Network Characteristics and the Value of Collaborative User-Generated Content

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1110.0684

References

  • Adler P. S., Kwon S.-W. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Acad. Management Rev. (2002) 27(1):17–40CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alba J. W., Hutchinson J. W. Dimensions of consumer expertise. J. Consumer Res. (1987) 13(4):411–454CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aral S., Van Alstyne M. The diversity-bandwidth trade-off. Amer. J. Sociol. (2011) 117(1):90–171CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Asvanund A., Clay K., Krishnan R., Smith M. D. An empirical analysis of network externalities in peer-to-peer music-sharing networks. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15(2):155–174LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Berger J., Heath C. Where consumers diverge from others: Identity signaling and product domains. J. Consumer Res. (2007) 34(2):121–134CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger J., Milkman K. L. What makes online content viral? J. Marketing Res. (2012) 49(2):192–205CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borgatti S. P. Centrality and network flow. Soc. Networks (2005) 27(1):55–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borgatti S. P., Everett M. G. Network analysis of 2-mode data. Soc. Networks (1997) 19(3):243–269CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borgatti S. P., Mehra A., Brass D. J., Labianca G. Network analysis in the social sciences. Science (2009) 323(5916):892–895CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brandes U., Kenis P., Lerner J., van Raaij D., Quemada J., Léon G., Maarek Y. S., Nejdl W. Network analysis of collaboration structure in Wikipedia. Proc. 18th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (2009) (ACM, New York) 731–740CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brooks F. P.The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering (1975) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown J. J., Reingen P. H. Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior. J. Consumer Res. (1987) 14(3):350–362CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Butler B. S. Membership size, communication activity, and sustainability: A resource-based model of online social structures. Inform. Systems Res. (2001) 12(4):346–362LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Capocci A., Servedio V. D. P., Colaiori F., Buriol L. S., Donato D., Leonardi S., Caldarelli G. Preferential attachment in the growth of social networks: The Internet encyclopedia Wikipedia. Phys. Rev. E (2006) 74(3):036116CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carlile P. R., Rebentisch E. S. Into the black box: The knowledge transformation cycle. Management Sci. (2003) 49(9):1180–1195LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chevalier J. A., Mayzlin D. The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. (2006) 43(3):345–354CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clauson K. A., Polen H. H., Boulos M. N. K., Dzenowagis J. H. Scope, completeness, and accuracy of drug information in Wikipedia. Ann. Pharmacotherapy (2008) 42(12):1814–1821CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Constant D., Sproull L., Kiesler S. The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(2):119–135LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Costenbader E., Valente T. W. The stability of centrality measures when networks are sampled. Soc. Networks (2003) 25(4):283–307CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Denning P., Horning J., Parnas D., Weinstein L. Wikipedia risks. Comm. ACM (2005) 48(12):152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duan W., Gu B., Whinston A. B. The dynamics of online word-of-mouth and product sales—An empirical investigation of the movie industry. J. Retailing (2008) 84(2):233–242CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elsner M. K., Heil O. P., Sinha A. R. Spreading the word: Assessing the factors that determine the popularity of user-generated content. (2009) Presented at Emergence and Impact of User-Generated ContentDecember 10(MSI and the Wharton Interactive Media Initiative, Philadelphia) Google Scholar
  • Espinosa J. A., Slaughter S. A., Kraut R. E., Herbsleb J. D. Team knowledge and coordination in geographically distributed software development. J. Management Inform. Systems (2007) 24(1):135–169CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Faust K. Centrality in affiliation networks. Soc. Networks (1997) 19(2):157–191CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferguson T., Frydman G. The first generation of e-patients. British Medical J. (2004) 328(7449):1148–1149CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forman C., Ghose A., Wiesenfeld B. Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Inform. Systems Res. (2008) 19(3):291–313LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Foutz N. Z., Jank W. Prerelease demand forecasting for motion pictures using functional shape analysis of virtual stock markets. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(3):568–579LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fox S., Jones S. The social life of health information. (2009) . Technical report, Pew Research Center, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  • Freeman L. C. