Whose Voice Do We Hear in the Marketplace? Evidence from Consumer Complaining Behavior

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2018.1140

References

  • Alesina A, La Ferrara E (2002) Who trusts others? J. Public Econom. 85(2):207–234.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alsan M, Yang CS (2018) Fear and the safety net: Evidence from secure communities. Working paper, Stanford Medical School, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
  • Anderson E (2000) Code of the Street: Decency, Violence, and the Moral Life of the Inner City (W. W. Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
  • Anderson KB (2007) Consumer fraud in the United States: The second FTC survey. Report, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Anderson KB (2013) Consumer fraud in the United States, 2011: The third FTC survey. Report, Bureau of Economics, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Ayres I, Lingwall J, Steinway S (2013) Skeletons in the database: An early analysis of the CFPB’s consumer complaints. Fordham J. Corporate Finance Law 19(2):343–391.Google Scholar
  • Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psych. Rev. 84(2):191–215.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bone SA, Christensen GL, Williams JD (2014) Rejected, shackled, and alone: The impact of systemic restricted choice on minority consumers’ construction of self. J. Consumer Res. 41(2):451–474.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brehm J, Rahn W (1997) Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. Amer. J. Political Sci. 41(3):999–1023.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bricker J, Li G (2017) Credit scores, social capital, and stock market participation. Working paper, Federal Reserve Board, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Dai W, Jin G, Lee J, Luca M (2018) Optimal aggregation of consumer ratings: An application to Yelp.com. Quant. Marketing Econom. 1(3):289–339.Google Scholar
  • Federal Trade Commission (2013) FTC sends $7.4 million in refunds to consumers harmed by scheme that sold allegedly bogus ‘platinum’ credit card. Report, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Federal Trade Commission (2015) FTC stops elusive business opportunity scheme. Report, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Federal Trade Commission (2016a) Marketers of Simple Pure supplements settle FTC court action. Report, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Federal Trade Commission (2016b) Combating fraud in African American and Latino communities: The FTC’s comprehensive strategic plan. Technical report, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC, https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/reports/combating-fraud-african-american-latino-communities-ftcs-comprehensive-strategic-plan-federal-trade/160615fraudreport.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Federal Trade Commission (2017a) FTC settlement puts a stop to money mule who profited from India-based IRS and other scams. Report, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Federal Trade Commission (2017b) Business opportunity scheme operators banned from telemarketing and selling investment opportunities; will return millions to consumers. Report, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Federal Trade Commission (2017c) Defendants involved in selling business coaching programs settle FTC charges. Report, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Fradkin A, Grewal E, Holtz D (2017) The determinants of online review informativeness: Evidence from field experiments on Airbnb. Working paper, Boston University, Boston.Google Scholar
  • Gans JS, Goldfarb A, Lederman M (2017) Exit, tweets and loyalty. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garrett DE, Toumanoff PG (2010) Are consumers disadvantaged or vulnerable? An examination of consumer complaints to the better business Bureau. J. Consumer Affairs 44(1):3–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghose A, Ipeirotis PG (2011) Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining text and reviewer characteristics. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. 23(10):1498–1512.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glaeser EL, Laibson DI, Scheinkman JA, Soutter CL (2000) Measuring trust. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):811–846.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • GSS Data Explorer (2019) Accessed March 21, 2019, https://gssdataexplorer.norc.org/variables/441/vshow.Google Scholar
  • Hirschman AO (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States, vol. 25 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Hu N, Liu L, Zhang JJ (2008) Do online reviews affect product sales? The role of reviewer characteristics and temporal effects. Inform. Tech. Management 9(3):201–214.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jagdip S (1989) Determinants of consumers’ decisions to seek third party redress: An empirical study of dissatisfied patients. J. Consumer Affairs 23(2):329–363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacLeod J (2018) Ain’t No Makin’ It: Aspirations and Attainment in a Low-Income Neighborhood (Routledge, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mayzlin D, Dover Y, Chevalier JA (2014) Promotional reviews: An empirical investigation of online review manipulation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(8):2421–2455.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nosko C, Tadelis S (2015) The limits of reputation in platform markets: An empirical analysis and field experiment. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oster S (1980) The determinants of consumer complaints. Rev. Econom. Statist. 62(4):603–609.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Putnam RD (2001) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
  • Raval D (2018) Which communities complain to policymakers? Evidence from consumer sentinel. Report, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Seligman MEP (1975) Helplessness: On Depression, Development, and Death. A Series of Books in Psychology (WH Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co., New York).Google Scholar
  • Tressler C (2016) FTC takes down Ideal Financial Solutions, Inc.'s fraud network. Consumer Information (blog) (March 9), https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/blog/ftc-takes-down-ideal-financials-fraud-network.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.