Analyzing Bank Overdraft Fees with Big Data

References

• Andersen S, Harrison GW, Lau MI, Rutström EE (2008) Eliciting risk and time preferences. Econometrica 76(3):583–618.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arcidiacono P, Miller RA (2011) Conditional choice probability estimation of dynamic discrete choice models with unobserved heterogeneity. Econometrica 79(6):1823–1867.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1963) Liquidity preference. The Economics of Uncertainty, Lecture Notes for Economics, Vol. 285 (Stanford University, Stanford, CA), 33–53.Google Scholar
• Bellman R (1957) Dynamic Programming (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Bolton RN (1998) A dynamic model of the duration of the customer’s relationship with a continuous service provider: The role of satisfaction. Marketing Sci. 17(1):45–65.Link, Google Scholar
• Bolton LE, Warlop L, Alba JW (2003) Consumer perceptions of price (un)fairness. J. Consumer Res. 29(4):474–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burns R (2010) Managing credit: 3 ways overdraft fees will still haunt you. Black Enterprise (August 9), http://www.blackenterprise.com/money/managing-credit-3-ways-overdraft-fees-will-still-haunt-you/Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Yao S (2016) Sequential search with refinement: Model and application with click-stream data. Management Sci. 63(12):4345–4365.Link, Google Scholar
• Chetty R, Looney A, Kroft K (2009) Salience and taxation: Theory and evidence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(4):1145–1177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ching A, Ishihara M (2010) The effects of detailing on prescribing decisions under quality uncertainty. Quant. Marketing Econom. 8(2):123–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ching A, Erdem T, Keane M (2009) The price consideration model of brand choice. J. Appl. Econom. 24(3):393–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S (2009) Psychology and economics: Evidence from the field. J. Econom. Literature 47(2):315–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans D, Litan R, Schmalensee R (2011) Economic analysis of the effects of the Federal Reserve Board’s proposed debit card interchange fee regulations on consumers and small businesses. Working paper, University of Chicago Law School, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Fang H, Silverman D (2009) Time-inconsistency and welfare program participation: Evidence from the NLSY. Internat. Econom. Rev. 50(4):1043–1077.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang H, Wang Y (2015) Estimating dynamic discrete choice models with hyperbolic discounting, with an application to mammography decisions. Internat. Econom. Rev. 56(2):565–596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske ST, Taylor SE (1991) Social Cognition, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friend I, Blume M (1975) The demand for risky assets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 65(5):900–922.Google Scholar
• Gabaix X, Laibson D (2006) Shrouded attributes, consumer myopia, and information suppression in competitive markets. Quart. J. Econom. 121(2):505–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gopalakrishnan A, Iyengar R, Meyer RJ (2014) Consumer dynamic usage allocation and learning under multipart tariffs. Marketing Sci. 34(1):116–133.Google Scholar
• Grubb MD (2014) Consumer inattention and bill-shock regulation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 82(1):219–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall RE (1978) Stochastic implications of the life cycle-permanent income hypothesis: Theory and evidence. J. Political Econom. 86(6):971–987.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartmann WR, Nair HS (2010) Retail competition and the dynamics of demand for tied goods. Marketing Sci. 29(2):366–386.Link, Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer D, Teoh HS (2003) Herd behaviour and cascading in capital markets: A review and synthesis. Eur. Financial Management 9(1):25–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imai S, Jain N, Ching A (2009) Bayesian estimation of dynamic discrete choice models. Econometrica 77(6):1865–1899.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kass R, Raftery A (1995) Bayes factors. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 90(430):773–795.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keaveney SM (1995) Customer switching behavior in service industries: An exploratory study. J. Marketing 59(2):71–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matzler K, Würtele A, Renzl B (2006) Dimensions of price satisfaction: A study in the retail banking industry. Internat. J. Bank Marketing 24(4):216–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehta N, Rajiv S, Srinivasan K (2004) Role of forgetting in memory-based choice decisions: A structural model. Quant. Marketing Econom. 2(2):107–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton R (1992) Continuous Time Finance (Blackwell Publishing, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Modigliani F, Brumberg R (1954) Utility analysis and the consumption function: An interpretation of cross-section data. Kurihara KK, ed. Post Keynesian Economics (Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ), 388–436.Google Scholar
• Monroe KB (1990) Pricing: Making Profitable Decisions (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Murray L (2010) Distributed Markov chain Monte Carlo. Working paper, CSIRO Mathematics, Perth, Australia.Google Scholar
• Mullainathan S (2002) A memory-based model of bounded rationality. Quart. J. Econom. 117(3):735–774.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neiswanger W, Wang C, Xing E (2014) Asymptotically exact, embarrassingly parallel MCMC. Proc. 30th Internat. Conf. Uncertainty Artificial Intelligence (AUAI, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada).Google Scholar
• Nwokoye NG (1975) Subjective judgments of price: The effects of price parameters on adaptation levels. Proc. Fall Conf. Amer. Marketing Assoc. (American Marketing Association, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Peng L, Xiong W (2006) Investor attention, overconfidence and category learning. J. Financial Econom. 80(3):563–602.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pope DG (2009) Reacting to rankings: Evidence from “America’s Best Hospitals.” J. Health Econom. 28(6):1154–1165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reis R (2006) Inattentive producers. Rev. Econom. Stud. 73(3):793–821.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossi PE Allenby GM, McCulloch RE (2005) Bayesian Statistics and Marketing (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rust J (1987) Optimal replacement of GMC bus engines: An empirical model of Harold Zurcher. Econometrica 55(5):999–1033.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sims CA (1998) Stickiness. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Vol. 49 (North Holland, Amsterdam), 317–356.Google Scholar
• Sims CA (2003) Implications of rational inattention. J. Monetary Econom. 50(3):665–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stango V, Zinman J (2014) Limited and varying consumer attention evidence from shocks to the salience of bank overdraft fees. Rev. Financial Stud. 27(4):990–1030.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sudhir K (2016) Editorial—The exploration-exploitation tradeoff and efficiency in knowledge production. Marketing Sci. 35(1):1–9.Link, Google Scholar
• Topper S (2012) The history and evolution of the free checking account. Free Checking Information (March 18), http://freecheckinginformation.com/financial-writers/the-history-and-evolution-of-the-free-checking-account/Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1973) Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probable cause. Cognitive Psych. 5(September):207–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yao S, Mela CF, Chiang J, Chen Y (2012) Determining consumers’ discount rates with field studies. J. Marketing Res. 49(6):822–841.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou Y (2012) Failure to launch in two-sided markets: A study of the US video game market. Working paper, State University of New York, Stony Brook.Google Scholar