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc. Networks (1979) 1(3):215–239CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frels J. K., Shervani T., Srivastava R. K. The integrated networks model: Explaining resource allocations in network markets. J. Marketing (2003) 67(1):29–45CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frenzen J. K., Davis H. L. Purchasing behavior in embedded markets. J. Consumer Res. (1990) 17(1):1–12CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frenzen J., Nakamoto K. Structure, cooperation, and the flow of market information. J. Consumer Res. (1993) 20(3):360–375CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Godes D., Mayzlin D. Using online conversations to measure word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):545–560LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goldenberg J., Oestreicher-Singer G., Reichman S. The quest for content: How user-generated links can facilitate online exploration. J. Marketing Res. (2012) . ForthcomingCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. (1985) 91(3):481–510CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gregan-Paxton J., John D. R. Consumer learning by analogy: A model of internal knowledge transfer. J. Consumer Res. (1997) 24(3):266–284CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grewal R., Lilien G. L., Mallapragada G. Location, location, location: How network embeddedness affects project success in open source systems. Management Sci. (2006) 52(7):1043–1056LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gu F. F., Hung K., Tse D. K. When does guanxi matter? Issues of capitalization and its dark sides. J. Marketing (2008) 72(4):12–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R., Gargiulo M. Where do interorganizational networks come from? Amer. J. Sociol. (1999) 104(5):1439–1493CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen M. T., Haas M. R. Competing for attention in knowledge markets: Electronic document dissemination in a management consulting company. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46(1):1–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen M. T., Mors M. L., Lovas B. Knowledge sharing in organizations: Multiple networks, multiple phases. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48(5):776–793CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haveman H. A. Organizational size and change—Diversification in the savings and loan industry after deregulation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38(1):20–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hiltz S. R., Turoff M. Structuring computer-mediated communication systems to avoid information overload. Comm. ACM (1985) 28(7):680–699CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iacobucci D., Hopkins N. Modeling dyadic interactions and networks in marketing. J. Marketing Res. (1992) 29(1):5–17CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iskowitz M. Pharma poised to up online ad spend: eMarketer. (2011) . Medical Marketing & Media (April 27) http://www.mmm-online.com/pharma-poised-to-up-online-ad-spend-emarketer/article/201584/Google Scholar
  • Iyengar S. S., Lepper M. R. When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2000) 79(6):995–1006CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones G., Ravid G., Rafaeli S. Information overload and the message dynamics of online interaction spaces: A theoretical model and empirical exploration. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15(2):194–210LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kane G. C. A multi-method study of information quality in wiki collaboration. ACM Trans. Management Inform. Systems (2011) 2(1). Article 4CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kane G. C., Alavi M. Information technology and organizational learning: An investigation of exploration and exploitation processes. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(5):796–812LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kane G. C., Fichman R. G., Gallaugher J., Glaser J. Community relations 2.0.. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2009) 87(11):45–50Google Scholar
  • Khullar O., Colson Y. L. The underfunding of lung cancer research. J. Thoracic Cardiovascular Surgery (2009) 138(2):275CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kittur A., Kraut R. E. Harnessing the wisdom of crowds in Wikipedia: Quality through coordination. Proc. 2008 ACM Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work (2008) (ACM, New York) 37–46CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kozinets R. V., Hemetsberger A., Schau H. J. The wisdom of consumer crowds: Collective innovation in the age of networked marketing. J. Macromarketing (2008) 28(4):339–354CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kriplean T., Beschastnikh I., McDonald D. W. Articulations of wikiwork: Uncovering valued work in Wikipedia through barnstars. Proc. 2008 ACM Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work (2008) (ACM, New York) 47–56CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuk G. Strategic interaction and knowledge sharing in the KDE developer mailing list. Management Sci. (2006) 52(7):1031–1042LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lave J., Wenger E.Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (1991) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D. A., March J. G. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14(S2):95–95CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li C., Bernoff J.Groundswell: Winning in a World Transformed by Social Technologies (2008) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Li X., Hitt L. M. Self-selection and information role of online product reviews. Inform. Systems Res. (2008) 19(4):456–474LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lin N.Social Resources and Instrumental Action (1982) (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) Google Scholar
  • Lovelace K., Shapiro D. L., Weingart L. R. Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(4):779–793CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lurie N. H. Decision making in information-rich environments: The role of information structure. J. Consumer Res. (2004) 30:473–486CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Madey G., Freeh V., Tynan R.Modeling the F/OSS Community: A Quantitative Investigation (2004) (Idea Publishing, Hershey, PA) Google Scholar
