. R. Two explanations for negativity effects in political behavior. Amer. J. Political Sci. (1985) 29(1):119–138Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lau R. R., Pomper G. M. Negative campaigning by U.S. senate candidates. Party Politics (2001) 7(1):69–87Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lau R. R., Rovner I. B. Negative campaigning. Annual Rev. Political Sci. (2009) 12:285–306Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lau R. R., Sigelman L., Heldman C., Babbitt P. The effects of negative political advertisements: A meta-analytic assessment. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. (1999) 93(4):851–875Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luce R. D.Individual Choice Behaviours: A Theoretical Analysis (1959) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Mann T. E., Wolfinger R. E. Candidates and parties in congressional elections. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. (1980) 74(3):617–632Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narasimhan C. Competitive promotional strategies. J. Bus. (1988) 61(4):427–449Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narayanan S., Manchanda P., Chintagunta P. K. Temporal differences in the role of marketing communication in new product categories. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(3):278–290Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neuman W. R.The Paradox of Mass Politics: Knowledge and Opinion in the American Electorate (1986) (Harvard University Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Niemann J. The trouble with comparative ads. Ad Week (1987) January 12):BR4–BR5Google Scholar
• Peterson D. A. M., Djupe P. A. When primary campaigns go negative: The determinants of campaign negativity. Political Res. Quart. (2005) 58(1):45–54Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips J. M., Urbany J. E., Reynolds T. J. Confirmation and the effects of valenced political advertising: A field experiment. J. Consumer Res. (2008) 34(6):794–806Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shachar R. The political participation puzzle and marketing. J. Marketing Res. (2009) 46(6):798–815Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaffer G., Zettelmeyer F. Comparative advertising and in-store displays. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(16):1144–1156Link, Google Scholar
• Shiv B., Edell J. A., Payne J. W. Factors affecting the impact of negatively and positively framed ad messages. J. Consumer Res. (1997) 24(3):285–294Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sigelman L., Buell E. H. You take the high road and I'll take the low road? The interplay of attack strategies and tactics in presidential campaigns. J. Politics (2003) 65(2):518–531Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sigelman L., Shiraev E. The rational attacker in Russia? Negative campaigning in Russian presidential elections. J. Politics (2002) 64(1):45–62Crossref, Google Scholar
• Skaperdas S., Grofman B. Modeling negative campaigning. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. (1995) 89(1):49–61Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soberman D., Sadoulet L. Campaign spending limits and political advertising. Management Sci. (2007) 53(10):1521–1532Link, Google Scholar
• Thaler R. Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(3):199–214Link, Google Scholar
• Theilmann J., Wilhite A. Campaign tactics and the decision to attack. J. Politics (1998) 60(4):1050–1062Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson D. V., Hamilton R. W. The effects of information processing mode on consumers' responses to comparative advertising. J. Consumer Res. (2006) 32(4):530–540Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vranica S. And in this corner…marketers take some jabs. Wall Street Journal (2008) October 2). http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122289868915095901.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Wand J. The allocation of campaign contributions by interest groups and the rise of elite polarization. (2006) . Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• West D. M. Political advertising and news coverage in the 1992 California U.S. senate campaigns. J. Politics (1994) 56(4):1053–1075Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang Y., Gerstner E. Negative advertising in business markets: An eye for an eye? (2006) . Working paper, University of Houston, HoustonGoogle Scholar
• Zettelmeyer F., Shaffer G. Comparative advertising and in-store displays. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(6):1144–1156Link, Google Scholar