Scalable Inference of Customer Similarities from Interactions Data Using Dirichlet Processes

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1110.0640

References

  • Akerlof G. A. Social distance and social decisions. Econometrica (1997) 65(5):1005–1027CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ansari A., Mela C. F. E-customization. J. Marketing Res. (2003) 40(2):131–145CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ansari A., Koenigsberg O., Stahl F. Modeling multiple relationships in social networks. J. Marketing Res. (2011) . ForthcomingCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Antoniak C. E. Mixtures of Dirichlet processes with applications to nonparametric problems. Ann. Statist. (1974) 2(6):1152–1174CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arndt J. Role of product-related conversations in the diffusion of a new product. J. Marketing Res. (1967) 4(3):291–295CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Banerjee S., Carlin B. P., Gelfand A. E.Hierarchical Modeling and Analysis for Spatial Data (2004) (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL) Google Scholar
  • Bass F. M. A new product growth for model consumer durables. Management Sci. (1969) 15(5):215–227LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bearden W. O., Etzel M. J. Reference group influence on product and brand purchase decisions. J. Consumer Res. (1982) 9(2):183–194CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bell D. R., Song S. Neighborhood effects and trial on the Internet: Evidence from online grocery retailing. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2007) 5(4):361–400CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blackwell D., MacQueen J. B. Ferguson distributions via Polya urn schemes. Ann. Statist. (1973) 1(2):353–355CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blau P. M.Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure (1977) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Bradlow E. T., Schmittlein D. C. The little engines that could: Modeling the performance of World Wide Web search engines. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19(1):43–62LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Braun M., Fader P. S., Bradlow E. T., Kunreuther H. Modeling the “pseudodeductible” in insurance claims decisions. Management Sci. (2006) 52(8):1258–1272LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brown J. J., Reingen P. H. Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior. J. Consumer Res. (1987) 14(3):350–362CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choi J., Hui S. K., Bell D. R. Spatiotemporal analysis of imitation behavior across new buyers at an online grocery retailer. J. Marketing Res. (2010) 47(1):75–89CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dasgupta K., Singh R., Viswanathan B., Chakraborty D., Mukherjea S., Nanavati A. A., Joshi A. Social ties and their relevance to churn in mobile telecom networks. Proc. 11th Internat. Conf. Extending Database Tech.: Adv. Database Tech. (2008) (ACM, New York) 668–677CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eagle N., Pentland A., Lazer D. Inferring friendship network structure by using mobile phone data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2009) 106(36):15274–15278CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Escobar M. D. Estimating normal means with a Dirichlet process prior. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1994) 89(425):268–277CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Escobar M. D., West M. Bayesian density estimation and inference using mixtures. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1995) 90(430):577–588CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Escobar M. D., West M., Day D., Müller P., Sinha D. Computing nonparametric hierarchical models. Practical Nonparametric and Semiparametric Bayesian Statistics (1998) (Springer-Verlag, New York) 1–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fader P. S., Hardie B. G. S., Zeithammer R. Forecasting new product trial in a controlled test market environment. J. Forecasting (2003) 22(5):391–410CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feick L. F., Price L. L. The market maven: A diffuser of marketplace information. J. Marketing (1987) 51(1):83–97CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferguson T. S. A Bayesian analysis of some nonparametric problems. Ann. Statist. (1973) 1(2):209–230CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ford J. D., Ellis E. A. A reexamination of group influence on member brand preference. J. Marketing Res. (1980) 17(1):125–132CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gatignon H., Robertson T. S. A propositional inventory for new diffusion research. J. Consumer Res. (1985) 11(4):849–867CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gelman A. Discussion on the paper by Handcock, Raftery and Tantrum. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. A (2007) 170(2):337Google Scholar
  • Gelman A., Meng X.-L., Stern H. Posterior predictive assessment of model fitness via realized discrepancies. Statistica Sinica (1996) 6(4):733–807Google Scholar
  • Getoor L., Diehl C. P. Link mining: A survey. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newslett. (2005) 7(2):3–12CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Godes D., Mayzlin D. Firm-created word-of-mouth communication: Evidence from a field test. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(4):721–739LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goldenberg J., Libai B., Muller E. Talk of the network: A complex systems look at the underlying process of word-of-mouth. Marketing Lett. (2001) 12(3):211–223CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Handcock M. S., Raftery A. E., Tantrum J. M. Model-based clustering for social networks. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. A (2007) 170(2):301–354CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hill S., Provost F., Volinsky C. Network-based marketing: Identifying likely adopters via consumer networks. Statist. Sci. (2006) 21(2):256–276CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoff P. D. Bilinear mixed-effects models for dyadic data. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (2005) 100(469):286–295CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoff P. D., Raftery A. E., Handcock M. S. Latent space approaches to social network analysis. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (2002) 97(460):1090–1098CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hunter D. R., Goodreau S. M., Handcock M. S. Goodness of fit of social network models. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (2008) 103(481):248–258CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ishwaran H., James L. F. Gibbs sampling methods for stick-breaking priors. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (2001) 96(453):161–173CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iyengar R., Van den Bulte C., Valente T. W. Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing Sci. (2011) 30(2):195–212LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jeh G., Widom J. Simrank: A measure of structural-context similarity. Proc. ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (2003) (ACM Press, New York) 271–279Google Scholar