  • Mallapragada G., Grewal R., Lilien G. Born to win? How foundational network structure affects the success of open source development projects. (2008) . ISBM Report 3-2008, Pennsylvania State University, University ParkGoogle Scholar
  • Manchanda P., Xie Y., Youn N. The role of targeted communication and contagion in product adoption. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(6):961–976LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):71–87LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Martins L. L., Gilson L. L., Maynard M. T. Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? J. Management (2004) 30(6):805–835CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McAfee A. P. (2007) . Wikipedia (B). HBS Case 608-066, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
  • Miller C. C. Ad revenue on the Web? No sure bet. New York Times (2009) May 25):B1Google Scholar
  • Moe W. W., Trusov M. The value of social dynamics in online product ratings forums. J. Marketing Res. (2011) 48(3):444–456CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Monge P. R., Contractor N. S.Theories of Communication Networks (2003) (Oxford University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(2):242–266CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Naik P., Wedel M., Bacon L., Bodapati A., Bradlow E., Kamakura W., Kreulen J., Lenk P., Madigan D. M., Montgomery A. Challenges and opportunities in high-dimensional choice data analyses. Marketing Lett. (2008) 19(3):201–213CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oh W., Jeon S. Membership herding and network stability in the open source community: The Ising perspective. Management Sci. (2007) 53(7):1086–1101LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Oh H., Chung M.-H., Labianca G. Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(6):860–875CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • R Development Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (2011) . Accessed May 1, 2011, http://www.R-project.org/Google Scholar
  • Ransbotham S., Kane G. C. Membership turnover and collaboration success in online communities: Explaining rises and falls from grace in Wikipedia. MIS Quart. (2011) 35(3):613–627CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R., McEvily B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(2):240–267CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rindfleisch A., Moorman C. The acquisition and utilization of information in new product alliances: A strength-of-ties perspective. J. Marketing (2001) 65(2):1–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rossi P. E., Allenby G. M. Bayesian statistics and marketing. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(3):304–328LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schlosser A. E. Experiencing products in the virtual world: The role of goal and imagery in influencing attitudes versus purchase intentions. J. Consumer Res. (2003) 30(2):184–198CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schlosser A. E. Posting versus lurking: Communicating in a multiple audience context. J. Consumer Res. (2005) 32(2):260–265CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schlosser A. E. Can including pros and cons increase the helpfulness and persuasiveness of online reviews? The interactive efects of ratings and arguments. J. Consumer Psych. (2011) 21(3):226–239CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sia C. L., Tan B. C. Y., Wei K. K. Group polarization and computer-mediated communication: Effects of communication cues, social presence, and anonymity. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(1):70–90LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Singh P. V., Tan Y., Mookerjee V. Network effects: The influence of structural social capital on open source project success. MIS Quart. (2011) 35(4):813–829CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith E. A., Senter R. J.Automated Readability Index (1967) (Aerospace Medical Research Laboratories, Wright-Patterson Airforce Base, OH) Google Scholar
  • Spence M. T., Brucks M. The moderating effects of problem characteristics on experts' and novices' judgments. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34(2):233–247CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Su Y.-S., Yajima M. R2jags: A package for running JAGS from R. (2011) . Accessed May 1, 2011, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=R2jagsGoogle Scholar
  • Tuckman B. W. Developmental sequence in small groups. Psych. Bull. (1965) 63(6):384–399CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tuli K. R., Kohli A. K., Bharadwaj S. G. Rethinking customer solutions: From product bundles to relational processes. J. Marketing (2007) 71(3):1–17CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(1):35–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wasserman S., Faust K.Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (1994) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weiss A. M., Lurie N. H., MacInnis D. J. Listening to strangers: Whose responses are valuable, how valuable are they, and why? J. Marketing Res. (2008) 45(4):425–436CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wikipedia (2011) . Wikipedia: Article size. Accessed November 18, 2011, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Article_sizeGoogle Scholar
  • Zlatić V., Božičević M., Štefančić H., Domazet M. Wikipedias: Collaborative Web-based encyclopedias as complex networks. Phys. Rev. E (2006) 74(1):016115CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zukin S., DiMaggio P.Structures of Capital: The Social Organization of the Economy (1990) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.