  • Johnson M. E.Multivariate Statistical Simulation (1987) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz L. A new status index derived from sociometric analysis. Psychometrika (1953) 18(1):39–43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz E., Lazarsfeld P. F.Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications (1955) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Kim J. G., Menzefricke U., Feinberg F. M. Assessing heterogeneity in discrete choice models using a Dirichlet process prior. Rev. Marketing Sci. (2004) 2Article 1CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kossinets G., Watts D. J. Empirical analysis of an evolving social network. Science (2006) 311(5757):88–90CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kotz S., Kozubowski T. J., Podgorski K.The Laplace Distribution and Generalizations: A Revisit with Applications to Communications, Economics, Engineering, and Finance (2001) (Birkhauser, Boston) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kratzer J., Lettl C. Distinctive roles of lead users and opinion leaders in the social networks of schoolchildren. J. Consumer Res. (2009) 36(4):646–659CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazarsfeld P., Merton R. K., Berger M. Friendship as a social process: A substantitive and methodological analysis. Freedom and Control in Modern Society (1954) (Van Nostrand, New York) 18–66Google Scholar
  • Lenk P. Simulation pseudo-bias correction to the harmonic mean estimator of integrated likelihoods. J. Comput. Graph. Statist. (2009) 18(4):941–960CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liben-Nowell D., Kleinberg J. The link-prediction problem for social networks. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. (2007) 58(7):1019–1031CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McPherson M., Smith-Lovin L., Cook J. M. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. (2001) 27:415–444CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morrison D. G., Schmittlein D. C. Predicting future random events based on past performance. Management Sci. (1981) 27(9):1006–1023LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Morrison D. G., Schmittlein D. C. Generalizing the NBD model for customer purchases: What are the implications and is it worth the effort? J. Bus. Econom. Statist. (1988) 6(2):145–159CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nachtsheim C. J., Johnson M. E. A new family of multivariate distributions with applications to Monte Carlo studies. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1988) 83(404):984–989CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nam S., Manchanda P., Chintagunta P. K. The effect of signal quality and contiguous word of mouth on customer acquisition for a video-on-demand service. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(4):690–700LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Neal R. M. Markov chain sampling methods for Dirichlet process mixture models. J. Comput. Graph. Statist. (2000) 9(2):249–265Google Scholar
  • Novak T. P., de Leeuw J., MacEvoy B. Richness curves for evaluating market segmentation. J. Marketing Res. (1992) 29(2):254–267CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O'Hagan A., Forster J.Kendall's Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. 2B: Bayesian Inference (2004) 2nd ed.(Arnold, London) Google Scholar
  • Park C. W., Lessig V. P. Students and housewives: Differences in susceptibility to reference group infuence. J. Consumer Res. (1977) 4(2):102–110CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reingen P. H., Kernan J. B. Analysis of referral networks in marketing: Methods and illustration. J. Marketing Res. (1986) 23(4):370–378CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reingen P. H., Foster B. L., Brown J. J., Seidman S. B. Brand congruence in interpersonal relations: A social network analysis. J. Consumer Res. (1984) 11(3):771–783CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rossi P. E., Allenby G. M., McCulloch R.Bayesian Statistics and Marketing (2005) (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rubin D. B. Bayesianly justifiable and relevant frequency calculations for the applied statistician. Ann. Statist. (1984) 12(4):1151–1172CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sethuraman J. A constructive definition of Dirichlet priors. Statistica Sinica (1994) 4(2):639–650Google Scholar
  • Smith A. F. M., Gelfand A. E. Bayesian statistics without tears: A sampling–resampling perspective. Amer. Statistician (1992) 46(2):84–88Google Scholar
  • Toivonen R., Kovanen L., Kivelä M., Onnela J.-P., Saramäki J., Kaski K. A comparative study of social network models: Network evolution models and nodal attribute models. Soc. Networks (2009) 31(4):240–254CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Alstyne M., Brynjolfsson E. Global village or cyber-Balkans? Modeling and measuring the integration of electronic communities. Management Sci. (2005) 51(6):851–868LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Watts D. J. Networks, dynamics and the small-world phenomenon. Amer. J. Sociol. (1999) 105(2):493–527CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watts D. J., Dodds P. S. Influentials, networks and public opinion formation. J. Consumer Res. (2007) 34(4):441–458CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watts D. J., Strogatz S. H. Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature (1998) 393(June):440–442CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wedel M., Zhang J. Analyzing brand competition across subcategories. J. Marketing Res. (2004) 41(4):448–456CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Witt R. E., Bruce G. D. Group influence and brand choice congruence. J. Marketing Res. (1972) 9(4):440–443CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang S., Allenby G. M. Modeling interdependent consumer preferences. J. Marketing Res. (2003) 40(3):282–294CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.